Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 05/18/2024 in all areas

  1. What is suborning perjury? A person is guilty of suborning perjury if he or she attempts to induce a witness to give false testimony under oath in a court or other proceeding, and the witness actually gives false testimony (if the person is an attorney, simply knowing of the witness's plans is enough; see below). Here is what a prosecutor will have to prove when charging a defendant with suborning perjury. Costello is saying: Costello also said Bragg’s office had been “trying to shut me down” during his grand jury testimony last year after he shared with them exculpatory material for the case, including between 200 and 300 emails and text messages with Cohen.  But prosecutors “cherry-picked” that exculpatory material for “two to three” pieces of evidence, he added, describing the rest of the files as “hearsay.”  “You know, and I know, but the grand jurors don’t know, that business records are an exception to the hearsay rule,” Costello said he explained to them, while adding that even hearsay is admissible in grand jury proceedings. That means Bragg's office knew that Cohen would be lying when they put him on the stand. That is suborning perjury.
    4 points
  2. Less than 80 years thats for sure. It was pretty obvious by the 60's that israel wasn't going anywhere. Certainly by the end of the 70's they'd had their wars and israel was clearly kicking butt and wasn't going anywhere, was well recognized by the international community, and nothing was going to be changing that. That was over 50 years ago. But even then - being 'pissed' does not justify an attack like October 7th. You are siding with the terrorist, not freedom fighters not patriots not 'displaced peoples' - just a bunch of terrorist drunk on hatred and eager to kill. Still the wrong side to be on,
    4 points
  3. He has the vibe of a guy who is dejected and checked out. Pretty clear they won't run him in the election next year, they may be timing his resignation closer to the election so the new leader doesn't get blamed for any of the mess in his wake. Maybe a Fall or even Spring 2025 Liberal leadership race. If I were a Liberal I definitely wouldn't put my hat in if I had any serious ambitions.
    4 points
  4. Any woman can make a good sandwich, But it takes two women to make an excellent sandwich!
    4 points
  5. Robo: only 25,000 showed up it was massive failure for Trump especially since he bussed them all in and paid them to pretend to be Trump supporters, that is what AOC said and she is an expert she is a super genius economist.
    3 points
  6. Let me ask you something: Let’s say your a Canadian trucker, protesting in the streets of Ottawa, standing peacefully among a crowd of other truckers in the street, and some liberal motherfcker drives his car straight at you, barely misses you, then jumps out of his car carrying a gun? Is THAT GUY defending himself against YOU, or are YOU defending yourself against HIM? On top of that, the guy had just texted his buddy, saying that he was going to go out and kill one of those truckers. Who is the attacker and who is the defender?
    3 points
  7. I dug up the truth about Ivermectin in less than 2 minutes. I dug up actual medical studies and data. You - Mr. Accountability - what have you dug up? Nothing, because you don't really believe in accountability. The government hands you a slice of 💩pie and you ask for seconds.
    3 points
  8. Sigh. He really inspires a sense of confidence these days. I feel so good knowing our leadership is in the hands of this great thinker. Well.. he can find his way off the stage so i suppose there' that Once again he's out there trying to divide people. He wants to shatter canada into as many small pieces as possible and have them fight for his amusement and for votes. He has no business wading into this fight other than he things if he can make one group of people hate another group that somehow he'll win the next election, and he doesnt' care if it permanently harms canada
    3 points
  9. Unfortunately the electorate are forgetting just how valuable Canada’s roots are. Canada happened in a particular context and inherited institutions and traditions that put her on solid foundations. The pushers of Post-National State or UN rule don’t understand that the values underlying Canada are her strength. This is not China or Venezuela. Continuing to cook up Marxist redistribution programs and anti-family policies will eventually result in a failed state, because few people will care about a place that offers no good guidance, let alone defend it militarily. Trudeau’s government has called Canada genocidal (it isn’t) and has attacked its founding cultures. Of course many people don’t care about having King Charles on our bills because they don’t understand that it was the Royal Engineers who laid out our cities and the Royal Navy who settled them, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police who policed the country and the British Parliamentary system that governed it. They don’t understand the very specific conditions of Loyalists building the farmsteads in Ontario and New Brunswick and throughout the early settlements. Why would this government who is in the business of making Canadians hate their first Prime Minister honour the builders of the CP railroad that settled the West? All we get is toxic propaganda about the “settler colonialists”, which is why our universities are full of ignorant radicals supporting Hamas. Much of our honour as a people lies in our valiant military history. Our Parliament is a veritable WW1 museum. Our role fighting Nazism in Europe in WW2 was significant. Our peacekeeping arose out of our reputation as honest brokers. If people don’t think that’s tied to our cultural history, they are sadly mistaken and will throw away Canada’s honour quickly.
    3 points
  10. Son I could smoke a crack rock the size of my fist, and still sound more rational and intelligent than you on your best day
    3 points
  11. He sets the tone for his incompetent, inefficient, overly bureaucratic government. Do you think Harper would have let the public service balloon by 40% in a few short years? You think it takes four years to replace the Queen's face with the King's? Seriously? You sure have that bureaucrat mentality. You know how to get it done faster? You tell the head of the Bank that if The King isn't on the bill by the end of the year he needn't bother coming to work in 2025. You bet your ass it will get done. And on the passports too. As for pictures in government offices and embassies, same message to Heritage. Get it done or find other employment.
    3 points
  12. The advantage of the Constitutional Monarch is the armed forces and the RCMP swear allegiance to the monarch and this prevents a would-be little tin-pot dictator from seizing absolute power and setting up a Communist or Fascist dictatorship like north Korea or Cuba or China and eliminating all human rights and freedoms. We have an elected Parliament now and supposed to have human rights although at times it is not perfect. But if you get rid of the Constitutional Monarch you could be setting yourself up for an absolute dictatorship because the barrier to protect from that would be gone. Many simple-minded people don't understand that.
    3 points
  13. Pixie-Dust didn't actually win the last election. But we have more than 2 parties. And Pixie-Dust has made his fair share of "executive decisions". What's actually "clear" is... 1. Trump dangled a hook for you silly fops and you bit like a bass. Now you all look dumb. 2. I swear to Gawd...your posts read like a 6 year old complaining that Billy is chewing gum in class.
    3 points
  14. Is your purpose so you can look down on and feel superior to people on election day? Or is it ingrained behaviour from your days of night clubbing? Two threads of a meaningless and ineffective policy? Why not give them a $100 tax credit when they deposit their ballot? That rewards them, encourages people to vote and doesn't punish anyone who chooses not to.
    3 points
  15. Several Democrats have claimed that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority is “out of control” after a second flag carried by January 6 rioters was seen flying outside Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s house.  Mr Alito is facing further backlash following revelations that an “Appeal to Heaven” flag was flown outside his New Jersey vacation home on multiple occasions during the summer of 2023. It comes just a week after an upside down American flag – synonymous with “Stop the Steal” protests – was discovered outside Mr Alito’s Virginia home weeks after the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021. My gawd. These people are pure more-ons. First, flying Old Glory upside down is a signal that was used (before radios) to indicate the military was in serious trouble. Since, it has become a symbol that the nation is in trouble. Alito, almost certainly, flew the flag upside down because he was pissed about J6. Second, the appeal to heaven flag was commissioned to represent the writings of John Locke. John Locke was the philosopher that was heavily relied upon in designing the principles of our Constitution. Locke considered nations to be accountable to God. During the revolution, the flag was used as a symbol of defiance to the oppressive, authoritarian King. So these more-ons have unwittingly supported J6 and authoritarian governments.
    2 points
  16. Here's why you should pay more attention to me: From your link: When you click on the link, you get this: The reason the link (and your article) is "not correct or out-of-date" is because AS I TOLD YOU AND LINKED YOU TO - the FDA and CDC recently lost a court case against the FLCCC Frontline doctors who sued them over their misinformation about Ivermectin and won. The FDA and CDC were ordered to remove the misinformation. That article was also debunked in my Trickle thread.
    2 points
  17. That is my biggest fear also. He has to lay out believable and realistic plans and stop just whining.
    2 points
  18. Is that why the ACLU defended Rush Limbaugh? ACLU sides with Trump against gag order given in federal criminal case ACLU of New Jersey Successfully Defends Republican Candidates' Right to Political Speech ACLU Files Supreme Court Brief Supporting Republican Voters’ Challenge to Democratic Gerrymandering in Maryland
    2 points
  19. As if firing “the Head of the Bank,” who has much more important things to deal with, over such a trivial and unimportant issue would be an intelligent move . That would be a major disruption to one of the major institutions that stabilizes the economy over something inconsequential and stupid. Thats like telling an airline pilot mid-flight that if he doesn’t ensure your airline food is warmed up in 5 minutes he’d better grab a parachute and bail out. 90% of Canadians couldn’t give a rats ass about royal portraits or images especially the ones hanging in buildings they will never visit, much less the timeline for when they’re updated. Most wouldn’t spend a a dime of taxpayer money on it.
    2 points
  20. 2 points
  21. Personally, it saddens me greatly Politically, I'm on the bodily autonomy side, not my business what someone decides to do with their own body and I think it's beyond the scope and mandate of the government to regulate such things. As much as it pains me to say Hillary got it right with "rare but safe"
    2 points
  22. Now our beloved leader "PP" with his magical tongue and hand-ridden caucus will say a few words and it'll all go away. Somehow. Magically. Just believe.
    2 points
  23. Not really shocking that you guys are lying and playing politics with something stupid AGAIN.
    2 points
  24. Everyone knew the rates would be going up. That's why nobody was going to buy 30 year t-bills issued in 2020 and 2021. Every single one of those contracts is now deeply in the red (like easy double digits), and none of them will be made whole until they mature. The only buyers would have been institutional, heavily-regulated institutions with strict capital reserve requirements (think pension plans and insurance companies) who had no real choice in the matter. The real issue here, as has been discussed, is the glut of debt we took on and continue to grow. That's how Justin Trudeau has dicked us. The math nerds looking after bond financing almost certainly knew what they were doing, and did the best they could. This stuff is really cut and dry, and very boring.
    2 points
  25. I forgot to add that the other issue for the left is that a white man had a point of view. The fact that his rich and Christian...OH LORDY!!!
    2 points
  26. Taking pride in one's race is hollow and in my opinion shows a profound lack of intellect. Why? Because one has zero control over being born caucasian, black, etc. To take pride in something that you do not control is simply hollow. Take pride in your accomplishments, decisions, etc but your race, height, or hair color is meaningless.
    2 points
  27. The monarchy is part of our system of governance and an important aspect of our culture. It’s not about Charles but the significant symbolism and heft of a title that has been maintained throughout significant world events over thousands of years. If you want to discard the Loyalist origins in favour of a second American republic, there are arguments to be made for that, but traditions are protections. The fact that we can refer to our important roots protects us from twits who think nothing of scrapping aspects of Canada that most of us value.
    2 points
  28. All of that has been answered eyeball. There are no inconsistencies. The challenge is you bring up different rationale to support your pro Hamas claims and people tend to refute it. So when you say this is all been happening for a hundred years other people say well realistically it's longer than that. When you bring up religion people bring up religion. But at the end of the day the people alive today right now make their decisions. And right now Hamas chose to attack and kill civilians without warning or declaration in a horrible fashion. Israel is moving to eliminate that threat and whatever is necessary to eliminate that threat will be tolerated. His real has a right to self-defense. And none of the Canadian Russians who got kicked out of Russia back in 1918 Talk about going back and reseing their land. They have moved on. Gaza chose not to move on and is getting killed. Their initial resistance could have been understood but at this point in time? Sorry nope
    2 points
  29. Blackbird said: that changing sex is not natural and is unproven Chopping down trees, grinding them up, bleaching and pressing the pulp into sheets so you can wipe your bum is not natural either, but you prove it everyday after your morning coffee. What's 'natural' got to do with it. And your gripe seems to be how scientific theory can adapt based on new evidence yet the words in an ancient committee written book were, are, and ever will be the absolute truth. IOW you criticize theory without knowing what it is.
    2 points
  30. Translation: "It can't be true. Must deny. Must not confront reality"
    2 points
  31. Hamas issued a statement claiming that they have proof that the accident was caused by Israeli sabotage, and, also, 574 Gazan children were aboard the helicopter when it crashed.
    2 points
  32. I bet in October Biden will tell everyone about a meeting he had with Raisi in September and how he told him to "cut it out, man".
    2 points
  33. i personally think the ICC has overstepped it's bounds here, with over 3 dozen conflicts ongoing today, they have singled out Israel...like any international organization these days, if it involves the jewish people it needs to be condemned...It is funny that the IRGC/ sudan, etc etc is not mentioned for crimes against humanity...
    2 points
  34. Or better yet why it matters. Whatever you call them Israel is a real thing and is not going anywhere. Which means the people in the area have a choice. They can choose to live in peace and find a way to get along so that everybody has as much of what they want as they can, or they can choose violence and die which is currently their program. Arguing about labels and names at the end of the day is just trying to come up with an excuse for why they're choosing violence. It doesn't matter. Choose peace or choose violence that's where we're at. They chose violence and how's that working out?
    2 points
  35. Gas prices are not an economic indicator. They do not reflect economic health except at the margins, but rather are mostly decided by Sheiks half a world away acting on their own interests. POTUS has very little influence outside of extreme actions. But the price of gas as an input can influence the economy. A low interest rate is traditionally a response to a weak economy--or in the case of Trump taking office, the desire by the Fed to avoid disrupting the Obama recovery. They arguably kept their foot on the gas a bit too long. When economies get hot, central banks raise interest rates to slow spending and keep the economy from overheating into bubbles and inflation. The rates are set in response to economic conditions. So, again not an economic indicator. Unemployment, finally, is a reasonable economic indicator, but dig deeper there and you'll see that Trump's low unemployment number comes with caveats. The first is that he started on third base. He inherited a robust and growing economy. Job creation didn't change at all under Trump--well actually it slowed just a bit. He didn't accelerate the curve at all. The second caveat is that under Biden, who inherited a financial crisis, unemployment actually dropped lower than even Trump's best month, and has sustained far longer. Biden's record on jobs is objectively better than Trump's. It's Biden who owns the best jobs market since the 60s. So you're 0 for 3 in an effort to support your claim. Because it's a silly claim.
    2 points
  36. Israel should be allowed the right to defend itself and to exist as a nation. When you attack as Hamas did on Oct. 7.. they knew that Israel would counterattack. Depending on one's perspective.. they are overreacting or not. When you attack someone and kill hundreds, you can't demand that react equal to you. For example.. hamas kills 500 and then Israel kills 500 and we are even. Not happening. Israel is trying to take measures to ensure that the next attack by Hamas takes place a date further out in time or is lesser in scale.
    2 points
  37. I have no difficulty whatsoever justifying my support for a Western style democracy against the savages of Gaza and their murderous rape and torture gangs.
    2 points
  38. He hasn't actually done anything, and when you listen to his replies they have a certain formula to them where he avoids having to talk about that. He first restates the problem as if he was the one bringing it up and stating it, (even if he disagrees), then he claims it's a problem everywhere and goes on about insigificant details and will pretend he's been talking to canadians about this, till people forget there WAS a question and then claims they're already fixing it without really saying how. He will then say he's trying to fix things for "All canadians' Pick a topic. The rise in interest rates for example. "Mr trudeau, why are interest rates climbing under your leadership" "I think you'll agree that inflation is one of the largest problems facing young people today. It's a global issue that's being felt in every country everywhere and as we know from the past inflation is a terrible thing that can quickly impact people's lives in a negative fashion. Canadians want lower inflation That's why my government will continue to do everything we can to fight inflation and create a better life for all Canadians trudeau's other little trick if you haven't noticed is to constantly say the word Canadians. And he insists on what Canadians want or what they believe or how they think. Canadians want vaccine hesitant people to suffer. Canadians know that I'm doing my best on inflation and if that's not good enough too bad. Canadians believe that parents have no right to know about their child's mental health. He thinks if he tells people that Canadians want or believe or whatever that they will be more likely to think that they should too because after all, the rest of Canada already wants or believes that way apparently.
    2 points
  39. ROFLMAO!!!!!! Worse back pedal ever HE's talking directly to women and discussing being a wife and a mother. Now i know you leftist types think men can have babies these days but he probably doesn't think that I'm pretty sure he was talking to women Nice try though. Always remember the leftist motto: " If truth and science isn't helping us then a pig-headed unwillingness to stare facts in the face will see us through!" No, the point is that's what he did and you're still whining about it. There's nothing wrong with saying the choice is yours and many will choose one direction or another but I want you to know that this is a perfectly valid choice and you should consider it despite the fact that the left says you're evil and Satan if you do. So the real question is why the hell does the left feel the need to lie about what he said? They can't actually debate or discuss the point, they can't actually say he's right and that being a mother is a perfectly valid choice and let it go at that, they have to freak out and turn it into something he never said. Why is that? Why do you feel the need to do that? Why isn't the honest truth enough for you?
    2 points
  40. #Truth The real story here is how the left thinks women that are housewives are worth less than women that have careers. They look down on them. They despise them. Anyone that would glorify them must be attacked.
    2 points
  41. Holy crap. It is you guys who are the ones demeaning women here. This is precisely why we need people like Butker to stand up for women who are Homemakers because people like you demean them. Listen man, you have made your point here. You are the one demeaning women, not Butker. You are the one saying women are less if they are Homemakers. This is exactly why Butker said what he did, because there are people like you out there who think less of women who choose to stay home to invest in their family.
    2 points
  42. They should throw someone in as leader who is on the brink of retirement and would be happy to have the PM title on the resume for a few months. Of course the decent way for Trudeau to end his PM role play is to go down with his ship as PM in the next election. If he did so, it wouldn’t be out of honour but pride, because he thinks he can win the election.
    2 points
  43. I will vote him out just to never hear the words "will step up", again. I would vote out any leader who did so after. That, or to be gaslit into thinking paying more for my fuel will stop forest fires and weather calamities.
    2 points
  44. You are sinking deeper and deeper into your own self-delusion. You're getting to that point where you don't even make sense anymore and start trying to talk to yourself into imaginary victories that just simply don't exist You want the terrorists of today to be on the right side of history. They are not. It's that simple. Say what you like, dance however you wish but at the end of the day they're still wrong and bad people. Sorry for the inconvenience
    2 points
  45. Robertson told The Defender he hopes the ban announced today, “is a sign that investigators are willing to pursue this issue, rather than an indication that they have found an individual/organization they’ll be happy to pin everything on.” I couldn't possibly agree more with "David Robertson, Ph.D." some of the most prominent officials and science institutions in biomedical research funded and promoted these experiments. “Some of those very same officials then consistently misled the public about the possibility that research funded by US agencies may have contributed to the creation of SARS-CoV-2.” Regardless of whether or not this goes anywhere, it does my heart good to see a Dr saying publicly the exact same thing that I've said here 1,000 times, only to be flamed by low-IQ, credulous covid10ts. Even if Fauci believed with all his heart, mind and soul that the covid virus came from the unlikely bat-pangolin-human trio, he still had the moral and ethical obligation to disclose the fact that there was another, possibly more likely source of the virus, that being a lab experiment which Fauci had personally approved funding for - on behalf of American taxpayers - in his capacity as NIH Director, just a stone's throw from the wetmarket. The fact that social media was banning all talk of the BSL4 lab, and that the MSM also chose to hide that from the public, is the epitome of Orwellian. Big Brother just gave us all the mushroom treatment, then forced our youths to take a dangerous/lethal injection that they didn't need at all, and which served literally no purpose whatsoever for the greater good. I'm pretty sure that by the time this is over, I will be asking for a lot of high-ranking people in our public health service to be put to death.
    2 points
  46. Well the thing is, what this guy has in his life is a loving wife, a great family, a fantastic home that he feels is amazing, and he works hard to provide and do his job in the equation and he and a lot of people like him have been told that all of this is wrong. And he's looking at what he has and thinking that it's actually pretty fantastic in his opinion. He very clearly dearly loves his wife, he broke up on stage talking about her. He obviously Loves the idea of fatherhood and of being a man that cares for his family And it's pretty clear that he's sick of being told that he's some sort of evil person for allowing his wife to live like that. And he's got a point. It's a perfectly wonderful life to live for many people. A lot of women like that and a lot of men like that. And kids are raised happier and healthier like that.
    2 points
  47. Can you name one Trump cabinet official who said that Trump did a great job? Cause there’s a HUGE list of his own cabinet secretaries who said he was terrible.
    2 points
  48. Holy shit. Well we know who the real sexist is here again. There you have it folks - women's work in the home to raise families is worthless. It's so easy anyone could do it apperently. Tonnes of time for the lady to watch her stories on tv and eat bon bons. r The left is nothing but bigots and misogynists these days. How Much Is a Homemaker Worth? (investopedia.com) According to 2019 data from Salary.com, if you are a stay-at-home parent and paid for your services, you would be looking at a median annual salary of $178,201.1 Why? Because many stay-at-home parents work around the clock. If you have young children, work can often mean nighttime feedings, greeting early morning risers, and late-night meal prep. In addition, a stay-at-home parent wears many hats and must employ many skills to be a tutor, negotiator, nurse, party planner, and chef, for starters. KEY TAKEAWAYS A stay-at-home parent performs various jobs all under the title of the homemaker. According to the Pew Research Center, roughly one in five U.S. adults are stay-at-home parents.2 Pew Research Center. "Stay-at-Home Moms and Dads Account for About One-in-Five U.S. Parents." Stay-at-home parents often act as chauffeurs, chefs, nannies, tutors, and housecleaners. The discussion of whether or not to pay a stipend to stay-at-home parents is ongoing in American politics. During the global pandemic, lockdowns left millions working remotely from home, and people became aware of what it is like to be a stay-at-home parent.3
    2 points
  49. Hi Nationalist, Biden was "non compos mentis" at least as far back as his campaign for the 2020 election. Do you remember how his dementia was already pronounced enough that his minders had to hide him in a basement for fear of the embarrassing gaffes he would make if permitted to speak in public. Biden struck a deal with the Democrat power-brokers that he would play the role of a Trojan Horse in smuggling a shadow Executive of of hard-left neo-Marxists,, Cultural Marxists radical Progressives, anti-semites, Islamists, Eco-Marxists, Globalists, etc; into the White House. As President, Biden was to be a compliant puppet who rubber-stamped their revolutionary policy proposals. Their objective was/is to entirely destroy America: its West (classical liberalist)culture;; its Constitution; its national borders (sovereignty); its traditions; its history; its Christian religion and Judeo-Christian moral law; its capitalist economy, its established institutions (e.g. its Criminal Justice System and monogamous heterosexual marriage (and) the Nuclear Family); its middle class; its social norms; customs and so on, including an open persecution of White (European) Americans. The whole "Box and Dice". Regards Dachshund
    2 points
×
×
  • Create New...