Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/02/2025 in all areas

  1. Let’s also be clear that Trump NEVER campaigned on short term pain for long term gain. He campaigned on prosperity and golden age FROM DAY ONE The most generous thing you could say about this incompetent fool if you wanted to pretend he actually knows what he’s doing is to say that he pulled a bait-and-switch but I am sure he’s as surprised by the mess he’s created as his followers are.
    4 points
  2. You just here to milk the welfare system, milk Canadian taxpayers? Have you ever contributed to this country that that you refer to as a sh!thole? If there's better places, and places you'd rather be . . . feel free to leave. All your other threats to leave were just so much fetid gas . . .
    2 points
  3. Thanks to the conservatives behaving like Trumpians
    2 points
  4. I'm going back to ignore on this one. Please tell me if he provides a substantive response to my critique of his mathematics
    2 points
  5. While I admit to being flippant, and showing attitude towards you... it was you who stated that you could impose your will on First Nations peoples because they're "only" five percent of the population. So I showed you a little paradox in your thinking, admittedly with some derogatory wit. And now you're getting all haughty. Oh well...
    2 points
  6. I'm sorry that my math vexes you. Try not to be a grumpy bear, though, now that you proper realize your minority status in all of our minds. Let's just live with it and listen to each other hm ?
    2 points
  7. To be fair the integrity and independence of MP's disappeared long before Poilievre. That's been a long trend that accelerated under Harper and got much worse under Trudeau. Poilievre barred more than a few reasonable centrist MPs from running for the Conservatives, and stacked the party with loyal sycophants instead.
    2 points
  8. I read it but you don't seem to understand what I said. Your insults are worthless garbage.
    2 points
  9. Alberta is 11% of Canada's population. So I guess that means you'll finally do what you're told and pipe down when Canada tells you to behave ? What are your thoughts on this ponderous question ?
    2 points
  10. For four years we watched Brandon exhibit a complete lack of cognition. The Democrats lied about it, the MSM lied about it and you Libbies lied about it. But we all knew you were lying. So once it was unavoidable, the Democrats handed their presidential nomination to this twit...without even one vote cast for her. Now...please understand that these are only 2 of many...many reasons why most people are willing to ignore Libbie accusations of Trump's indiscretions. You've lost all trust. Nobody but the most committed TDS afflicted, are willing to believe a word any of you say. Now you know. You dumb sh1ts actually destroyed your own credibility... AND YOU LOST! So now the question becomes... Why are Libbies so stupid? And I'll even give you a hint. Pure hatred is evil and cannot be disguised.
    2 points
  11. It was an accident! He tripped in his foot just kind of slipped out of his mouth for a second....
    2 points
  12. Bullshit. As has ALREADY been explained to you all the economic indicators were going UP before Trump took office. Trump took credit dor that and claimed it’s because the markets new he was going to eventually become president. He claimed his golden age had already started before he was sworn in. It’s absolutely hilarious to now say that somehow that the downturn AFTER Trump took office is from tue guy who is no longer in office. Stock markets don’t crash because of things that happened in the past you simpleton. How deluded do you have to he to think that blowing up the global economic system has nothing to do either the US economy shrinking? Seriously stop being such a brainwashed dumbass. Answer this: What’s it going to take for you to see the light? How bad does it have to get and how long does it have to last?
    2 points
  13. You are right monsieur. I mistook you for sharkman.
    1 point
  14. Because I didn't? 🤣 I'm not making any assumptions about it at all. That's you. Carney's advice could have been good, or it could have been bad. He could have offered a lot, or he could have offered very little. Justin could have listened, or Justin could have ignored him. You're the only one trying to spin a story here, insisting people make the same giant leap in logic that you did, which as always is the one best supports your bias! I was too generous in my assumptions for you. Let's look at the buffet of conspiracy theories you offered within this literary masterpiece: Inside you’ll discover: The truth behind ESG investing, carbon markets, and the financialization of climate change His connections to BlackRock, the World Economic Forum, and the architects of the “Great Reset” Oh yes, please! I need to learn more more about the "Great Reset" I'll do you a favor and assume this is just another one of those boneheaded and careless citations you lob out there without even reading what it's about. The alternative makes you look much worse.
    1 point
  15. I am glad you are conceding . Your ministry of propaganda fails to mention is was sparklesocks that got you the pipeline. Omission by error or propaganda? LOL Manitoba and Saskatchewan are not harping or whining. They have already stated they are going to work with the Feds. Good to see you finally have realized and accepted you are nothing without the Feds.
    1 point
  16. You are a troll. You know the only purpose of trolls is to provoke and cause trouble.
    1 point
  17. So the majority can overrule indigenous people, but the majority in Canada can’t overrule Alberta? Sounds like you have a hypocrisy problem.
    1 point
  18. Damn rights, Capt. America!
    1 point
  19. The conservatives are spinning. They cannot believe and are unwilling to accept their dilemma. They will deflect as much as they can to hide their shame. All we can do is remind them of the failure of the party and leader.
    1 point
  20. Sure. Where did I ever disagree with that? The question is what advice was given and what advice was taken? You don't actually know and neither do I, but you believe with absolute certainty in the answer that best serves your bias, as usual. What am I pulling out of my ass? Did you read the book or not? Of course you didn't. That begs the question, why are you telling people they should read something when you haven't read it yourself? It's just another example of you being absolutely certain of something that you don't actually know anything about. I'll tell you what though: I'll read his book when you do, and then we can compare notes. Sound good? 🙃
    1 point
  21. No, I haven't said that ever, anywhere. Now you're being dishonest, and I think deliberately too! You really don't see how dumb it is to suggest people read a book that you yourself never read? It's kind of like citing an article and ranting about it without even reading it...but you'd never do that would you? 🙄
    1 point
  22. You must "know" as you continue to state Carney had NO effect on justins policies or thought processes.... I just assuming that if you hire a advisor your listen to that advice and incorporate it into your decisions....that would require common sense which justin did not have and it seems you do not either....if you don't listen to him or take his advice carney gets a free meal ticket for doing nothing that's what you're implying .... It would be common sense to assume carney had a role to play, in Justins decisions...but since we're talking about the new liberal king, your nose blind to anything slanderous about him....he was on Justins team....the same team that screwed up the nation , now your saying for the 4 or 5 years Carney was on the team he did nothing , nor did he distance himself from the team....just collected his pay check and did nothing...thats the guy you voted for... Your not going to read the book, your just going to wait for it all to unfold when it happens....because that's not how you roll your already made up your mind,....but somehow don't have any sources to back up your side of this debate, just opinion
    1 point
  23. Integrity of Conservative party is disintegrating in real time. Defeated fairly and squarely in his own "safe" riding he just moves to another one. Supposedly "representatives of the people" quietly acquiesce. There's nothing normal about it. Integrity and independence of Conservative MP is heading down the drain. Another step down toward maga.
    1 point
  24. No. I quoted the Clarity Act on how it could be done legally. 🤪 …an amendment to the Constitution of Canada would be required for any province to secede from Canada, which in turn would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada.
    1 point
  25. You don’t seem to be able to read.
    1 point
  26. Get the formatting right, at least: Useless Fact #1 Useless Fact #2 ===== then you say "We Canadians get along"
    1 point
  27. Bigotry against what? Misinformation, conspiracy theories and culture war bullshit? OKAY! What we saw and what we heard sounded a lot like MAGA, and Canada passed on it. Your useless coping and seething after the fact don't change that. 🙃
    1 point
  28. Welp, stocks are down. I guess we better kill ourselves and everyone around us.... -- The Left
    1 point
  29. Blowing a 25% lead in the polls, increasing Liberal vote share to the highest its been in 45 years, losing the election AND losing his own seat were always part of the endgame. Poilievre has the Liberals right where he wants them....
    1 point
  30. I'm saying that nobody knows what effect Carney had on Justin's policies. All we know is that for the first 5 years of Justin's tenure, he did perfectly fine screwing things up without Carney's input. It's just as likely that Carney stopped Justin from screwing things up even worse as anything else, but the only possibility you'll ever consider is the one that confirms what you've already chosen to believe. Your reality is based on filtering out any information that conflicts with your beliefs. Like you got, from not reading the book you're insisting we need to read? 🙃
    1 point
  31. Nobody thinks it's a coincidence you're talking about separating at the exact same time Trump is trying to get Canada to fall apart? The first thing to accept is you're a gullible traitor. Next is to accept you're a sore loser who throws childlike tantrums when he doesn't get his way
    1 point
  32. to deport... ILLEGAL immigrants. Don't worry, still full speed ahead on arresting, detaining, and deporting them under existing Immigration law.
    1 point
  33. I have a fair bit of experience with this topic. The collection, transportation and reprocessing infrastructure isn't there and if it was possible to be significantly successful (and it is not) the costs would be many times that of the original product. The big deal is we would still HAVE the damned plastics - and whenever and wherever they exist, they deliver a wide range of "forever chemicals" into not just our environment but our own bodies. The only solution is to stop using them completely. Fortunately, the technology exists and is well proven to make replacement resins that can and SHOULD be disposed of by directly passing into soils as they can be a tremendous soil nutrient - able to repair some of the damage we have done to our soils. It would require effectively washing of content remainents that are toxiins on their own - and this can most effectively be done by placing the full life cycle costs and responsibilities on the original packager. This can be very effectively done by a deposit/return mechanism to get the container back to its source by "flowing backwards" through the distribution system. The latter has been done with incredible success in some jurisdictions with aluminum drink cans and others with lubricating oil, containers and filters. The one that is widespread in visibility but seldom achieving stated goals is used tires. The market for ground rubber compressed into floor mats and curb stops is saturated - but new tech is around that can take it back to the OEM as re-useable feedstock.
    1 point
  34. With Trudeau Jnr, we Canadians got along - until his wife left him.
    1 point
  35. You and @blackbird need to go back to grade 10 Social Studies class. I can’t even believe Canadians could be this ignorant! Where did you get the idea that the Constitution allows for secession??? https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-31.8/section-3.html?txthl=terms#:~:text=3 (1) It is recognized,would require negotiations involving at 3 (1) It is recognized that there is no right under the Constitution of Canada to effect the secession of a province from Canada unilaterally and that, therefore, an amendment to the Constitution of Canada would be required for any province to secede from Canada, which in turn would require negotiations involving at least the governments of all of the provinces and the Government of Canada.
    1 point
  36. I've read far more than you. For example, B.C. was British colony before it joined Canada. If Quebec has the right to separate so does every other province.
    1 point
  37. I doubt First Nations will cede much of what's left of other half either. Someone isn't thinking this through.
    1 point
  38. Or, better yet, move back to the third world sh!thole you came from . . .
    1 point
  39. The letter itself makes perfect sense. The best way to get the country back on track is to .... support free enterprise eliminate barriers restore fiscal discipline reform the tax system develop natural resources It also doesn't take a genius to implement these things, only the will and desire to do so. As they say.... 'government is not the answer, but the facilitator'. With the Liberals track record, they logically would support the Conservatives. When governments stop being facilitators and try to micromanage things they usually screw up. Living standards are dependent upon how well an economy functions, and an economy is dependent upon energy and lots of it. If Carny wants to cut fossil fuels... then that baseload energy has to be replaced by something equivalent. And by the time 2050 rolls around were going to require massive amounts of it according to government sources. It's going to be interesting to see how Carney deals with these conflicting realities.
    1 point
  40. If you are correct, then it must be only conservatives who have kids.
    1 point
  41. According to the GDP report, the shrink was due to two major changes: prepurchasing imports to bypass tariffs and lower government spending. The lower government spending will stick around, but the imports count against GDP and are a temporary influx. Importers bought more than normal to save money on tariffs. Therefore, they will buy less and that will positively effect the economy. Also, exports and investments were stronger than expected which shows the private sector economy is strengthening and not weakening. Oh...and jobs have been growing. As the left was absolutely adimit about before, a recession must have a loss of jobs.
    1 point
  42. Nope, just hitting you on the head with the reality hammer LOL Ya gonna mope and whine and cry for ht e next 4 to 5 years??
    1 point
  43. Sorry but even criminals deserve their day in court. Also, stay classy you tantrum- throwing toddler.
    1 point
  44. Of an autistic child. Gimme a cookie sis or I'll smash your doll. No? I'll smash two of your dolls... Don't look at what's happening at your airports. You'd have to lie and claim traffic's plunged because less immigrants are coming.
    1 point
  45. Terms? He's about to have only Europe to finance and arm his lost cause. Do you really think Europe is going to save them? How many more dead before people wake up? Even the Ukrainians want this to end. But tell ya what. In the spirit of compromise...you go fight...or you help finance them. But I have no skin in this farce and want none of my tax funds tossed away for this...abject failure.
    1 point
  46. And who is The Green T-Shirt to decide anything? He's already lost. He has very limited troops...very limited funds...very limited arms...and the Ukrainian people are out of patience. What? Should Putin just level Kiev and end it by force? What good would that do? Answer...NONE. The hatred between the 2 groups would just fester and within a few years...they'll be back at each other's throats. To propose that Russia should just pack up and leave now is...well its down right juvenile. IMO...if The Green T-Shirt wants to go on with this charade...let him do so without our financing.
    1 point
  47. 1 point
  48. You can't reason with these fools, they obviously think we need more plastic crap going into the environment.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...