Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/24/2024 in all areas
-
Robo: only 25,000 showed up it was massive failure for Trump especially since he bussed them all in and paid them to pretend to be Trump supporters, that is what AOC said and she is an expert she is a super genius economist.3 points
-
Let me ask you something: Let’s say your a Canadian trucker, protesting in the streets of Ottawa, standing peacefully among a crowd of other truckers in the street, and some liberal motherfcker drives his car straight at you, barely misses you, then jumps out of his car carrying a gun? Is THAT GUY defending himself against YOU, or are YOU defending yourself against HIM? On top of that, the guy had just texted his buddy, saying that he was going to go out and kill one of those truckers. Who is the attacker and who is the defender?3 points
-
Several Democrats have claimed that the Supreme Court’s conservative majority is “out of control” after a second flag carried by January 6 rioters was seen flying outside Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito’s house. Mr Alito is facing further backlash following revelations that an “Appeal to Heaven” flag was flown outside his New Jersey vacation home on multiple occasions during the summer of 2023. It comes just a week after an upside down American flag – synonymous with “Stop the Steal” protests – was discovered outside Mr Alito’s Virginia home weeks after the Capitol riots on January 6, 2021. My gawd. These people are pure more-ons. First, flying Old Glory upside down is a signal that was used (before radios) to indicate the military was in serious trouble. Since, it has become a symbol that the nation is in trouble. Alito, almost certainly, flew the flag upside down because he was pissed about J6. Second, the appeal to heaven flag was commissioned to represent the writings of John Locke. John Locke was the philosopher that was heavily relied upon in designing the principles of our Constitution. Locke considered nations to be accountable to God. During the revolution, the flag was used as a symbol of defiance to the oppressive, authoritarian King. So these more-ons have unwittingly supported J6 and authoritarian governments.2 points
-
The OP can't grasp the fact that other good people have a God that meets their needs and beliefs.2 points
-
You're talking about people being bamboozled now? 🤣 That's pretty rich coming from a little snake-oil addict like yourself. Do you still believe that the bat-pangolin human origin is the only real possibility, and that people should be banned from social media for saying "Wuhan BSL4 lab"? Do you still believe that the jabs were safe? Do you still believe that you don't have to worry about covid if you're jabbed? Do you still believe that you don't have to worry about giving covid to granny if you're jabbed? Guess how many young people were killed by ivermectin, dummy... Guess how many young people got myocarditis from ivermectin... To this day you've still never confessed to which level of vax-propaganda/drivel you're stuck at... Even if ivermectin is completely useless against covid, at least our gov't didn't waste billions of dollars on it, just to injure/kill people who didn't need it, right dummy?2 points
-
That is my biggest fear also. He has to lay out believable and realistic plans and stop just whining.2 points
-
Is that why the ACLU defended Rush Limbaugh? ACLU sides with Trump against gag order given in federal criminal case ACLU of New Jersey Successfully Defends Republican Candidates' Right to Political Speech ACLU Files Supreme Court Brief Supporting Republican Voters’ Challenge to Democratic Gerrymandering in Maryland2 points
-
As if firing “the Head of the Bank,” who has much more important things to deal with, over such a trivial and unimportant issue would be an intelligent move . That would be a major disruption to one of the major institutions that stabilizes the economy over something inconsequential and stupid. Thats like telling an airline pilot mid-flight that if he doesn’t ensure your airline food is warmed up in 5 minutes he’d better grab a parachute and bail out. 90% of Canadians couldn’t give a rats ass about royal portraits or images especially the ones hanging in buildings they will never visit, much less the timeline for when they’re updated. Most wouldn’t spend a a dime of taxpayer money on it.2 points
-
Foster was reckless. Actions have consequences. Perry was smart enough to have his own weapon and only uses it because he was threatened and only shot the guy threatening him. That was perfectly legal. The jury got it wrong. This is the perfect reason to pardon someone.2 points
-
Ah yes...Garrett Foster...was pointing an AK47 at Perry. Meh...ya gits wut ya pays fer.2 points
-
2 points
-
This is either another story of the disregard and disinterest the Trudeau government has in anything related to English Canada's historical and traditional ties with Britain or another sad tale of the bureaucratic inertia in Ottawa. It seems that a year after the Queen's death no one in the Canadian government seems much interested in making any changes to anything to update our official monarch. it will take at least another three years, apparently, to get Charles' picture on the $20 bill or on passports. And no one seems to have a clue as to when the official portraits hanging in government buildings and embassies might be replaced. I think it's a combination of almost comically inepct bureaucracy and a total lack of interest and respect by Trudeau and his leftist cadre for anything related to our monarchy. https://nationalpost.com/opinion/justin-trudeau-lets-king-charles-down-again1 point
-
The Real Danger if Trump Is Re-elected IOW, the great democracy experiment would be OVER.1 point
-
Haiti gang kills US politician’s missionary daughter and her husband Missouri state representative Ben Baker’s daughter and her husband were reportedly ambushed when leaving a church Glorious Union ; God bless America1 point
-
quite the opposite we Loyalist Orangemen are the only ones who ever took that into consideration we Loyalist Orangemen are the ones who say no Popery, no man nor office between you and your God we Loyalist Orangemen are the ones who invented the modern separation between church & state1 point
-
Indeed, my saying that your statement was false doesn't make it false. The fact that it's false, makes it false. You said, "These "protestors" angrily surrounded and stopped this guy in his car." When what really happened is that he ran a red light to drive into the crowd of protesters. Ergo, your description of the event is false. Now I suppose instead of just acknowledging that you got it wrong, you'll lie about it for 7 pages.🙄 Are you going to go on record saying that open carrying a rifle is an invitation of some sort to be shot? That the shooter shouldn't face consequences? What exactly are you hedging at?1 point
-
Open carry is legal. It's also (in my view) asking for trouble. But the gun nuts disagree wholeheartedly--until the guy open carrying is protesting something they disagree with. At any rate, open carrying does not give someone the right to shoot you "just in case" you might point your gun at them. That's why Perry was convicted of murder instead of being sheltered under Texas generous "stand your ground" law. There is no reason whatsoever this murderer should be back on the street.1 point
-
Benefit of the doubt, but your search is incomplete. He had a lot of conversations about killing people. About what one could get away with in a "good shoot." All of those messages were shared in court. Making it pretty clear that this encounter is something Perry at least fantasized about, if not outright planned. Not a single witness testified that Foster pointed a gun at Perry. Perry didn't claim so either. He ran a red light to drive into the crowd, and when somebody complained about it Perry pre-emptively shot the person. Fulfilling his fantasy. Messages in court On the night of the protest, Perry’s revolver was in between his seat and the center console. [not where he normally kept it] Safari searches also entered into evidence revealed Perry looked up protests happening in Austin and Dallas. “Make sure you only use one shot on the protestors so if they try you have enough. I’ll only shoot the ones in the front and push the pedal to the metal,” said a prosecutor, reading off the message.1 point
-
Obama's presidency was a disaster for democracy but he was protected because he's black. But did some sketchy shit1 point
-
Here's an idea which might cure this problem once and for all. If the crowd surrounds a car and prevents it from leaving, that is attempted car jacking. In Texas that is a second degree FELONY. So ARREST those animals, send them to prison and they cannot vote with a felony on their record. In Florida, animals blocking a street in protest are committing a misdemeanor. Maybe the Texas legislature should go a step further and make that a FELONY, which costs those animals the right to vote if convicted. Threaten those animals with their right to vote and who knows? Maybe a few of them will get a real job and not do that crap any more.1 point
-
Not to mention all the commentary they made at the time. "Protests are SUPPOSED to make people uncomfortable". "it's MOSTLY peaceful". etc etc. The problem is their supporters don't call them on it. Their supporters believe whatever they heard in the last 5 minutes and don't take anything else to the consideration. So if the democrats say "This thing is wonderful" today, and then say "This thing is terrible" tomorrow then in their mind there's absolutely no problem with that. They will scream and shout about how terrible it is in the first case and the next day join in with the cheers about how wonderful it is. So the democrats know that all they need to do is lie today and regardless of what was said yesterday or tomorrow there people will support them.1 point
-
Blinded by the light Revved up like a dunce, another runner in the night. Your Calliope's crashed to the ground.1 point
-
I was expecting the worst from Doug Ford, even though I voted for him. After his crackhead brother made a joke out of Toronto, it disgusted me that this was the best the PC could muster to go against the worst government Ontario has probably ever had. He has far exceeded my (admittedly low) expectations. PP is also doing a decent job of discrediting himself. As others have said, a dog (or @Army Guy's pet hamster) would do a better job than Trudeau running the country, and probably beat him in an election. I think the low IQ slogans, BSing and annoying-shrill routine is unnecessary, and doing him more harm than good for anything but his base. Most Canadians dislike him, his credibility rating is almost as low as Trudeau's, and he's doing it all to himself. A Harper or Doug Ford approach would be a bigger winning ticket, in my mind. Just be a reasonable, adult alternative, and Trudeau's continuing implosion will hand you a majority. Don't be a Tim Hudak and go out of your way to lose an unlosable election.1 point
-
Therein is the dichotomy of Canadian politics. Scandals don't matter if you like the guy. Similarly, we toss out scandal-free (or almost) leaders like PMs Harper and Martin pretty easily. But anyway, as you are all saying, at this point in history having a vision is the most important thing. PP might have it, but he's not talking about it so much... yet. His fans on here don't seem to think that it's important - I had a thread where some suggested he just needs to cut the Carbon Tax, CBC and some civil servants and we'll be ok.1 point
-
Friendly fire is something that unfortunately happens in most wars. But friendly fire is very different from one side using their own people as human shields. It's been pointed out that during WW2 the Einsatzgruppen often numbed themselves with alcohol before executing civilians, Hamas of today LIVESTREAMED what they did on Oct 7. They were proud of what they were doing, and they wanted the world to see it. What does that tell you about Hamas?1 point
-
I looked at some articles about the case and I don't see anything that said he was going to kill protestors. He did say he would shoot looters.1 point
-
The guy with an expressed intent to murder protesters, who drove through a red light into a crowd, and who tried to defend his actions by claiming to have been texting while driving was not the reckless one?🙄1 point
-
There’s nothing wrong with the flag pole itself. But his political expression is obvious and you know it.1 point
-
Numbers I'm seeing online is 25,000 to 35,000. The venue was only 3,000 so thousands were stuck outside the official venue. This happened in the overflow crowd: https://x.com/BossBlunts1/status/1793907589392282054?t=dbB1U7LQlxM8DgPjciVjAg&s=191 point
-
AG, Have you been to Iran? I agree - but not so easy Bill Maher recently asked some Americans to respect other Americans.1 point
-
Although wildly off topic (and admittedly not comparable in substance), I found the "Hunter Biden laptop "Russian disinformation" saga analogous for three reasons: first it shows what can be accomplished when the media and national security forces (in this case intelligence) are aligned with, and weaponized by, a motivated government. Secondly, it serves as an example of how long it takes to sort through the trail of deception (usually two years or more). And thirdly, by the time the trail is uncovered and documented voters (mostly) don't remember and/or don't care anymore... The people doing this aren't dummies, they carefully analyze the cost / benefit ratio before any action is taken and plausible deniability (at all levels) is anticipated in advance. It's done in "bite size chunks" and each chunk (on its own) doesn't initially appear to be part of the same zebra that's being systematically devoured by a pride of ravenous lions. You have to reassemble the pieces... it takes time, effort, a box of rubber gloves and nose plugs to accomplish. All of that simply to say, that like some of the more liberal posters here, I was intrigued by the motivations of the 50 (or so) analysts who cosigned the document asserting that the laptop (and information contained) was "clearly" a Russian disinformation effort intended to effect the election outcome. I questioned how and why it could possibly be. But suspecting that it was the exact opposite of what was on offer, I went looking for the names and bios of the analysts, their likely motivations for making the assertion, and the markers/evidence that lead them to do so. It was another example of "thirsty work" and limited search skills on my part. I got nowhere with it and abandoned the chase after a bit but it does show how easily it was deployed, how effectively it was communicated and how fleeting voter interest in the deception was. It seems to me that it serves as the perfect example of a well thought out cost/benefit analysis and I can only say "well done." When considering the ease of deployment vs the difficulty of disproving/overcoming it, the NS wolf hoax (accidental deployment by reservists) is instructive... and IMO, cute and funny. But that's just me. Done purely by accident, it was harder to undo and more embarrassing than you would think if viewed as a hypothetical before the fact. Bogus stationary and recorded wolf howls (on a loudspeaker) had greater deployment efficacy than anyone could have reasonably anticipated in advance. That said the effects were certainly limited in both scope and duration but if carefully fed and left to fester, it would have been fun to see how long its legs could have grown. In this case it's noteworthy that that the provincial government shut down all rumours immediately and the media was in lockstep with them. In short, deployment efficacy requires all members of the trinity (government, media and security forces) to be onside. Taking one of those entities out of the equation results in the total collapse of the 3 legged stool that the deception sits on.1 point
-
Yeah because Biden and Democrats are using lawfare to commit the largest election interference scheme in history. Your bragging about case brought to you by the DNC and act like it was Trumps fault. We found out Cohen is a thief but Bragg was willing to look over that to get Trump on accounting entries. We are talking about the difference between grand larceny and a misdemeanor.1 point
-
More than a year after a Travis County jury convicted Daniel Perry of murdering a protester in Austin, Gov. Greg Abbott pardoned Perry, 37, on Thursday shortly after the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles recommended a full pardon. the parole board said it delved into the intricacies of Perry's case, by reviewing documents, police report, court records, witness statements and interviews of individuals linked to the case. Then again, robo posted a stupid meme and mumbled about something. Hmmm...1 point
-
Even if it weren't predicated upon a fiction, that would be a sorry excuse.1 point
-
Lol...Donny's in Bronx right now and the crowd is chanting "USA". I wonder how many in the Bronx would attend a Brandon rally?1 point
-
Then they're being lied to as well. So are all their peers and institutions and associations that represent them. The scope and scale of the lying you're talking about would have to involve thousands of people. It defies logic and reason not to mention simple human decency. It's clear to me your bullshit filter is hopelessly clogged up.1 point
-
Now you just have to prove the allegations you made but as I pointed out you can't. No one can without cameras microphones and human witnesses to public officials and MSM/corporate officials coordinating and orchestrating things as per your explanations. If you had these so would the W5’s and 60 Minutes' of the world, it would be all over the media, public officials would be swinging from lampposts and there would be blood in the streets.1 point
-
Ignoring the rest of your tirade... to the point of this thread, no, he was not talking like a Nazi. This is how it works with you guys, you just push a lie and then continue to distort it to no end. I would think, for someone as outraged about Trump's Character as you are here, you might be more concerned with your own integrity on what you accuse him of.1 point
-
Trump has made a cozy home in the Republican party for the alt-right and neo Nazi types, because, for him, no vote is too deplorable to court. But I suspect that sometimes he wishes they wouldn't "help." Because sometimes they say the quiet part out loud.1 point
-
The monarchy is part of our system of governance and an important aspect of our culture. It’s not about Charles but the significant symbolism and heft of a title that has been maintained throughout significant world events over thousands of years. If you want to discard the Loyalist origins in favour of a second American republic, there are arguments to be made for that, but traditions are protections. The fact that we can refer to our important roots protects us from twits who think nothing of scrapping aspects of Canada that most of us value.1 point
-
Why would that happen? The UK does not govern Canada. Do you know how the Constitutional Monarchy works? Canada is a completely self-governing country. We are better off being part of the British Commonwealth with a King because of the threat of China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, etc. United we stand. Divided we fall. God bless the King. The Ireland Republic became independent long ago. Then they declared themselves neutral and did not support the Allies in WW2 to defend against the Nazis and Hitler. Thousands of Canadians gave their lives to defend democracy and the west against Nazism. The Irish Republic still did not join NATO. They are nearly useless to the western world which is always under threat by Russia and China. That is what happens when people in the country are ignorant of how the world works and fail to appreciate how many people gave their lives in the past to defend what we have today.1 point
-
Why? Just because I am not monarchist?? The Americans have their very own, made by them, system. Not hanger ons to the knights of the round table LOL You must be Sir Canadalot1 point
-
Monarchy Pffft. Parlaiment wants to be productive instead of bickering, find out a way to cut the British apron strings....completely.1 point
-
The UK won't even have Chucky on its money for another couple months. WTF does Trudeau even have to do with it? Does he personally decide when the mint redesigns and issues coins and bills? Once again showing you think the PM should, praising democracy as you bellow for a leader who will tell you what you will have for f*cking breakfast. Call PP and tell him to take up the highly important issue of WhoTF is on the money so he can outrage too. He can order the trains to run on time as he wishes away the glacial speed of bureaucracies. As for you tradionalists, replace the $20 with Terry Fox and all the coins with the Maple Leaf from the old penny. You can still wave at Chucky when he visits.1 point
-
Just thought this is relevant... https://www.rebelnews.com/liberals_finally_answer_what_is_a_woman1 point
