Jump to content

Black Dog

Senior Member
  • Posts

    15,131
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by Black Dog

  1. You're not asking questions though, you're making specific claims about what chemtrails are. Or at least you were; now you are backpedaling and confessing to not knowing what you're talking about which I suppose is progress of a kind. How many people do you think work at Area 51? A couple hundred, max? Now, how many people would have to be involved in a conspiracy to outfit and maintain hundreds of commercial airliners from around the world with chemical spraying apparatus? We're talking literally thousands from scientists, engineers to aircrew to maintenance personnel. And not one of those people has blabbed over decades? B.S. LOL how much training do you think one needs to do what they did? Flying a plane, even a commercial airliner, is relatively simple when you don't have to worry about takeoff or landing and you only have to keep the thing in the air for a short period of time. All you need to know is where the throttle is and how to work the flaps and rudder.
  2. Transitional species exist in the fossil record showing clear evolution from one form to another, like in hominids. That's not a fact lol. The natural world and humans are not the same as a watch, which is mechanical, not biological. No it's not. Physical evidence for God would be just that: physical evidence of the thing itself. Finding bear shit in the woods is evidence of the existence of a bear, you're argument is the forest itself is proof there's a bear in it.
  3. So why are you acting like the number of deaths among the vaxxed is big news? Also you're ignoring a significant other factor (and this is where the base rate fallacy comes in); the determining factor in 2022 COVID deaths wasn't vaccine status, but age. Deaths during the Omicron waved peaked in January 2022 and fell off by late February. Lotso f headlines at teh start of the year, less so when the cases and deaths dropped. Is that so because you sure wouldn't know that from all the pissing and moaning by conservatives about "muh freedoms" lol That's absolutely not true.
  4. Yes shithead, because almost everyone was vaxxed in 2022 so almost everyone who died would have been vaxxed. This is simply made up, there was plenty of coverage around cases and deaths from the Omicron variant at that time and many provinces actual re-introduced some restrictions to deal with the outbreak. So what you're saying is: lockdowns and restrictive public health measures worked to keep people from dying during the height of the pandemic and a lot of people died when those measures ended. lmao.
  5. Hmm I wonder why there were more multivaxxed deaths in 2022 when 80% of the population was vaccinated than 2020 when there were no vaccines available. Truly a mystery! I'd suggest you google "base rate fallacy" for further explanation instead of your current research methodology of sticking a screwdriver all the way up your nose and wiggling it around, shit for brains.
  6. There's plenty of evidence for evolution like the entire f*cking fossil record. Denying something and offering up a different explanation that doesn't have any evidence supporting it is not "refuting" anything. Bzzt wrongo, that's the evidence for evolution you're looking at. Where's the actual physical evidence for god?
  7. There's physical evidence for evolution and none for God, Idk, seems cut and dried to me.
  8. I don't need to prove jacksh!t. The burden of proof here is on you, the guy making the insane claim that a well-documented and easily explained phenomenon of aircraft contrails is actually something nefarious and part of a massive conspiracy that would require the knowledge, participation and total silence of literally hundreds of thousands of people over decades.
  9. Contrails are real. Chemtrails are not. No one is "spraying" anything in the sky. No chemicals are falling to earth from airplanes. Hope that helps, dipshit!
  10. Volcanoes, asteroid impacts, continental drift, mass evolution of plants...lots of different factors. I think we can rule lots of those out now though.
  11. Mass deforestation impedes the planets ability to regulate carbon dioxide which means less CO2 gets absorbed and more stays in the atmosphere to contribute to warming. This is like the most basic stuff and you can't grasp it, it's amazing.
  12. The "principle of irreducible complexity" is not a real scientific principle, it is an assertion that was literally invented to support the so-called "intelligent design" hypothesis and exists in no other field. In other words it's an assumption created to support a pre-existing conclusion, not an evidence-based hypothesis. There's absolutely no reason to assume complex things cannot form naturally. There's is copious fossil evidence for evolution. More importantly, there's no fossil record supporting creation because if that were real, we would expect to find fossils or other evidence of modern humans and other contemporary fauna deep within the fossil record, but no such evidence has been found. This guy (who as far as I can determine is neither mathematician nor professor at least at a real academic institution) also believes that the universe revolves around the earth lol.
  13. Well my answer is they don't because chemtrails aren't real. You're the one making the rather extraordinary claim and you know what they say: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
  14. Describe the scientific process that enables "chemtrails" to stay suspended in the atmosphere for hours and then "fall to earth".
  15. As usual, you can't do it because you're lying gutter trash. Nope, same one, stupid. Again, dipshit, I was talking about the specific claims you've made re: nails in genitals etc. Claims that have not been independently verified and are sourced from proven fabulists. I already acknowledged that other bad sh*t happened, but apparently that's not enough for Israel and they have to make up stories to enhance their victim status.
  16. You are an astonishingly stupid person who believes in fairy tales and Facebook memes.
  17. You might not be able to measure it with a standard household thermometer, but it absolutely would change the temperature, even if only slightly Are you shitting me with this right now? High concentrations of C02 can cause unconsciousness and ultimately death. Slaughterhouses use it to knock animals out before they kill them.
  18. I'm not it seems you don't understand basic logic. No it probably isn't. This is so funny to me because adding even a tiny percentage of hot water into cold water would absolutely change the temperature of the cold water.
  19. Post the quote then shithead. This is the same Mendes who told the Daily Mail that “A baby was cut out of a pregnant woman and beheaded and then the mother was beheaded.” at a kibbutz where there were no pregnant residents and who was repeating claims she heard from others here. Once again you're moving the goalposts from specific claims to sweeping accusations about sexual violence, which no one has denied. Fail.
  20. That's not evidence, it's a statement of fact (well, maybe, i've yet to see that corroborated, but we'll go with it for now.) Evidence would be something that shows why that amount of would be too small to alter the climate (which is your argument). But you clearly don't have that evidence, just vibes.
  21. I dunno Mike the argument that "I'm not a Nazi, but I'm not sure we can rule out the existence of a global conspiracy of Jews to destroy the white race" is pretty convincing.
  22. Pretty telling you can't even bring yourself to take a stand on one of the oldest antisemitic conspiracies in the world, wild stuff. That's just like your opinion man.
  23. You said you posted evidence to support your belief. You did not. Also this in't just a question of opinions. "I think cilantro is gross" is a subjective opinion. "I think that man made CO2 is not present in sufficient quantities to alter the climate" is a falsifiable statement. Onto the next thing: Anyone would half a brain would consider the possibility that even a small change in c02 levels could serve to throw off the balance of the carbon cycle, leading to more greenhouse gasses in the atmosphere and thus greater warming. Prior to industrialization, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere was fairly static and subject to natural processes of absorption. So for hundreds of thousands of years, atmospheric C02 was well below 300 ppm. Now it's well above 400 ppm.
×
×
  • Create New...