Leaderboard

Son I could smoke a crack rock the size of my fist, and still sound more rational and intelligent than you on your best day

He sets the tone for his incompetent, inefficient, overly bureaucratic government. Do you think Harper would have let the public service balloon by 40% in a few short years? You think it takes four years to replace the Queen's face with the King's? Seriously? You sure have that bureaucrat mentality. You know how to get it done faster? You tell the head of the Bank that if The King isn't on the bill by the end of the year he needn't bother coming to work in 2025. You bet your ass it will get done. And on the passports too. As for pictures in government offices and embassies, same message to Heritage. Get it done or find other employment.

Blackbird said: that changing sex is not natural and is unproven Chopping down trees, grinding them up, bleaching and pressing the pulp into sheets so you can wipe your bum is not natural either, but you prove it everyday after your morning coffee. What's 'natural' got to do with it. And your gripe seems to be how scientific theory can adapt based on new evidence yet the words in an ancient committee written book were, are, and ever will be the absolute truth. IOW you criticize theory without knowing what it is.

Oh son if the best you got is to make shit up, you might as well quit now. You're just embarrassing yourself

Misogynists are those who talk down to women, not those who think they should have choices. Choices not dictated to them by men like you and Butker.

Hamas issued a statement claiming that they have proof that the accident was caused by Israeli sabotage, and, also, 574 Gazan children were aboard the helicopter when it crashed.

i personally think the ICC has overstepped it's bounds here, with over 3 dozen conflicts ongoing today, they have singled out Israel...like any international organization these days, if it involves the jewish people it needs to be condemned...It is funny that the IRGC/ sudan, etc etc is not mentioned for crimes against humanity...

It takes about one minute to figure out that other than some historical oddity, in the real world it can quickly lead to real, serious problems. This individual is a citizen of another state, and has the first and primary allegiance to another state. Can one really have a "head of state" like that? Why has it been so hard to think? What hasn't been right with us?

You have to understand that the second you purified in the light of Trump hate you are now completely free of all sin and lies. Once he gave into hating Trump he then magically became honest and true and incorruptible just as Liz Cheney and Mitt Romney are now wonderful people because they have given into their TDS.

You absolutely did.

Translation: "It can't be true. Must deny. Must not confront reality"

Let's be honest: How many guys are saying "No."? It might be easy to say no to the girl who works the counter at Krispy Kremes, but only 10% of guys could say no to those two.

No, but what does that have to do with our $20 bills? Yeah, but why bother? Why would we be in any rush to get the face of a whiney, deservedly unliked monarch, when the bills of the previous popular monarch are just fine? Like...why would we do anything but the bare minimum on this front?

I'm a devout Christian and I forgive Donald Trump for his trespasses.

You mean another 'mostly peaceful protest'?

Many stable democracies have elected heads of state to perform the duties of a monarch and get on perfectly well. In fact, more countries in Europe are parliamentary republics with a ceremonial president than anything else. We are close to that already with our GG as de facto head of state and a monarch who hasn’t turned up in well over a decade.

To what? That after 6 months of delays for arms supply, Russia managed to capture a handful of tiny villages, before stalling out yet again? Fixed that for you. My logic easily demonstrates how bad yours is. See the above quote. Russia has manpower shortages too, and also shittier leadership, less motivated troops, and nothing worthwhile to fight for. The logical thing to do isn't to make a shitty peace deal on Russian terms. LOL!

If you're interested, in the Trickle thread, I posted the actual request for funding from the NIH by Daszak. It outlines exactly what he wanted to do - engineer a more infectious coronavirus by monkeying around with a specific furin cleavage site. The same funky cleavage site that makes the covid virus adhere so seamlessly with human cells. Except Daszak proposed releasing the infected bats BACK INTO THE WILD. These people are insane. People don't usually invent elaborate lies and cover-ups for no reason..... If you want to be scared sh!tle$$, google how many lab accidents with infectious viruses there are every year.....

Just 4 days after The Declaration went out, Francis Collins (then director of NIH) sent a panicked email to Fauci and other high-ranking bureaucrats, calling it the work of "three fringe epidemiologists" and they all agreed to a "quick and devastating takedown of its premises". Fauci described it as "nonsense" and dangerous." Outrage flared up in the media: Murderers!! Covid deniers!! Granny killers!! Dr. Battacharya received death threats and racist attacks. He said, "I started getting calls from reporters demanding to know why I wanted to 'let the virus rip' when I had proposed nothing of the sort." Dr. Gupta said "I was utterly unprepared for the onslaught of threats, insults, personal criticism and intimidation that met our proposal". Dr. Kuldorff was forced out of Harvard after 18 years of professorship. @eyeball At what point are you going to admit that you were the victim of misinformation and stop spreading it?

As has been explained to you multiple times on multiple occasions - there was an option presented early on (October 2020) that recommended "focused protection" for those most vulnerable, while those with nearly zero risk would be able to continue on with life. No need for crashing the economy or CERB payments to teenagers to sit at home, no need to shut down schools or bankrupt businesses. It was, I'm sure you remember because I posted about it multiple times and you mocked it in favour of anti-scientific draconian measures, The Great Barrington Declaration. It was signed by thousands of scientists and doctors worldwide and was created by: Dr. Jay Battachrya - a public health expert and health economist with a focus on infectious diseases in vulnerable populations, from Stanford University. Dr. Sunetra Gupta - the world's top professor of epidemiology, who specializes in vaccine development, immunology and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases, from Oxford University. Dr. Martin Kuldorff - professor of biostatistics and epidemiology from Harvard University. Great Barrington Declaration (gbdeclaration.org) But you chose to listen to the CBC "experts". 🙄

There has been a story going through social media that Kansas City cancelled three Pearl Jam shows. Eddie Vedder, singer for Pearl Jam, at a show in Las Vegas expressed his dislike of Butker's views. Supposedly Kansas city stands behind Butker and so cancelled three Pearl Jam concerts. The problem is that there never was any scheduled Kansas City shows in the upcoming tour cycle. If you want to, go to https://pearljam.com/tour, and look. Second, to have 3 dates in one city and not have it be a residency... is almost unheard of. If Pearl Jam was going to do 3 nights in one city.. it would be Vancouver or Seattle. This reminds me of the fake story that Jason aldean and Oliver Anthony would be performing at the Super Bowl halftime show. Quite a few (on here and elsewhere) reflexively reacted saying things like, "the NFL is getting it right. They know that we wont put up with those woke, mediocre hip hop acts".. and then guess what? Usher was the actual halftime show act.

And writing in cryptic unclear ways that make him look like a lunatic and a ****** had a love child and he's posting on the internet Why not just talk like a normal person? Just how emotionally damaged are you anyway?

Yes, granted people like him are the reason we need instructions on shampoo bottles. But still... this seems pretty cut and dry even for someone who can't get the water out of their boot with the instructions written on the heel.

Canada is confused. That much is clear already.

The advantage of the Constitutional Monarch is the armed forces and the RCMP swear allegiance to the monarch and this prevents a would-be little tin-pot dictator from seizing absolute power and setting up a Communist or Fascist dictatorship like north Korea or Cuba or China and eliminating all human rights and freedoms. We have an elected Parliament now and supposed to have human rights although at times it is not perfect. But if you get rid of the Constitutional Monarch you could be setting yourself up for an absolute dictatorship because the barrier to protect from that would be gone. Many simple-minded people don't understand that.

We already have Prince Trudeau the Sockmighty and his roundish table.

How could a modern democratic country be run by a foreign monarch? Can we think still? Or is it too expensive already?

I bet in October Biden will tell everyone about a meeting he had with Raisi in September and how he told him to "cut it out, man".

He doesn't know what he's saying. It's all just irrational mumbo-jumbo. The Libbies are on the ropes and panicking. That's what this nonsense is about.

Being a colonist or settler is absolutely NOT relative to the length of time it's been since someone else settled the same area. Sorry. Once they're done settling - they're not settlers, they're settled. And once they're not a colony they're not colonials. Canada has niether settlers nor colonials any more and its quite arguable that the israelis are past that point as well. Maybe you could agrgue those 'settling' in the west bank are but israel is a thing, it's not a 'settlement' and it's not a colony.

In light of 1st Nations whose footprint in the Americas makes Israel's look like they just showed up? It's nowhere near as simple as yes or no.

You want to know what our military is under Biden? It’s a military that’s not at war… for the first time in 22 years. THAT’S the U.S. military under Biden.

Gas prices are not an economic indicator. They do not reflect economic health except at the margins, but rather are mostly decided by Sheiks half a world away acting on their own interests. POTUS has very little influence outside of extreme actions. But the price of gas as an input can influence the economy. A low interest rate is traditionally a response to a weak economy--or in the case of Trump taking office, the desire by the Fed to avoid disrupting the Obama recovery. They arguably kept their foot on the gas a bit too long. When economies get hot, central banks raise interest rates to slow spending and keep the economy from overheating into bubbles and inflation. The rates are set in response to economic conditions. So, again not an economic indicator. Unemployment, finally, is a reasonable economic indicator, but dig deeper there and you'll see that Trump's low unemployment number comes with caveats. The first is that he started on third base. He inherited a robust and growing economy. Job creation didn't change at all under Trump--well actually it slowed just a bit. He didn't accelerate the curve at all. The second caveat is that under Biden, who inherited a financial crisis, unemployment actually dropped lower than even Trump's best month, and has sustained far longer. Biden's record on jobs is objectively better than Trump's. It's Biden who owns the best jobs market since the 60s. So you're 0 for 3 in an effort to support your claim. Because it's a silly claim.

The candy on the clearance shelf was $3.00 on Weds. it's remarked to $6.69 on the same clearance shelf today. The jelly doughnuts that were 6/$6.69 Thurs. were 6/$7.99 today. Shit like that is what's making shoppers irate. Like I said before you can buy the Family size pack of sausage rolls and pay 4¢ more if the big sticker fools you. They ALL pull every sales trick in the book and thinking a different govt would change anything is stupid. Don't bu it and use your feet to shop elsewhere. if you have that choice.

I think it's crazy that people are going to vote for the sequel of Weekend at Bernies.

But they did say that. And i've defended what he's said in every single post What he said very clearly is that he thinks many women there will be looking forward to being a mother and a wife. He said he is sure some will choose the corporate route but that life as a mother and a wife can be the most fulfilling life for many people. He noted that his own wife has found it extremely fulfilling There is absolutely nothing wrong with any of that. But you hate that he's telling the truth. You can't refute what he said so you add a whole bunch of things he didn't say. To cover your tracks you attempt to accuse someone else of the same thing that you yourself have done. This is very simple what he actually said is that it's okay to be a mother and a wife, and in fact Many women find it to be an extremely rewarding and fulfilling thing to do. That's it. So either you can explain what's wrong with that statement without adding on any additional things that he didn't say, or you are being dishonest and simply don't like the idea of women making their own choice and choosing something other than having a career. Which would make you the misogynist

I get it. You can't really argue the facts on Biden's obvious failing mental condition...

For the record can you list these crimes against humanity, and or if war crimes were committed...

Only those on the west bank. Anyway, the whole region was colonized centuries ago. That's why they're all Muslims and speak Arabic.

Good grief AG, give your head shake...even Israelis call themselves settlers.

Exactly. Raise debt, inflation, and taxes, make people feel guilty about asking for a bag at the grocery store or going on a road trip, but give them drugs and assisted suicide to deal with the fallout of their broken dreams. Birth control and abortion are free and unlimited, just in case you had the high and mighty idea of saving enough money to have kids and buy a home. Why bother? Get a small rental apartment, have poly hetero and non-hetero sex, go on meth or opioids, collect welfare, then book your appointment with the MAID team. So much for the Canadian Dream…

Two parts of the same whole, both noteworthy for showcasing the power of information management techniques when properly deployed against a fearful (or angry) majority. It usually (I'd suggest always) requires a villainous antagonist (one that either already exists or can easily be created) to entrench the outrage... in this case, "anti-vaxxers served the purpose well. The bad behaviour of supporters is then brought to bear in the form of peer pressure while factual debate and contrary minded opinion is suppressed and/or ridiculed. This is deliberately and systemically encouraged (the PM helped this along and it wasn't an accident) until it reaches a point where it's very difficult for those who willingly participated in it to walk back their support after the fact. Ivermectin was an interesting bunny trail that served to illustrate the power of this. No discussion about the possible benefits of off label use of a cheap, innocuous drug that was shown to be effective (but only) at the first sign of symptoms. I'll wager that none of the "horse paste crowd" took 10 minutes to look up the how or why of that. Anyway, that's the issue for me, how easily all of this was accomplished. There are courses in such things and you often see it on full display in places where the unholy trinity of government, media, and security forces is entrenched. There might be a lesson in that too eh?

Are you competing with FOS LIES for who can tell the biggest LIE? NOTHING in your cite about "poor Joe is devastated," so this time YOU WIN. 🤮

Are you, though? Are you interested in any potential lessons? It doesn't seem so when the rest of your last two posts here imply that the greatest virtue the public had was to follow government and Big Pharma blindly and that it is somehow virtuous to ask no questions because "it was an emergency." To some of us, more than you know, and many scientists, more than you know, that is not understandable at all. What a naive and childish view that governments never terrorize their citizens for profit and that Big Pharma who has repeatedly paid fines in the billions of dollars for fraud that involved people dying, are to be unquestiongly followed. We knew by March 2020 that only certain people were vulnerable. Yet not did you did question that during mandates, you cheered it on and demanded pregnant women, children and babies were forced to get multiple doses of an experimental injection they did not need. Do you have any idea the centuries of medical ethics that were thrown out the window? We have NEVER allowed experimentation on pregnant women or denied people informed consent. These issues were part of the reasonfor Nuremburg, for gawd's sake. We learned that "potential lesson" 80 years ago and you threw it out the window along with already established science, like natural immunity and basic biology. The truth about Ivermectin was less than a 5 minute Google search away. What prevented the general public from even just doing that one thing? IMO, Intellectual laziness. So don't pretend you're some kind of intellectual and moral person. Blind obedience to authorities that have proven track records of fraud and lies, is not a virtue. You, like many, have zero critical thinking ability and *THAT* is scary to the rest of us. Because if this was a huge marketing ploy to see how stupid the public is and how far they'll go in giving up everything they believe in by applying a bit of fear that only a few questions would have revealed as manufactured, we're in big trouble. You'll go along with absolutely ANYTHING an authority tells you to do or think. How you think that's a virtue is....beyond me. I don't think you're interested in potential lessons at all. You ignored all the lessons from history already. So, no. Not understandable at all.

This can't be a fact... it has never happened yet. Its a prediction based on information you choose to focus on. The "fact" (pun intended) that you call it a fact only shows your own bias here. This is not a fact, its speculation on your part at best, not backed up by what we know happened. This is your buying into some phony pro-Russia narrative that they wanted peace and if only Johnson hadn't blown up the deal. The problem is that this isn't what happened at all. If Ukraine was out of military personnel, Russia would have already conquered them. What you likely meant to say is that they are out of reserves or maybe out of recruits... who knows, but those are for more accurate. Either way, you are wrong. Ukraine is actively working to replenish their ranks and has been doing so for months now, but they are certainly behind the curve to some degree. It is not perfect, they are struggling, but it certainly is not "out of military personnel" as you claim. Your so-called "facts" are anything but...

Personally I find the "First Nations" moniker not only offensive but laughable. Despite what "natives" would have us believe they did not spring from the ground like the rocks and tree's but immigrated here like everyone else. Call them "First Immigrants". Nation? A loose confederation of peoples with no common language, in most cases no written language, no anthropological achievement beyond existence whose "cultures" stagnated at a stone age level is not a "nation". I'm sick of governments pandering to the whining's of people saying we "stole" their land. Firstly, nothing was stolen. The monies paid to "native" groups over the years has bought this country 10x over. Second, the land wasn't theirs to begin with! Except for small area's there is no proof of residency. No, a yearly fishing or hunting trip to a particular area doesn't convey ownership. If it did my family should claim much of Northern Ontario and the Florida keys not to mention the travel corridors used! Except for small area's they can't demonstrate stewardship, the land was not cared for, improved, worked: it lay fallow. Finally, not to put too fine a point on it, but they were unable to defend a claim of ownership. The whole thing reeks of sour grapes. Now seeing the wealth available from the land various tribes are lining up to scream "mine". Why the courts humor these claims is disgusting. I might be able to entertain "native" land claims if they paid taxes like everyone else but no, they want autonomy. Last time I checked autonomy implies, self government and sufficiency. So why are we paying for everything? Why are native social issues our problem? It's time the government started treating "native" groups like the spoiled children they behave as!

robocrat's head is firmly up the left's ass.

yep its our dream someday people like you and the few other alt righters will be locked up.

IT's what the left loves to do Cancel culture taken to the extreme - dare say things we don't like and go to jail