Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 10/15/2024 in all areas

  1. 3 points
  2. This is the result of a society that began devaluing men and maleness, associating it with toxicity. Rather than celebrating natural feminine and male differences and strengths, and recognizing that the perpetuation of humanity requires a strong family unit, women have been sold a story that they should have as many positions as men in all fields and have as many leadership positions and as much pay even if leaving the workforce to have and raise children makes that harder for obvious reasons. Now far more women than men are in university. I guess the men can play video games, take opioids, commit crime, go to jail, and commit suicide. This is part of the same anti-fertility phenomenon as free birth control, abortion on demand up to the expected delivery date, MAID, porn, the affirmation of non-heterosexual and non-biological gender in our education, media, and policies, as well as the general feminization of men that’s related to the heavy presence of estrogen (and plastic that mimics estrogen) in our water supply combined with the social alienation of men as they have been redefined as toxic. All of this is resulting in the literal extinction of people born and raised in modern western societies who aren’t raised with more traditional values. Muslims generally are doing the opposite and having more kids. Under current circumstances the future is theirs. Atheists, feminists, and LGBTQ+ culture are the nail in the fertility coffin. It has meant that the West has to gut its own traditions and cultures through mass immigration as it sterilizes itself. If you grew up in Canada, you’ve probably been trained to believe in these self-destructive world views.
    3 points
  3. The border czar blamed trump but her party has been in power for 12 of the past 16 years AND border czar rolled back 90+ of Donnie's executive orders. Democrats alone are responsible for the murder of Laken Riley
    3 points
  4. The Democrats had the sense to dump their senile old man, Republicans aren't that smart.
    2 points
  5. Funny, considering the reason your tribe is going extinct is because it never feels the touch of a woman. Go have sex, incel.
    2 points
  6. The strain would be enough to bring a person to their knees That's not so shocking, people read it when the original author put it out
    2 points
  7. Or they could go to university, or college, do a trade, start a small business, get a job, travel, take up a meaningful hobby... IDK why men choosing to be worthless pieces of shit is women's fault.
    2 points
  8. Or don't bother because they can make more in the trades than they'd make with a degree. An electrician is going to make a buttload more money in his lifetime than the Masters in Child, Youth and Family. (I'm totally not speaking about my ex who, last time I checked, was still doing her PhD in something useless).
    2 points
  9. Poor lady, imagine having to go through life unburdened by original thought.
    2 points
  10. Look, to be seen seriously you have to understand the notions like objectivity and facts. Otherwise you wouldn't be any better than the lying cult - they make their "facts" and you, yours. On a whim. There's a difference between trying to eliminate a political opponent, and someone who tried, and repeatedly, to kill you. Do you understand it? The latter is called "self-defense", while the former, criminal. Having a political cause is not a crime. Quebec had two or three? independence referendums, that was not a valid cause to persecute or eliminate political leaders of PQ. Do you understand such obvious matters? or just couldn't care, like the lying cult on the opposite side?
    2 points
  11. I am more educated than ANY far left goose stepping DemoNazi here. I have occasionally substitute taught in autism and downs syndrome classes with kids who are smarter than the DemoNazis here.
    2 points
  12. Retitle this thread Another Big F*cking Republican Lie
    2 points
  13. I believe that was actually "The prunes we hold " But I can see your confusion
    1 point
  14. Our country is stupid Garland is suing a police department because their written test to become a police officer is too hard for black people, part of the test is like 4 grade math. They are also suing them for their physical fitness test because it is too hard for women. https://www.wndu.com/2024/10/11/us-justice-department-sues-south-bend-alleges-discrimination-against-black-female-police-officer-applicants/ These requirements aren't subjective they are objective. We need cops who can chase criminals and detain them and we need cops who can properly document things. They are demanding that they hire the black people and women who failed the tests and give them the benefits of seniority and back pay. We can't get rid of Garland and Biden's DOJ fast enough, jeez these are the same people who cops to be more than human and yet they are going to force departments to hire stupid and weak people.
    1 point
  15. See no logical error in that conclusion? Like how about uniting the German speaking people, the Russian people? In the Sudatenland, in the Donbass? Someone else's country. Or (pick any one) Slavic enclave. The Crusades even? Every single war in history. We either learn to get along or we're f*cked in the end.
    1 point
  16. I love it when you run like girl when you get cornered. lol I'm accusing you of being an open borders slut. Prove me wrong.
    1 point
  17. It is time to get rid of the Marxist leftist liberals and Marxist democrats once and for all. Both Marxists political party's have done whatever they could to try and destroy North America and try and turn North America into another 3rd world hell hole. Hopefully Republican Trump wins the next American election and Conservative Poilievre wins the next election in Canada. Only those two political Conservative party's can save North America from communism. 😇
    1 point
  18. Did her relationship with Willie Brown play a role in advancing her career or not?
    1 point
  19. Apparently she also had another book out called 'The Truths We Hold'. I wonder if she talked about the role Willie Brown played in advancing her career in any of these books? It's funny that she titled one of the books 'Smart on Crime' given the sorry state of the criminal justice system in San Francisco.
    1 point
  20. ^Unburdened by original thought. LMAO
    1 point
  21. Black Dog-Hardner, was it a difficult experience being castrated? I’m sure there are support groups out there. Take heart.
    1 point
  22. Why are you so soft? Take some responsibility for a change you wuss.
    1 point
  23. At the very least this teaches us that affirmative action must end.
    1 point
  24. I think you're an idiöt , with no grip on reality, that would greatly benefit from reading a few textbooks. They're written by unbiased, truth seeking people, not the partisan hacks that you get your "information" from. To be clear partisan hacks exist on both sides of the political spectrum.
    1 point
  25. These are publicly available. I'm not interested in your diversion tactics becoming homework assignments for me. You need to decide what your point is. States voting rather than people is literally the thing you're defending when you are claiming that democracy is bad and and that states 'have to' exist and and their interests are ultimately more important than what the people want. Pick a lane--either you're for a democratic society or you're for the anti-democracy of the electoral college. The US founders wanted the electoral college to capture "a sense" of what the people want but by design they did not want it to be democratic. So straining to claim that it's democratic is a dead end argument for you. Reductio ad aburdum pseudo-reasoning. If even the tiniest viewpoints can't be represented, then why represent anyone is what you're saying. Once again you're clearly against people being democratically represented, so why do you sometimes pretend otherwise? That is not why it exists. It exists because of the federalist structure of the government. Back in 1789 it was seen as a way to manage states choosing a chief executive and giving them the sovereignty to decide how to choose their electors. Many states initially just had state legislatures chose their electors. Democratic ideology did not pick up until around the 1820s, so states gradually switched to a vote. But I do agree with you that the parliamentary system is a better system for choosing an exective. The separation of powers and federalism experiments are a failure and has created the exact opposite of what the founders intended. Don't be obtuse, we're talking about who gets to have a say in the election. Making the electoral college proportional would still be flawed but it would be less flawed. You're claiming that doing so would be impossible. Now there is flat out lie. You implied voters were roughly equal. They are not, by far and rather than own up to it you're just fabricating numbers now. Societies mitigate against a tyranny of the majority by safeguarding the rights of those in the minority. Due process, free speech, and a host of other civil rights and liberties. Subverting democracy by having a rule of the minority is simply a tyranny of the minority-- the typical state of affairs in all authoritarian societies which you are defending. What prevents democracy in most societies is a powerful minority of elite interests who keep the masses of disadvataged ordinary people largely out of the political process.
    1 point
  26. The really shocking part is that someone actually read it.
    1 point
  27. Literally every country until very recently was focused on a single race and religion. It worked fine. Wars only occurred when diversity was introduced.
    1 point
  28. No, it's the place to discuss Biden's dementia given that for the past 4 years, he has always been in worse shape than Trump. YOU voted for the old f*ck, and now we as a nation are paying for it.
    1 point
  29. Really it's like the middle ages again. No prevailing intelligence. The scientific method doesn't exist...
    1 point
  30. Did you bother to read it. It’s about trying to slow global warming by simply spraying water into the air, not trying to control weather. Gates is spending billions of his own money trying to solve some of the world’s biggest problems and he is a villain. The likes of Bezos, Musk and other billionaires just work on making themselves richer and building their own egos and they are heros. What an upside down world we live in.
    1 point
  31. https://x.com/GOP/status/1815118190768173111/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1815118190768173111&currentTweetUser=GOP And wait. In this clip, Brandon says when Harris speaks, she speaks for him. https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-taps-harris-lead-coordination-efforts-southern-border-n1261952 Oh oh robo...so much for your whining that she had no power to do anything.
    1 point
  32. Nationalist's shameless simping for Russia and Putin, is in line with Trump's simping for Putin.
    1 point
  33. So that’s the pile you have your head buried under.
    1 point
  34. 1 point
  35. Yet your use of proves you're no more than a drooling tool with only a vocabulary of catchphrases and dogwhistles to show your brain's been starved of oxygen but not clinically dead yet. Too damn true.
    1 point
  36. "1 Now faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. 2 For by it the elders obtained a good report. 3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear." Hebrews 11:1-3 KJV
    1 point
  37. Yeah they do. You should try to get an education too.
    1 point
  38. You know what? You're right Agreeing with you on anything, much less trying to find common ground with a pervert was not very intelligent. I guess stooping to your level makes it unavoidable to lower ones IQ , if only to be able to communicate on the primary school level of logic you operate under. You're not even fun to laugh at anymore because you just keep repeating things you know to be false. At least come up with some new nonsense so you're incoherent rants stay fresh.
    1 point
  39. Since yours is, as usual, the only thoughtful post in a soup of blech... May I ask you if civil rights legislation from the 1960s from LBJ is unprincipled, in your opinion?
    1 point
  40. Again I agree you nimrod Problem is the Democrats are none of those things and by going off half cocked (because you're impotent) about nonsense, you're not addressing the actual problems with their actual policies and platform Now of course this is mainly because you're not at all a logically thinking, reasonable minded person. You are someone that wouldn't be able to put together a sound argument for anything even if It slapped you in the face then I wrote it down for you. You're just sad
    1 point
  41. It's not the best example to use of Nationalist's Simping for Russia. Plenty of people believe in the notion that Russia invaded Ukraine because they were afraid Ukraine would join NATO, and that Russia considers NATO their enemy. His comment about Russia joining NATO was just his personal stance that Russia might calm down about NATO expansion if they were a member of NATO. Although if true that Russia invaded Ukraine to keep it from joining NATO, it just proves that Ukraine really needed to join NATO because that isn't any justification to invade Ukraine, much less to annex the territory, and Russia really is a threat to their neighbor's sovereignty that needs to be resisted. It's also not accurate at all. Russia isn't scared of having NATO on its border, it already has NATO on its border. It doesn't give a shit about It's border with NATO expanding now that FInland has joined either. Putin has always wanted to annex Ukraine. Ukraine joining NATO would destroy his ambitions of annexing Ukraine, so the risk of it may have caused him to invade Ukraine to prevent his dream of annexing Ukraine from being ruined, but the goal has always been to annex Ukraine. Putin would never accept both Ukraine and Russia joining NATO, because than he wouldn't be able to annex Ukraine. So while it's a wrong belief, it's not one that proves he's a Russian simp like him saying they're just invading Ukraine to bring Democracy to the Russians in Ukraine was. Plenty of people have an ignorant understanding of Russia's motives because western journalists toss around this idea that Putin is scared of NATO being on its border.
    1 point
  42. Yeah, religion has no business being anywhere near nor having any influence of politics. History has shown how "religion" is the excuse for the Big Lie that is used to try to control people - to the benefit of the Big Liars. To make the hideous implication that Judeo-Christianity is somehow "good" and Islam is "bad" can not come out of the mouth of anyone who has studied religion and history. You really need to be a brick or two short of a load to think that some spook in the sky is running the whole show and will allow you to "live forever". Any serious discussion around sustainability starts with population. Fix that humanely and we could deal with other issues, but leave that alone and you will soon find out how inhumane "humanity" can and WILL become. Any spook with a spec of decency would have taught his (or her) mindless mass of followers that on day 1. Instead the message has been to breed like rats and obediently follow and give all of your assets to "the church" (insert whatever institution fits.....geez GOVERNMENT also seems to fit that one to a tee). So, you can see why "government" by theocracy is simply government by another name.
    1 point
  43. Ah come on eyeball you must have noticed the Liberals picking in to find something they can run on but never enact.
    1 point
  44. last thing about Marxism. Lenin knew that Marx's ideas and theories were predicated on a gradual evolution where the proletariat rises up, negotiates, rises up again, and so on. He knew that imposing it with an iron fist was not what Marx had in mind. Marx's ideas were not political.. he (wrongfully) thought that labor would over time not be content with being treated poorly and would demand change. So saying that Lenin and Stalin were Marxists is simply not true. They were brutal autocrats who used Marx's ideas to justify their terrible ways. Marx's entire philosophy was based on Western Europe in the 1850's. Being that he never went to North America.. he had no idea that technology was fast approaching.
    1 point
  45. So Hezbollocks is not an Iranian proxy and that money will go to the civilians. You really have lost grasp of reality.
    1 point
  46. Did Trump end the War in Afghanistan? NO. You define ending that war as ARMING THE TALIBAN? Did Trump manage the Covid pandemic well? NO. He managed it better than any DemoNazi would. He inherited that crisis from Saddam Hussein Obama, who paid for the Wuhan lab that created that virus in the first place. Did Trump have the worst unemployment figures since the Great Depression? YES Nope. That would be OBAMA. Worst job participation numbers in history. LARGEST numbers of people giving up on finding a job. Did Trump have the largest federal deficit ever? YES, BY FAR. NOpe. That would be UNELECTED JOE, who managed to drive deficits up TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS trying to buy votes from illegal aliens and other useless m0rons.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...