Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/07/2023 in all areas

  1. Tucker Carlson is a seething mound of human garbage, and anyone who believes him at this point is a hopeless fool. And this thread is exactly what was expected. 1. He shows "peaceful" footage as if that will erase the footage of chaos and violence. Again, like showing footage of the 99.9% of the time Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't killing and eating people. He must be peaceful! Forget about the other stuff! 2. He says there is dispute about how Chansley got into the Capitol, but Chansley is on video with a throng of window smashing a-holes as they break in. Do we see him specifically smash his way in from that camera angle? Nope, but there is no mystery about how he got in and whether he thought he was allowed. He didn't leave when police told him to and he didn't "accidentally" leave a threatening note to Mike Pence. 3. He shows footage of officers in proximity to Chansley and implies that they are essentially tour guides. You don't think their "escort" has any other purpose? Jeebus. 4. He asks why the police didn't stop or arrest these people? Because they were already farking overrun and vastly outnumbered. After the initial violence what officer is going to escalate against a mob like that? They were literally beaten and threatened and warned against impeding the mob. There's footage of that too. There's sworn testimony from the officers who actually lived through it. 5. AND THIS IS THE WORST. He has the unmitigated gall to say that the rioters were there "Because they thought the election was stolen" when what he SHOULD be saying is "They were there because my colleagues and I lied to them for months about the election being stolen. Sorry!"
    4 points
  2. Sorry, denier. Your only excuse for not recognizing the Horseshit that should be burning in your nostrils now is refusing to recognize the evidence.
    3 points
  3. I count myself as a rational and reasonable human being. I'm interested in and follow news in science. I recognize that vaccines have been highly effective in eliminating terrible diseases such as smallpox, poliomielitis, mumps and others. And we also know and just had another chance to observe that the distance and the edge between real science, manipulation of science, misleading pseudo science and so on can be quite thin. So I'd like to propose a genuine, straightforward, no bull description, understanding if not a formal definition of the term "vaccine". P.S. in real, genuine science we are always open to new things, findings, trends, inventions, laws. And if and when we do come up with something new, of ours, we do not create confusion with terms and concepts already known previously, quietly changing or modifying their meaning. No. That would be a cause for concern. Why would one do that in genuine, open science? In it we do not aim to mislead, mix up and confuse. Quite the opposite: to find, understand and clarify. And so, vaccines: 1. Provide a clear and essential benefit to the recipient. Such as significant reduction of risk and/or severity of the condition. 2. Have to provide a clear, measurable and significant benefit to the general community. Otherwise it is a preventative treatment, prophylactics, therapy. No need to create confusion. 3. Have to carry minimal risk of adverse effects for the recipient. The natural standard is the risk of a severe condition. A genuine vaccine cannot have comparable or even higher risk than the condition it is trying to prevent it wouldn't make any sense not just in science but by sheer common sense. 4. And not in the least, the significant preventative effect is expected to last a considerable time. More than a year likely. We call it "flu shot" for a reason, do we not? By the way, what would be the essential difference, why is it that one is a "shot" and the other, the v-word? Do we need an exSpert for that, with an outrageous pay direct from our pocket? And while at it, we used to call it "a booster" when administered once or twice per lifetime, not bi-monthly for eternity, that used to be called a chronic condition treatment. This is not science. This is deceptive confusion around science with the intent to mislead and manipulate. And so I'd like to bring the question up for an open and honest discussion. Maybe it doesn't make sense? Maybe there are flaws, of logic or fact? This is how science works and why it has worked so far. Because every finding and conclusion are robustly verified and can be trusted. Not some creative bs that changes with the daily direction of the wind. And now, for a practical example, based on the definition above and conditional on its validity, what would be the chance of branding preventative Covid-19 treatments in the age group 0-12, in good faith, honesty and scientific or professional competence as "vaccines"? How many tests would it pass, out of four?
    2 points
  4. Tucker also posted a film of Kennedy's motorcade to prove it was mostly violence free.
    2 points
  5. Oh come on. Even one such instance has been known to destroy careers. And for someone as sanctimonious as Trudeau to have done it multiple times, including with a banana in his pants, and pay no political prices is pretty wild. I have no doubt that if it had been one of Trudeau's MPs with the same history he'd have booted him from caucus and sternly spoken of the need to call our racism and punish it wherever it is found.
    2 points
  6. Which was probably triggered by leftist radicals - probably Antifa.
    2 points
  7. Yet more left wing LIES debunked. Sick people
    2 points
  8. Sooo...Chubaka guy was peacefully escorted around the capital and the police even opened the doors for him. That baaad ol' dangerous guy... Start at around 10 minutes. The great "insurrection". What horseshit.
    1 point
  9. Those of you who still think it's hyperbolic to say that the modern right-wing establishment is fascist, remember that Tucker Carlson is the most popular right-wing pundit.
    1 point
  10. “At best”? Very much your opinion inserted there. The use of the Emergencies Act and the treatment of protesters have totally stripped Trudeau of respect and credibility for millions of Canadians. It’s far more significant than you seem to think.
    1 point
  11. "Hang Mike Pence! Hang Mike Pence!," chanted MANY in the MOB in response to the Trump tweet denouncing Mike Pence for DOING HIS JOB.
    1 point
  12. CNN was NOT the only source showing the SAME VIDEOS. Doesn't NEED to be "comparable" to ANY HYPERBOLE. Attempting to PREVENT the certification of the election by VIOLENCE is MORE THAN ENOUGH to be a INSURRECTION.
    1 point
  13. You must be completely insane. Do you think he just strolled into the US Capitol building while Congress was in session and they just decided to take a lunch break so he could walk up to he podium in the House of Representatives and scream? That’s like saying the bank robbers just walked into the bank vault. Yes, they broke a bunch of windows and doors to get there any they beat up, bear sprayed and speared a bunch of cops to get there, but all they did was walk into a bank vault, they only stole a little bit of stuff, and what’s wrong with that? Or are you just insane because you’re crazy enough to think anybody would believe your lunacy?
    1 point
  14. Perhaps if your nose is rubbed in the Liberal stench enough, you'll quit sh!t!ng on the carpet by voting for Trudeau.
    1 point
  15. And, if all the above fail, he'll try to play the racism, misogynist, un-vaxxed, etc., etc., card. Nothing's beneath that clown.
    1 point
  16. FOX Lawyers say you can't believe Tucker Carlson Judge rules Carlson not a credible news source. Judge is wrong, the Carlson cult will believe anything they are fed.
    1 point
  17. It is unprecedented for Republican legislators to interfere in prosecutions, with one of the targets (Lt. Governor) appointing members of the committee being a HUGE conflict of interest. The evidence against Trump of election interference is VERY STRONG, and the Republican legislators are all about partisan protection.
    1 point
  18. He hasn't acquiesced. He's throwing out smoke and mirrors to try to pretend he's acquiescing. There is no independent or public investigation. And what do I not really know? All I said was the Liberal majority on that committee will make all the decisions, including terms of reference, witnesses, and what is made public.
    1 point
  19. All members of this committee have to swear an oath of secrecy under the official secrets act, too. So even the opposition members won't be able to say anything publicly.
    1 point
  20. I looked on Repolitics today for signs of remorse, intelligence or reason from leftists, but there was nothing. Tomorrow we will surely see more of the same, because the truth is meaningless to them. CBC/CNN's description of events means far more to leftists than video evidence of what actually happened. Pro tip: if you listen to the audio that was dubbed over CNN's selective video footage of Jan 6th while you read my post, it will help you get in the mood to make Pelosi-style accusations against me, rube.
    1 point
  21. The evidence against Ray Epps, Pelosi and the FBI just keeps growing. I already knew he was an agent provocateur even before I saw the texts he sent. Regardless of which side he was actually on, he needs to be in jail: either he was a Trump supporter urging people to break the law or he was a Pelosi/FBI plant who was sent to urge other people to break the law, in either case he needs to be in prison. Whatever unholy deal he struck with losers from either side, it doesn't allow him to commit actual crimes.
    1 point
  22. Political pundits went on the TNI networks and said that he needed to be shot, and it wasn't because of anything that he did, it was only because of Nancy Pelosi's lies and the evidence that she withheld. Just think what a cold-hearted, evil whore you'd have to be to sit back with that smug little smile of hers while watching people call for the death penalty against a person for no other reason than your own, self-serving lies.
    1 point
  23. It's to be expected that the Dems would embellish a bit, even lie by omission sometimes, because that's what all politicians do. The length and breadth of their lies about Jan 6th is appalling and disqualifying though. Not only did they lie, slander, and even criminalize people who did nothing wrong (called innocent, fellow Americans "terrorists" and "white supremacists", no less), they they had their KGB arrest them and put them in jail without trial for months, and the Dems withheld exculpatory evidence from those who got their show trials. What the Dems have done has far surpassed what could be written off as mere "lying" for the purpose of political manoeuvring anymore, it was blatantly criminal behaviour. It was the kind of criminal behaviour that you see from despots in failed states. We're at a tipping point in NA politics, we're on the brink of surrendering our democracy to tyrants, and our mainstream media is heavily invested in it. Their credibility is now based on the pandemic, the pseudovaxes, white supremacist terrorism rampant, the purity of Biden and Trudeau, and the evil of conservatives. They have crossed the rubicon - they are one-party media.
    1 point
  24. "OMG, THE LEAK!" lol. The fact that we have elected officials here who were propped up by the Communist Party of China is of secondary importance to our police....
    1 point
  25. Robosmith, the sooner you people accept that YOUR side of the political fence is responsible for at least 90% of the pain and misery in this country, the sooner this country will be able to heal itself.
    1 point
  26. Brian Sicknick was. He was also frisky and in perfect health, filmed in the building after he was supposed to be getting murdered outside in the riot. The "deadly insurrection" label was a lie and the subcommittee knew about it. He was giving tours, but to his constituents. The tours weren't in the building and you can see families milling around holding the hands of their children. "Tours to invaders" was another lie the subcommittee knew about. Watch the video, Dummy. Stop embarrassing yourself.
    1 point
  27. HA HA HA. You actually are blaming one person for destroying science LOL Because you don't agree?? Pretty full of yourself eh? LOL Who are "they"?
    1 point
  28. Trump is a conman and YOU'VE BEEN CONNED. LMAO
    1 point
  29. Lol...more to come tomorrow...sweetie-pie.
    1 point
  30. I'm interested in knowing what this "new evidence" is, because the evidence we already had, coupled with the obvious cover-up, was already pretty damning.
    1 point
  31. It's actually not a mystery. Fauci was funding the GoF research on bat coronaviruses through EcoHealth with Daszak, the Chinese "bat lady" and Baric doing the work at the Wuhan lab. The grant funding given to them, documents that they were doing the exact research that sounds a LOT like what became covid, right down to the funky furin cleavage site. Fauci took the lead in covering this up in N. America, he go caught lying to Congress about it and Daszak made sure he was on BOTH committees appointed to investigate a possible lab leak. Guess where those investigations led? Go on. Guess. This is like finding your 2 year old with his hand in the cookie jar, crumbs all over his shirt and chocolate all over his face, asking him if he's been eating the cookies and him saying "No" and expecting you to believe him.
    1 point
  32. I posted the stats in earlier posts with the link to the poll
    1 point
  33. It's amusing that you point out the enormous flaw in your lunatic belief in equal treatment even as you pretend it doesn't matter. Yes indeed, the rich do trot off to the US to get treatment. They also have special clinics that don't use public healthcare dollars in Canada. None of your 'no one can buy better healthcare here' bullshit works with the rich. They do get better healthcare. Of course, they do! The people who don't are the middle class. The middle-class guy who is in constant pain for a year and a half being treated with opioids, who would certainly rather put money into getting a knee or hip replacement than buying a new sofa or taking a vacation down south, but can't because the communists won't let him. You're devoted to a principle which has never worked and will never work. But that doesn't seem to bother you. You'll screw everyone else in your determination to somehow make the impossible dream come true.
    1 point
  34. CTV news announced today the RCMP is investigating the leak from CSIS of Chinese spy interference. Canadians apparently have no right to know anything if it comes from unauthorized channels in CSIS. Why is CSIS not authorizing the release of such information? Guess they are not permitted to give any information out unless authorized by Trudeau. That is the only explanation that makes sense.
    1 point
  35. This is why I love Canada. We're shitting bricks over fake titties instead of excusing daily school shootings.
    1 point
  36. Well they raised interest rates to damped demand for housing (higher cost of borrowing and less people to qualify) and hence lower prices as demand falls. Home prices have indeed fallen all over Canada past year up to 20%, though I get your point that it is more expensive for those who qualify for mortgage to finance a less expensive house. I don't believe interest rates affect food prices as people don't borrow to buy grocery. War in Ukraine and a break in delivery chain and pandemic are the main causes of rise in food prices. Until they are addressed in time food prices will keep rising.
    1 point
  37. Interest rate hikes are not intended to bring down food prices but rather to stop rising house prices. It has to some extend backfired as it caused ridiculously rising rental prices so affecting most those who cannot afford buying the house or the poor. Also those with loans on credit cards (again the poot) paying more on their debts while the rich getting more interest on their savings. More for the rich and less for the poor. Damn.
    1 point
  38. It sounds like the woke Disney corporation had way too much power in Florida to begin with. Their agenda used to be about good family entertainment but now it seems to be mostly about indoctrination of young minds. Good on DeSantis for reining them in. Disney heiress melts down in mad rant, rails against conservatives turning customers against them (bizpacreview.com)
    1 point
  39. Right, so the mrna clot-shot isn't one of them.
    1 point
  40. You don’t want evidence, you want proof. All wrapped up in a pretty bow so you don’t have to bother with critical thinking. Your lazy programmed brain… Same goes with the economy and so on.
    1 point
  41. Well, to me it's not that a crazy person is wearing enormous fake breasts with giant nipples to teach school. It's that the school board is so bloody frightened of appearing even slightly transphobic they don't dare tell them to stop. The teacher is dressed like some kind of pornographic caricature. It's a bizarre sexual fetish displayed in public in front of kids. And regardless of how mature you think high school kids are, remember that some are 14 and come from very morally conservative communities. Regardless, this would be a huge distraction in class, and in this case a safety issue. Almost anyone can see the absurdity of this yet we have a school board quivering and wringing their hands and not daring to do anything but express their full support for a 'transgender' teacher. And it's that cowardice on the part of largely progressive politicians and bureaucrats which has allowed the more extreme demands of a rather shrill activist group to push past the boundaries of common sense. It would be nice if our politicians at every level weren't such cowards, but most of them appear to be. Is it in the nature of a politician? Have we taught them to be that way?
    1 point
  42. Having big breasts isn't a crime. You are confounding the topic with having big breasts and showing nipples to minor students. Showing nipples to minors may be subject to a conviction. Same thing if you want to show your big cock to a class. It isn't appropriate. You have the right to have a big cock herbie, although I doubt you have one, but if you did have one, don't show it to kids. Is it understandable?
    1 point
  43. You'll never hear an intelligent counter-point from that corner, just outright denial of everything that wasn't on CNN. CNN's opinions outweigh video evidence, don't ya know... It's not worth dignifying the trolls here with a response.
    0 points
×
×
  • Create New...