Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Or victims. This is more marketable, in trying to ascend when bound to a patriarchy. If she's a minority, look at Kamala Harris. How many know what she's accomplished? How many know where she is from or has an immigrant mother?
  3. Today
  4. As I pointed out, the environmental programs are happening across the West more than in China even and certainly not places like Russia and North Korea. You're confusing ideas and practices that are discussed in the public sphere, with fascist ideas that are pushed down on people who do not have electoral or human rights. I don't think I can convince you anyway.
  5. 1. That one should be easy for you to cite. Just post budgets from 2016-2021. 2. You're letting your personal feelings get in the way of analysis. I can accept the assertion of bias but not exaggerated claims. 3. You didn't mention the economy. You don't think that that is a factor? 4. And you actually think that CBC (and CTV) have that kind of influence? No, you're wrong there. 5. It won't happen in Quebec and the North. Radio is still viable and hugely popular in Toronto, other parts of Canada. I don't want either one of us to waste time on this. I asked you for a few cites, let's see where that goes.
  6. The next step of this would be for me to find a link where they actually did talk about the story or didn't. So you're saying that WE was in the news and CBC didn't mention it? Or SNC Lavalin during that election? That would be pretty good evidence of them being grossly unfair. Is that your claim? And if I found evidence otherwise, you would retract this claim and say you were wrong?
  7. Never has there been an alternate elector slate fraudulently claiming to valid AFTER the vote count was certified until Trump.
  8. Because you imagine the woman who was shot didn't bleed? And ALSO all the cops who were beaten with weapons like fire extinguishers? It is YOU who LIES CONSTANTLY. Who had just broken down the door to illegally enter the House chambers soon to be followed by a violent mob. You've stated yourself you would shoot ANYONE breaking down YOUR DOOR.
  9. It's a coup because it was a PLAN to ILLEGALLY disrupt the EC vote count with violence and ILLEGALLY force a contingent election. Look that up and inform YOURSELF.
  10. You look like what you are: a completely IGNORANT viewer of FOS LIES. Thanks for demonstrating the IGNORANCE of FOS LIES once AGAIN.
  11. Trump scared Pence by getting his goons to erect a gallows on the steps of the Capitol and an armed mob to chase him down. Unfortunate that FOS LIES didn't report that to you. ONLY AFTER his COUP ATTEMPT FAILED. Duh
  12. Gore went to court, LOST, and complied with their decision. Trump went to court 60+ times, LOST and decided to send a mob to the Capitol to disrupt the EC vote count. Duh The former: LEGAL. The LATTER: attempted coup. Your responses are 100% vacuous as usual. AKA BANKRUPT.
  13. I can tell you have NO IDEA what their reputation is. It is completely independent of MY EVALUATION. Duh
  14. No, he did NOT. And also told them to "fight like hell" and they knew which he WANTED. Yes, AFTER BLOCKING the EC certification FAILED. I can tell you're speaking from PERSONAL EXPERIENCE. LMAO You have NO IDEA what constitutes EVIDENCE. AKA NOT YOUR OPINION.
  15. He clearly pressured Pence to ILLEGALLY refuse to certify the EC votes and return the decision to the state legislatures cause a contingent election would make him POTUS. But ONLY by illegally disenfranchising millions of voters. You should google "contingent election" cause you are obviously ignorant about that. You are right about one thing: Eastman agreed that his plan would never get past the SCOTUS.
  16. I already told you it is evidence of the insurrection on Jan 6th. It's the easy version. There's also the final report from the Select Jan 6th Commision Hearing. If you don't at least watch the video, that is YOUR CHOICE to remain IGNORANT of the EXTENSIVE EVIDENCE. For the record, I believe the SWORN TESTIMONY of WH INSIDERS detailed in the video I already told you I don't have to believe an ENTIRE ARTICLE TO POST IT HERE. You CLEARLY don't even want to discuss it, cause YOU FAILED TO DO SO.
  17. Thanks for not disputing that ANYONE can edit it and write whatever they want.
  18. Christian nation means different things to different people. Some believe we are bound by laws detailed in the Bible. New Testament, of course, since that is post Christ. Depends on who you are and whether you have the POWER to implement it. If you're JoSCOTUS, ruling against the 1st Amendment, violates it.
  19. That is just YOUR ASSumption. Like everyone outside of the MAGA CULT, she knows about the extensive EVIDENCE justifying the prosecution as decided by the GJ. Has nothing to do with race outside of the satisfaction that some blacks are finally in a position of power which was LONG DENIED ALL OF THEM. You obviously don't know his history. Google Trump racial discrimination in rental and Trump racial discrimination Central Park Five In any case, Reid referenced Trump's cronies, NOT Trump himself. Duh No evidence of ^this. Your mere claims are hollow and gratuitous.
  20. If you can't exercise your rights, they are meaningless. There are many other ways to own a gun. Duh Now you're just making up shit. You have free speech and everyone else has the freedom to ignore you. People listening to you has nothing to do with your freedom to spout bullshit.
  21. What are you gifting if you abolish money?
  22. Do you want to answer my question? What does it MEAN TO YOU? Equality can mean many different things. What does "equality of process" mean to you?
  23. And what is meant by saying we are a Christian nation? That can mean many things and is a very common saying among folks in regard to our country being predominately Christian. Thinking such and saying such and wanting such is not a violation of the 1st Amendment at all.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...