Jump to content

Nefarious Banana

Member
  • Posts

    1,436
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Nefarious Banana last won the day on October 4 2022

Nefarious Banana had the most liked content!

Recent Profile Visitors

2,165 profile views

Nefarious Banana's Achievements

Veteran

Veteran (13/14)

  • First Post
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Reacting Well Rare

Recent Badges

733

Reputation

  1. -TSS- . . . . could it be that with past Pope(s) declaring they know nothing of the 'musical chair' charade that the Catholic church has played with their predatory child molester priests? Moving them to another parish instead of the jail cell where they belong? Maybe the Catholic church has no credence . . .
  2. Fact is that there was no reason to stray inland from the 'coastal strip' . . . . old growth stands of hemlock/spruce/red cedar on the west side of VI and north coast are virtually barren in regard to understory/brush/berry/food producing vegetation. There was no need to penetrate the coastal vegetation to any great degree because everything to sustain the coastal tribes was at their fingertips along the coast. Their claims of everything 'as far as the eye can see' are bogus, and should be treated as such. The horse cultures of the prairies were a different story however . . . mobile natives competing with other mobile tribes for a mobile/seasonal food source . . . . the old scars run deep back there.
  3. Was referring to coastal natives . . . . interior plateau and others were mobile. Should have made that point clearer, apologies.
  4. Coastal Indians had all their necessities on the beach /coastal strip lands, and the water. There is virtually no indication of any Indian influence inland from the Pacific coast. Prairie tribes pursued a nomadic existence with their food source, the bison. Prairie tribes have a legitimate claim, coastal tribes have a disputable claim to interior coastal land.
  5. Maybe they're not 'tokens' . . . It's fairly obvious that Trudeau does not like smart, independent women thinkers around him (Chrystia Freelunch is neither, just a bobble head) and they are soon tossed aside . . .
  6. First Immigrants will get the final say on anything that needs doing in this country. Country will grind to a halt from its snail pace now.
  7. The Trudeau government is like stepping in sh!t . . . . no matter how many times you scrape your shoe, the stench remains.
  8. Justin's telling Joe about his secret stash of Oreo cookies . . . . . . and why he crosses his legs and sits like a woman.
  9. Great picture . . . Pierre Poilievre, upright and straight, eye contact with Biden, look at their clasped hands - solid, as men shake hands. Yes, a great campaign photo. Trudeau looks second best, at best.
  10. Again, what would make you happy other than sharing thoughts with Zeitgeist? You seem stuck in the past . . . .is this a healthy outlook? I'll gladly forward this small quip that puts things in perspective for myself and kin . . . The buffalo are gone. They're not coming back. Get over it.
  11. What's your idea/wish for the perfect governance of/for Canada ? You seem to be very disenchanted with this country. What would make you happy ?
  12. Are you a Canadian citizen? . . . if so, do you vote federally or provincially?
×
×
  • Create New...