1. Incorrect.
2. I didn't say I was more open minded. It seems we're the same on that front. Although it's pretty clear, you think you're better than me.
3. Incorrect.
4. You have me jumping through hoops, and when I satisfy your request, you simply reject my answer. Meanwhile, the answers you give are impractical and I think sometimes avoidant.
5. Yes I do. That is why I keep asking you to skip past our different definitions and get to the root of it. We actually agreed on something with regards to change rooms, and you seem to be unable to accept that.
I have said, a few times. I think, frontal nudity only with consent. You never responded even though it's a point of agreement. I think it's because you you are hell bent on defeating me. Not very engaging.
6. Now this is obfuscation. We have come to an agreement, or close to it several times... Then you come back and insist on switching from the general to the specific or vice versa and then using language to say that I'm saying things that I'm not.
It's not very engaging.
I'm not going to give you the example, just look further up in the thread for it.
But I said I was okay with men in women's spaces, as a general comment. You interpreted differently from how I intended and then started shrieking at me.
It's not very engaging.
7. Aren't you pushing your position ? How is what I'm doing different? Oh right, it's because I'm wrong and you're better than me. Did I get it?
......
I'm just trying to find out how you arrive at your conclusions. We're not going to agree, you know that right?