Jump to content

Fluffypants

Member
  • Posts

    996
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Fluffypants last won the day on December 10

Fluffypants had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Fluffypants's Achievements

Mentor

Mentor (12/14)

  • One Year In
  • Reacting Well Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Very Popular Rare
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

561

Reputation

  1. Of course they did it is the only way to replace all those people fleeing blue cities so they don't lose representatives. If the census stopped counting illegals they would be whistling a different tune.
  2. I would take BLM more seriously if they actually defended someone who deserves to be defended. In the case of Neely he was in and out of jail over 40 times and some of his crimes were violent crimes, he was a completely useless person. At some point it is pointless to try to rehabilitate them, it doesn't work. Lock them up and throw away the key. I am not saying he should of been killed but even if he survived he would be out of jail again in less than a day and would be out committing crimes. His father is a complete piece of shit using his son to get a payday. Where was he when his son was in and out of jail and was strung out on the street sucking dick for crack? Also screw the media for giving Neely the Trayvon treatment they took an old picture of him and was like "Oh he looked like such a sweet and kind boy" except he was a 30 year smelly homeless guy who was out of his mind.
  3. Probably would of wet himself and hid under the seat
  4. The real reason why is part of them are the election is over and they don't care anymore A large group of them are those that hate watch them and the election is over and the don't care anymore.
  5. That is a biased poll the only one that matters is the one that confirms my bias created by people who think like me.
  6. You mean when he was 6? If he isn't a journalist NO ONE at MSNBC should be calling themselves journalists.
  7. The attorney on this case got charges reduced for a thief who robbed an old man and killed him at an ATM and got him 10 years and bragged about doing it for "restorative" justice which has to be the most unconstitutional BS I have ever heard. She worked her ass off to be kind to a man WHO COMMITTED A CRIME AND KILLED AN OLD MAN and throw the book at a hero who may of stopped a fatal attack on the subway because he was white and i guess this is payback. https://nypost.com/2024/12/04/us-news/manhattan-prosecutor-in-daniel-penny-trial-secured-reduced-sentence-for-brute-convicted-in-fatal-2019-nyc-mugging/
  8. Are you shocked his racist ass throws the book at the white boy while getting more black people off than Kim Kardashian.
  9. Barack Obama pardoned or granted clemency to 1927 people. Clinton 459 Carter 556 Trump is a lightweight compared to Democrats when it comes to pardoning people.
  10. Of course they will, just like the left justified giving blanket pardons to people for any crime they may have committed, yet when Trump was leaving office that was their fear that he would give blanket pardons to his people and yet didn't. Its always "different" when they do it. But but but Trump really did commit crimes even though everyone and their grandma had classified documents in insecure areas. Hilary and her server and Biden in his garage and in a closet at a college. What I want you to remember is they were throwing a hissy fit that Trump had these documents for less than a year and raided his home while Biden had them for decades and he had no authority to take any of them home with him, hell he had some from when he was a Senator that in order to even read them he has to be in a secure room in Congress and can't take them out of that room.
  11. Is that really shocking you are talking about a group who were mad because the assassin didn't kill Trump and cheered when a CEO was assassinated. What is interesting though is the judge has opened the door to getting smacked down on appeals if Perry is convicted of negligent homicide because in his original instructions to the jury was that negligent homicide could only be considered if they found Perry not guilty on manslaughter. When he dismissed the case he changed the rules and you can't do that and could be viewed as coming afoul of Perry's due process rights.
  12. Its not so much of a gift to Joe because if Hunter gets pissed off at his father or the family he could turn on them and rat them out since he knows he can't be prosecuted for the crimes.
×
×
  • Create New...