Leaderboard

Thank you Blackbird. The King does not cost Canadians anything except for security when he is touring. Canada has a blended heritage. We have the French language, the great circle of our First Nations heritage, cultural heritage of the Ukraine, Germany, Norway, the Philippines, India and Pakistan, Syria etc. We embrace and support all of these cultural gifts that make up Canada. The only part of this cultural blend that is under threat, is our British heritage. Why is my heritage under threat when all of the others are supported. Most of the free, democratic nations in the world are constitutional monarchies. Norway, New Zealand, the Netherlands, England, Denmark, Japan, Sweden, and more. What is the alternative? A republic with a Politician personifying the country like Putin, Xi, Trump (and Biden) or Macron? The King of Canada is the symbol of Canada. He is Canada. However, on the bright side, the position of being King of Canada does not depend on popularity. The position is double locked into the constitution and cannot be changed.

I think this is the bottom line. People saw it as insincere, as dragging identity politics into a simple product, and virtue signalling and they got pissed off. Honestly - i don't care if some tranny somewhere drinks something. I really don't think the majority of people do either. Despite barbie's claims, there's just not that many people who 'hate' trans. But when it's in teh paper every day, you're being bombarded with trans story time, and giant fake breast teachers and kids being thrown out of school for saying maybe males should stay out of girls bathrooms, and now even school shootings - you're going to get damn sick of it. And i think they tapped into that anger and it just blew up on them. I mean they've done stuff with gays and lesbians and stuff for years. Spuds mackenzie was a girl Nobody cared. But its' just getting to be too much.

Tucker Carlson tells it like it is and isn’t afraid to criticize government and media on a range of important topics, such as war in Ukraine. Even if you disagree with some or many of the things he says, no one can deny that Carlson stands up for and exemplifies free speech. All we can do is speculate on why he’s out at Fox. I just hope he resurfaces soon. He’d probably be better off and freer having a podcast or Rumble channel.

The news reports that a majority or large percentage of Canadians do not support Charles becoming King and do not support the monarchy. Could this be the beginning of the end of democracy in Canada? Perhaps a judgment for Canada's general ungodliness and rejection of God and the Bible? Seems like a possibility. In a world of dictatorships Canada has been one of the few democracies. But that could be changing as many Canadians seem dissatisfied with the present system. We could end up as a totalitarian state with no freedoms. The existence of the Constitutional Monarchy is one of the main things that prevents a would-be dictatorship from taking control and abolishing the Parliamentary system we have. The fact the Armed Forces, the RCMP and others swear allegiance to the King makes it very difficult for a would-be dictator from seizing power by firing a GG or President and abolishing Parliament. Without that safeguard, the system could be more easily overthrown and changed to a dictatorship.

I also like the fact that the monarchy believes in God. The ultimate authority in our lives must not be a politician or we’re seriously screwed. Look at every communist dictatorship to find out.

We will never know. The King is above politics and his conversations with his Prime Minister are secret.

What about a despicable turd like Carlson? Can you keep them down?

He'll bounce back. Can't keep a good man down

Well don lemming (sorry don lemon) was fired so i guess there's an opening at cnn...

It should be noted that in the past, before everything became lies, any death within 4 weeks of a vaccine injection (any vaccine) was considered suspicious and worth investigating.

Good bye Tucker. You will be missed.

I’ll be perfectly frank: If people with your views run our governments for enough time to enact your insane ideas on gender and communism, our liberal democracy would collapse like a house of cards and you’d be reporting to the local Communist Party of China police station to beg for clemency. Oh, and they wouldn’t give it to you, because your views are anathema even in most communist countries.

the American republic will not invoke Him by name the American Founders were Deists, they would only say "Creator" only the British Crown in North America defends Christ Himself, Jesus of Nazareth see the light over Damascus shine through the regimental window at St Andrew's Dileas Gu Brath : Faithful unto Judgment Day

When he says "there are potential side effects", he's doing a 180 turn-around on what he and his administration told Canadians during the vaccine mandates. Hopefully there will be a class action lawsuit against the federal and provincial governments and their politically appointed "Top Doctors". Just let me know where to sign on.

No. I'm decrying the media CREATING perceptions. And I'm not using stats because my argument isn't "Black people create crime disproportionately as compared to White people" but that the media focuses inordinately on white v black racism or violence while mostly ignoring black v white racism and violence (or black v asian racism and violence for that matter). In the same way as they focus obsessively on pro-trans messaging. The only (for want of a better term) anti-trans people you'll ever see in the mainstream media are cranks and portrayed as such. I would say that of course there is racism. And in Canada there's a ton of it coming from newcomers who grew up in cultures where racism flourished (and continues to flourish) without any societal criticism. THAT racism is almost never mentioned by the media. We're told to obsess over minor instance of subjective racism, or supposed racism, or even subconscious racism - by white people. The presumption is this is a great and terrible and daunting threat to all non-whites when it really isn't. Out and out racism by whites in Canada is rarely much of an issue for non-whites. And for every black guy not hired by a white person because of their skin there's probably fifty black guys hired specifically due to their skin by corporations and government agencies. No, we should be relying on common sense. The idea that someone can just make a self-declaration that they are now a member of another gender and we're to accept that is lunacy. Especially when they're kids. Everyone knows there's no common sense to the idea of letting male-bodied individuals compete with women in sporting events either. I didn't so much defend him as point out the absurdity of a situation where a teenage boy who doesn't like the idea of other teenage boys intruding into girls' bathrooms and locker rooms should be suspended by a Catholic high school. The suspension itself was ridiculous. The arrest was just the topping on the pie. The idea that stating your view on such things is so problematic that it makes trans people feel unsafe is dumb. And the belief their feeling of being unsafe, however unrealistic it is, simply because some guy doesn't think they're really girls trumps his right to an education is nonsensical. It's high farce. He can't be at school because some trans kid doesn't like that he disbelieves his fantasy and so feels 'unsafe'? Ridiculous!

the Supremacy of God & the rule of law under a Parliament of Westminster the modern liberal British state itself founded by William III incorporating Canada by force of arms Treaty of Paris 1763 the birth of the British Empire the foundation of all Canadian constitutional law

The UN has just released a major policy proposal to legalize hard drugs, prostitution, pimping, and pedophilia. What good can come of a society of legal human trafficking, the proliferation of opioids, exploitation of children, and unsafe cities? Why is this happening?

Why doesn’t the church pay their own such expenses? There should be a very clear separation of church and state.

I wonder how King Charles and King Trudeau will get on.

For this forum, it seems to be a radical opinion to believe experts over conspiracy theorists.

Messiah Complex? Why are you so intolerant, unaccepting, condescending and condemning of other folks beliefs?

That's the left of center position. The Right doesn't want ANY gun control. They don't even want red flag laws. Leftists are gun nuts too, but even we want red flag laws and the closing of loopholes.

No King = No Freedom You heard it first here on re:Politics, folks.

'My God's tougher than your God' . . . . as blackbird implies. A sad, rigid, blind blackbird.

Try to dispute any of those points. Pick any topic, you'll find that most Americans are left-of-center on it. Conservatives hate this, because their whole narrative is that they're the "real Americans" battling a minority that's trying to change the country. The truth is, conservatives are the minority. That's why they can't win a presidential election with the popular vote. That's why they need to gerrymander to win local elections.

It's odd that you care about semantics more than Obama's support of bigotry. Liberal/leftist, cancer/malignant tumour, they're the same.

A fresh look at Trudeau lying through his teeth. The question is, why? Is the pressure mounting? I sure hope so…

Yes. You're one of the clearest examples possible. Tell us more about what the Bible says...please. ?

Public opinion - so what about a jury? Like the one that decided against Alex Jones? As for judges, of course they'd care. It's silly to say they wouldn't. They're big on common sense, and if it smells like a turd it's probably a turd, and firing the guy makes it smell worse. He was also the one who's texts were made public and embarrassed the network by making it clear they were bullshitting everyone - subsequently offering Dominion the slam-dunk. Of course the die-hard Trumpies will do the mental gymnastics necessary to somehow cope and rationalize with this, but the reality is that Fox News' most popular host was caught red-handed telling everyone stuff he not only knew wasn't true, but sickened him. Whatever tiny shred of credibility Tucker Carlson had among serious and even semi-intelligent adults is gone now, and having him remain as your headliner just embarrasses the network further. There's no doubt Fox News ratings will tank, in my mind. Folks weren't tuning in to Carlson for news anyways. They were just dumb apes watching him make the ape noises they liked, so if he goes somewhere else, many will undoubtedly follow him.

1. Bureaucrats are hiding behind their paper-based timeframes of the past. 2. Speed up. Be accountable. Serve.

I can only ascribe it to denial and cognitive dissonance. It doesn’t agree with the cushy affirmations of moral superiority doled out by the CBC-CTV-CNN government echo chamber. The policy paper is real and won’t get noticed by the mainstream until it’s normalized. This has happened with “trans rights” and the legalization or quasi-legalization of hard drugs and theft in cities like Vancouver, San Francisco, and Chicago.

Sort of. He's got his head stuck in the sand.

No, it was less by far, only about 1.3 billion - and harper got shares from the automaker to offset that which were sold later. Ontario put in more money because of course that's where the cars are built. But even together it was only like 4 billion. I think the oil and gas industries would be a better example, if we're going to call a tax break a 'subsidy' then they ceratinly get more than 13 billion. but - that's an entire industry employing literally hundreds of thousands of people and producing massive tax revenues in subsidies for the provinces that have oil. But in fairness that was actual money. MOST of this is basically a tax break, with about 1 billion in actual money being given to the auto maker if i understand the details, 700 million for the plant and then some extra expenditures here and there. So - in terms of cash dollars being handed out it's comparable. But as i noted harper got shares in the companies to offset that, while justin will be giving up 12 billion or so in tax revenues. Now you could argue that if you didn't give the tax break they woudlnt' come at all and you'd lose 100 percent of the tax revenues and that's not untrue. it's not like we're actually handing over THAT part of it. this doesn't sound like a great deal on the face ot it - it feels like we could have negotiated something better. 12 billion in tax breaks and a billion in cash is a HELL of a lot for one lousy factory. But it would take a deep dive to really work that out. I think dividing the total tax break over time into the number of workers is kind of silly to be honest. And even if it's not a great deal, it's probably a net benefit.

Carlson was caught red handed privately admitting he doesn’t believe the lies he tells you people on the air and that Republican liars like Sydney Powell are “insane. And yet you still insist on worshipping him. He is the worm in the light and still you can’t help but worship him and still believe in the lies that he’s admitted are lies.

Contrarian it's a crackpot conspiracy video hosted by a couple of children. It's nothing.

You are correct. What kind of defendant would fire a key player DURING legal proceedings, creating an eager witness for the plaintiff? Waiting until after was the only reasonable move.

That is the exact opposite of truth He complained that the news dept wasn’t repeating the stolen election lies that his viewers wanted to hear.

Reverse Transcription Reverse transcription was one of the very major hurdles that the mRNA technology was unable to overcome and why it was never brought to market. Your DNA is in the nucleus of your cells and uses messenger RNA to take that information out into the body of the cell in order to create proteins. It's supposed to be a 1-way trip. Reverse transcription is when that messenger RNA gets pushed back into the nucleus of the cell and gets incorporated into the DNA - the DNA then copies it and it then becomes a genetic issue that is passed down through generations. Viruses are the only known life-forms that can use RNA as their genetic material. To propagate itself, each virus makes a copy of the information in its genetic material to pass onto its ‘daughter’ viruses. Some viruses contain the machinery to make copies of their RNA, but they don’t have a DNA component. The influenza, Hep C and SARS-CoV-2 viruses are in this category. These viruses also deviate from the central dogma only slightly: there is no DNA - but the information flows from the RNA to proteins. However, in 1970, some viruses were found to be the exception to this. Called "retroviruses", these ones could make a DNA copy with their RNA - using an enzyme called reverse transcriptase, in a process called reverse transcription. A virus then mixes this DNA with the DNA of its host, thus becoming part of the host forever. This process violates the central dogma because information FIRST flows from RNA to DNA, and then from the DNA BACK to the RNA, then to proteins. Viruses like HIV and Rous sarcoma belong to this family. This process of reverse transcription was first seen in the SARS-CoV 2 virus in 2020, but with an interesting twist - it uses it's OWN protein to convert and mix the DNA. But the experiments and interpretations in 2020 were not convincing at the time, although they were within the realm of possibility. Suggestions flooded in from scientists around the world, with ways to conduct further experiments in order to extract the correct data (or lack of it). Now - keep in mind that the above information applies to viruses - and the covid virus - themselves. This can happen if you catch the virus naturally. The question for scientists became - does this process of reverse transcription happen when we purposely inject the virus and especially the spike protein into humans? If it happens, is the process mitigated by the injections or made worse? We were assured that this could NOT happen with the injections, however: mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored? - PMC (nih.gov) This shortage of relevant studies is reflected in numerous reviews [4,5,6,9,10,14,15,16,17,18], book chapters on the mRNA vaccines [13,19,20,21,22] and documents of international organizations [23,24,25], which often state that mRNA vaccines do not pose the risk for genome integration but do not cite any references in support of this idea. Occasionally, some citations are embedded, e.g., [15,22,26,27], but unfortunately, they are circular as they point to similar unsupported statements [6,10,21,28,29,30]. This signals that the idea of vaccine mRNA’s resistance to genome integration behaves like a meme that self-replicates in the literature and, therefore, it should not be considered reliable scientific information. Undoubtedly, there is always a possibility that my literature search missed some important work; however, other researchers also notice, although without going into details, the shortage of studies that explicitly deal with the possibility of vaccine mRNA genome integration [13,31,32,33,34]. In the absence of such studies, statements such as “In addition, IVT mRNA-based therapeutics, unlike plasmid DNA and viral vectors, do not integrate into the genome and therefore do not pose the risk of insertional mutagenesis.” [10], “First, safety: as mRNA is a non-infectious, non-integrating platform, there is no potential risk of infection or insertional mutagenesis.” [6] or “mRNA-based vaccines avoid the risk of integration with the host cell genome …” [24,25] obviously go against sound scientific epistemology. Besides the lack of references, the argumentation line for the claim that the genome integration of vaccine mRNA molecules is not possible, or is negligible, is rather limited in the vast majority of papers. Many of them simply state that vaccine mRNA cannot integrate into the host genome without explaining why this is not possible. The next part of that paper describes how this retroposition activity takes places in humans as a result of "unfunctional remnants of evolutionary turnover, termed processed pseudogenes" And that this retroposition activity is actually quite high in both humans and mice. So, humans and mice are uniquely suited to being vulnerable to the reverse transcription process. The paper then goes on to describe the actual mechanisms for how this takes place, but this is established science, so for lay people like us, we can just accept that reverse transcription happens with many viruses, with the SARS-CoV2 virus in particular, and that humans are especially vulnerable to the process. The above paper, from May, 2022, concludes: Whether the current vaccine mRNAs could integrate into the genome, and by which frequency, has to be ultimately demonstrated using experiments. However, it remains puzzling why and how the mRNA vaccinology field neglected the retroposition biology of L1 retroelements and its theoretical links to possible vaccine mRNA retroposition, especially when one considers the volume, visibility and significance of the L1 [44,45,60,83,84,85,117,131] and retroposition research [36,37,38,39,40,41,45,46,49,60,66,68,77,80]. The mRNA vaccinology field started its development more than 30 years ago [11,31] and L1 retroelements in humans have been studied for more than 40 years [205,206] but obviously without any crosstalk between the two fields. This awkward silo effect points to the fact that, on some occasions, the structural drawbacks of contemporary science, despite its amassment, globalization and unprecedented dissemination, are deeper than we are willing to admit. Unfortunately, all of this creates an impression that L1-driven retroposition is a kind of taboo topic in mRNA vaccinology. I conclude that the broadly reiterated statement that mRNA-based therapeutics could not impact genomes is an unfounded assumption of unclear origin. This implies that the current mRNA vaccine evaluations, which lack studies that specifically address genome integration, are insufficient to declare their genome integration safety. We should not forget that mRNAs are information-bearing molecules that can, in principle, encode any information [207]. From this perspective, an mRNA vaccination could be viewed as a sort of “molecular tattooing”. The scary part, besides the fact that they forced everyone to inject something that they have NO IDEA what it's doing to your genetic makeup or that of your future children, is this: It is, therefore, important that the exact nucleotide sequences of mRNA vaccines are disclosed and easily publicly accessible, including product information documents [208,209], to allow for unambiguous and independent tracking of possible vaccine mRNA integration in the somatic and germinative genomes of already vaccinated people and their progeny. Got that????? Pfizer has not released the genomic sequences of the RNA used in the injections, nor the product information SO THAT THIS CAN BE STUDIED!! This process of reverse transcription has been identified in many studies now, as happening with these mRNA injections. The mRNA, coded to produce the toxic spike protein, is being reverse transcribed back into the cell nucleus and now you are genetically programmed to produce spike protein continually. This process of reverse transcription is how the spike is being found now in many organs of the body, but particularly in the liver, ovaries and testes. CIMB | Free Full-Text | Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line (mdpi.com) ^^^ Notice that it is settling in the liver?? ^^^ Now - go back and watch Dr. Jessica Rose's testimony at the NCI Hearings that I posted a few days ago and you'll see why this is BAD. And how it ties into specific adverse reactions we are seeing. SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome - PubMed (nih.gov) Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues - PubMed (nih.gov)

I think that we are forgetting that bud is a company with share holders, that main objective is to make money, and sell some beer... I think in this case it is the consumers that are saying you f*cked up, and if it don't change we will stop buying your beer... and to prove that point the lady in charge of martking has taken a leave of absence, and replaced by a temp, with the Company CEO offering a apology for the company going down that road. Anheuser-Busch CEO offers apology following Bud Light's Dylan Mulvaney backlash (nypost.com) They really don't give a rats ass about the LGBTQ community, or they would have stayed the course, to them making money is what drives them to exist no social fades or spaces... And who can blame them, money makes the world go round... And really it is not buds fault, well they did misread the space, and the consumers were not ready for this direction...And it is not just conservatives that are behind this as someone suggested before , this is Americans of all types, liberal and conservative...

So, I waited until the kerfuffle over this paper died down to post about it: COVID-19 Evidence Alerts from McMaster PLUS | Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Arm, Parallel Clinical Trial of Proxalutamide for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Multiregional, Joint Analysis of the Proxa-Rescue AndroCoV Trial. (plus-mcmaster-ca.translate.goog) And here it is on Pub Med: Final Results of a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Arm, Parallel Clinical Trial of Proxalutamide for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Multiregional, Joint Analysis of the Proxa-Rescue AndroCoV Trial - PubMed (pubmed-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.translate.goog) Dr. Flavio Cadegiani, physician, scientist and lead author of research on proxalutamide to treat COVID-19, found it was very effective in treating covid and greatly lowered mortality - by 80%. He is known as "Brazil's greatest living scientist." The reason I hesitated to post this study was because Dr. Cadegiani was ATTACKED MERCILESSLY by the pro-vax maniac crowd. They did not want and still do not want ANY treatments for covid. Accusations on himself and this study included: that he did not comply with Code of Medical Ethics (ironic, I know) that he deliberately poisoned the placebo arm to inflate deaths that the study was conducted in some place other than where it was purported to have been that he was connected to the Pharma industry (ironic, I know) that he was promoting untrue information that he was, in actuality, a smuggler of the drug (his home & office were raided) Amazingly, it was McMaster University, here in Canada, that confirmed the results and integrity of the study and cleared the good doctor's name. Brazil's greatest living scientist is unanimously acquitted by medical councils (medicospelavidacovid19-com-br.translate.goog) Throughout the "pandemic", I'm astonished (and dismayed) at how utterly DESPERATE the coronamaniacs are suppress treatments. I mean, the Pharma companies did it for money, the governments did it for power and money.....but WHY are ones like Eyeball, Dialamah, Hardner, Contrarian, et al......so desperate to suppress treatments for covid, unless it's an experimental injection, using experimental lipid nanoparticles? It's baffling.

Today: The Receipts:

Oh, thank goodness you're here to share videos of YouTubers talking about a random woman at Target. Is Reason10 off today? You covering his shift? Are there two sides to this issue? Nope. But you'll pretend this reflects some level of debate in the world. Next up: Someone kicking a puppy. Let's debate!

You keep repeating like a mantra - it's the left, it's the left!

Because you support an organization that doesn't accept any responsibility for the information it puts out - an organization that was formed for the purpose of holding other organizations responsible for the information they put out. That's some kind of special hypocrisy.

Not sure where you're going with any of this. You seem to be off your rocker. Your link does say this: I wasn't aware of that.

Another anti Catholic (or is it anti Mexican) post by Blackbeard. The most anti christian christian person on the forum LOL

Definitely sounds like your typical internet forum warrior. A…Freeman filled with fake news ideology. Here's the link to the story. What are the chances he straightens out and is reformed? I imagine they restrict access to the Internet in jail so he might stand a good chance. Let's just hope the prison Chaplain doesn't manage to get into his head, he sounds a tad too impressionable. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/contempt-jail-prince-rupert-1.6819182

Yep. Or that if anyone on trump's team ever talked to a russian, it's "COOOOLLLLUUUUUUUUSSSIION!!!! (Shakes fist vigorously at monitor) the fact is that the fbi report was VERY clear - no evidence at all of collusion.

Some here still believe the Steele dossier was factual,