BeaverFever

I believe she said Fred Trump withheld affection, from both kids and the family in general. He berated them constantly and made his temporary approval conditional on them displaying certain behaviours like dominating others and encouraged unhealthy competition and bullying, between them. Fred Jr was least favoured because daddy thought he was too “soft” and rewarded Trump’s bullying of his older brother. But Donald was not spoiled in terms of being showered with affection, he was just slightly better off than his brother. He was only spoiled in the sense that like all insanely rich people he had an army of flunkies to pave the road in front of him, clean ip messes behind him and do things like write him fake medical certificates for non-existent bone spurs so he could dodge the draft Family dysfunction Well-to-do from the small fortune Fred’s brothel-keeper father had made, this unhappy Trump family was unhappy in its own way, all five siblings warped by its oppressive frigidity, “but my uncle Donald and my father, Freddy, suffered more than the rest.” In her telling, a critical shift came one night when Donald was 2 1/2. His mother nearly died from post-partum complications, was hospitalized for months and “never completely recovered.” Finally back home, she was … weird — an insomniac “wandering around the House at all hours like a soundless wraith… In the morning her children sometimes found her unconscious in unexpected places.” “Unstable and needy,” she used “her children to comfort herself rather than comforting them.” And so, as a result of his mother’s de facto abandonment and his father’s disengaged failure to “make him feel safe or loved [or] valued,” Donald developed “powerful but primitive defenses” — a willful callousness and “an increasing hostility to others … narcissism, bullying, grandiosity.” … That’s because, according to Mary Trump PhD, Fred Trump was a “sociopath” who taught his children that his affection for them “was entirely conditional.” One of his explicit conditions for approving of any Trump son was that he be a “killer.” And so Donald’s transgressions “became an audition for his father’s favor, as if he were saying ‘See, dad, I’m the tough one. I’m the killer.’ ” As when he obeyed Fred’s apparent order to drive up to Massachusetts and whack Freddy, who’d just achieved his dream of becoming a TWA pilot. “You know,” 18-year-old Donald told him, “dad’s really sick of you wasting your life.... He says he’s embarrassed by you ... Freddy, dad‘s right about you: you’re nothing but a glorified bus driver.” Freddy promptly became an alcoholic, got canned as a pilot, returned to the family business and ruined his marriage, finally living in his indifferent parents’ attic and dying from heart disease at 42 in 1981. Meanwhile, the “reckless hyperbole and unearned confidence” of his shameless younger brother, masks for “pathological weaknesses and insecurities,” were a perfect match for the manic, money-crazed, celebrity-obsessed perception-is-reality zeitgeist. In the 1980s he turned himself into famous Manhattan developer Donald Trump. https://enewspaper.latimes.com/infinity/article_share.aspx?guid=dffe646e-a537-4a02-a158-4e5c35356dae

Meh so many toxic conservatives are motivated by mommy or daddy issues. Look at Trump and his abusive father. Or PP and his (possibly indigenous) birthmother who gave him up at birth. And the ones that don’t have longstanding issues over parental rejection often have issues over being rejected by the opposite sex.

He’s objectively an a-hole, which is why a lot of conservatives like him.

This Opposite-of-reality reporting brought to you by the crowd that brought you the fabricated justification for the Iraq war, the financial meltdown, Obama birther lies, so many lies that the terms “fake news” “gaslighting” and “alternative facts” became some of the most common expressions in the public lexicon, Putin and Orban adulation, blatant Trump/Kushner bribery and an attempt to steal the 2020 election and end US democracy permanently.

You stole that OJ line from me. As Ive said many times about Trump’s collusion

1) as has already been pointed out the commercially available cell data that Dsouza and his con artists an obtain through legal data brokers is not that accurate for security reasons and it can be off by as much as 1000 meters This is different from what law enforcement has available 2) as was already mentioned law enforcement uses it in conjunction with other evidence not by itself. 2000 Fools is based on nothing but massively inaccurate phone data, which he now admits is not linked to the camera footage, and the rest is completely fabricated claims

And yet if you’re a dumbass MAGA J6er who live tweets that you are storming the Capitol and your dumbass MAGA buddies have ratted you out for being there, but then you try to deny it when the authorities come, the cell data is legit evidence. And that pretty much fits the profile for hundreds of J6ers taking selfies inside the Capitol like complete mor0ns

And yet it provided a factual and accurate answer

LMAO you’re the dumbass that keeps falling for fake news whether from Convicted election fraudsters like D’Souza or bloodthirsty dictators like Putin. And you still falling for this crap that been debunked countless times over the years. And you’re too stupid to realize he stands by the conclusions even though he admits that the supposed evidence the conclusions were based on is bogus

Don’t just take my word for it, here’s what ChatGPT says: Some January 6 protestors were arrested in part based on cellphone geolocation data, but this was typically combined with other evidence, such as video footage, social media posts, and witness statements. Key Differences Between J6 Investigations and Claims in 2000 Mules 1. Precision of Geolocation Data: • For J6 cases, authorities used carrier-grade data obtained via subpoenas, which is typically more accurate (down to a few meters) than commercially available geolocation data used in 2000 Mules. • This data was often corroborated with video footage, unlike the claims in 2000 Mules. 2. Legal Process and Context: • Geolocation data in J6 cases was obtained under strict legal standards, such as court-approved subpoenas or warrants, ensuring its reliability. • The analysis was targeted to specific individuals based on evidence of their involvement. 3. Corroboration: • J6 investigations did not rely solely on geolocation data but used it as one piece of a larger puzzle. In contrast, 2000 Mules heavily leaned on geolocation data without sufficient corroborating evidence. Conclusion Yes, cellphone geolocation data was used in the arrest and prosecution of January 6 protestors, but it was part of a broader investigative strategy that included other forms of evidence. The reliability and accuracy of this data in the J6 cases were higher due to its source (carrier-grade data) and corroboration with other evidence, unlike the claims made in 2000 Mules.

Typical Republican scumbag, “the data was wrong but the conclusion that was entirely based on the data was right” Zero evidence for his widely debunked bullshit. It’s not only based on bad data but completely illogical and implausible.

That has been debunked 2 MILLION times. Cellphone geolocation data is not that accurate and a ping is split second signal so their so-called data (if they even ever had any) wouldn’t be able to differentiate between a phone that is sitting on top of a dropbox, one that was in a building next door to the building with the dropbox, and one that was speeding past a dropbox at 200mph in a car 500 feet away. Given that drop boxes are placed in high traffic areas like malls and libraries and public buildings where people work and pass through of course it would pick up the same signals repeatedly (again if they have any data at all - they refused to share their raw data or methodology) 1) It didn’t show her put in “a bunch of ballots”. There is no way of telling whether she is putting in more than one in at a time. It shows her go to the box, put what is probably ONE ballot in, then go back to the car and put what is probably one more in. In other words it could just be the ballots for her and her husband and she realized she left one in the car. This is a lie that 2,000 Fools makes often: footage of someone depositing a white rectangle that looks no different than one envelope while the narrator claims without basis it’s a stack of “3 or 4” envelopes, when there’s no way anyone could tell from distant security cam footage 2) no footage of anyone making repeated trips to the Dropbox, or visiting multiple dropboxes, which is 2000 Fools’ central claim The woman mentioned above didn’t drive away then come back with another load to make multiple drops on multiple days Remember a central claim is that EACH of the 2000 “mules” visited an average of 10 drop boxes so at least 20,000 “mule drops” and the only footage you could come up with is “one lady walked back to her car”. Remember 2 years ago D’Souza said he had more footage he would release soon. But he released nothing because as he admits now it was all a lie 3) no evidence of the supposed “democrat stash houses” where the supposed fake ballots were produced and distributed to the supposed mules Remember 2 years ago D’Souza said he had more footage he would release soon. But he released nothing because as he admits now it was all a lie 4) no evidence of any actual fake or fraudulent ballots being found n any of the failed witch-hunt audits the MAGAtards launched after the election. If ballot boxes were stuffed with fake ballots then where are they? The republican lies made the 2020 election the most audited election in history and all it proved was the Biden won fair and square.

Wow Great person to put in charge of schoolchildren. Then again Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert used wrestling as a pretext to groom and sexually assault boys for decades and the GOPedoohiles elevated him to one of the most powerful jobs in the country. And of course Trump had a decades-long close friendship with Epstein and used to publicly brag about their shared taste for women “on the younger side”

Another unqualified dumbass nutjob from the cultural sewer. And a pedo enabler to boot. She has that in common with Trump also.

False. No videos show anyone doing that. D’Souza the liar claimed all along he had the videos but now 2 years later and after getting his ass sued off admits it was all a lie er “honest mistake” that took him 2 years to realize.