Nationalist

Really? So you can prove this?

Well that's all very cool but. It's here say. Not provable. Thus...in your own favorite words...you have no proof. That and...ya...up yours. Relish your own tactics Libbie.

Are you through making an a55 of yourself...again...? What inequities do you see?

What commies and NAZIs? I must have missed something.

Hey. Who else recognizes the "Summer of Love"? Who are these collage protestors? Who's financing them?

Lol...ok sure...

Ok. China did get involved in our last election and Trudeau new about it. He's already paying for his stupidity. His own side dislike him now. Shortly after Trump starts his second term, Pixie-Dust will be disposed of. Isn't it strange how collusion actually looks like a Libbie tactic? Hillary, Hunter, Brandon...all have had their "collusion" with assorted Russians and Chinese.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/obama-trump-biden-ukraine-military-aid-1.6371378 Obama sent blankets. That was the talking points of the day remember? Trump started sending arms in 2018. Back then... https://ottawacitizen.com/news/national/defence-watch/canadian-officials-who-met-with-ukrainian-unit-linked-to-neo-nazis-feared-exposure-by-news-media-documents We were being warned that the Ukraine military had neo-nazi freaks and maybe couldn't be completely trusted. Then...as if by the magic of the cold war...Russia makes its "minor incursion" and poof...the Azov Batallion becomes the recipients of new arms and bales of cash. "Poof". On the other side Putin, a Russian president that has been surrounded here by accusations of election tampering and "collusion" with Orangemanbad. The ultimate sin. I always found the sequence of events leading up to this...a little too convenient. Simple yet..."plausible". Sellable to at least half the population right from the onset. A cakewalk story. Anyway... Russia attacks. They enter eastern Ukraine and North aimed at Kiev. Air strip, military installations, targeted. Nothing about that northern incursion made sense. Sh1t or get off the pot...and they just sat there. It was weird. But as Russia was drawing back their forces in the north, a treaty was being negotiated. The one Johnson killed. Since then, hundreds of thousands have died. None of this was necessary. Frankly I'd like to charge Johnson with a war crime. Today Russia has regrouped and expanded its troops about 5 fold. If Eastern Ukraine was being negotiated before, it's lost now. Maybe even Odessa. America sends 61 billion in "aid"...to arms producers in America. Oh I'm sure some more drones and missiles will be sent, along with some cash, but the cost here is higher debt for us, and what? We can pat ourselves on the backs for feeding them so they don't die today? What is needed is a negotiated peace deal now.

I never said Putin is benevolent or even a nice guy. I'm saying Ukraine cannot "win" and needs to negotiate with the Russians for a peace treaty. As soon as Donbas and Luhansk voted to separate, the Ukrainian military began shelling civilians. Not even Obama could bring himself to send military aid under those conditions.

Most of Ukraine is still there. Russia has not "conquered" anything but the lands of the folks Ukraine was busy trashing. Question: Did the harshness of the Treaty of Versailles after WWI, have anything to do with the reasons for WWII?

Ya...a brave cop shot an unarmed woman who happened to be a military veteran. You're full of sh1t.!

No they were not "scrubbing blood off the floor" on the 23rd. Man you just lie constantly don't you.

News will always be available. Funding from our money through taxation or not.

No. I "blame" all of them...including the USA and NATO and Russia.

Ukraine has little to no "leverage" now! There's an old saying I reiterate here often. "Ya gits wut ya pays fer" Perhaps Ukraine should have treated the ethnic Russians in the east, better than slaves and unwanted? Perhaps they shouldn't have attacked them? But they did. I'm not excusing Russia from invading. I'm saying...if you kick a bear, the bear is likely to bite your leg off. Putin is a liar. Zelinsky is a liar. Biden, Macron, all of them...liars. In the mean time...it the Ukrainian people who foot the bill. Its gotten sick now.

Hodad...your continuous harping about the insurrection that wasn't is tiring and a complete lie. No "political party" hunted anyone. No politician hunted anyone. Your constant attempts to force a square peg in a round hole is ridiculous. As are you.

What I mean is, sit them both down and have them negotiate seriously. The original framework reached in 2022 would be a great starting point. Remember...Russia says they are willing to negotiate any time Ukraine is ready. Sooo...do it. Save some lives and let Blackrock re-build Ukraine...then own all its infrastructure.

Too bad so sad?

The OP is virtue signalling...plain and simple.

Remove funding for all media and let's see who survives.

How very stupid. Do you really think women are not "empowered" to get into politics? As has been proven, when given completely free reign, men choose certain careers and women choose certain careers. In many, if not most cases, their choices are completely different. If that surprises you then I would suggest you know very little about either sex. Some women would make great leaders. But overall, women tend to go into other professions. They make their choices of their own free will. This is clearly reflected by the numbers of each in politics and every other profession. In summary, you cannot force women...or men...to choose careers they don't have any interest in. I'm sure you feel good about this stupidity you've displayed here but here's another truth. Women gravitate to strong masulinity. Being a limp noodle may get you accolades. But it won't get you prodigy. Be a man.

Good debate. Here's the current reality. https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukraine-outnumbered-outgunned-ground-down-by-relentless-russia-2024-02-21/ And the idea that Ukrainians are eager to go to war is nonsense. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-66542065 Thousands have fleed and It appears thousands more will flee. Ukraine will have a hard time raising a military defense. So...short of ammo...short of manpower...being ground to hamburger. And will Russia ever relinquish what they've captured? The saying "cold day in Hell" comes to mind. It's already known...and has been for a long time now...that Ukraine simply does not have the manpower to win a drawn out war of attrition. Russia now outnumber them by at least 2 to 1. They are armed to the teeth while Ukraine is now having to budget their arms usage. You wanna save what's left of Ukraine? Invite the Russians to Switzerland in July and hammer out a peace deal.

Ok...so you assert...that... 1. With proper financing from NATO nations, Ukraine can hold Russia to a stalemate for 250 years. I disagree but assuming the Ukrainians would be willing, what would be the point of that? So that in 250 years Russia has possession of the land they have today? It would be wiser of NATO to force a peace deal on them both and be done with it. Ukraine gets to rebuild and Ukrainians get to live. 2. NATO nations cannot afford to pay to keep Ukraine functional and arm them. It drags all NATO nations further toward financial disaster. Russia and China know this. Both have their own financial issues, but is the USA or any NATO nation willing to divest from China? No. 3. There was a realistic peace deal in the works 2 years ago. Why did Johnson go there and kill it? What did he offer Zelinsky to get him to do an about face? It's commonly said that this war will degrade Russia and that's a good outcome. But Russia appears to be doing just fine. Now Zelinsky wants another peace deal summit in Switzerland this July...without Russian presence. Just about the dumbest, most presumptuous idea I've heard in a very long time. 4. This idea that Russia will attack a NATO nation after they "conquer" Ukraine is asinine. If a full scale war breaks out between Russia and NATO, it'll have been a NATO nation that starts it...and you already know that I suspect. 5. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/nov/04/ex-nato-head-says-putin-wanted-to-join-alliance-early-on-in-his-rule Yes...Russia did want to be a NATO member. NATO could have negotiated term that both sides could agree to, but chose not to. Granted, Putin's condition of not having to apply and stand in line, was a bit presumptuous, but negotiations could have resulted in a unified Europe. Now who do you suppose this rejection benefited? Certainly not the European population. This is a war of misguided convenience by the USA. They are using the Ukrainians as cannon fodder in an effort to neutralize Russia...but it isn't working. This farce needs to end now before some dumb pr1ck causes a full scale war in Europe.

There was no coup. You should stop lying now. You look ridiculous.

I post my opinions and draw those opinions from what I see. Live with it.