Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 09/06/2022 in all areas

  1. Really? That's the snarky title you choose? That's what's sad.
    7 points
  2. Sad day she was a strong lady. Could of atleast had the respect to make a nicer title then this
    7 points
  3. 6 points
  4. ..........look ma, restrictions are gone! 😁 It was always been ................................ about the ECONOMY, stupid. (I got that from Bill Clinton). That's what's being emphasized by the Freedom Convoy, among other important things! We can't keep shutting down. ESPECIALLY..... ................when Trudeau keeps....................spending like there's no tomorrow!
    6 points
  5. Trudeau's been criticized heavily, both in the media and just generally, for his bromidic platitudes and vapid "sunny day" answers. Every time he opens his mouth I can pretty much pre-empt what he's going to say by stringing together words like, "As Canadians, we have to be look forward to the future and we can be proud of how Canadian we are in our hope for Canada and something something Unity blah blah blah."
    6 points
  6. Fair enough, but if you like "In your face" journalism (I don't, really) then you have to condemn Global for going after Poilievre AND Trudeau on a beach having private time with his family. And you have to condemn scum rag The Rebel, although it's easier there because they don't have any substance. True conservatives have principles. If you make a rule, your team has to follow it too.
    6 points
  7. It’s not about someone’s sexual identity or orientation. It’s about policies. One can oppose someone’s lifestyle and still agree with that person’s views on certain issues, perhaps many issues. No one here wants to criminalize homosexuality, to my knowledge. Lantsman is a very admirable MP who deserves a Cabinet position if the CPC wins the government, in my opinion. I also admire Leslyn Lewis, a social conservative. As long as Poilievre lets people speak their minds and doesn’t throw people under the bus unless they are clearly mean-spirited or hateful, he has my support.
    6 points
  8. The government had trouble finding businesses who would take advantage of their offer to compensate for "damages" done by the convoy.
    5 points
  9. “It never was about science but about political control and power. Thanks to all those citizens, freedom convoys, who had the courage to mobilize against these tyrannical policies. They endured a lot hate, name calling, suffered and vilified on behalf of all of us. I thank them!” - Kaycee Madu, Canada’s first-ever Black provincial minister of justice. Link Our PM falsely accused the convoy supporters and the unvaccinated of being racists. It had nothing to do with race of course. Justin Trudeau is actually using the race card as a lever, to divide Canadians. Make us less tolerant, and fight among ourselves. Can a parliamentarian’s behaviour be any more repugnant than what we have here?
    5 points
  10. Trudeau has done what he planned to do.. royally f up the economy. Now, predictably, he's over at the UN talking about "food security" as his globalist buddies create an avoidable crisis thru reduction of fertilizers. He'll then pay some leftist flunkies to do a report on "climate change" and push it through the media he bribes off. Sick folks 🤧
    5 points
  11. It actually showed us how Trudeau is anything but 'weak' and stood up to these Diet Pepsi of Jan 6th goons when the City & Provincal Politicians wouldn't take their thumbs out of their ass.
    5 points
  12. ....with CENSORSHIP! I'm sick and tired of it! Livid with being held hostage by a mostly biased, if not leftist propaganda Liberal or ANTI-CONSERVATIVE machines! Who the heck voted for this GLOBAL NEWS idiot - David Aikin - to censor what I'm trying to hear? I want to hear what Poilievre was going to say, not some freakin undisciplined and unethical trashy reporter from Global News yapping it up - disrupting and being disrespectful not only to Poilievre, but especially to................................. ME - the viewer! I didn't interrupt my routine to hear a freakin reporter with his issues! I was there to hear what this candidate for PM was going to say! If this immature, UNPROFESSIONAL man who calls himself a journalist wants to question Poilievre - then, freakin get in line, idiot! I want to listen to Poilievre's message - not your stupid questions! I'm not the only one! Btw..... Have you apologised to Mr Poilievre?
    5 points
  13. The arrivecan app where the government demands the ability to track you in exchange for your right to enter your own damn country is 100% right out of commie land
    5 points
  14. Face it, he used you ppl to win the leadership. Now he needs to win an actual election and you're a hindrance. Surely you're not so politically ignorant to think anyone seeking to win gov't is going to promote Convoyer BS, pull down rainbow flags, stop or roll back 'wokism' or even touch the abortion issue. At best he'll be a typical Tory, try to roll back spending and fail by cutting funds to social programs people need and want. Like cut $10 Child Care and buy an obsolete leaky battleship instead.
    5 points
  15. JT is the result of a ruined child born with a silver spoon in his mouth. Whatever his image is, it’s been carefully cultivated by his handlers and allies in the media. But it’s an empty shell. Whatever he does, he better stay away from debating in parliament with Pierre Poilievre. The guy is a gifted orator who will expose Justin for the empty suit that he is. Plus, there are so many Trudeau fails to pick from. No doubt the JT media allies will go on attack mode next week in an attempt to protect Trudeau. It’s going to be fun watching the show. Got your popcorn? Edit: I know, exflyer. The truth hurts, best to stay in denial…
    5 points
  16. Anyone who works in Canada has had to sit through Diversity training. Listen to lies about systemic racism and imaginary oppression. Let's fact check anti black racism and the lies about blacks being enslaved in Canada. The Conquest of New France by the British in 1763 gave New France to the British Empire. Yes, pre-confederation, which predates Canada, there was slavery. The colonists and British parliament were quick to end slavery. Upper Canada (which is now Ontario) abolished slavery in 1793/94 which predates Canada. In 1834, slavery was banned in all British colonies. This is 33 years before Canada existed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_Against_Slavery On March 25, 1807, the slave trade was abolished throughout the British Empire – of which British North America was a part – making it illegal to buy or sell human beings and ending much of the transatlantic trade. On Prince Edward Island, the complete abolition of slavery was pronounced by the legislature on 1825, nine years before the Imperial abolition of 1834. https://humanrights.ca/story/the-story-of-slavery-in-canadian-history Now we know Canada that never had slavery but France and Britain did in their colonies. Of course, Canada is not responsible for the actions of the previous empires that ruled here but for context, the extent of slavery here should be explored. Between 1671 and 1834, there was an estimated 1, 400 Black slaves in the colonies. For the entire 17th century, there were only 7 slaves who were Blacks in the colonies. After 1760, the number of Black slaves in the colony increased considerably, from 300 to more than 800. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Act_Against_Slavery In the 1800's, the numbers also dropped with the above laws impacting the legality of slavery. Canada saved many slaves through the Underground Railroad. In 1834, there were less than 800 Black slaves in the colony. At the time of Confederation, there were zero Black slaves in Canada. Obviously, the few hundred former slaves experienced inter generational trauma. We are now in 2022 and hearing more and more about how racist and oppressive Canada is. Are we to believe these few hundred people from 1834 that were enslaved are still oppressed? It's been almost 200 years. Do Jewish people claim oppression in 2022 because of Nazi Germany in the 30 and 40's? Chinese people do not claim they face "barriers " in 2022 because of the Chinese Head Tax. Japanese are not talking about inter generational trauma despite WW2. All of three aforementioned groups do better than " whites " in earnings. Yet each has a legitimate claim to having faced systemic barriers and oppression. Why does only one group, based on a few hundred people 200 years ago, suffer from inter generational trauma? Now, we also have to believe that all Black people experience intergenerational trauma from slavery. Even immigrants from Africa who were never enslaved. Even people who immigrated here and are highly successful and would NEVER go back to their country of origin. People like Desmond and Anthony Morgan. Professional race baiters, according to some, selling their grift. Morgan makes 150k/year " fighting anti black racism" in Toronto. This is tax payers dollars. The anti black racism unit actually has racist programs that are only available to black people. Interesting that an anti racism unit engages in racial discrimination with tax dollars. https://www.sunshineliststats.com/Salary/anthonymorgan/2021/9/?employer=cityoftoronto How about Canadians who suffered through WW1, the depression, and WW2? That impacted millions and millions of people less than a hundred years ago but they recovered. If someone was one of the 1,000 people linked to pre Canada slavery, they had 7 generations to recover. 200 years to learn a trade/skill , start a business, acquire wealth. That is not a disadvantage. No one mentions in these diversity sessions that Indigenous and Blacks were also slave owners and that slavery pre existed European arrival. It was a common practice. Slave-owning people of what became Canada were, for example, the fishing societies, such as the Yurok, that lived along the Pacific coast from Alaska to California,[7] on what is sometimes described as the Pacific or Northern Northwest Coast. Some of the indigenous peoples of the Pacific Northwest Coast, such as the Haida and Tlingit, were traditionally known as fierce warriors and slave-traders, raiding as far as California. Slavery was hereditary, the slaves being prisoners of war and their descendants were slaves.[8] Some nations in British Columbia continued to segregate and ostracize the descendants of slaves as late as the 1970s. Despite the British Empire abolishing Slavery, it continued in Africa. The African slavers continued to sell Black people and still do to this day. On any given day in 2016, an estimated 9.2 million men, women, and children were living in modern slavery in Africa. The region has the highest rate of prevalence, with 7.6 people living in modern slavery for every 1,000 people in the region. https://www.globalslaveryindex.org/2018/findings/regional-analysis/africa/#:~:text=Index%3A Africa Report.-,Prevalence within Africa,1%2C000 people in the region. Canada. Wake up. You're being fed lies and division and hate. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery_in_Canada https://www.historymuseum.ca/virtual-museum-of-new-france/population/slavery/#:~:text=The slave population (show),and one-third were Blacks. https://www.sunshineliststats.com/Salary/anthonymorgan/2021/9/?employer=cityoftoronto
    4 points
  17. So the PM should go to conferences in Paris on the bus? Or went to PEI and N&L by rowboat to inspect the damage? Or would you rather see him sit in his office mandating what you can have for breakfast and how you tie your shoes like you seem to think he does? Getting real tired of defending a PM I'd never vote for from petty idiots.
    4 points
  18. It's not bad when you have a private jet and don't have to wait in line or go through security and your catering budget is $100,000 and it's all paid for by taxpayers and no one is making you show up for work.
    4 points
  19. As per NASA, the earth is not on a turtle's back. But, they are white supremacists who work in an organization rooted in systemic racism so what do they know? Imagine people doing land acknowledgements that recognize " turtle Island"? Sounds like a cult. If you use a wheel or a wheel like product, thank colonialism. The wheel did not exist in pre Colonial Americas. Nor did electricity, roads, hospitals, schools, cars, planes, gas/ectric heated homes, refrigerators. If you are not Indigenous, you are a settler and you are in Canada because you love colonialism. You cannot be a non indigenous person living in Canada and enjoying the wonders of European arrival and claim to be be against colonialism and to be pro Indigenous people. If you are a pro Indigenous settler, leave Canada, hand over your land and stop using Indigenous water, air, and resources. Be honest. If you believe that the earth sits on the back of a turtle, let me sell you the myth of systemic racism and white privilege too! Donate millions to radical violent organizations so they can buy luxury houses! And, you can virtue signal on social media what a hero you are! If you want to honour the pre Colonial way, like the Aztecs and human sacrifices and slavery. Slavery in the Pacific Northwest developed at some point between 500 B.C. and A.D. 500, long before European contact, and at contact, slaves were clearly set apart from the existing tribal ranking system and prestige-seeking in the region. Early indigenous peoples also possessed other practices that predated contact with the British and Europeans: cannibalism and the killing of slaves, the latter of which also occurred and for a variety of reasons: funeral feasts, the building of a new home, a new title, the erection of a totem pole, or as part of the ceremony at potlatches. A Russian Orthodox priest recounted how in one Sitka ceremony where a new clan chief was appointed, four slaves were strangled as part of the ritual. Ah...the good ole days. Migwetch
    4 points
  20. This needs to be said repeatedly, every time a know-nothing Putin fan or an anti-western Zealot tries to say otherwise. You can have all kinds of problems with the West but this action is reprehensible and the patsies and trolls are making themselves known by supporting it.
    4 points
  21. Biden is a traitor to the constitution and his country for his own power. Anyone who disagrees is either a conned fool or support tyranny over democracy just so their boy will win. He should be permanently banned from any political office.
    4 points
  22. Trump is a traitor to the constitution and his country for his own power. Anyone who disagrees is either a conned fool or support tyranny over democracy just so their boy will win. He should be permanently banned from any political office.
    4 points
  23. History is one of narratives. A narrative holds a set of truths and perspectives that tell a story, but a story that is incomplete, because it leaves out other facts and perspectives. The left will tell one set of narratives, typically focusing on the bad things the powerful have done and showing the weak to be victims of that power. The right will tell another set of narratives, focusing more on the good things the powerful have done or how the weak have made poor choices that have contributed to their situation etc. For instance: the left will say the rich are greedy, horde their wealth, and take advantage of workers. The right will say the rich create businesses that provide goods/services we all use, create jobs and wealth for society etc. There is truth in both of these perspectives, but the left seems compassionate while the right seem like a-holes. It's easier to seem moral when you're standing up for the weak rather than the powerful. With the indigenous we typically only hear 1 set of narratives. We don't hear how the West brought them medicine and modern healthcare, modern agriculture/nutrition, longer lifespans, tools, literacy etc. We don't as often here that indigenous people pre-Columbus warred, raped, murdered, ensalved, looted, scalped/tortured each other etc at rights far higher than today, or how they had their own violent expansionist empires (Aztec, Incas). Focusing on 1 set of narratives over another is called politics. The guilt for our wrongs is why we focus on 1 set over the other (understandable), while the rest of the truth is inconvenient and therefore downplayed. If you point out other facts/narratives you are silenced and called a racist because these narratives are political & push a certain agenda & policy, which is why you're angry with the OP & want him to leave. It's a conservative's job to tell us what the progressives conveniently leave out, and vice versa. A self-correcting system. Don't fear other facts and narratives Michael, if we listen to them we might find some truth amongst the bullsh!t.
    4 points
  24. Trudeau believes his own bullshit. Thinks he's a savior . . . .
    4 points
  25. Think what you like, but an unforeseen result of the 'convoy' is that it showed the rest of the country what a truly weak PM Justin Trudeau is. Convenient-Covid . . . where he snipes his racist, misogynistic, enemy of the country, terrorist bullshit, while not having the balls to address the protestors and try to find a solution to their and the country's problems. Then employs 'The War Measures Act' to make himself look tough in the eyes of the world. Yes, the convoy showed to Canadians and the rest of the world what the brain-dead voting public have done to this country by electing this clown . . . . not just once, but ?
    4 points
  26. The root cause of people turning to fake news is that every media outlet is not just determined to report the news but to persuade us to their narrative, whatever that narrative might be. The mainstream media won't deliberately tell an untruth, but they don't have any issue with lying by omission. They will tell you the parts of the story that will make you lean towards their narrative, if possible, and try to avoid the parts which could persuade you to lean the other way. They will also quote selected people - the ones that further their narrative, and not the others. It will cover things out of proportion to their news value to continually poke at you to agree with their views. And it will do stories specifically based on getting your agreement with their views. Through all of this the mainstream media has engendered a lot of doubts about the accuracy and truthfulness of the news they present,
    4 points
  27. 1. Nope. 2. Nope. 3. He's not my clown, I consider him a silly little dilettante. How he managed to make you people so afraid of him that you'll compare Canada to Nazi Germany and assume anyone who doesn't share your delusion is also a Nazi is disturbing. It suggests you people will accept and do whatever it takes to make you feel safe again.
    4 points
  28. I think the reporter should have waited for Pierre to finish.
    4 points
  29. And all those "talking heads" on CTV with Evan Solomon - who shallowly say, "yes David Aiken went out of line.....but, he apologised for it." And then get this, they freakin' focused on the fact that Poilievre called Akin a "LIBERAL HECKLER!" Why wouldn't Poilievre think and say that? I thought that myself - without being told! That's how it looked like on tv, oh you talking idiots! That's their issue! The talking heads nimbly turned the situation around to focus the attack on Poilievre instead. And they wonder why people have lost trust in the media? Hello? You treat us like idiots!
    4 points
  30. How could it not be under control? You're on what....5th shot now? In a year and half? Are the jabs not working? Is that what you're saying? For Pete's sake, even New Zealand, who imposed some of the harshest restrictions along with Canada, has given it up. New Zealand ends all restrictions imposed to tackle coronavirus pandemic (msn.com) The rest of the world has given it up and you're still calling for people to be fired from their careers, the economy to keep going into its death spiral, children (who have zero risk from covid) to have jab after jab after jab, who cares about the science! and be kept from going to school, masking, lockdowns...... Christ on a cracker, get over your abnormal fear. Continue clutching your "wubbies" - masks and social distancing - if you can't get over it, but for gawd's sake, leave the rest of us alone already.
    4 points
  31. People like you support a government that has broken our highest of laws. As far as I'm concerned...that makes you an accessory.
    4 points
  32. Like it or not, that is the reputation he is getting from the rest of the world. Booster Nations - by Robert W Malone MD, MS (substack.com) In Canada, Justin Trudeau is threatening that COVID tyranny will return this fall if 90% booster shot compliance isn’t achieved. In other words, OBEY OR BE LOCKED DOWN…again! With summer about to close in, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is already threatening to reinstate more lockdowns, mask mandates, and “vaccine” requirements for the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) if not enough Canadians voluntarily line up for the latest “booster” jab. And he expects maximum compliance. In a statement he provided to the press inside what appeared to be a hospital room, Trudeau argued that Covid is “not done with us yet,” even though the vast majority of the world is done with it. “We might want to be done with it, but it’s still around,” Trudeau stated. “And yes, we have a lot more tools, a lot more understanding, a lot more knowledge on how to keep ourselves and our loved ones safe. But we also know that as winter comes, and as people get pushed back indoors, there is a real risk of another serious wave of covid.” The only solution to that potential “wave,” according to Trudeau, is “to ensure that everyone is up to date on their vaccinations,” otherwise provinces will have to “make decisions about restrictions and mandates.” “The recommendation is you should be up to date on your vaccinations if you have had a dose within six months,” Trudeau added. “Everyone who has been a while since their vaccinations should look at the fact that we have new vaccines coming out this month that are tailored against Omicron that will provide better protection, and everyone should get out and get vaccinated.” “If we are able to hit that 80, 85, 90 percent of Canadians up to date in their vaccinations, we’ll have a much better winter with much less need for the kinds of restrictions and rules that were so problematic for everyone over the past years,” he went on to blab. “But every step of the way, government’s responsibility is to keep people safe, to prevent our health care systems from getting overwhelmed, and that’s where individuals choosing to make sure they’re up to date on their vaccinations with these new vaccines is going to help us all.” You can watch Trudeau say these crazy things here. The Freedom Convoy trucker protest is when I really started tuning in to what Justin Trudeau was saying, how he was behaving and the tyrannical decisions he began making. Trudeau has been on an extreme tyranny kick the past few years, and really seems to be enjoying himself and his ability to impose whatever nightmarish scenario he wishes with seemingly minimal pushback from Canadians. He invoked the Emergencies Act (passed by Parliament way back in 1988) and shut down people’s bank accounts, not just of the truckers but even those who supported and aided the truckers. I would suspect Trudeau is going to be met with resistance from the people if he thinks another round of plandemic theater is justified. In the video above Trudeau uses a mixture of wild hand gestures, frequent bug eyes, and spastic verbal inflections which show how truly deranged this manchurian candidate with a dictator complex is becoming. With the booster rollout already unfolding, we can expect the medical tyranny dial to be turned to maximum this fall and winter. Perhaps this booster obsession may finally turn on the light bulb for the masses who have lined up willingly to take the initial 2-3 jabs, that they would come to their senses and say enough is enough—no boosters for me, something is just not right here.
    4 points
  33. 1) His post doesn't imply - it "proves". 2) Are you honestly trying to say that there are still black people here who are suffering 'intergenerational trauma' from something that happened to less than 800 people over 170 years ago? Why ask such a stupid question? Do you not understand the concept of historical context? FYI slavery was the most normal thing in the world to everyone, everywhere, for every single moment of recorded history, yet diversity trainers [and people like you] talk about it like it was unique to America and Britain. That's 100% wrong. Do you know what actually was unique to America and Britain? Being a world power and abolishing slavery. Just learn this MH: The Persians, Chinese, Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks, Moors, Hittites, Ottomans, Mongols, Umayyads, Huns, Aztecs, and every other world power that you can name had slaves, and none of them even considered abolishing slavery. Abolishing slavery when you are in a position of power is a uniquely British & American policy. You're trying to vilify Canada for our role in slave ownership when 0.000000% of the Canadians ever experienced slavery for more than 1 second. FFS dude, I know that you can't se the stupidity in your comments, but at least stay out of the conversation if you're that clueless.
    4 points
  34. Meh...we'll see how crazy. A popular fellow. People want to be around this guy. I can only see him getting more popular...not less. He took the time to talk with everyone of the thousands who lined-up to get a photo with him. His wife is gorgeous and equally adept at handling crowds. Myself and a few friends chatted with him for about half an hour without feeling rushed along. That takes talent.
    4 points
  35. Poilievre talked about some wild things during that campaign that entertained his base but will only divide this country more deeply if he keeps at them. The average voter does not want to hear about Bitcoin, banks or convoys. Address things like health care and the absurd price of telecom services in this country and you’ll have a much bigger audience.
    4 points
  36. Bloody awesome. Step one complete.
    4 points
  37. Poilievre is going to be our next Prime Minister.
    4 points
  38. she was the head of state for 70 years and she handled those duties gracefully I can think of no one who could have done a better job in her place
    4 points
  39. She was a great head of state who understood her role, and worked within it, so well.
    4 points
  40. Elizabeth II ascended to the title while still of the age most people today are just leaving college. She is the last of the world leaders from "The Greatest Generation" and lived a life dedicated to and restricted by duty and responsibility. She sailed majestically through all the chaos, wars, political drama, family crisis, social change, and the rise and fall of nations. And she did it in a restrained, thoughtful and dignified manner almost completely at odds with what we see of most world leaders today. RIP to her. And God bless the King.
    4 points
  41. God was invented by MAN. There is NO EVIDENCE proving the contrary. You don't even understand WHY man invented god despite being told a reasonable explanation which you've not even addressed let alone refuted.
    3 points
  42. Buh bye, Don Lemon. Who’s next at CNN?
    3 points
  43. The kind who knows the difference between a Liberal and a Marxist.... I don't put on a Mexican wrestling mask when I come on here...
    3 points
  44. You just have to go back and read my explanation. Go to religion section. I think I've given the detailed explanation there.
    3 points
  45. Yeah paranoid dummies like tech genius Elon Musk and Democrat influencer Bill Maher compared Trudeau to Hitler. I guess we can add the word “paranoid” to the list of insults used to dismiss people who disagree with Liberal policy: racist misogynist conspiracy theorist unacceptable paranoid
    3 points
  46. No, you support irresponsible government. You don’t create massive new program spending when you’re critically in debt. It’s a moral catastrophe, like trying to cure a heroin addiction with a lot more heroin.
    3 points
  47. Wow, that was worth repeating. The Lincoln Project are scum, and you're their new mascot. Good job.
    3 points
  48. of course there was more than two sides Trump did not call Nazi's fine people he said people on both sides of the Confederate statues debate were fine people he explicitly said he wasn't talking about the Nazi's and condemned them totally you buying into the fine people hoax is the ultimate sign of Trump Derangement Syndrome
    3 points
×
×
  • Create New...