Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 02/08/2024 in all areas
-
"Why do so many of your critics have issues with falling out of windows or getting radiation poisoning?"3 points
-
Couldn't you just smell the liar? How many countries has the U.S. invaded, without any just cause, unilaterally and in a blatant violation of international law, to subjugate and/or annex? The three Baltic states Finland Poland Romania Czech Republic Hungary Afghanistan Lithuania (after declaring independence) Moldova Georgia Chechnya (after declaring independence) Georgia again (2008) Ukraine (2014-2022) Ukraine again (2022 - ) Are you counting, still? Is this USA? Check your glasses. There's a cause! Ai-ai so threatened! Pathetic, worthless excuses of a brutal, murderous psycho bent on capturing, controlling and complete subjugation of his victims. This is who and what you're trying to excuse and explain: nothing less.3 points
-
If he doesn’t win, he will be in jail for quite some time. If he wins, there will be a new constitutional crisis when he fires the guy prosecuting him and then pardons himself. Whether he wins or not is still 50/50, imo.3 points
-
The vote to impeach Yanukovych was unanimous. Because his Berkut killed 100s of peaceful protestors in Maidan. Duh. And also cause he reneged on his promise to sign a trade deal with the West and signed one with Putin instead after being BRIBED. I can tell you right now, Putin will LIE his ass off and Carlson won't call him on it. Which is why Putin is talking to Carlson. 🤮3 points
-
Because that is not legal, and The Dumb-Dumb Party, at Trump’s insistence just blocked legislation that they wrote which would do that. They also blocked additional border protection funding. You are complaining about a Republican-Party created “crisis” being used as an election plank. I am against illegal immigration and even excessive refugee immigration. But the government must use legal means to stop it, not dictatorship. Personally, I think the law should let law enforcement or a court ask for proof of legal residency in the U.S., and if you cannot reasonably prove you belong here (not on the spot); you should be put on a bus. I have no problem with that, but it must be legal.3 points
-
A syllogism: Premise 1: Actual journalists are arrested in Russia. Premise 2: Tucker can move about freely in Russia. Conclusion: Therefor, Tucker is not an actual journalist.3 points
-
its an age old gag for "conservatism" in the US... that "conservatives" aren't conservative at all. they are just another vehicle for the richest of the population to get richer and a lot of it directly from tax payers. the gag goes like this... get people all riled up about some imaginary enemy ("social conservatism")... gays, "wokeness", immigrants, abortion. the issue doesn't really matter, it used to be something else, the actual issue can be switched on a dime. this works mostly with uneducated rural types. just keep repeating that they are in danger and they will believe it. now the center of the GOP support, the uneducated rural types are already pissed that they've missed the "american dream" economically because GOP policies mean they've been getting more poor for 40 years. they need someone to blame. get them to blame gays and immigrants! studies show that people who suffer more from black and white thinking lean "conservative". and so these people are targeted by the business status quo. Political Ideology and Black-and-White Thinking and then have a god like cult figure like Trump to push these people over the edge. a cult like figure that will attack the faceless evil. save the country from "wokeness". while only making them more and more... poor! Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (no Jobs there!) "under the Act individuals and pass-through entities like partnerships and S corporations would receive about $1.125 trillion in net benefits (i.e. net tax cuts offset by reduced healthcare subsidies) over 10 years, while corporations would receive around $320 billion in benefits. The CBO estimated that implementing the Act would add an estimated $2.289 trillion to the national debt over ten years" "Bloomberg News reported in January 2020 that the top six American banks saved more than $32 billion in taxes during the two years after enactment of the tax cut, while they reduced lending, cut jobs and increased distributions to shareholders." meanwhile, Democrats continue as always to support unions and working people. no one can point to ANY policy evidence that the GOP support working people. they only support business and promise "economic trickle down" except that that hasn't been working for 40 years. as a business owner here in Canada... Trudeau has not made it easy for me. because i control the corporation from which i make money, my effective tax rate went up from 8% to 11%. poor working stiffs have to pay a minimum of 17%! but i'm aware that the happiest societies are those where the wealth gap is smallest. Income Inequality Makes Whole Countries Less Happy and with that wealth inequality destroys democracies... because it leads to concentration of power.2 points
-
Supporting an allies' defense against an imperialist aggressor is not "advocating for war" it's understanding that there's already a war on and we need to pick a side.2 points
-
Of course he won't. He stayed at home for 2 years for a flu-like disease, and then pretends to be a courageous warrior since Feb 2022. Coward. I never advocated for a war. You are the one advocating for it. You are the one to go to the front line, mr Chicken Hawk.2 points
-
You're so brave. Asking 18 years old of a foreign country to fight for your ideals and Joe Biden's ideals, with taxpayers' money. I really wish you go there.2 points
-
No, I'd rather send fighter jets, missiles and long-range bombers to Ukraine. Fu ck Putin and especially the cowards who prescribe submitting to him.2 points
-
The admission by the Left that they would not talk to a World Leader capable of starting a major nuclear war is an admission of their warmongering. No one on the Left dares to bat an eye when journalists and politicians talk to Xi Jinping, despite him literally making concentration camps and being THE rival of the US. Russia bad. China good. This is preposterous. This foreign policy is extremely unproductive, as China will not be on our side towards Russia and vice versa. The Nazis allied themselves with their mortal enemies; the Communists, before WWII. Here we have the Russians and the Chinese who are allying themselves, because like the Nazi and the Communist Regimes, the West made it convenient for them to ally. Russia and China are supposed to be rivals. They have territorial conflicts. Now they are united, and we must thank Antony Blinken, Barak Obama, Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden for that mess.2 points
-
Again, I don't see anyone saying he can't or shouldn't interview Putin. But if you're expecting anything orher than a different kind of fawning softball affair, you're ripe for a let down.2 points
-
I'm not sure we've had someone this dumb to play with since americana antifa ran home crying2 points
-
I listened to the opening arguments live, and they are night and day different in terms of clarity and efficacy, but I am deeply skeptical that this court is going make the plain judgment. They will 100% weasel out of it because it's a political hot potato and it's a highly political court.2 points
-
I'll be watching too. I have always liked Carlson...even when he was on CNN...and I want to know what Putin thinks. That's called "knowledge" and the accumulation there of. But check out the 2 Tweenkies here. They have no desire to hear anything that might contradict their firm belief that war is good...as long as its not them getting shot. I do hope Tucker asks Putin some uncomfortable questions...which I'm sure he will. The interview should shed some light on the blackout Comic-Boy's state media is feeding these lackeys.2 points
-
Will Tucker ask Putin anything useful at all, such as: 1) Why have you refused interviews with all the other American journalists who requested them? 2) Why are all of your political opponents in jail? 3) Why have you jailed so many Russian journalists? 4) Why are Russians jailed for opposing the Ukraine War?2 points
-
Tucker went form the most watched man on cable to a nobody posting on Twitter to a few thousand views practically overnight and now he's allowing himself to be used as a human megaphone by a vile despot in a desperate bid for relevance. You almost hate to see it.2 points
-
The US certainly exercises force, but I'm not sure you know what the word "aggressive" means. The US is active in world affairs. In the last 50 years it has often often played the role of peace maker or peace keeper or otherwise intervened in conflicts, often as part of a coalition. It has taken defensive action. It has taken retributive action. But it is not wantonly invading other countries. It is not conquering. It is not expanding. In short, it is involved in many conflicts, but it is not, as an aggressor, starting conflicts. The one very notable exception to this is W's invasion of Iraq. He definitely started that war--and without reasonable justification. It was entirely elective and is a huge black eye on the legitimacy of the US as force in the world for stability, freedom and peace. This doesn't mean that the military itself is perfect, or that I personally agree with all of the actions, objectives and aims of every intervention. But the US is not, generally, aggressive. And we certainly aren't trying to gobble up our weaker neighbors and steal their resources. You're welcome.2 points
-
I know of a teacher who has a student, Edwina, who is dressing very boyish like. Has asked everyone at school to call them 'Eddy'. The parents are thought to not be ok with this. The teachers are following the student's wishes.2 points
-
keep calm & carry on British is not a race British is not a place British is the Glorious Revolution to found the modern liberal state British North American Loyalists, Guardians of Confederation after every dark age, there comes a renaissance thus we have a duty to keep the torch lit and hold it high for some future generation we will never meet bydand2 points
-
Typical Tory knee jerk idea. 4 ways to punish car thieves more is not a plan to reduce car thefts. Just a simple gut reaction to appease the simple minded.2 points
-
2 points
-
does it matter? what about all the other points i make? YOU GOT NOTHING except your illogical belief systems. and thats the rub, isn't it... that you believe that you are logical, when you are not.2 points
-
Good thing, if he had won, Biden could have him shot.2 points
-
I'm pretty sure FOX News has been infiltrated by Russian government influence and i've thought that for years.2 points
-
Tucker makes a lot of great points in this video. The CENSOR EVERY MESSAGE WE DON'T APPROVE OF/ignorance is bliss crowd won't like it, but nothing of importance is directed at them. They can entertain themselves with CNN/MSNBC drivel while the rest of the world is watching Tucker. Like Tucker says, you don't have to agree with anything that Putin says, but it still makes sense to hear what he's saying because he's also saying it to Xi, KJU, and the leaders of several other countries. This is, at the very least, a window into what the rest of the world - the the gang that we're not on the best of terms with - is saying about us. I actually signed up to be notified when the interview is released, and I could literally feel my social credit score drop when I hit send 🤣 . Couldn't care less. I hate my current gov't as much as I hate cancer.1 point
-
A federal appeals court has unanimously ruled that Donald Trump can be put on trial for trying to stay in power after losing the 2020 election, rejecting Trump’s sweeping claim of presidential immunity and moving the case one step closer to a jury. “For the purpose of this criminal case, former President Trump has become citizen Trump, with all of the defenses of any other criminal defendant. But any executive immunity that may have protected him while he served as President no longer protects him against this prosecution,” the panel of three judges wrote. “The interest in criminal accountability, held by both the public and the Executive Branch, outweighs the potential risks of chilling Presidential action and permitting vexatious litigation.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2024/02/06/trump-jan-6-immunity-appeal-denied/1 point
-
Sure why don't you dm me a picture of your supposedly banging wife I can crank it to and we can both walk away satisfied.1 point
-
I agree. And I think there's a special place there for those who would interfere and force people to suffer.1 point
-
Everyone does. "WAAAAAAAAAHHHHH I GOT CALLED OUT FOR SOMETHING STUPID AND I"M GOING TO GO ON LIKE A P*SSY ABOUT IT!!!!" Yeah kid - you continue to impress.1 point
-
Pathetic, sad, but true. It appears that none of the Justices will bar him. Guess we don’t really need a Constitution, we just have these nine old people who do whatever the fck they want. I guess this will kick it back to Jack Smith to amend his DC indictment to include the charge of engaging in insurrection, according to Kavanaugh, at least.1 point
-
You literally cropped out the question mark in my original quote to make it look like a statement, did you think I was gonna miss that? What a dishonest piece of shit you are. On the off chance you weren't playing silly buggers, I still have no idea how you would read that and come away thinking "this guy doesn't want teachers to report abuse" Yes but if a kid goes to a teacher and says "I think I'm trans, but I can't tell my parents because my dad will kick the shit out of me" you think the law should require the teacher say "lol too bad, I'm calling the old man right now".1 point
-
So it's ok for a kid to tell a teacher that they're being abused without it getting back to their parents but information that might lead to a kid being abused must be shared with the parents?1 point
-
Systemic racism against Caucasians, males, and straight/cis people etc is legally codified in the Charter of RIghts. A south asian business only hiring south asians is not. I'm a radical who thinks all discrimination is wrong.1 point
-
Nope. Nobody else has managed to do this much to themselves. We're special-stupid. That's what happens when you have a far left gov't like the lib-ndp But i love your defense of "wait - i think OTHER people maybe screwed up as bad as we did???" No, no we screwed up on a pretty individually epic level with the libs and dips at the helm1 point
-
1 point
-
You can’t find mass fraud in even one single frickin’ precinct out of 10,000’s across the country. The proof is in the trial. In a court of law. So far, the indictments prove that probable cause has been established. The trials are for the rest of the facts, and a jury will do the rest.1 point
-
Part of the new policies in Alberta and Saskatchewan concerns names and pronouns. Why is it an issue if a student asks the teacher to address the student using a particular name and pronoun. It is not something that is irreversable. It is a question of a person's personal choice and is nobody else's business. It is something that concerns only the student and the teacher. Does government have the right to take away a person's freedom of choice?1 point
-
Yes, and a lot of things believers ignore. Jesus' ---- What you do to the least of us you do to me --- was one of his good ones. Have you seen the right wingers and how badly they treat the LGBTQ+?1 point
-
1 point
-
I tire of chopping off the heads of wives I become bored with, therefore I shall snap my fingers, create a new barely modified church of which I am the head of. For centuries there will always be fools that quote Biblical references that seem to justify that I am King Shit. Imagine being so unpatriotic you believe your country shouldn't create it's own symbols and must always use someone else's FFS. Lester Pearson face-palming in the grave at the dinosaurs still roaming 60 years later.1 point
-
Great you do that! Plenty of non-monarchies around the world have rights so we must be missing something. The truth is we only have constitutional rights because Pierre Trudeau, who did more to enshrine and guarantee those rights when he championed and spearheaded the constitution. The monarch simply rubber stamped the arrangement struck between Trudeau and the provinces, which the monarchy had no part in forming. The monarchy doesn’t defend squat. It signs whatever the politicians tell it to and it keeps its opinions to itself. Also there’s something hypocritical and absurd about claiming we only have rights because the king lets us have them. If the king can giveth and the king can taketh away our freedoms then they’re not freedoms at all.1 point
-
Changing some imagery and logos/symbols should require constitutional change? I wish that was the silliest thing you've ever said here. ?1 point
