Jump to content

CdnFox

Senior Member
  • Posts

    29,961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    312

CdnFox last won the day on April 25

CdnFox had the most liked content!

2 Followers

Recent Profile Visitors

86,491 profile views

CdnFox's Achievements

Grand Master

Grand Master (14/14)

  • One Year In
  • One Month Later
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • Week One Done

Recent Badges

7.4k

Reputation

  1. They absolutely do not have similar numbers. In fact I don't think I have ever seen such a wide variety of numbers in an election campaign in my entire life. At various points the pollsters were showing about a 15% spread in their numbers which is absolutely that crap crazy. Even if you take out the super highs like ecos the number spread is nuts, usually you talk about a three or four percent spread Now that doesn't mean they are deliberately putting a thumb on a scale. There has been speculation as to why various different methodologies may produce less than accurate results in the specific setting of this election.But there's no doubt it is insanely all over the map
  2. Geez i think you broke him. You have to go easy dude, please remember that encountering truth is to Robo Smith as stepping on a piece of Lego in the middle of the night barefoot is to us
  3. I don't think there's much mistake. Even if you support the NDP you're supporting the liberals. And if you support anyone else other than the conservatives then you're supporting the status quo While pretending falsely that you're above it Dishonesty to say the least Just like sex, you can pretend to be something else but at the end of the day you are what you are
  4. In a way. It suggests that carney gave him bad advice and he was too stupid to realize how terrible it was. And now we're going to get that same bad advisor bringing his advice to the table directly.
  5. You're literally quoting a source called "the cult" who's referring to a "la presse" opinion piece. And the examples they give are, not surprisingly, not true. For example, Jagmeet said "guess how many houses he built?" And then said six while PP said 200,000. Not "affordable" housing, as the article suggests. And they did build 200,000 homes while he was minister, that DID get fact checked. You should be ashamed of yourself for posting that. It's the equivalent of posting a fox news story about Tucker Carlson's opinion that kamala told more lies.
  6. You're wrong
  7. I wish you were joking. but fact is you're dead right
  8. You can really taste the slavery in ever bite. Their secret ingredient isn't just love, it's Indentured servitude.
  9. So you can't answer his legitimate questions or comments? I guess that's your way of admitting you lose then
  10. He's already doing a lot of business with carney. Carney's company leases their American office from the kushner's. Carney knows a lot of people that trump knows. Trump is certain he's going to be able to get concessions from carney that he needs because he knows he can reward carney in ways that will benefit carney even if they don't benefit Canada at Large.
  11. Well essentially. However, it's a little like saying that there's no point in watching the game, you should only look at the final score. The game is what makes it entertaining
×
×
  • Create New...