CdnFox

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-trump-bennie-thompson-secret-services-rfk-1892371 a prominent House Democrat has introduced new legislation that would strip felons of Secret Service protection, specifically mentioning former President Donald Trump in case he's convicted in one or more of his criminal trials. Mississippi Representative Bennie Thompson, ranking member of the House Committee on Homeland Security, is bringing forth the Denying Infinite Security and Government Resources Allocated toward Convicted and Extremely Dishonorable Former Protectees Act—or the DISGRACED Act—which would terminate Secret Service protection for individuals convicted of either state or local felonies. Trump, whose first of four criminal trials involving hush money payments and alleged falsified records prior to the 2016 presidential election, is specifically mentioned by Thompson as someone whose protection privileges would be affected should he be found guilty. ----------------- Ok - that is beyond scummy even for the Dems. I get that they're scared he might win again - but to strip a former president of his protections is basically saying you want to see someone kill him. Like - it was BAD when they subverted democracy to try to keep him off of the ballot, but to actually try to put his life in direct danger to satisfy their petty political ambitions? This is absolutely horrible. I've never bought into the whole 'democrats hate democracy and will do anything to cheat to victory' storyline. I 've always thought 'sure they fight dirty but they still respect the basics of democracy. I am prepared at this point to admit i was wrong. The democrat politi9cians are horrible people.

Yes. The gov't is misusing it's power to force the banks to comply with justin's propaganda and agenda.. Congratulation - you managed to work your way around to my initial point ROFLMAO!!! Honestly Eyeball, some days you just kill me

Hmmmmm From your own cite: Chartered banks, sometimes known as commercial banks, are public corporations that are licensed by the federal government to operate a banking business within Canada. By issuing these licenses (or charters), the Canadian government regulates and controls the country’s economy So they are LICNESED by the federal gov't for the purpose of REGULATING the economy. But they're not RUN by the gov't regulation. They just have to operate within it's license. Wow. That's twice in as many days as you provided proof you were wrong and i'm right God damn you're a freak

ROFLMAO - after WHAT fact? They're literally in response to his post - did you think i should post facts and graphs BEFORE he raises the question ?!??! Holy shit kid - normally it's him that has the brain melt, but you're in full meltdown mode Ok - name them.

You've lived one lifetime, unless you're a cat or believe in reincarnation. And if you think you're a cat you need help. You lied. that's obvious, And you're lying now about your 'data'. That's obvious as well. If you're not a poorly written bot, you do a damn good impression,

And i posted graphs and charts and links to studies and data AS WELL as a link to the study HE referenced but didn't link to. Oh look at that. You lied again. Yawn. What a sorry little person you are,

I'm more of an "anti-being-forced-to-take-an-experimental-injection-without-any-long term-studies-especially-when-my-risk-is-below- 0.02%" type of person. Well quite understandable but you have to admit it doesn't roll off the tongue the same way

Banks regulate themselves every day. Go look at your bank statement - all those codes by the transactions? All decided on by the bank. That's why we've never had legislation like this before - banks largely manage themselves. Obviously you know what the gov't is doing is wrong or you wouldn't have said something so stupid. Never in the history of banks in Canada has a bank been ordered by law to change their coding to promote gov't propaganda.

ROFLMAO!!!! Well there you go folks - Robosmith was in court once (as the defendant presumably) and has there fore heard Every instruction that is ever given to a jury I assume your lawyer got you off based on insanity? I mean reading your posts here would be more than enough proof of that

LOL - well i've posted that - yes your anger over the fact i mentioned truthful things is quite hilarious So you still can't refute anything i said i take it. Your own posts show you were wrong. You're THAT much of an 1diot You and moonbox should start a club for people who go out of their way to accidentally prove me right When you're a pile of dung, everything looks like a horse.

The truth you mean? Yeah - i'm kind of predictable that way And the international study i posted was AFTER you claimed you were talking about 'Da world!" Posted stats on Canada earlier. Me - Makes a true statement. Eyeball - "I KNEW you'd resort to truth and facts - what a troll!" LOL!

A satire article meant to be a joke is "strong evidence"? I think the only thing 'strong' here is your cough syrup.

Not at all actually. Defend failed petty canadian dictatorial slimeballs who've ruined the country with woke nonsense much? Hogwash. As the article notes the banks systems have limits and there are other issues - the gov't is insisting they change where necessary so that they can promote the gov'ts propaganda policy. When was the last time you saw parliament pass a law requiring banks or any other financial institution to use it's preferred language to make sure that voters credited them with giving them money?

@eyeball knows better. He participated in discussions where TWO studies, one posted by me and one posted by a brain dead tard who THOUGHT it refuted mine but it actually fully supported it when he actually read it, said that the risk from covid was slightly lower than the vaccine EXCEPT for males under the age of 40. Then it was higher. And for the rest - it assumed that they wouldnt' get covid anyway. And many vaxxed people did. And to top it off it does very from vaccine to vaccine. So when he posts old resaerch with faulty conclusions he knows exactly what he's doing. The dishonestly is insane. The aboslute desperate need to believe he wasn't wrong at the time is overwhelming his ability to be logical and dispassionate about it now.

Ahhh - so you have no rebuttal DERP!!!! - HE'S RIGHT AND I'M WRONG AGAIN - BETTER TRY TO FIND SOMETHING ELSE TO TALK ABOUT!!1 lol - well i guess someone like you would find the idea of honesty a little surprising and confusing So - you were wrong. There wouldn't have been millions of deaths or even 10's of thousands or even likely hundreds in Canada. But the damage done by those measures is HUGE. So we hurt a LOT of people just so you could virtue signal. And instead of saying "well looking back with the knoweldge we have today i wish we'd have done it different and hurt a lot less people", you double down and lie your ass off trying to pretend you made a good choice back then. That would make you a pretty bad person. Might want to rethink that,

Wrong. It turns out it has more to do with population density (as well as maybe don't send the sick people BACK to the nursing homes) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8253654/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7806252/ There's plenty of other research. The higher the population density of a region, the higher the mortality. The us has much more high density areas than Canada. And that's clear from this map https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/covid19_mortality_final/COVID19.htm The higher density states had higher death rates for the most part. There are other factors but there you go. If it was STRICTLY about vacination differences - why did washington state have a lower death rate than canada's average? or maine? Further there's issues involving health coverage and other factors. Man - you just can't get anything right can you?

Ummm... how long does it take you to read 260 pages like that? Are you saying it takes you MORE than a night? Wow Sometimes i forget how elementary school you are The fact you'd be impressed by that is hilarious However in honesty i read the parts that addressed covid mostly. Did not take long at all. I appreciate you letting us know about your reading disability tho, it explains a lot

YEW NEVER POST THE EVIDENCE!!! followed by WE DON"T HAVE TO POST THE EVIDENCE!!!! ROFL - man you could hypcrisy for the olympics And no it didn't reference all it's conclusions - and even the ones about covid it got wrong. Which you'd know if you could read the study. LOL - some days you make a sack of hammers look smart

ROFLMAO - vaccine mandates were already not in place in MOST countries and where they did happen they were far more limited and short lived :) And his comment was very specifically about Canada Not to mention your 'evidence' that we discussed was specifically from canada ROFLMAO - you are SUCH a dumbass You totally effed up and shot your mouth off like a tard and then when you got busted you're trying to double down on the stupid There would not be "millions more deaths" in Canada - and there would not be millions more around the world because most places didn't go as hard as we did with it. And while i posted lots of proof you yourself provided the best hunk - 2500 as an absolute max worst case probably can't actually happen number. Not millions LOL - well that was a pretty epic fail. You'd think by now before you call me out like that you'd at least do a LITTLE thinking and reading first to save yourself the embarrassment

https://www.castanet.net/edition/news-story-482980-4-.htm#482980 Canadian banks that refuse to identify the carbon rebate by name when doing direct deposits are forcing the government to change the law to make them do it, says Environment Minister Steven Guilbeault. His department has been battling with banks for almost two years over how carbon rebates are labelled when they are deposited directly into bank accounts. So now we're passing propaganda laws. Every time i turn around this guy is more of a tyrant.

https://archive.ph/4DfBM Federal Mental health and Addictions Minister Ya’ara Saks plans to meet with her B.C. counterpart, Jennifer Whiteside, and B.C. police chiefs to talk about how the province’s drug decriminalization experiment is working. The police chiefs are concerned that law enforcement officers have no power to stop problematic drug use in hospitals or public spaces. Article content Article content And critics say the public safety risks of decriminalization outweigh the benefits and, for that reason, the experiment should be scrapped. So - yet another woke social experiment that's gone up in flames. Add it to the pile i guess

I can see what the palestinians did was wrong, and i can see what the iranians have done is wrong. Hamas gets it's weaponry and money and support from iran. Iran picked a fight and now it's getting a black eye for it. If they're smart theyll back off and learn a lesson. If they're dumb they'll wind up getting their ass 'gaza'd'.

You don't. You didn't just now either. LOL - well you're a m0ron but you're a consistent one I posted several data sources and a study on TOP of posting the study that eyeball referenced but didn't actually provide - which proved him wrong in any case And once again - in the face of solid evidence all you can do is have a hissy fit i mean we both know you didn't actually read any of the data - anything more than two sentences and you start crying and holding your head Sorry kiddo , If we had not forced vaccinations and allowed people to choose there would not have been 'Millions more deaths". I doubt there would have been any. Well you called it

The problem with free speech is that someone might say something you don't like, Accepting that free speech is necessary and desirable in a free and democratic society means accepting that and not looking at it as a bad thing. The commies in 1920's used violence and intimidation to attempt to deplatform and repress nazi speech. But that only made the nazi's stronger. "A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still". You don't fight nazi or white supremicist ideas by burying them, You do it by exposing them to sunlight. Then you can present your own thoughts.

This is the only way to do it. And the Palestinians can stop it at any moment. They started the war, they continue the war - are you saying they are 'genociding' themselves?