Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/13/2025 in all areas

  1. And yet he got more votes than the likeable O'Toole.
    3 points
  2. charlie angus was one of the most respected mps spewing such lies is bs . as far as gazan lady yea shes not my cup a tea even t hough i consider myself ndp leaning more then lib but each party has some wackos you dont like.
    2 points
  3. I’ve been pondering this question for some time and can only surmise it to a bastardized, godless, aspiration of Christianity. Leftist principles are rooted in the Christian tradition of justice and equality but where they fail is the separation from a higher power, a God. Without the fundament of worship and someone to hold you accountable, it quickly devolves into idolatry. Which is why you get the wacki doodles.
    2 points
  4. I'm not sure what that means. Are you suggesting that no one supports it then? ----------------- In general , and IMO of course, if you have a huge coastline, an inadequate supply of surface combatants, limited shore bombardment capabilities and limited TASMO options all at the same time, then logically (I think) the force multiplier effect of submarines is a topic worthy of sober reflection. Over the years I've watched (mostly in awe) as capabilities got whittled away and the prefix always seemed to be "Canada doesn't need." For me, heavy lift helicopters was the most obvious one to date but I'm now hearing the same sentiments expressed (in some circles) about ASW and fighters in addition to subs. All are perishable capabilities (especially ASW and subs) and you have to envision a world where you will never face a submarine threat and never need to protect airspace in order to make your case. I'd simply observe that water is where your navy operates and airspace is the domain of the rest of your AIR Force. There's an interesting overlap in this stuff too, if you are going to offer TASMO as a reason to limit an NGS capability does it make sense to later say that Canada doesn't need fighters? As it stands, any potential aggressor(even in low-level events like fishery disputes) is forced to consider the presence (or possible presence) of submarine(s) and take the appropriate precautions. It imposes a significantly broader threat assessment on them and requires a lot of baggage to counter (and you can't not counter it)... the Falklands conflict is case in point. You can find reams of information about the value of submarines on line and northern sovereignty should be a consideration for anyone who sees global warming as a threat. I won't belabour this point further but (I think) a navy without submarines (especially a small one like ours that has a huge coast to protect) is like a small army that decides sniper teams are a waste of resources without considering that both are potent force multipliers that provides a level of deterrence and kinetic potential that punches above its weight... I'd also suggest that both are harder to reinit when they're gone than they are to maintain.
    2 points
  5. Do tell my dead sister about it Dr. Shady and every kid sick in bed and isolated for weeks.
    2 points
  6. He’s a pedo. We knew that all along, right? “There have previously been some vague insinuations that President Donald Trump is a pedophile and a sex criminal, like when several people credibly accused him of being a sex criminal, and when he was caught on tape saying, ‘I, Donald Trump, am a sex criminal,’” a CNN analyst said. “But this is the most intriguing evidence yet that the President might have possibly engaged in some behaviour that certain voters might consider dubious.” https://www.thebeaverton.com/2025/11/trump-is-a-pedophile-email-raises-questions-about-whether-trump-is-a-pedophile/
    1 point
  7. Trump COVER UP of DARK PAST BACKFIRES…GOP PANICS!! Epstein files worse than anyone thought
    1 point
  8. Oh Oh...Eric's next. https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5604660-swalwell-trump-lawsuit-critic/ Ol' Eric's-a-gonna whine and squeal like a stuck pig. Hell if he has to, he'll even rat out some other politicians involved in this sort of crap. Yes-siree Bob. This story is gonna be fun to watch.
    1 point
  9. Oh Jeez, let's make that a priority! We can have a recession by tomorrow morning! Can't wait for one, can you?
    1 point
  10. No I put you on IGNORE because your posts are so STUPID, and WORTHLESS as I told you in the PM. The coward emerges from hiding long enough to confirm he is a still a coward.
    1 point
  11. Thanks for demonstrating how far out of touch from reality you are.
    1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. No, because the results are supported by public information and science. If you claim that investments in wars will benefit Canadians, then prove it—by any means you can. How exactly would Canadians profit? By selling bombs to Sudan or other criminals around the world to make those investments pay off? What you are saying on this forum is nothing more than disinformation, funded by the CIA, the American government, or similar criminal organizations.
    1 point
  14. And the fact that they talked at some length at Epstein's place isn't terribly surprising to me. He knew her because she worked for him briefly and the only reason he even hired her was because she was the daughter of the maintenance man he employed at Mar a Lago. At first I thought dumping all of the information into the public domain was a bad idea because it tended to tarnish far too many innocent people and victims alike, placing all of them under a spotlight in the public domain that they didn't deserve to wither under. I was prepared to trust the DOJ (of any administration) to investigate and bring charges where appropriate as opposed to tarring and feathering all and sundry. I didn't anticipate the level of the self serving cherry picking that would take place though and I've had a change of heart because of it. I now say dump it all, let the chips scatter as they will and let the great axe fall where the offence lays. Democrats may find themselves suddenly defanged and more on the defensive about "their guy(s)" than they anticipated. So... up to now I considered the contents to be a criminal matter as opposed to a political one and thought it reasonable to protect the innocent from scrutiny and abuse. I now think Robo deserves to wear the consequences of the very data dump he longs for and in response to his selective snippets of self serving appetizers served out of context I'm now in favour of stuffing the entire menu up his left nostril and passing out Gravol to anyone inclined to vomit.
    1 point
  15. @robosmith Tweenkie-Poo...Virginia Giuffre has testified that Trump was never involved. So the best you whiney little biatches can say is that it "appears" that Trump knew about Epstein's fixation on young girls, but said nothing. Too bad, so sad. You've struck out yet again.
    1 point
  16. Yes, you've done that at least a couple million times around here now...
    1 point
  17. No, it isn't But it's very liberal of you to lie about it Liberal supporters like him will go to any extreme To defend the undefensible actions of their liberal leaders. This is one of the biggest problems with Canada. People like eyeball have no loyalty to Canada, or their fellow man, or anybody other than their beloved party and their echo chamber talking points
    1 point
  18. But that's not what you posted. You posted about the senate Did you forget what you posted already? Jesus dude we haven't even got to the end of a page
    1 point
  19. Like I said people who say something can't be done, especially a million times, to people that are in fact doing it are daft. Meanwhile... Concerns over running out of battery power during trips is among the major deterrents for buyers. But battery ranges have significantly expanded, with EVs tested in cold weather boasting an average driving range of 300 kilometres on a single charge. That’s sufficient to meet the weekly work commute for 90% of Canadians. https://www.rbc.com/en/thought-leadership/climate-action-institute/canadian-ev-adoption-bracing-for-impact/
    1 point
  20. Right. Because European counties don’t? 😂 Regardless, regulations are subjective, some are good, some aren’t. I don’t know what you mean by valuing institutions, and how that has anything to do with investment in Canada. Keep making excuses for terrible policy though. That’s made Canada and Canadians less prosperous.
    1 point
  21. And this is because we value things like regulations that protect the environment and institutions that reflect our values? Good.
    1 point
  22. It’s a good sign, though. There is some sanity in the Republican Party after all.
    1 point
  23. An outbreak at my high school resulted in ZERO deaths. ZERO seriously ill. Nobody dies from measles unless there are serious other health issues involved. But why wasn’t your sister vaccinated?
    1 point
  24. There you go again talking about your miserable self and life again. CdnFox and me have already shown you out to be one of the biggest troll LOSERS here. The only troll here is a loser troll like you who does not know when to quit. You just keep coming back for more and more insults LOSER. Well, at least you have finally admitted to us all and that you are just a troll here, LOSER. You are such a stunned troll LOSER. LOLOLOL. H He's back. 👎
    1 point
  25. You didn’t need to trot out lies to criticize what Angus was doing, but that’s what you did saying he is for jailing people who are pro oil industry. I liked the bill. It would’ve ended oil industry propaganda, just like there is a bill that prohibits tobacco companies from advertising their products. Are you pro tobacco advertising and propaganda?
    1 point
  26. We know you're paid to sugarcoat the rot.
    1 point
  27. Have you ever lived in Europe? Not everybody considers support for child care an awful imposition in their lives. If we want more children we have to make bringing them up less expensive.
    1 point
  28. There's definitely something wrong with the left wing thought process.
    1 point
  29. Just wanted to add that Canada was a pioneer in gas turbine propulsion for frigates and destroyers going back to the late 1960's. The Iroquois Class was very innovative in this regard and many other nations jumped onboard this trend. So Canada has led the way in the past.
    1 point
  30. To be clear: Various US governments are borrowing faster than the US economy is growing, faster than these governments can tax. A Ponzi scheme. We Canadians are similar - but our governments started from a better position.
    1 point
  31. But they were and you didn't actually refute it. I pointed out exactly what the difference was.
    1 point
  32. IF you believe that you are even stupider than Trump. That he cab even say out loud that Canadian goods are a security risk to the USA is almost as off the wall as the dupes that believe such shit. Ya better stop buying hydro from us and it will get so much cheaper,eh? You can fool some of the people all of the time.......
    1 point
  33. Nope. The reaction that we're seeing from people like Michael hardner is fairly unique to the left these days. And not just unique but pervasive. The CPC has always been very reluctant to accept fluorocrossers unless there is a very good reason such as the case of Emerson. The NDP simply won't, demanding that the person run before they be allowed into caucus. But this guy at least owed a public apology to the people he trashed and to see people like Mike hardener dancing on this lady's aunt's grave in Glee is a bit much.
    1 point
  34. Disagree. Strongly. PBO? Canadian governments are not Ponzi schemes. No government in Canada borrows faster than it spends. Canadian governments are sustainable. ===== The US federal government is not sustainable. It borrows faster than Americans can generate wealth.
    1 point
  35. Yeah. Say what you like about the guy, nobody can dispute that Justin was transformative It just wasn't the kind of transformation we wanted to see. The real blow in my books is how people treat each other. There is a shocking reduction in patients that people have for each other. He played a huge role in teaching people to see those who disagree as enemies who must be crushed, rather than neighbours who you need to work stuff out with.
    1 point
  36. good man nova scotia cons usually are pc cons he must of got sick of the alt right populust bs millhouse spills daily.
    1 point
  37. Convince yourself of that. That people will "flee" like from Godzilla over who's Mayor for a couple years.
    1 point
  38. The Liberals taught Canadians to hate each other. They taught First Nations people and coloured people to hate white people and they taught the pseudovaxed to hate the unjabbed. The narrative surrounding the residential schools was vile, completely lacking in historical context, and completely false from top to bottom. You could never lie about muslims or blacks like that, even telling the truth about them is seen as racist, but there was an entirely slanderous and evil narrative created about catholics and Canadians that can never be set right. The narrative about covid and the jabs was 100% known to be false right from the beginning, and divided Canadians to an extent that I never would have believed possible. It's at the point now where poppies can't even be worn in NS courtrooms, but no doubt the universal symbol for misogyny and religious bigotry can be. F- NS. That whole province can go to hell now. Those people aren't my friends or countrymen anymore.
    0 points
  39. So you have two leaders. One say that Canada's economy is in the dumper because of bad government laws and regulations, and that the government is overspending and mispending. Almost all his complaints are about that. Then you have the guy who says Canada is a genocidal non-nation on stolen land that is racist to the core, and every single institution is systemically racist. And you hate the first guy because he's too negative and vote for the second guy. 🙄
    0 points
  40. I am honest. I don't believe in the man-made climate change scam. There is no viable replacement for fossil fuels. You still don't understand the real world.
    0 points
  41. Well a kid is a young goat, so it does fit. Blood spot here-------->
    0 points
  42. You sure are. Always begging for attention we can tell!!! You're such a well balanced individual and all! LOLOL No we're just laughing at you As I said kid, you're the comic relief
    0 points
  43. Internet troll, all day, every day. What a sad existence. 😢
    0 points
  44. We are not biting on any bait. We are just amazed as to how you got this far in life with so little. But we do enjoy watching you always biting on our hook where we can then continue on with making you appear and make it show that you are but one big gigantic and complete azz hole, LOSER. Bite on that, LOSER. 🤪
    -1 points
  45. And as we've gone over a million times that suits a portion of the country, maybe 25 % of the market? But it's absolutely not any replacement for ice engines for the majority of people and the sales kind of show us. Just not practical. The day will come but that day is not today
    -1 points
×
×
  • Create New...