Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/15/2024 in all areas

  1. When you denounced your parties violent rhetoric. I am pretty sure you have lied over and over again about Trump and compared him to Hitler multiple times.
    3 points
  2. There are many wars where scarcity caused by climate change has be a contributing factor. The actual term is “threat multiplier” meaning it exacerbates existing tensions between groups and makes conflict more likely. Here’s Chat GPT’s short list of such conflicts: 1. The Syrian Civil War (2011–present): A prolonged drought from 2006 to 2010, devastated agricultural production, leading to mass migration from rural areas to cities. This, combined with other political and social factors, increased tensions and contributed to the outbreak of civil war. 2. Darfur Conflict (2003–present): Environmental degradation, including desertification linked to climate change, intensified competition for scarce resources like water and arable land between nomadic herders and farming communities. This heightened tensions, contributing to the violent conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region. 3. Lake Chad Basin Conflict: Climate change has caused the shrinking of Lake Chad, a vital resource for millions in Central Africa. The reduction of water availability has fueled tensions among communities and contributed to the rise of extremist groups like Boko Haram, which exploit grievances related to resource scarcity. 4. Somalia (1991–present) • Climate Factor: Prolonged droughts and desertification. • Impact: Somalia has experienced recurring droughts that have severely affected agriculture, livestock, and water resources. This has worsened food insecurity and intensified conflict between different clans and militant groups, such as Al-Shabaab, as they compete over scarce resources. 5. Yemen Civil War (2014–present) • Climate Factor: Water scarcity and reduced agricultural yields. • Impact: Yemen is one of the most water-scarce countries in the world, and climate change has exacerbated this condition by affecting rainfall patterns and causing prolonged droughts. The resulting resource shortages have intensified pre-existing political and social divisions, contributing to the ongoing civil war. 6. South Sudan (2013–present) • Climate Factor: Flooding, drought, and changing rainfall patterns. • Impact: Climate change has worsened both droughts and flooding in South Sudan, leading to food insecurity, displacement, and competition for resources between communities, particularly pastoralists and farmers. This has fueled ethnic tensions and exacerbated the country’s civil war. 7. Afghanistan (1978–present) • Climate Factor: Drought and reduced agricultural productivity. • Impact: Afghanistan’s ongoing conflict has been worsened by climate change-driven droughts, which have devastated agriculture and increased poverty in rural areas. These factors contribute to social instability, pushing people to join militant groups such as the Taliban in search of livelihoods. 8. Ethiopia-Eritrea Conflict (1998–2000) • Climate Factor: Drought and resource scarcity. • Impact: While the primary causes of the Ethiopia-Eritrea war were political and territorial, climate change-exacerbated droughts in the Horn of Africa region put additional pressure on food supplies and resources, contributing to tensions and conflict. 9. Conflict in the Sahel Region (Ongoing) • Climate Factor: Desertification and shifting weather patterns. • Impact: The Sahel, a region across northern Africa, is highly vulnerable to climate change, experiencing desertification and irregular rainfall. This has led to resource scarcity and competition between farming communities and nomadic herders. These conditions have fueled conflicts across several countries, including Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, and Chad, where extremist groups exploit instability to expand their influence. 10. Rwandan Genocide (1994) • Climate Factor: Land scarcity and agricultural stress. • Impact: While the Rwandan Genocide was primarily driven by ethnic tensions and political factors, the growing pressure on arable land due to population growth and environmental degradation played a role in increasing social tensions between Hutus and Tutsis. Climate change-related stresses on agriculture exacerbated land competition and food insecurity, contributing to the underlying grievances. 11. Pakistan-India Tensions (Ongoing) • Climate Factor: Water scarcity and glacial melt. • Impact: Climate change is affecting the Himalayan glaciers, which feed the Indus River system, a vital water source for both Pakistan and India. As glacial melt accelerates and water availability fluctuates, tensions between the two nuclear-armed neighbors have risen, particularly over the shared river system and disputes related to water resources. 12. Bangladesh-Myanmar Rohingya Crisis (Ongoing) • Climate Factor: Rising sea levels and natural disasters. • Impact: Bangladesh is highly vulnerable to rising sea levels and flooding, which has displaced millions of people over the years. Climate migration is increasingly a factor in the region, with competition for resources like land and water contributing to tensions, including between the Rohingya ethnic minority and the Myanmar military, which led to the displacement of hundreds of thousands of Rohingya people. It is a fact that we are having more severe and more frequent disasters So we shouldn’t purposely cause something like that to happen again. You’re asking for science that explains why increased frequency and severity of natural disasters, rising sea levels, mass dying of species and mass migration are bad? I see endless articles explaining how they got to those conclusions. If you don’t see them in a format intended for the general public it’s because you’re not looking. I will provide you a link but first we need to cover off an explainer because I don’t think you even understand how science works so we need to address that first l As for “the actual data and analysis” of course if you’re not also a phd in science you likely won’t be able to make heads or tails of the data. It’s a climate denier meme that when they read articles intended for laypeople they say “show me the numbers so I can do my own calculations!” But then when they re presented with the data and analysis , which is written by scientists for scientists using technical terms and references, mathematical and statistical models you wouldn’t even begin to understand, they go “this is indecipherable mumbo jumbo give it to me in plain English!” You wouldn’t even be able to UNDERSTAND those studies let alone independently validate them There are hundreds of universities and scientific organizations around the world who each have dozens of scientists studying hyper-specialized topics like ocean acidification, ice core samples, soil samples old growth forests, specific plants, animals or ecosystems, weather phenomena, etc, each usually with a focus in specific regions of the world. Then there are research papers that simply compile the findings of other original research papers. So as hypothetical example the existing scientific consensus on the topic of ocean acidification might actually have arisen from hundreds of papers on hyper-specific topics such as “acidification in the intertidal regions of the Gulf of Mexico as determined using xyz methodology” or “survey of peer-reviewed oceanic acidification studies 1993-2023” and so on. As I mentioned you wouldn’t be able to understand any of their research because it’s not intended for non-scientific laypeople. You then have other groups like IPCC among many others who also review and compile the research, formulate positions amd make the info available to the general public and policy makers. In addition the journalism industry and various scientific or interest groups and mainstream media employ science writers who “dumb it down” to plain English for a general audience and you can easily find those in outlets such as National geographic, Time Magazine and traditional news outlets. Since you’re asking for data (for which let’s be honest you have neither the intellectual curiosity, lack of bias, or the scientific acumen to review or assess): Here is an example of where you can find reports. Or again you can read scientific journals intended for mainstream audiences like National Geographic, Nature, Smithsonian and others https://www.ipcc.ch/srocc/chapter/technical-summary/
    3 points
  3. You know for sure you overwhelmingly won a debate when, nearly a week later, the Trumpees are still posting about how it wasn't such an overwhelming win. 😂
    3 points
  4. Here's an interesting observation. For a long while, the dictator scum of the world like Kim and Vlad worked hard to recruit stooges and agents of influence in the West's left, maybe following an established tradition. They got some traction here and there but overall, not much to boast about. The agents and their influence were meager with hardly any following. Then someone bright back there decided to try a different direction. And lo, look! A falling star of the cult, a full-time conspiracy nut, with the second man in the hierarchy (the one who wants to decide how many kids you should have and when and with whom) pick Vlad's lies right off his tongue and fan them around like some sh*t ventilators. Could Vlad, in the wildest of his dreams hope for a better output on investment? One cannot overlook it: this a bunch that is both desperate and entirely devoid of any values and principles. They will associate with anyone and anything to advance their agenda and get to the power. There are no covers anymore they are showing and telling who and what they are very clearly. To parrot lies and narratives of a fascist aggressive regime of our time is as clear a line as it can possibly get, ever, even theoretically. This never happened before in America. We will not have a simpler, more obvious case that is staring us right in the eyes.
    2 points
  5. You’re proving that people who oppose Jews are ldiots. Great job!
    2 points
  6. 2 points
  7. I'm not leaving out anything, you on the other hand, are following the deceptive and dishonest practice of stating an unproven allegation (if not a purely made up disparaging claim) as a known and proven fact. Needless to say, such tricks add no credibility to your arguments.
    2 points
  8. According to Robo Republicans are violent and evil and yet the only candidate who has had at least 2 attempts on his life is the Republican one. The whole cooling down the rhetoric with Democrats lasted about 2 seconds they gotta keep calling him Hitler and telling everyone he is an evil supervillain.
    1 point
  9. They do? But how do those white monstrosities actually do it? Do builders build power plants next to windmill farms and then plug the power plants into the windmills to get their power?
    1 point
  10. Honestly i think we'll see in time that it's the same thing. AI can't replace lawyers. It CAN replace articling students going over briefs but that just frees them up to do other things. And if it did replace lawyers then those people would go on to do something else. I'm sure most of us who are over the age of 50 remember when computers were going to totally replace secretaries. The more we create tools to do our work for us, the more we find other work to do. Time will tell, but honestly I wouldn't worry about it
    1 point
  11. Why are turbines in existence? Turbines are in existence because every single source of electricity production, except solar, requires turbines. Coal, natural gas, nuclear, geothermal and hydro ALL use turbines to generate electricity. Shouldn’t that fact alone tell you that you probably aren’t well-enough informed to be so sure that your ideas about this are correct?
    1 point
  12. No, you’re just ignorant. The science behind climate change theory and the observed effects are rock solid. And America should develop as much renewable energy generation as possible so that OPEC can pound sand. You say you care about the economy but you’re opposed to the one single thing that can make our economy strongest: Massively reducing our reliance on petroleum.
    1 point
  13. Got any examples Micheal or you just chirping because it is the thing to do now...
    1 point
  14. You can't tell one side "DO THE RIGHT THINGS ALL THE TIME!" while you're making excuses for the other side to plan genocides, openly preach genocide, launch missiles as fast as they can make them, continually mass troops and rockets along the border, and propagandize the rest of the world to teach them hate. If you think the propaganda is no big deal, just remember that it worked on you. You are openly supportive of a group that openly preaches hatred and genocide. You must not be paying attention to the news or you would have noticed that if Hamas/Hezbollah/Iran got the chance to wipe out Israel and kill every last Jew on the planet they wouldn't waste one second weighing the morality of it, nor would they shed a tear when it was all over. There would be no international criminal court, no Nuremburg trials, just a billion-bigot celebration of joy and you'd be one of the partiers. Let me ask you this: why do you care so much about what happens to people who openly plot genocide? Why don't you have any expectation at all for Palestinians to offer peace to Israel? If Palestinians were trying to leave in peace then I would be fully on your side, but the offer of actual peace has never been on the table. The official stance of almost every muslim on the planet has always been: "The Pakistan partition, along with the millions of murders and the tens of millions driven from their homes, is 100% awesome We fully support Pakistan's right to exist as a nation we don't think that the 8 million Sikhs and Hindus who were dispossessed of their homes have any right of return Dig a hole for the dead, and everyone who lost their homes can go to hell. BUT!!!!! The Palestinian partition was evil the 500 murders are an atrocity that can only be avenged by a genocide in the millions the state of Israel can never be acknowledged - only Pakistan is worthy of statehood. Eventually the Israelis all have to be killed Mr problem solver, mr pontificator, mr humanitarian, oh great arbiter of peace and justice, can you tell me which one of those 8 bullet points is inaccurate? Can you tell me why I should just go along with the opinion that: "One partition was AWESOME and the much smaller one was evil"? Make your case, you self-righteous snot. Don't come here pretending to be some sort of sagacious humanitarian when you can't even answer the most basic questions of all. The fact is that you're an ignorant, violent bigot, and not a caring human who's busy dispensing worldly knowledge on the uninformed masses. Of course you will only focus on what you want to focus on and completely ignore the fact that YOUR SIDE HAS BEEN ACTIVELY TRYING TO KILL EVERY SINGLE ISRAELI SINCE BEFORE PARTITION! FYI the grand mufti of Palestine went to live in Germany during WWII, and he was plotting to commit genocide against the Jews long before Palestinian partition even happened. Hitler was already dead years before partition and the subsequent 1948 war. Iraq, Yemen, Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Saudi Arabia and Palestine (8 countries) all attacked Israel on day 1 of their existence. FYI that took prior planning. Now look at that 8-country attack through the lens of its proper historical context: it was only 8 months earlier that the Pakistanis slaughtered 800,000 Sikhs and Hindus and drove 8M more out of Pakistan, but the entire world had already moved on. It was all good. The countries who attacked Israel knew that they could get away with that exact same level of genocide back then, and that had been the plan for more than half a decade at that point. Another thing for you to consider, mr hypocrite, is that the Deir Yassin slaughter that you referenced wasn't even close to being 'the atrocity of the century' in that region. 1805, June 29 200-500 Algerian Jews are massacred.[1] 1815 Eight Jews are burned at the stake in Algiers.[1] 1818 Turks from Algiers attack Constantine, massacre and pillage Jewish homes, and abduct 17 young Jewish girls whom they bring to their commander.[2] 1830 The Persian Jewish population of Tabriz, Iran is attacked by a mob, resulting in most of the Jewish community either being killed or fleeing.[3] 1830 The Jews of Shiraz are forced to convert to Islam. 1834 The 1834 looting of Safed was a month-long attack on the Jewish population of Safed by local Arab and Druze villagers. It was full of large scale looting, as well as the killing and raping of Jews and the destruction of many homes and synagogues. Before the attacks Jews made up over 50% of the population, but many of them fled to nearby cities which reduced their presence drastically. 834 Jewish heroine and martyr Sol Hachuel is publicly decapitated at 17 years old in Fez, Morocco. She is executed for refusing to convert to Islam. 1839 Forty-plus Persian Jews are killed and the entire Jewish community of Mashhad is forced to convert to Islam in the Allahdad.[6] Many of them practised Judaism in secret, which led to the Mashhadi Jews, whom today number in the thousands. 1840 The Damascus affair: false blood libel accusations cause arrests and atrocities, culminating in the seizure of 63 Jewish children and attacks on Jewish communities throughout the Middle East. 1860 The Jews of Hamadan are accused of mocking the Ta'zieh ceremonies for Imam Husain, several of them are fined and some have their ears and noses cut off as punishment.[11] 1864 At least 500 Moroccan Jews are massacred in Marrakech and Fez. 1866 The Jews of Barforush are forcibly converted to Islam. When they are allowed to revert to Judaism thanks to French and British ambassadors, a Muslim mob kills 18 Jews, burning two of them alive.[13][14] 1869 18 Tunisian Jews are killed in a pogrom and an Arab mob loots Jewish homes and stores, burns synagogues, on Jerba Island. 1875 Twenty Jews are killed by a Muslim mob in Demnat, Morocco. 1881 Pogrom against the Jews in Tlemcen, Algeria.[20] 1882 Jewish population of Algiers is attacked by a Muslim mob.[23] 1886 Jews are attacked by Arabs in Petah Tikva[24][25][26][27] 1892 Mulla Abdullah issues a fatwa to kill all the Jews of Hamadan if they refuse to abide by Jewish restrictions. The local Persian Jews were later ordered to become Muslims or face death.[30] 1892 Two Persian Jews go out to sell merchandise and end up killed with all of their property stolen. Their relatives went out to search for the bodies and when they found them, they were killed by the same villagers. Even after many attempts to plea for their, the governor of Savojbolagh County paid them no mind.[12] 1897 Synagogues and Jewish homes are pillaged in Oran.[31] 1897 Synagogues are ransacked and Jews are murdered in Tripolitania.[32] 1898 Violent anti-Jewish riots erupt in Algiers.[31] 1907 Over 60 Jews in the Mellah of Casablanca are killed in a pogrom by Kabyle Muslims. Many more were wounded, and a large number of women and children were carried off.[5] 1910 The 1910 Shiraz blood libel was a pogrom of the Jewish quarter in Shiraz, Iran. It was sparked by accusations that the Jews had ritually murdered a Muslim girl. By the end of the pogrom, 12 Jews were killed, 50 or so were wounded, and 6,000 were robbed of all their possessions. 1912 The Tritl or the 1912 Fez massacre left 42 Moroccan Jews dead. 1917 The 1917 Jaffa deportation was a forceful expulsion and confiscation of property of 10,000 Jews from Jaffa and Tel Aviv by Ottoman authorities. 1929 18–20 Jewish residents of Safed were brutally killed in the 1929 Palestine riots. 1934 2,000 Afghani Jews are expelled from their towns and forced to live in the wilderness. 1934 34 Algerian Jews were killed and hundreds were injured by Muslim mobs during the 1934 Constantine pogrom. 200 Jewish stores were raided, the total property damage was estimated at over 150 million Poincare francs. It also sent a quarter of Constantine's Jewish population into poverty.[27] 1936 The Bloody Day in Jaffa refers to various violent attacks on Jews in Jaffa by mobs of Muslims. 1938 Arab rioters rush into the Jewish Kiryat Shmuel neighborhood, killing 19 Jews, 11 of whom were children in the 1938 Tiberias massacre. 1941 The Farhud pogrom in Baghdad results in 780 Jews dead, over 1,000 wounded.[47] 1945 The 1945 Tripoli pogrom was a violent massacre of the Jewish population of Tripoli by Muslim rioters. After days of violence 140+ Jews were dead and hundreds were injured. In the aftermath 4,000 Jews were left homeless and thousands were reduced to poverty. 9 Synagogues were destroyed, along with thousands of Jewish homes and businesses. 1945 The 1945 Anti-Jewish riots in Egypt started as an anti-Zionist demonstration, but it ended with the killing of 5 Egyptian Zionists by a Muslim mob and over 300 other Jews were injured After all of the above massacres and persecutions in Arab states (along with scores of even worse massacres in Europe), the UN voted in favour of Palestinian partition. The massacres in above, in red, were all at least 5x as large as the massacre at Deir Yassin. They also resulted in far more murders than the entire Palestinian partition. That's just a bit of proper historical context for you, old-but-unwise-guy. Below is post-partition vote/pre-partition day violence against Jews in the ME: 1945 The 1945 Anti-Jewish riots in Egypt started as an anti-Zionist demonstration, but it ended with the killing of 5 Egyptian Zionists by a Muslim mob and over 300 other Jews were injured. 1947 Anti-Jewish riots erupt in Aleppo, resulting in some 75 Jews murdered and several hundred wounded. 1947 A mob of Muslim sailors looted Jewish homes and shops in the Manama riots. In the end one Jewish woman was dead and a Synagogue was destroyed. 1947 A three-day riot broke out between the Jews of Aden and the local Muslim population. When it was over, 82 Jews were killed and 76 Jews were injured. 1947 The Aden riots of December 2–4, 1947 targeted the Jewish community in the British Colony of Aden. At least 76 Jews were killed. Shortly after the riots, Aden's Jewish community almost entirely left, together with most of the Yemeni Jewish community. Violent anti-Semitism caused the Jewish exodus from Arab lands. The Jewish population in the Arab Middle East and North Africa has decreased from 900,000 in 1948 to less than 8,000 in 2001. (When Arabs try to tell you that "Israeli Jews are all Europeans", just remember that almost a million came from that exodus. Also, the Jews that did come from Europe were almost all Arabic Jews or their descendants) 1948 The Djereda was a pogrom against the tiny Jewish population of Jerada at the hands of the local Muslims. It ended with 43 Jews dead and around 150 Jews injured. So, "old guy", the next time that you want to reminisce about just compare that to this: You wake up one day, you're sitting there having a coffee when mobs from the majority-muslim population in your city rise up and start destroying your synagogues, raping the women and girls, and killing men as fast as they can. You gather your family and flee for your lives, only to go to another muslim-controlled city because there is no Jewish country on the planet, ever since the Romans took over thousand of years earlier. At the end of that day 600 members of your community are dead and the rest of you are scattered among other hostile/semi-hostile muslim cities. Or compare it to Pakistan's second genocide. Yeah, they committed a second genocide in 1971. You wake up one day, you're sitting there having a coffee when militias controlled by the muslim government in your country set their sights on killing 3M of their own citizens to squash Bengalis who want to preserve their own culture. Your door is kicked in, and your mom and sisters are raped by Pakistani militia members while your dad is killed. (systemic genocidal rape was employed by the Pakistani gov't to force people to give up their own culture and adopt islamic culture). The Pakistanis have committed TWO genocides, both in the millions, while the big bad Israelis killed less than 500 people in the 1948 partition, but old dipshit is completely hung up on the 107 people of Deir Yassin. What do you have to say to all that, old man? Too many facts for you? Too much accurate historical context? You're just going to ignore it all and go back to your hating, right? Join gaetan here, he's your kind of guy. He might hook up with you to go have some fun at the expense of others.
    1 point
  15. 1 point
  16. Really? What part was a lie what she said now or what she said then?
    1 point
  17. Trump is the coward. He said he would debate Kamala Harris “any place, any time,” and now he’s surrendering, like a total ****, with his tail between his legs, because he knows he’s no match for her.
    1 point
  18. Wow. I heard she just trounced some fool in a televised debate. If she's stupid then I can't imagine how unbelievably brainless that sucker must be.🤷‍♀️
    1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. Yes. If you'll give her a promotion. Also I will add this to the ever growing list of crap you've said that's kept me up with nightmares over the years.
    1 point
  21. If he doesn't know then how is it racist? How the hell do i upvote this twice? LOLOL Your mom cut back your allowance again?
    1 point
  22. @French Patriot specifically asked about someone being gay. That’s what you responded to. Why would you answer a question that wasn’t asked? So you don’t think being gay is a fantasy or delusion?
    1 point
  23. And where in that link does it say that "Every Day" israelis enter the west bank and kill 1200 civillians, rape the women and burn the bodies as you claimed they did? LIke, at all? Me: IF Israel crossed the border without warning or direct provocation and slaughtered 1200 of their people and took a few hundred hostages You: You must not be paying attention to the news or you would have noticed IDF do this on an almost daily basis in the west bank. there isn't a single word about that in the source you cited. Not one. It does not happen. So I was right, and you were lying. Which is for whatever reason exactly what we see constantly from the left attempting to justify gaza's attacks. That would be the sound of your credibility flushing down the toilet. If you can't be honest, you should probably be quiet.
    1 point
  24. You make me laugh, this coming from a guy that has a proven record on this forum of having superior critical thinking skills...Is that why you changed your name to DUI offender, that's some critical thinking skills right there...
    1 point
  25. Wow how clever a deflection is that? Here's one for you. If the dentist tells you, "you have a cavity" how much of it is caused by the candy you've eaten in the past year and how much is caused by the candy you've eaten in the last 5 years or is it all caused because you don't brush your teeth. There is rarely an all or nothing simple answer no matter how much we wish it were.
    1 point
  26. Here are a few for you. BTW it is so easy to find answers to questions. You see there is this thing called google and all you have to do is type in a question. I asked, Is there good science to support climate change I took the top choice which you will find here Why do you think so many migrants are moving north both in Europe and North America?
    1 point
  27. The well adjusted put love above sex and gender. Do you? Would you fully support your gay child and his or her spouse? Would you hug them both before your altar and God? All souls are created perfect. Right? Do unto others.
    1 point
  28. I'm talking about the plethora of EVIDENCE FREE OPINIONS.
    1 point
  29. The Republicans no longer care about prices, deficits or debt. Except when the Democrats are in the White House. I remember when the Republicans used to be conservative - a long time ago now. Even before this offer the Trump economic plan would have increased the debt by five times more than the Democrats' economic plan. https://www.cnbc.com/2024/08/27/trump-harris-budget-deficit-economy-election.html
    1 point
  30. What does a word of a fascist dictator worth? Does it worth anything in any positive sense, and value? And what about his servant and stooges, busy pushing and promoting his lies? Some seem to not understand. Dim or dumb? Or pretending to be? How could anyone with a grain of working brain and conscience step into into this sh*t? Utterly unbelievable. Brainless and entirely devoid of principles and values: both.
    1 point
  31. Its a stupid question from a stupid person. We are already experiencing disasters due to climate change and they will only get worse as time goes on, leading to resource shortages, more wars, more mass migrations, all of this will become the new normal.
    1 point
  32. They're still whining because the moderators corrected two of Trump's most ridiculous lies? These babies just can't stop being victims
    1 point
  33. Absolutely. IF Israel crossed the border without warning or direct provocation and slaughtered 1200 of their people and took a few hundred hostages and tortured and mutilated the people and then fled i'd say hamas would have the right to fight back to protect itself. Especially if israel was still firing hundreds of rockets into gaza as well directly targeting civilians only. But that never happened. At all. It DID happen the other way around.
    1 point
  34. Mine come every 6 months or so. Next one is just a month away. I can't wait, and I get a flu shot too. It's like a bonus.
    1 point
  35. Just learn it, stupid. Muslims will always cry about the 500 muslims who were killed in 1948, but they'll never shed a tear for the 800,000 Sikhs and Hindus that were killed less than a year before by muslims, in an earlier British partition. So when the muslims from outside of Palestine scream and cry that they want justice for 1948, I know that they are just bigots who aren't worth listening to. Oh stop with the poetry you bigoted whiner.
    1 point
  36. 1) no video 2) a woman trying to get an abortion is jot the same ad a woman actually getting an abortion 3) ABC didn’t say late-term abortions don’t exist, they said delivering a live baby and then “executing” it as Trump falsely claimed doesn’t exist. The MAGA LIE MACHINE continues
    1 point
  37. Retarded people often struggle with reading comprehension
    1 point
  38. The debate illustrated yet again that Trump has zero impulse control. Not a person to trust with any serious matter, let alone the US presidency.
    1 point
  39. It is now a scientific fact that climate change is real and human activity specifically greenhouse gas emissions are the cause. Period. The climate has already changed likely irreversibly. Period.
    1 point
  40. Because Russia is paying people to tell us our media is corrupt. And because people hate the libs, they parrot the message...
    1 point
  41. What was amusing was Harris's expression when she triggered Trump into his, aborting babies after they are born, immigrants eating pets, my rallies are the most awesome things ever rants. Like, Wow, that was easy, what an idi*t. Do you really want someone who is so easily triggered and manipulated to be president?
    1 point
  42. I said EVEN Fox News said she won. If a Republican propaganda outlet agrees with all the other news sources that the Republican lost that’s noteworthy. It’s not “one reporters’s take” Any perusal of post-debate headlines even in conservative-leaning mainstream outlets either declare that Kamala won or that Trump lost Here’s one from a famous Republican political “guru”: GOP pollster Frank Luntz: Debate will cost Trump the election 09/12/24 08:02 AM ET Campaign Republican pollster Frank Luntz predicted former President Trump’s performance in the Tuesday night debate will ultimately cost him the election in November. In a Wednesday interview on “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” Luntz criticized the GOP nominee’s performance and pointed to specific moments in the debate against Vice President Harris that he noted were particularly negative. “It was a pretty negative performance. Pretty pessimistic, cynical, contemptuous,” Luntz told Morgan in the interview, highlighted by Mediaite, adding, “and I think that this will cost him, yes.” Luntz hesitated, appearing to choose his words carefully. “I’m trying to decide if I want to go on record, and the answer is yes,” he continued. “I think that — that he loses because of this debate performance.” … https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4875745-frank-luntz-donald-trump-kamala-harris-debate/amp/ Here’s the conservative National Review’s take on it: Trump’s Trainwreck …If you’re obsessing over how bad, how in the tank for Kamala Harris, the two ABC news moderators were, it’s because you don’t want to come to grips with the brute fact that Donald Trump was a disaster last night. He was unhinged, often incoherent, incapable of completing thoughts and sentences when he had points to make, and led into self-absorbed rabbit-holes … https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/trumps-trainwreck/?utm_source=recirc-mobile&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=header&utm_content=popular&utm_term=first
    1 point
  43. Ezra Levant furious to discover he could have been getting money from Russia this whole time https://www.thebeaverton.com/2024/09/ezra-levant-furious-to-discover-he-could-have-been-getting-money-from-russia-this-whole-time/
    1 point
  44. Out of my age bracket you mean and we ain't talking fine wine here.
    1 point
  45. 😆. Ask about January 6 but cut Trump off when he talks about getting shot in the head. Don't follow up on kamala lies about fracking Don't ask her about some of her more radical and absurd policies like price controls. Was a hit job on Trump yet again.
    1 point
  46. At this point it's pretty clear that you only see what you want to, and only hear what you want to. You called someone retarded in this thread (among other things) and later cried foul over insults when people mocked your reasoning. The absurd hypocrisy of that complaint is yet another example of your shitty, one-directional reasoning in this thread. You're "over it, and you've moved on", though. Cool. 🙄 Hopefully that spares us any more of this kind of foolishness.
    1 point
  47. A known terrorist group invaded the state of Israel, and killed 1250 of it's citizens and has taken countless hostages. those actions amount to a declaration of war, and in war people die, BTW well over half your total number of palestinians killed are confirmed Terrorist, which are included in Hamas death tolls...It's not a slaughter...if Israel wanted to it could have carpet bombed the whole place and would now be dozing it into one big parking lot...but that is not happening....What every Canadian should be doing is condemning Hamas for its actions, stopping all Canadian tax payer dollars from flowing into gaza and the west bank...Stopping all palestinians from migrating to Canada. Until Hamas is removed from power... It would be a different story if it was Jewish students that were the ones threatening palestinians students, how many pro palestinians students have been killed by jewish students NONE...your original question is a moot point...threats of all kinds should be investigated and those guilty should be charged,or have their student visa canceled ..this is Canada not Gaza or the west bank
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...