User

I did read the whole article. How would you know what it said when you missed the first sentence? This was answered in the article you claimed to have read as well. There is no trust with any money in it. The money has all been borrowed against. I explained this when I said it exists on paper. Do you need me to do some math in crayon to explain it to you? You can't even understand the problem or discuss it honestly. You got to do that first.

Why don't you look at how you prefaced what it meant if someone answered a certain way... I understand just fine. You never went the first one. Here is my post again. Feel free to actually respond to it this time: The Bible doesn't say PI isn't 3.14... nor does it prescribe what PI is. The Bible was not providing some mathematical proof with drawings and calculations at all. You are talking about where a description is given of how a cylindrical container was built. You are making some presumptions here to skew what is being done here. It is not a math problem, it is a laymen description of something being built. No where are they saying it was precisely X diameter and precisely Y circumference and that this thus proves PI = 3. Its like me telling some friends about a project I had in my garage. Telling them I built wooden circle and it was 30 feet around and 10 foot in diameter... you come along and say that I am trying to tell people PI = 3... or maybe in lay talk people give approximate figures when speaking, I didn't explain that it was really 30 feet 10 5/16th inches around and 9 feet 11 15/16th inches around measured with exact precision with my micrometer! (just throwing out numbers here to demonstrate the absurdity of this) This whole line of argument is just done by someone so pathetically desperate to come up with something to criticize The Bible over.

If you thought it really looks like it, you should have phrased your first post much differently....

Oh... I see, so the whole loyalty to the Constitution thing is just a partisan talking point for you.

You can't argue the facts... all you have is memes.

There is no trust fund. That money has been borrowed from and spent. It only exists on paper. That article also points out that it runs out in 10 years. Not 40. I swear, did you even bother reading it? That was in the first damn sentence. It will slowly die from there. As it will never be able to cover all costs and will only stay afloat on the continued ponzi scheme of taking money from the current payers to keep covering those getting money. Social Security is going to implode unless 2 things happen: We radically increase taxes (aka steal more money from those currently working) and/or We radically reduce benefits Better option: We fundamentally change it all together to let people keep more of their own money to invest themselves.

Yes, but the implication here is that somehow, donations to help the victims here were paying his salary instead. That charity is massive with hundreds of millions of dollars. Duh. The operational costs are already there, with or without the additional contributions.

Evil double-speak... The attempts to kill the child in the womb failed, so as they lay there dying outside of the womb, we let them pass in "peace and dignity."

So, now you think Samartins Purse isn't even a charity? Seriously, dude, all this is showing is that you hate Christians and are spiteful because they are down there helping people.

I was looking at some older numbers, 700K is the number. Oh great... here we go again. So, did anyone die of COVID? Are we back to the conspiratorial craziness? No percentages were offered, you claimed there were no flu deaths... I am still trying to get you to figure out what you are assering here. You claim there were none, you claim there were some... So... you didn't trust the CDC link you shared with me that you used to support your previous comments? Yet again... more contradictions. Again, you did not merely say "took a year off" It is your fault that you contradict yourself. You literally quoted me already saying this to you in this response. Here you go again: Except, you didn't merely assert it took a year off, you asserted: "2020 and 2021 there was no flu, and no one died from it." Let me know when you can figure out what your argument is here and what you want to assert. No, you are a joke. You contradict yourself, and instead of owning up to that and figuring out what your position is you have to play these dumb games. Way more than I thought? My position was that 700K was the top of the range. The argument being made here was that more people died of COVID. So, is your big conspiracy that no one died of COVID and all those deaths were the flu? Stop playing these dumb games. Just come out and say what it is you are trying to beat around the bushes about. You won't do it, because you know how dumb it is. You just want to imply it. How much do you think that statistic is off by then? What do you base that on? OK, so... first you claim no one died of the flu, and now you think people did die from the flu, but that they were all falsely categorized as COVID deaths. OK... so what is your point then? Which is it man, are you here saying the flu disappeared or that it was here the whole time and just counted as COVID deaths? Make up your mind. Are you saying Scientific American lied? Then why are you here telling me I need to tell them anything if you don't even believe them? No, I sure don'! What bait did I take here? Where was I gullible? What hook am I refusing to spit out? To what end? What is your point? I have no idea why you care. Ah, I see. How convenient for your conspiracy theory. No, you see, you keep exaggerating here. Just like you did with flu deaths. You claim no one died... then you claim some died, then you claim that they all still died as usual, but were counted as COVID deaths... The COVID vaccine did not fail or not work. Did it work as effective as claimed? No. Was it a savior in preventing spread? No. It certainly did provide protection to folks at risk in helping to prevent their deaths or serious hospitalization. That is not a failure. It was your claim, no loss to me if you don't want to back it up. My life goes on.

Which church are we talking about here? What minister? Care to share a link? The Minister is not taking his salary from these charitable donations... you are conflating this and lying.

He didn't lie. He went on to correct the so-called fact check. Why did the moderators lie? They pledged to do something and adhere to a rule set they didn't. That is a lie. Since you care so much about lying.

And? Still not a scam. Just you being uber mad that Christians... *GASP* are Christians.

We already played this game in another thread.

Who lies about what happened by making it a vague rhetorical question lacking context. A liar does. That is you.