Goddess

In my city, about a week before the carbon tax was to be eliminated on gas, prices went up 10 cents a litre. So now they are only about 3 cents below what they were before. This is definitely gouging.

Do you see a Canadian flag anywhere there? Also, all their elbows are DOWN.

If there's anyone here that would support and defend the Liberal govt's ties to China, it would be you, eyeball.

Ahhhh, now I get it. China is the key to the new globalist financial system Carney is pushing for.

Mark Carney today: “I am deeply offended by Paul Chiang's comments, but will use this as a teachable moment and make sure none of my MPs coordinate any more extrajudicial political assassinations again."

Good news, everyone! The Motherland has assured us that the election is secure. Calls to have your political opponents kidnapped and handed over to communist regimes for bounty is totally above board! Hooray!

So you think the IgG4 switch that's been documented and reproduced in studies from all over the world is: a) Not really happening. OR b) A good thing. Alright then. ☺️

We know there's at least 2 Randy Boissoneaults. How many Randy Whites are there?

If he would've just gotten rid of Chiang, this would be over now. But it's just getting started. If I had been an undecided voter up til now, this situation would be the line in the sand for me. The Liberal Party is standing behind their candidate who called for his political rival to be turned into the China Consulate for the bounty. Carney claims it was "just a lapse in judgment." This is on the heels of Sam Cooper's revelations of Liberal Party involvement in the fentanyl crisis in Canada, the revealing of Carney's financial obligations to a Chinese bank worth billions of dollars, China being caught meddling in Freeland's leadership bid, and China executing 4 Canadian citizens recently. The reason for the bounty is that the man is accused by the CCP of having publicly criticized the regime. Now, I'm reminded of the Bills the Liberals brought in regarding jail sentences for online "misinformation". And the way they brought in riot police, tear gas, Stompy the horse and froze bank accounts and years-long lawfare against those citizens who challenged their political decisions. The Liberal agenda for Canada matches up perfectly with the Chinese agenda for their citizens. This is why they won't do anything about this disgusting situation.

This is a really good idea. Very original and something a lot of people can get on board with. It’s too bad the Conservative Party didn’t think of recommending that… repeatedly… for the last two years… in the House of Commons… so the Liberals could unanimously oppose it… repeatedly… in the House of Commons.

Is someone holding a gun to your head forcing you to click on this thread? Reply with squid emoji if you need help. 🦑

Someone put this together to simplify it a bit: Paul Chaing's team. Does this look like Canada? Or China?

For a deep dive into the topic of foreign DNA in the mRNA jabs, but in easier to understand layman's terms, there's this paper: Foreign DNA in the mRNA Vaccine – Dig Deeply

RE: the SV40 promoter found in the jabs (simian virus 40) Harvey Shein and John Enders were top scientists in the 1960's. Look at this paper they wrote about SV40 Transformation (cancer causing) in human kidney cells. But don't worry about SV40. It's nothing to worry about and probably like fairy dust making you stronger. TRANSFORMATION INDUCED BY SIMIAN VIRUS 40 IN HUMAN RENAL CELL CULTURES, II. CELL-VIRUS RELATIONSHIPS - PMC The paper is older, so here's some screenshots of pertinent parts and a meme visual:

Prior to Carney running, the Conservatives had a large lead. But everyone knew that some die-hard Liberal supporters would go back to the party if they changed the leader. Which they did. Carney quickly called an election to capitalize on Lib supporters coming back to the party when the leader changed.

Employers in Canada have to give employees time off to vote. FAQs – Time off to vote – Elections Canada

This is Paul Chaing's statement on the incident: He apologizes, then reiterates his allegiance to Hong Kong. The Liberal Party is entirely beholden to China.

A Liberal gov't could lead to more than financial collapse for Canada. This Liberal candidate just publicly called for people to claim the $1 million bounty China has on Conservative candidate, Joe Tay, by turning him in to the Chinese Consulate. This guy, Paul Chaing, was a former cop in Ontario, he should know better. He is apologizing for it now but he should be removed by the Liberal party. I doubt he will, though. I think if the Libs get in again, being turned in for bounties for China will be the least of any opposing party's worries. GTA Liberal candidate apologizes for suggesting people claim China's bounty on Conservative

This is just the latest study on the IgG4 class switch. There's about 7 or 8 of them now. I've posted on the IgG4 switch with the other studies here, in the past. I judge studies by their methods used to reach conclusions and whether those studies are reproducible, not by where they're published. For instance, The Lancet, the largest medical studies publisher, still has not removed the Proximal Origins paper from their website, even though it's been long since debunked. Maybe they will soon, they've recently removed many of the junk science papers used to promote the jabs. If you want to discuss the studies here, I'm down for that. Otherwise, your comment just illustrates your profound ignorance.

Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption. Look it up. Also, WAR is bad for the environment.

Ya, we know. They do the same thing in greenhouses, pump CO2 into them. It makes the plants grow.

Unconfirmed, but I suspect they started putting crystal meth in our water supply around 2020.

Ten days ago, ANOTHER peer-reviewed jab study quietly published in the Journal of Infection titled, "Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections" Corporate media ignored it, unsurprisingly. But what was perhaps most impressive was that it was published at all. The study’s conclusions were bleak. The Spanish team found that repeated covid mRNA shots —especially the third jab and beyond— shift injectees’ antibodies toward a usually rare “non-fighter” type of antibidy called IgG4. IgG4 is the immune system’s version of a conflict-avoiding diplomat. Instead of gearing up to attack invaders, the body treats the virus like it’s a persistent uninvited houseguest: inconvenient, maybe even annoying, but not worth an unpleasant confrontation. The study unsurprisingly showed that the more this IgG4 antibody “class switching” happened, the more often people got reinfected. Meaning, more shots, more sickness. Exactly the opposite of what the experts promised. Even worse, the results showed that the IgG4 increase lasted for years after repeated mRNA doses. The elevated IgG4 (and IgG2) levels stabilized above normal baseline levels and stayed that way for the rest of the study period— nearly three years. The researchers saw no sign of those levels returning to pre-booster norms. Although they never came out and said it, the data the team collected suggested this could be a long-lasting, possibly chronic immune shift. And it’s not a shift for the better. This kind of class-switching effect is called “immune tolerance.” It’s typically seen in cases of chronic allergies, long-term parasitic infections, and rare auto-immune disorders. In other words, victims’ immune systems get trained to chill out even though the virus keeps crashing the party and hogging the DJ stand. Defenders continue to argue the shots may not “work” per se, but they reduce your chance of serious illness per infection. That tortured argument misses the forest for the viral trees. They claim the shots reduce severity of covid cases. But even if you believe that, if each shot makes people catch covid more often, their total cumulative risk of a severe case may actually go up. A -10% drop in severity risk is worse than meaningless if you’re getting infected three times as often. This study reinforces early “conspiracy theories” that successive waves of covid would get increasingly deadly to people who’ve had lots of shots. It hasn’t happened quite so quickly as theorized by the heterodox researchers, but this study’s results add to evidence of a slowly unfolding disaster version of the same dark prediction. Finally, since it was out of the study’s scope, the researchers did not consider whether chronically elevated IgG4 levels could suppress immune responses to other things besides covid, like infections, cancer, parasites, or any number of foreign invaders. The problem though is that elevated IgG4 is immunologically anti-inflammatory. It’s like issuing a permanent, body-wide “stand down” order to your immune system—the opposite of staying on high alert. Rather, it’s on low alert. Like Jeffrey Epstein’s guards snoozing during his mur, I mean suicide. Here’s the nub: Jab-takers were sold a medical product under the false assurance of zero long-term risk— an assurance that was always biologically impossible to make. It was the complete collapse of informed consent. Public health authorities assured us there were no meaningful long-term risk— not because they had any data to prove that, but because they had no long-term data at all, the world’s most fraudulent blank check on an empty bank account. The public health mo-rons played the most dangerous shell game in human history, and we still don’t know the full scope. Well, we are where we are. Let’s look at the half-tumbler of whiskey still in the cocktail glass. It is fair to assume that every single study finding something positive about the jabs has been published and highlighted by the media. Nothing pro-jab is missing. But it is also fair to assume that many studies finding problems were sneered at by editors, slow-rolled, and denied effective peer review. So there is almost certainly a back inventory of unpublished work. Worse, the funding behemoth drowned researchers in green-lighted mRNA grants— but only for pro-jab studies. So, research on mRNA problems has likewise been drastically underfunded. Both variables —censorship and funding— are changing for the better. Kennedy is laying off scads of narrative enforcers at the CDC and other captured health agencies. HHS is pulling the plug on junk studies designed to prop up fear campaigns and pharma-friendly messaging. The money is drying up. The academic playing field is finally, belatedly, leveling out. And when it does, we will witness an unprecedented avalanche of pent-up scholarship— studies that were previously unfundable, unpublishable, or simply too dangerous to write. Every paper like this Spanish one is another dagger in public health’s waning credibility. And it can’t happen fast enough. Because if I’m right, we’re headed toward a reckoning.

They're drowned out by your Liberal media-funded screeching on every channel - "We can tax Canadians into oblivion to save the planet!" And ding-dongs like you believe every word of it.