Leaderboard

Yeah, this is some serious shit. But this case is about the US abandoning EVs. Very stupid short-term thinking. Just handing more advantage over to China. I'd say, reduce or take the tariffs off Chinese EVs but get some concessions from them, like building cars or batteries here and tariffs off soybeans, etc... Then build the pipe line to the west coast to sell oil into Asia. Problem is Trump would retaliate hard and fast. And US-Canada trade will always be our most important relationship. Between a rock and a hard place.

There's been a trend among the American left wing since the Obama era to destroy their political adversaries and their reputation through nonsensical high profile legal battles. This has historically tied up their political adversaries money and influence in never ending legal battles. Unfortunately Canada has followed suit through their treatment of freedom convoy organizers. To recap this vile trend among the Obama Democrats: 1. Attempting to imprison multiple Trump affiliates and Trump himself 2. Use of intelligence to spy on and create fictitious narratives about Trump and his associates. 3. The destruction of a Christian baker for refusing to engage in a homosexual wedding (ended up winning on appeal) 4. Multiple lawsuits against the NRA 5. The latest targeting of church ministers to sway a narrative 6. Targeting Fox News 7. Raiding law offices of their political opponents 8. Targeting conservative Christian universities with misleading press stories and lawsuits There are more. But the Obama era Dems are vile

It wasn't and isn't, despite the multi million dollar incentives from all levels of government to try and make it so.

Your sights seem to be unable to see past the large caps, try a different mantra, or better yet, put a new battery in the red dot.

The Conservatives need a leader. It's obvious that Pierre Poilievre is not that person. He's a pitbull on the floor of the Commons, but he seems to be losing his focus, concentrating on all the past Justin Trudeau damage. Conservatives need a leader . . .

Ok...I seriously doubt the 7 million BS. But ya...a bunch of elderly Caucasian folks are simply aghast at how Trump is rocking their lazy canoe. They'd all whiz in their Depends if the violence they call for, visited them.

Actually... Every point @West made, has already been established as true. But I know your objection. You're bored because nobody discussed raping another's daughter. Its just not exciting enough for your... Delicate sensibilities.

Let's be real: no mentally healthy adult in the US thinks that Trump is going to declare himself king, or that he is anywhere near as close to being a fascist as Biden and his FBI-as-a-political-weapon administration were (they even openly floated the idea of seizing total control of the SC by adding 4 new SCJ's). Everyone over the age of 6 who went to the trouble of putting on shoes and travelling 3 or more feet to take part in "no kings day" is clearly delusional, because they're responding with a real sense of purpose to things that are not real at all. Call it mass psychosis, cultist hysteria, or whatever you want, it's a sickness. And it's not just one group of 12 people screaming at clouds anymore, it's hundreds of groups that number in the thousands. It's almost becoming mainstream now. If these people's handlers were well-intentioned, or at least not capable of great evil, one could nervously laugh all of that off, but when you consider the amount of violent rhetoric that's being spewed by leftist leaders, or condoned by them when coming from high-profile cultists, and how many sheeple they have at their beck and call, it's cause for great concern. There are obviously a lot of wannabe assassins and terrorists in a group of 7M such cultists, and they are taking their marching orders from extremely violent leaders. I honestly thought that no kings day was just another small-scale scream at clouds day until one of the village idjits here said that there were 7M of them. Even if that actually means that there were 700,000 of them, that's a crazy amount of cultists. I'm afraid that the evil that we saw from the left from 2014 to early fall 2025 was just a warmup. They relished the murder of Charlie Kirk. They tasted blood and they liked it. How bad is the next set of violent riots gonna be? When you think about how well BLM and ABC were able to manipulate Americans just by carefully selecting and/or editing snippets from actual videos, just imagine how much more hatred they can instill in people by using deepfake technology to create the parts that they want you to believe... Instead of hearing cops actually saying "Can you please step out of the vehicle", you'll hear an edited version of that video sounding like "Get out of the car now, ni____!" Think I'm joking? Look at the whole 10-minute video (or whatever) of Rayshard Brooks' interaction with police.... The police were nice as pie to him for a very long time, while he was lying to them, but leftards pretended that it was some awful bigoted incident that was serious enough to justify extreme violence. Now just imagine a similar video, taken from an eye-witness's camera, where the policemen's words have been edited to come out all hateful and bigoted, while a repentant-seeming Rayshard seems to be telling the truth, but the end result is similar... My guess is that you're gonna start to see a lot of new videos coming out of the States where policemen are using "the hard R" word. The next wave of BLM violence is gonna be outrageous once BLM and ABC start editing those videos with deepfake. These 7M cultists are primed for harsh violence. The "enemy" has been dehumanized with words like Nazi, fascist, bigot, misogynist, racist, colonizer, misogynist, etc for years now.

Don't know the answer to that.

You could never say how it was an invasion before now and still can’t.

I am quoting your full post for emphasis. Finally, ONE place in this world gets it right: https://www.theenergymix.com/saskatchewan-to-extend-life-of-coal-plants/#:~:text=Saskatchewan's government is planning to,offline in the coming years. what few people realize is that there is a lot of talk about Clean Coal Technology, but there is only one plant on the planet that I am aware of that has gone full bore CCT - and that is SK's Boundary Dam. As anyone who has read my Goesfoundation link now knows, coal ash (mostly carbon particulates) are doing immense damage to oceans and lakess - but CCT eliminates those emissions. Just to put this into perspective: CCT plants cost more to build than a nuke.

For those with no real knowledge of the case, it can be best summed up thusly: The Cowichan lived and still live on Vancouver Island. In the summer, they'd come over the strait and set up a fishing camp and pick berries. They mostly stopped that after trading posts were set up on Vancouver Island by the Hudson Bay Company. Decades later, the area was taken over by the British. Eventually, surveyors checked over the area. There was no sign of the natives. Titles were sold off to various people, and that was that until 2014, when the Cowichan suddenly said that was their land and they wanted it back (or a really big payout). The land is worth about $100 billion. To list the many ways in which the trial judge showed open bias and favoritism to the Cowichan and ignored established and constitutional law, and principles, as well as all evidence presented that disputed the Cowichan's, and how politicized, ideologically bound Canadian judges have ignored the constitution to favour natives over the years, this is an excellent summary in easy-to-understand language: https://c2cjournal.ca/2025/09/manufactured-judgements-how-canadas-courts-promote-indigenous-radicalism/

Jeebus. This is not hard. 1. Is there any constitutional or statutory power assigned to the executive to designate individuals or groups as domestic terrorists? No. 2. Did Trump issue and EO that assumed the authority to designate domestic terrorist organizations? Yes. That is a contradiction. He is granting himself new legal authority--creating law--through EO. A. I did not say insurrection. I said political violence. B. Rejecting police authority is a protest, not an attempt to overthrow the government. Not an attempt to hunt (with an express goal of killing) our vice president and key legislators and overturning an election. And while some hodgepodge of various flavors of anarchism is vaguely political, it certainly not comparable to partisan violence. There were something like 75 arrests. Once would be good. Formatting is at your discretion. His "intent" is obvious. The language is plain. He did not address extremism in general. He did not address political violence in general. He explicitly listed things he doesn't "like." Common threads animating this violent conduct include anti-Americanism, anti-capitalism, and anti-Christianity; support for the overthrow of the United States Government; extremism on migration, race, and gender; and hostility towards those who hold traditional American views on family, religion, and morality.

In other words you have no source of truth or final authority. That explains your comments and why you resent someone who dares to express their beliefs. You should remember we supposedly live in a free society where everyone is free to believe in what they want and express their opinions freely.

It looks alot like the playbook they played on the Trump organization and on the NRA. Unless you believe every conservative institution is embezzling money. I personally see these as politicization of the judiciary with the midterms coming up. Its a pattern.

Why would you u want a boring banker from the UK to be your head of state. Who wouldn’t want a president like Trump. You’re all lucky to have such an emperor.

At the moment xenophobia is entirely justifiable given your country’s disgraceful actions against its closest friend. You just don’t get how we feel right now.

The name changes are a joke and a test for tthe most part. It's to see how far the Indians can push things, and also to see how far the 'wokie whites' will humble themselves so that they percieve themselves to be 'enlightened'. As I mentioned in an earlier post, we . . . white/native can't spell or pronounce the names either. They are made~up words. Enjoy the subtle native joke on you . . . you've been had. Smile, we're smiling too. Actually ear to ear grins!

If the left were honest, it would be because he makes them feel stupid, so they lash out. But they will say all pf the above because they think their emotional arguments are rational.

I dont know. I just notice the pattern and this has "WOKE" written all over it 😆

It doesn't help the people when the NDP/Liberals spend like maniacs and run Canada deep into debt. Now expected to approach 60 billion dollars. Interest must be paid on the debt by the taxpayers. That means less money available for all the services. Less money for services because we the taxpayers are forced to pay the interest on the debt. At some point the government will be forced to start cutting back on services to pay for interest on the debt and pay down the debt itself or we will never recover. All that means it is impossible to bring in new social programs like Pharmacare and increased spending on our failing health care system. All that has happened under the Liberal-NDP coalition is the cost of living has gone up, two million people depend on food banks, the cost of homes has gone through the roof, rent is out of sight, and the health care has got worse. The NDP would only make everything worse.

Wasted vote. The NDP can't do anything and have nothing positive to offer. All the NDP wants is to spend, spend, spend which would not be helpful at all.

I think this is a really important point and every time it's made here, the climate alarmists get an extreme case of the vapors and insist that no amount of money, no amount of suffering is too much because we're all going to spontaneously combust in flames ANY SECOND NOW. (Previously, we were all going to freeze to death ANY SECOND NOW.) The vast amounts of money being spent on lowering emissions of carbon, is money that could be spent on finding technologies that would actually improve the planet's environment. And it is impoverishing the world. Impoverished people don't give a rat's patootie about the environment. They just want to survive each day. Up to $41 billion in World Bank climate finance not being properly tracked, Oxfam finds | Oxfam International Where is all this money going to? No one knows, but there seems to be a lot of people getting super fuquing rich off this and still no effect on carbon, globally. It's a scam. It's a grift.

I know exactly what an EO is. You are the one espousing contradictory claims regarding that authority. I clearly articulated the contradiction. It's your problem if you can't reconcile the claims you must acknowledge that Trump is indeed illegally creating new executive powers: making law. Gaslighting over J6 is not going to work. How many times do you want me to quote it? Should I bold it more too? Jeebus. I can't read it for you too.

You aren't a b proctologist, but you spend so much time with your head up your ass we let you quote shit all the time. We figure you are an expert on shit.

Ya, different critters but I'd argue that all three require "showing up." And that isn't our strong suit IMO. Remember the Turbot... it's a flat fish most people had never even heard of before they heard of it for the first time. I thought we might collectively learn a few lessons from that because making a show of defending that little fish taxed our maritime resources pretty heavily... and that was at a time when there was arguably more resources to tax. Here's another thought, maybe the idea of community defence should include a coastal flotilla of expendable canoes with small cannons in the bow to replace the shore bombardment (NGS) capability that the Herbs of the world opined we didn't need in a modern world. Their arguments against it included the idea that things like TASMO (as a for instance) made more sense. The same Herbs now argue against the need for modern fighters without remembering what they said about NGS back then or even considering that (among other things), fighters protect airspace and airspace is what the rest of your Air Force operates in. It doesn't take much in the way of imagination to compile an updated list of "what did you think was going to happen" questions to be placed in an envelope marked "open in 20 years." Maybe it's the canaries of today that become the sage prophets of tomorrow... the "we don't need heavy lift helicopters" argument is actually my favourite to date, those arguments aged pretty poorly in Afghanistan. It's a bit like listening to the Cov1diots of today who insist that they're "following the science" but still can't (or won't) discuss that science at a high school biology level.

So you can't refute any of it and you're back to "why are we talking about this". I notice your post is citeless too

Yeah but you have to admire the consistency... that's hard to find these days

I have not told any lies, that’s just a one the many false accusations you rely on when you have no facts. And yet he’s ranting about a former prime minister and making spurious accusations about alleged controversies from several elections ago that Canadians don’t care about and don’t believe. Carney still has high approval ratings especially for handling the Tariffs so far. As I already pointed out, cancelling the counter-tariffs has boosted the Canadian economy. Why would he keep them if they aren’t getting results in Washington while also hurting the Canadian economy? Only a conservative would be that stupid as to keep doing things that clearly are no longer working. That’s not the base, that’s just how many decided to vote for him last time, some of them are swing voters and if he’s only going to appeal to the base while turning everyone else off he’s just going to lose more. Every day that Trudeau is gone, PP is that much more irrelevant. He better hope Doug Ford stays Premier for a long time because once that’s over he might be the new contender for PP’s job. Apparently DoFo is the most popular conservative in the country right now and PP’s team of toxic personalities decided to make enemies out of Ford’s team (they also unnecessarily made enemies with Houston’s team in Nova Scotia).

glad to hear you're on board Major Deflection Why would i? You're free comedy "Derp!! I'm not a liberal supporter, i just think the liberals are the best and everything's harper's fault!!! Terrorists are just oppressed people exercising their rights! Body cameras would solve all our political prolems!! DEERP!!" LOL honestly you can't buy that kind of humour I accept your surrender

On the one hand, you say that EOs don't create law, but on the other, you've just endorsed an EO which claims for the executive authority which has neither constitutional nor statutory basis. You might wanna figure that out. And someone whose lies and rhetoric incited the worst political violence since the civil war--and then pardoned the perpetrators--clearly is *not* concerned about divisive language as a whole. That's why the damn thing is written *specifically* to target his political opposition rather than to address all political speech. The opposition: that's who he's directing the government to investigate. It's naked fascism. There in black and white plain as day. Trump continues his quest to end the American experiment while you cheer him on.

No, don't ask Deluge, because Deluge already knows Don Lemon is a seditious piece of shit - he wants to use the 2nd Amendment to kill patriots and make room for illegal aliens. That's not what the Amendment is for.

This is what the Liberals have done to Canada

The frivolous lawsuit was thrown out as it should have been. Only SICKOS support the abuse of the legal system like that.

Yeah, like turkeys are looking forward to an early Christmas! Fever dreams of rabid PP supporters.

I hope that is not true, i just don't have enough time to be rubbing liberals noses in a loss, it would take all my time....i mean just take all those heads exploding in the streets , who is going to clean up all that Sh!t, see what i did there Sh!t for brains , heads exploding, ya you get it.......` anyways i'm not up for it, Conservative's would be parting like it was 1999, there would be no booze any where, they would be rounding up what was left of the lefties and deporting them to Gaza for the rebuild.... Liberals would be asking for MAID in record numbers....drug use would spike so liberal's could cope.... and lets not even get into the PP haters....crap they would be falling from the skys with no parachutes....in the cities....we would be up to our bellies in crap.... But the next day after the clean up, conservative polices would start to undo the liberal mistakes over the last 10 plus years.....Justin would be locked up, in a semi trailer with glass walls that would tour the country so conservatives could throw rotten vegetables at him for 10 bucks a throw...we could solve the deficit with just one cross country tour... It is just to much work right now, maybe next year when we are all ready for the parting and round up...

Or they'll both make a big show of whining about it then abstain from voting so they don't have to pick themselves up after the fall either. Drama queens need to dramatize.

You demonstrated the other day that you have no idea what the word means, but yes you are pro fascism. Here you go. You are supporting an executive order that illegally established a framework to investigate, harass and even imprison people for exercising a huge range of political speech and non-criminal actions. It's HUAC on steroids, aimed at chilling and criminalizing dissent. Under this illegal EO, I'm eligible for investigation simply for making this post. And you're applauding it. Yes, to are pro-fascist.

https://www.deseret.com/faith/2023/10/25/23930090/christian-baker-jack-phillips-masterpiece-cakeshop-where-is-he-now/ Here's one for you. They tried to ruin this dudes life over a cake. Sad stuff

"Former Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government supported and funded carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology . While opponents criticized his environmental record, the Harper government consistently positioned CCS as a key strategy for reducing Canada's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, particularly from the energy sector. Key examples of the Harper government's support for carbon capture include: Boundary Dam Project: In 2008, Harper repeated his support and announced federal funding for the Boundary Dam CCS project in Saskatchewan. The $1.4-billion pilot project aimed to capture carbon dioxide from a coal-fired generator, with the federal government contributing significantly to the endeavor. Clean Energy Fund: The Harper government's Economic Action Plan created a $1-billion Clean Energy Fund to support CCS initiatives. In 2009, funding from this program was distributed to eight different carbon capture projects in Western Canada. Oilsands investment: In 2013, Harper committed $82 million to fund clean-energy projects, including those researching more efficient ways to capture carbon dioxide from the Alberta oilsands. He argued that CCS was a "practical and responsible way of developing the oilsands". World leader status: In 2009, Harper expressed the belief that Canada could be a world leader in carbon capture and storage technology. Official communications from his government referred to Canada as a global leader in CCS research and development. However, some critics viewed the Harper government's emphasis on carbon capture as a way to avoid stronger climate action and regulations for the oil and gas industry. Environmental Minister Jonathan Wilkinson, a member of a later government, stated that under Harper, "carbon capture got a very bad reputation... because it was pointed to as the way to solve climate change," rather than part of a broader strategy.

Granted that was a bit sarcastic... but it's still not that far removed from reality when you consider the state of our (gasp) carrier battle groups. Here's the thing IMO, after 32 years and 10 foreign deployments you and yours don't trust me to even own a semi-automatic rifle, so I'm wondering... since you can't (or won't) train, equip and field a viable professional military, how do you plan to train and equip a viable (community based) force with enough teeth to bite a soft boiled egg? If Army Guy and I can't make the cut, what would your equity based recruiting standard look like?

His sheeple need just that! Can't think for themselves, they need to be TOLD what to do.

Yup. 'Pretend they're not there:' Canada won't submit new 2030, 2035 climate targets, but won't commit to meet them | National Post Nope. In fact emissions went down under harper more than any other prime minister. Harper did more to help the environment with his gst rebate on home upgrades than the liberals have done in the last 11 years. And yet twats like you still vote liberal "for climate change"

Is that your new sig? Can you tell me what being a black entrepeneur has to do with the health department? Can you tell me why you think the health department should be spending just under $200 million on black entrepeneurs and ONLY Black entrpeneurs?

The fact that Justin Trudeau was never interviewed by the RCMP when he was the primary person of interest is deeply troubling. This was either serious incompetence or corruption. Either one is pretty bad.

I find the whole SNC thing pretty interesting, mostly from the standpoint of it being about bribes in the "land of bribes." By all accounts, CBC reporters (and others BTW) carried suitcases full of cash to bribe their way into areas they wanted access to. That's how it works there, it's just how things get done... a simple fact of life if you will. Now, In the interests of full disclosure, I know nothing of the details and wouldn't be commenting on it if I did... BUT. During OUP Libya, when CF elements were involved in combat operations and the Gaddafi family were under UN imposed travel restrictions, there were SNC security operators known (through open source reporting) to be in Libya. What were they doing there? Some might opine that they were coordinating the evacuation of Gaddafi family members to third party countries. You and I will probably never know, but offering bribes in the land of bribes, which is an SOP by any definition of the term, became an under inflated political football and the outrage about it, propagated by other organizations that were equally culpable in paying bribes, always struck me as a bit over the top and lacking the ring of truth. Perhaps we don't even know what we don't know, and maybe I'm totally wrong...in either case though I'm willing to bet we never find out. I have a list of basic security questions about the NS shooting, the Danforth shooting and the "assault on the US capital"that remain unanswered to this day and I'm just cynical enough to believe that those answers are in the same file folder as the SNC debacle.

A Rebuttal: Via Vesper on "X" "Your take on what Pierre said needs an update from a fellow Montreal Conservative. Your post is a touching eulogy, Dimitris, for a Conservative Party that exists more in nostalgia than in reality. You speak of history, principle, and purpose, while scolding Pierre Poilievre for having the temerity to apply those very principles to a Prime Minister who treats the law as a suggestion box. Let’s be clear: your argument isn’t that Poilievre is wrong on the facts. It’s that his tone is impolite. How very Canadian to suggest that pointing out a Prime Minister’s alleged criminality is a greater offence than the criminality itself. You claim that in a “rule-of-law democracy, no opposition leader should ever call for a Prime Minister to be jailed.” What breathtakingly selective principle. A rule-of-law democracy ceases to be one when its highest official is seen to be above the law. The real recklessness isn't in calling it out; it's in the silent acquiescence to a two-tiered justice system. You accuse Poilievre of “grievance” for stating a grievance that is, according to the evidence, entirely valid. Let’s consult the very source you provided from Democracy Watch. Their request for an independent prosecutor lays out a case that is anything but the fever dream you dismiss it as. To summarize for those who won’t click the link: • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐄𝐯𝐢𝐝𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞: The Ethics Commissioner found Trudeau guilty of violating the Conflict of Interest Act in the Aga Khan affair. In the SNC-Lavalin scandal, the Ethics Commissioner found he used his authority to "circumvent, undermine and attempt to undermine" the rule of law. • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐂𝐫𝐢𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞: Democracy Watch points to Section 139 of the Criminal Code, which defines "Obstructing Justice." The evidence of a sustained, coordinated pressure campaign on the Attorney General to stop a criminal prosecution fits this definition to a T. • 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐑𝐂𝐌𝐏'𝐬 𝐈𝐧𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧: As Democracy Watch details, the RCMP never even interviewed Justin Trudeau about SNC-Lavalin, despite a mountain of public evidence. Your post defends this as protecting “confidence in our justice system,” but to any objective observer, it looks an awful lot like the “despicable” shielding Poilievre described. If the RCMP won't investigate a sitting Prime Minister with this much evidence, who exactly will they investigate? You say Poilievre “has not learned the lessons of his electoral defeat.” Perhaps the lesson he learned is that a segment of the electorate is tired of Conservatives who bring a PowerPoint presentation to a knife fight. Canadians saw a Prime Minister who, according to multiple, independent watchdogs, repeatedly violated ethical and potentially criminal standards. What they “needed” was an opposition leader with the courage to name that corruption, not one who wrings his hands over parliamentary decorum while the foundations of accountability are eroded. The legacy of Macdonald, Diefenbaker, and Harper wasn’t built on politely ignoring brazen abuses of power, Dimitris. It was built on conviction. Poilievre’s rhetoric isn’t a distortion of that legacy; it’s a revival of its fighting spirit. The only thing being “rewritten” is the Liberal narrative that their former leader is untouchable."

I haven't been had with anything. At the end of the day it's not important to me at all what street names are and not sure why it is to most, unless of course you have nothing else to be concerned about. That joke would be on you...

What do having sex in a canoe and american beer have in common? They're both F'ing pretty close to water. We could never join. We're just not the same

Says the cultist who nods his head like a bobble doll every time carney speaks You think that because you're a cultist everyone else is too. But that's not how it works