Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/15/2024 in all areas

  1. I wish you could learn that the MSM are 100% dishonest and devious. What TRUMP said is that he would be a dictator on day one of his Presidential term FOR ONE DAY ONLY. On his first day back in office Trump said he would only be a dictator in TWO respects.: (1) In restoring America's free access to its own oil/gas natural energy reserves ("Drill -Baby-Drill)" and I forget the other one (it was probably to do with re-securing the Southern Border) When Trump said," I will be a "Dictator" (on day one of his new administration)(using the term as a metaphor for "absolutely authoritative/decisive") in making sure these two things are done. You know, you really shouldn't watch the liberal MSM, buddy..All you're getting 90+% of the time is pure bullshit and twisted disinformation. Dachshund
    3 points
  2. roboshill doesn't understand that poseurs won that ruling for Dominion. The truth is, that piece of shit voting system was rigged for the demoncrats: Red ballot in, blue ballot out.
    2 points
  3. Shut the f*ck up you stalker creep.
    2 points
  4. Too bad for the Big Fat Orange Man, the FBI videotaped their entire search and they meticulously entered each document into evidence. The numerical order of the envelopes hardly makes him innocent. “Your honor, my client had the stolen nuclear codes, but they were in envelope six, not envelope seven, so he is innocent.” You’re a fool if you think that gets him off the hook.
    2 points
  5. I see you are still at it! Once again, you can "take care of your kid" without showering with them to the point they are writing about how it is probably inappropriate in their diary.
    2 points
  6. Let me ask you something: If the cops get a warrant based on probable cause to search a drug dealer’s home for cocaine, and they find 20 ten pound bricks of cocaine at the dealers home, and videotape the entire search, does it matter whether they stack the cocaine in the same order as they found it? If they number the bricks 1-20 and they switch the labels of cocaine bricks 3 and 4, why would that matter at all?
    2 points
  7. I understand just fine. He is praising his wife for her contributions to their family and his success. Nowhere did he tell women to get back into the kitchen. The issue is not my intelligence here, it is your dishonesty.
    2 points
  8. So... where does he tell women to stay in the kitchen? Seriously, this thread title is a lie. This article is trash and little more than a troll job.
    2 points
  9. Why does the sequence of the documents even matter? Obviously they did a cursory examination to determine content and just put them back into the boxes. What's far more egregious is the OBVIOUS slow rolling of this case by the rookie judge who's already been slapped down twice by the 11th Appeals court for SLOW ROLLING the case with an unwarranted "special master" order.
    2 points
  10. because it replaces the question of effectiveness and efficiency of the governance of public matters: what is rational; important and necessary for the society, today with: what do we/ would you like it to be? What do you like? In everyday life we know very well that what we would like to happen in our reality would not necessarily, and often by far, be the reality. In the entertainment, the dreamscape the difference is erased, smoothly, in a blink. The wish can become and becomes, the reality. Just believe! A natural human trait to imagine a better reality exploited for buck in any number of ways, becomes the American obsession with the dream where everything has to be entertainment and does not need to have connections, and eventually, any connection to the reality. This is fine in the theater. But imaginary realities cannot produce good, effective decisions and policies in the real world. So this is a path to inevitable demise of the dream-based, entertainment democracy. No, one cannot force the need to be reasonable and intelligent in making certain decisions. No, it's not possible to lock out the wish to dream. But what could be the solutions?
    1 point
  11. Trump has said repeatedly that he'd debate Brandon anytime anywhere anyplace. Now...ignoring the poor English (anywhere and anyplace being the same thing) the challenge has been accepted. https://www.npr.org/2024/05/15/1251520721/biden-proposes-debates-in-june-and-september-and-names-terms-trump-says-yes QUESTION: Will the Libbies actually allow Brandon to drag his addled old arse on stage to debate Trump? I say "No". I think that as June progresses, the Libbies will panic and find some lame-ass excuse why he can't. Bird Flu maybe? I don't know what the excuse will be but, if they let this happen, Brandon will flounder, Trump will pounce on his inability and the world will witness it. Oh and Harris is supposed to debate whoever is Trump's VP running mate. LOL...THAT will be one not to miss. Let the feathers fly...
    1 point
  12. even the Nazarene was filled with doubt & fear even the Nazarene cried out when nailed to the cross even the Nazarene was tempted in the end love thine enemies
    1 point
  13. WOW...maybe it is time your took a break big fella..your starting to sound like those people everyone talks about at the water cooler...
    1 point
  14. This was about 4(?) years ago just before covid, but I have a friend who actually went to the school/high school boards his kids were attending and complained about this. He felt that his kids being constantly told they are trash because they are white colonizers was really affecting their mental health, especially his 16 year old daughter. His point was that his kids had not done anything to anyone else and he was raising them to be respectful and welcoming to others and was sick of them being told they were garbage.
    1 point
  15. From what I've read, the statute of limitations on misdemeanours in NY is 2 yrs and for felonies it's 5 years, except for extremely serious crimes like murder and rape. The last payment was in 2016, so it's well beyond the NY State statute of limitations. From what I've heard there's still a possibility for a federal case, but the NY State court can't handle that one. I haven't followed this closely because it's just another witch hunt, but that's what I've heard.
    1 point
  16. strapped to the mast, doomed to go down with the ship for the love of a woman Victoria, Queen & Empress Pro Patria
    1 point
  17. Actually this sounds like a pretty handy way of taking pressure off the public system and alleviating suffering. When are you packing your bags?
    1 point
  18. A russian meets with trumps kid for 10 minutes and the entire election was 'russian collusion'. A known player who's been after trump talks to another person who's after trump and there's an actual result and it's a 'conspiracy' theory. Hypocrisy, thy name is democrat
    1 point
  19. I always get a good laugh of seeing you parse through reality with that smooth-brain of yours. You're complaining about people listening to liars while parroting direct-from-the-Kremlin propaganda and MAGA donkey-logic. Election was stolen! Election was stolen! Bioweapon labs! Joe Biden's laptop! 🤡🤣🤡
    1 point
  20. Not only is the health care system in Canada gone wacko but the whole dam country has gone wacko thanks to liberal socialism. It is liberal socialism that is killing this once great freedom loving country. Only a real and true conservative party government can save this country. 😇
    1 point
  21. You have got to be kidding me. If you were actually capable of putting on a pair of Palestinian's shoes you would know this without even using to ask. You precluded having to do that by utterly dehumanizing Palestinians. The way Israel was created is what started things. We're clearly not on the same page or reading from the same book. In fact we're probably in completely different libraries.
    1 point
  22. Joe's old enough to not remember it.
    1 point
  23. I figure I might as well post this here since it bears on the whole DEI antiracism bullshit currently a requirement of seemingly every federal government policy, decision, initiative or program now. You thought all this stuff could be held to the universities? No, it moved down into the K-12 school system, with kids being taught they're oppressors or oppressed. But the DEI fanatics don't want to leave any possible stone unturned. Now, with the aid of the federal government's new daycare system, they want to make daycare centres 'antiracist'. How do you do this? Why, by subjecting all staff to reeducation programs that would have pleased any apparatchik in Mao's cultural revolution. In March, the Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care held a national webinar on “Creating an Anti-Racist Child Care System in Canada,” which highlighted its three-year project, funded by the federal government, on how to make childcare “anti-racist.” The organization advocates, among other things, “mandatory anti-racism training as part of membership in the College of ECE.” Another recommendation is to have education programs for childcare workers that “demonstrate a commitment” to decolonization and include “a mandatory course on anti-racist pedagogy” and course materials from Black, Indigenous and racialized theorists. The activists also make recommendations to childcare operators, such as “ongoing anti-racism, inclusion and equity training” for staff, “ongoing training and coaching to develop and implement anti-racist, inclusive pedagogy” and creating an “advisory committee that includes Black, Indigenous and racialized community members.” Activists look to turn daycares into woke indoctrination camps | National Post
    1 point
  24. I pray you are wrong. I don't think a lot of these twits understand that hiding behind the law will only go so far. Here's one from the Republican side... How close is America, to exploding? How would you react to getting hit over the head just because you attended a rally? Why would people attend a rally just to cause crap?
    1 point
  25. Here’s the deal: James Comer would absolutely love to indict Biden on ANY CRIME HE CAN, but he can’t. Nobody has accused Joe Biden of any sex-related crimes. Not one single person. But LOTS of women have accused Donald Trump of sex-related crimes. And…. IT USED TO MATTER, when it was Clinton, but now, you guys don’t care. We know the guy has had four kids from three different women, he was dating one woman publicly while married to another, he was having sex with porn stars while his wife was pregnant, he’s been found liable of civil rape. The list goes on and on. Donald Trump is a proven sexual predator. Biden hasn’t even been accused. His daughter wrote something in a notebook about a very early childhood memory? She didn’t say that anything happened. That’s the fact, Jack.
    1 point
  26. Agreed. And I hope these Libbies have enough sense to not try something like that. America looks ready to fry. Its ripe for naked aggression. The closer we get to that election, the nastier things get. But I do really wanna see Trump go at Brandon...and Harris? Gawd I wanna see her debate. LOL...Hi Libbie. Warping what I said eh? Tsk...I'n't that special?
    1 point
  27. So you finally admit there was no election fraud.
    1 point
  28. Or I've never taken inappropriate showers with my kids... I don't sniff kids' hair or kiss them on the mouth, either. That's all pretty basic. 99% of people in North America get a pass on that. The other 1% need to be supervised when they're around children.
    1 point
  29. Censorship? Has Biden censored anything you’ve written? Has he censored a single thing aired on Fox News? You don’t know what censorship is. China and Russia have actual censorship. They’ll throw you in jail for speaking out against the government.
    1 point
  30. It is funny how hard you are trying to play this off. A parent can bathe their child. They are usually not naked in the tub with them, and they are usually not naked with them when they are old enough to have a diary and be self-aware enough to question how appropriate it is. If your kid is old enough to wonder if your showers with them are appropriate, they are not. This is an easy thing to admit. It's sad that you feel the need to defend it. I have run out of giving likes for today. LOL I would have liked this.
    1 point
  31. Empirical date provided by "scientists" who provide only the data that their benefactors want to hear. Climate change is a perpetual phenomena. You should be extremely worried if the climate stopped changing.
    1 point
  32. Oh good - they've been underrepresented for so long....
    1 point
  33. Yeah well the way things are going all that means is they might manage to finish slightly better than the libs The NDP has always been a bit of a split personality between the woke activist side and the blue collar working man's side. And they flip a little back and forth over the years. At the moment they are very much on the woke side and have tied themselves to the liberals who are also on the woke side. There is a very real chance that both of them will get absolutely trashed in the next electionreally the ndp's only hope to avoid that is to find a plausible reason to split and call an election early. But I think jagmeet has kind of blown his opportunity there. I mean what do you say? We didn't split over Chinese corruption, we didn't split over all of the financial disasters, we didn't split over the corruption so now we're going to split because... ? And of course jagmeet is doing so badly he's worried that he'll get kicked out early when he comes back with your seats. But his only chance is to force an early election and then run one hell of a campaign to draw every single left Wing voter that he humanly can Into the fold and hope for the best.
    1 point
  34. if the child then or later feels that the parent was behaving 'inappropriately' then it's an issue. She was quite clear. It was 'likely inappropriate'. She's an adult, she knows what happened, shes fully qualified to make that statement considering it was her body. So.
    1 point
  35. God May Grant land, but Smith and Wesson holds the title and deed
    1 point
  36. Maybe I'm not bright enough to see this at first glance so I'll be the dummy who asks the question: If medical personnel shortages are the primary contributor to wait times, I don't see how the creation of a parallel system with personnel drawn from the original one alleviates it. I'm not opposed to it, but If the number of patients, the number of doctors and the associated workload is quantifiable, and support facilities (operating theatres, hospital beds etc) are finite, how does shuffling doctors from public to private and private to public decrease wait times? If the concept is based on the assumption that a private system would be more streamlined and efficient by virtue of a profit motive and case load efficiency would increase as a result of that, then I don't see how that happens in less time than it would take to step up training and streamline processes within our existing system. And even if the profit motive increased access to infrastructure (over time), wouldn't the ratio of those able to afford private care vs those who couldn't remain (essentially) the same thus setting an availability ceiling of its own? If you have 10 airplanes and 10 pilots, paying half of the pilots more by raising the cost of a ticket for half of the passengers doesn't make the planes fly faster, burn less gas, or need less maintenance... does it? I'd say you need bigger faster aircraft with more available seat miles and the limiting factor would be the number of people willing/able to pay big bucks for cold food and hot flight attendants. As it stands now, there are already people jumping the cue by having preferred access, college and professional athletes don't wait 3 years for knee surgery, neither do military members treated outside the military medical system. You see the specialist next week, not next year and everybody else waits longer as a result of it. No?
    1 point
  37. Inappropriate showers as a young teen, or young child... Is one better than the other? You choose. Reply back by saying one or the other: Joe Biden took inappropriate showers with his daughter when she was a young teen. Joe Biden took inappropriate showers with his daughter when she was a young child.
    1 point
  38. the trial is already littered with a tonne of fodder for it. Honestly it's been a bit of a crap show and i think it's more about posturing on both sides than it is actually addressing issues of justice, and that kind of thing generally leaves the door wide open. not exactly. It's the court proceedings, which law was applied and how it was applied, which may or may not include errors. How testimony is handled and whether things said should be considered etc is a major factor. For example - The 'no condom' comment from stormy already is a potential source of a retrial whether it's a legal error or not - it shouldn't have been put out there and it may be claimed it was prejudicial later with or without claiming it was an error. We'll see.
    1 point
  39. Well no - he's saying he thinks many women will choose that. And what exactly is wrong with that? There's a big difference between saying a womans place is in the kitchen and saying many women would choose to raise a family rather than be an executive. AAAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (snort!)
    1 point
  40. UN is now reporting new revised estimates of person killed in the conflict, almost 1/2 of what Hamas have reported... So what does this all mean, well once again the Hamas propaganda machine is alive and well, it also means that here in the west and around the world a good chunk of our population are very gullible... first to believe anything from a terrorist regime should have been a huge red flag...., second Hamas knew they could play them like a fiddle because they controlled the info going in and out of Gaza, higher numbers means more readers and sympathy ... and they counted on global hate or distrust of Israel and it would be easy to fool those that so much hate or dislike for Israel to paint them as the bad guys... Statistics prof wary of data 'from Hamas,' says accurate breakdown won't come until after war | Watch (msn.com)
    1 point
  41. So Forbes and LA Times are blogs now, and their citing National Bureau of Economic Research's, Stanford University's and the German Institute of Labour Economics' actual academic study conclusions is...a guy offering his opinion. LOL! 🤡🤡🤡
    1 point
  42. Where did i ever say that white people are truly superior to other races? I still do not understand as to why you would say that having a White History Month is stupid and unnecessary? Who the hell are you to make that assumption, unless you are non-white and are racist towards white folk? So, are you white or non-white? Don't be shy to tell me. You know my color. Well?
    1 point
  43. A labour arbitrator ruled in a case where workers weren't exposed to the public. Canada Post made that vax rule NOT F*CKING JUSTIN TRUDEAU. Meanwhile you missed how a BC Supreme Court Judge threw out cases of doctors and nurses canned becasue they wouldn't get the vax as they did cause a risk to the public. One nurse whining vaccinations were against he religious beliefs (AWWW her wewigion was more important to her job... get a job as a nun then!)
    1 point
  44. "Choice" here means rich people get to choose the best care money can buy and the poor get scraps.
    1 point
  45. I was never confused about anything here. You are acting as if you can't understand my comments, which never had anything to do with some technicality between literally saying kitchen or homemaker... Yes, he is praising his wife. Back to the point: Nowhere is he telling women to stay in the kitchen. Are you through playing dumb?
    1 point
  46. The science is clear.... on what? The science is only clear in as much as there is measured warming and humans contribute some part to that.
    1 point
  47. Are you for real? You can't possibly post something this dishonest... no way. The link said: "Therefore, only applicants who self-identify as members of gender equity deserving groups (including cisgender women, transgender women, transgender men, two-spirit, and non-binary) and/or as racialized individuals will be considered for this opportunity. We encourage those with intersecting identities to apply (for example, women who identify as racialized individuals, Indigenous, and/or persons with disabilities)." They don't need to say White Men do not apply when they clearly outline who can apply that doesn't include white men. Perhaps he could have been a bit more explicit in saying straight white men need not apply.
    1 point
  48. I heard some of the Palestinian protesters in Los Angeles were converting to Islam. This is not a big surprise. That's what happens to people who don't have a clue about the world and just jump in head first to anything. The way to hell is broad.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...