Goddess

I posted about this before. It came out during the NCI hearings.

We'll probably never know for certain. There was no conformity in specifics of reporting and for most of it, literally everything was a "covid death". As I reported before, there were a lot of deaths in the US due to the use of ventilators and remdesivir, and in the UK due to midazolam. Fortunately for Canada, we dawdled on purchasing vents and by the time we got them, the US had already figured out it was the vents that were killing people. So our $1billion worth of vents went unused and were recently sold for scrap for (I think it was) $6 each. But at least the Liberal politicians and insiders made great money by investing in vent companies. Frank Baylis, especially. Former Liberal MP questioned over ventilator contract at ethics committee | National Post NY Governor is being questioned by Congress because his nursing home policies killed many of the elderly.

I'm not. I posted about it at the time. Here. I even found a CTV article on it, knowing that's important to you guys. If it's not reported by the CTV, it's "crazy anti-vaxxer stuff", right 🤣 B.C. COVID data: Death count may obscure vaccine benefit | CTV News On April 2, the province began reporting "30-day, all-cause mortality" in its weekly COVID-19 updates. This means anyone in the province who dies within 30 days of a positive lab test for the coronavirus is reported as a COVID-19 death, regardless of whether the disease actually caused the fatality.

He's painted himself into a corner, for sure.

I'm not sure what the official number is now. Health Canada was quietly deleting covid deaths, last I heard 16,000 had been deleted. One of the (many) things I found odd was that deaths were pronounced "covid deaths" if they tested positive at any time within the PREVIOUS 30 days. Even if they clearly did not have symptomatic covid. Where were all "correlation does not equal causation" people then, hmmmmmm? Yet, people have died within minutes of getting the jabs, and according to VAERS - the majority of people who died after vaccination died within the first 24-48 hours. The "first 24 hours" would include minutes or hours post-vax. When this happens and you point it out as significant and worthy of investigation, suddenly all the "correlation does not mean causation" people come out with fists flying.

I posted a news article about a woman in Texas (?) who thought her teen son MIGHT have had covid and she made him ride in the trunk of the car to get to the doctor and was stopped by police. That's how bad the brainwashing was.

I wont' admit that, because they're' not. The decisions and views of experts who were correct on everything - those decisions were based on science. These are all people who were at the top of their fields. That's why they've all been proven to have been correct. The "experts" paraded in the media - they've all been wrong. On literally everything. Because none of their advice was based on science. It was political or they were paid to promote Pharma views. This is why it's important for the public to at the very least, have a basic understanding of things. We can disagree on the reasons why these "experts" were so badly wrong on everything, but No. I was posting the studies and datasets and already established science on coronaviruses and vaccines here, very early on. I was following the science. It's the rest of you that aren't. The science didn't' change - you were just wrong the whole time.

Instead we followed Ferguson. Look him up, too. The guy's a ******. Ioannidis was correct from the beginning on covid IFR. Ferguson had a record of vastly exaggerating risk. Again, if you're happy with Ferguson.....gawd help us next time.

Am I? The world's top epidemiologists from Harvard, Yale and Oxford formulated the Great Barrington Declaration very early on and were absolutely vilified for it. It advocated for non-panic and focused protection of at risk groups. This was early October, 2020. When Fauci found out about it, he commanded his staff to do a "devastating takedown" of it. Which they did. If you're happy with public health bureaucrats taking over pandemic decisions instead of the world's top epidemiologists, biologists, virologists and scientists, then.....yes. We will have to agree to disagree. Gawd help us next time.

They were shut down, blacklisted and silenced and denigrated in the MSM. Were you unaware that for years, any one who said anything against "the narrative' was attacked mercilessly, including experts at the top of their various fields? Ya. Ya, we did. We had the 2 cruise ships and Italy. We had John Ionniddis. I tried to bring all this up, with references, datasets and experts and again, was attacked. Anthony "I am The Science!" Fauci. The world's pandemic plan called for experts in a variety of fields to gather together and make decisions based on risk/benefit analyses. This would have included economists, child psychologists, statisticians, data analysists, politicians, scientists of all sorts. That's what I hope we do next time. Instead we turned it all over to public health, who considered exactly ZERO of those other things. I believe it was Collins who recently came out and admitted this was the greatest mistake made during covid - turning all decisions on everything over to public health bureaucrats. I posted about it here.

I said I think they should all be re-evaluated. 🙄 LOL. Wow, I've posted repeatedly about the use of vents and remdesivir (which started in NY), lots of links and references. The US stopped using vents because that's what was killing people. It's why Canada's vents sat un-used and were just recently sold for scrap. You pretending to not know what I think is pretty lame-o.

I think that because there were many child psychologists trying to warn of it and they were silenced and censored. I even posted about it here at the time and was attacked by everyone saying lockdowns would have no effect on children at all and that the child psychologists I cited were crackpots. This is untrue. We knew early on, by March 2020, that the risk was to the very elderly, the very obese and those with multiple comorbidities. We knew covid was not dangerous to children by March 2020. It's interesting that in Fauci's testimony to the Senate, he tried to say he did not demand or prolong school closures. It was one of the lies he was called out for. Internet receipts are everywhere. Hopefully, we have learned to push back against these "experts" next time and follow established science and do proper risk/benefit analyses. I doubt it though. Everyone trying to re-write history with "We didn't know!" Yes, we fuqueing did know.

Child psychologists who weren't captured by Pharma predicted that the prolonged school closures would negatively affect children and teens. This was ignored, of course. Or minimized. Ready or not, here they come – Winnipeg Free Press More children are showing up to kindergarten without being fully potty trained, knowing how to share with others and meeting early development milestones. That’s according to the first study of school readiness in Manitoba in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. “A slightly higher percentage of children in this cohort than earlier cohorts is not quite developmentally where they should be for their age,” said Magdalena Janus, a professor and researcher at the Offord Centre and co-developer of the EDI. Janus noted some aspects of children’s behaviour, including aggressive outbursts, are impacted by “social learning,” meaning they come to understand what is and is not appropriate by interacting with peers. The most significant slide happened in students’ abilities to concentrate on tasks, help others, show patience and regulate their emotions and aggression. The drop in boys’ readiness is marginally greater than the one between the pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic cohorts of girls. While cautioning against panic, the researcher said the latest data should prompt schools to keep a “very watchful eye” on local development indicators and make programming adjustments accordingly. “The EDI vulnerabilities are highly predictive of later academic success,” she added. “If we have slightly higher percentages of children who are vulnerable in language and cognitive development in kindergarten, it’s quite likely that there will be slightly higher percentages of these children struggling with aspects of reading and mathematics in Grade 3 or 4, but that doesn’t mean that has to happen.” This will be quite a burden for teachers and for society in the years to come.

I do a lot of natural oil blends and when friends asked, I made one from lavender, clove, ravintsara, geranium and manuka oils. Those are anti-inflammatory and analgesic oils and my friends said it did soothe and help with pain. Baking soda and cornstarch pastes help with the itching. I also have blends for cold sores, diaper rash, eczema and one for hemorrhoids - I get asked for those ones the most. Lots of repeat customers, although I never charge for my blends.

True. I should stay away from here, less stress 🤣 I know people who've had shingles, it really is horrible.

That's what I've heard. I did have chicken pox as a kid, so I carry the dormant virus which can be reactivated. I worry about it a bit as I get older, but I do take extremely good care of my immune system. **fingers crossed**

They are not simple questions. The answers are not simple and if you were truly interested in finding out the level of corruption in Pharma, I provided you with ample information to look for yourself. Honestly, if you don't already know it is heavily corrupted just from what you see on MSM, I find that very bizarre. The problem is - you are not interested in finding that out. You want to defend Pharma from accusations of corruption, why I don't know. You want specific vax I think are dangerous and I've repeatedly said I believe they should ALL be reevaluated by independent labs and scientists. I'm sorry that's not an acceptable answer for you. I believe I was clear on what I think happened. Because you argued against each point I made and provided CNN links to back yourself up. Maybe go back and read again? Uh huh. 🙄

If anyone has the stomach to look further into the Rotherdam rape gangs, it's absolutely horrifying. It wasn't just that one city, it was happening in quite a few cities and involved girls as young as 11 yrs old - groomed, drugged and raped repeatedly. Thousands of girls. And nothing was done about it. Some of the girls and young women have to walk around town seeing their rapists every day. Yet the Brits who are rioting now are painted as right-wing extremists. In reality, the public in the UK, and in Canada and the US and other countries have been BEGGING politicians to stop bringing in people from these cultures for at least a decade and the politicians have ignored their citizens. DEI and extreme left-wing woke policies on immigration are destroying the West.

OK. Two to three pages of replies and trying to reason with you is "running away." As I said before, hopefully when Cuomo is questioned in Congress, we will find out why there are discrepancies between what was reported from NYC in the media and what really happened. My reasoning is that there must be a reason why they're questioning what happened there. Your reasoning is that everyone is id1ots except you and CNN. Have a wonderful day.

This is utterly ridiculous. You clearly have no idea what you're talking about. The only proof you have that the assertions are false is CNN articles. Clearly the assertions are NOT false, as Congress is investigating them and is requiring Cuomo to answer their questions. What part of that is difficult for you to understand?

This has been explained to you multiple times now. Stop pretending I'm an id1ot for questioning CNN reports when the US Congress is asking the same questions. Are they all id1ots, too? If I'm wrong and immoral for asking why, is Congress also wrong and immoral? Why are you so desperately against asking questions about what happened in NYC?

I'm not sure what point you're trying to make but I can tell you don't understand anaphylactic reactions/shock. If a vaccine is given in 3 doses, a month apart, that = 3 injections, which increases the chance of anaphylactic shock each time. It's not counted as "1 injection". It's 3. If you eat one apple at 1 pm, another apple at 2 pm, and another apple at 3 pm, you've eaten 3 apples, not 1. Then why do you think is Congress asking questions about it? Just for shits & giggles?

Again, if you need me to explain how 28-30 is MORE than 3 or 15.....I suppose I can do that for you.