Leaderboard

That’s because you’re not very smart.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-york-judge-sets-trump-sentencing-days-before-inauguration These people are pure evil

On the other hand you will repetitively vote for someone who has proven to be corrupt, breaks the law regularly, is dishonest, and has lead Canada to ruin. But he didn't say woke! So he's all good right? People like you are one of the best arguments against democracy

I would like to thank "Team Canada" for their good faith arguments based on knowledge and factual information. It certainly has not been easy in 2024, to debate with a bunch of MAGA Hyenas, but you were all up for the task, and I commend you for it. Team Canada is composed of: @Michael Hardner @myata @robosmith @BeaverFever @Hodad @Moonlight Graham @eyeball @Moonbox @Black Dog @Queenmandy85 @Politics1990 @herbie @Radiorum Sorry if I forgot anyone. You made 2024 much better. Thank you for believing in democracy.

The interview explains how the cost of living for Canadians has become a major disaster and what PP and the Conservatives will do about it. Home ownership is out of sight for young people which inhibits their ability to have families. The size of the federal bureaucracy has increased by 40% under Trudeau. The cost of homes means it would take 29 years for a young person to save up enough money for the down payment. This means they could not raise a family and own a home. The federal deficit of 62 billion dollars in the past year means a debt of $6,000 for each Canadian. This interview answers what the Conservatives plan to do about it.

According to the parliamentary budget officer income inequality grew under Chretien but subsided under Harper due to tax changes the Tories had made. It has been growing under Trudeau, however.

Nope. They absolutely did not. No they don't. And when conservative governments do it and the electorate finds out about it conservatives punish the shit out of them. The problem is that those on the left are constantly prepared to reward that behavior. And yet you want to excuse it by pretending somehow it's acceptable to other people. Like your own lack of morals and decency is somehow ok if you can pretend everyone else feels the same way. They don't. We're not talking about a slip up or a misunderstanding or somebody being incompetent and doing something they shouldn't have, we're talking about constant and regular deliberate breaches of ethics and the law that began almost immediately after he took office and has not stopped. Not to mention allowing foreign interference in the form of Chinese money pouring into liberal candidates and taking no action to prevent us because it was beneficial to him. Sorry, you don't get to pass that off as everybody does it. You are supporting a corrupt government because you are a corrupt and moralist individual as are many on the left. Fortunately the ones who are not as a moral and repugnant as yourself have finally realized that they cannot support the scumbag liberals the way they used to and are now turning to Poilievre and are set to give him the largest majority in history. The liberals will have a long walk back from this one and they may even be wiped out, which is what they desperately need. The party has become inherently corrupt and so has its base. They need to be shaken up and think about their actions.

News flash....PP does not need your approval or vote it is already a sure thing with a super majority, the liberal and NDP parties are going to be devastated....with a great possibility of the bloc party becoming official opposition, ....so for the next 4 years or so get use to his remarks....on a positive note we will not have to listen to many liberals or NDPers whine from the bench....

lol such a great life but you sit on this forum 24/7 year round good job bragging up your fake good life though bud lol

Is this better? Would this person do a better job of protecting us... ...from this... ...or maybe this guy... ...can protect us from... from these guys. ⬆️ I think I will take the guy that can cite law, off the top of his head, over the DEI hires that are more concerned about pronouns than results. And so will the majority of Americans. That's why they voted, overwhelmingly, for DJT.

The fact that you think that being interviewed by someone make someone fit or unfit is yet another sign that you are not fit to be a voter

Once you've described exactly WTF the Biden Crime Syndicate that you made up is and WTF "crimes" it supposedly committed I will be happy to provide you links to the Court documents about the crimes Trump has been convicted of. You seem to be totally unaware of the difference between conspiracy rumours and factual truth, That's a well known side effect of cultism.

I hope these three are voted out. They don't deserve to be MPs since they pose a threat to democracy! Ya’ara Saks, Marci Ien, and Karina Gould Three Liberal MPs have been ordered by the Federal Court to unblock Rebel News on X and pay $1,750. The ruling came after Rebel News was victorious in a lawsuit against Guilbeault, who blocked Rebel founder and owner Ezra Levant on the social media platform. “What’s so crazy is that they’re doing to us exactly what Steven Guilbeault, Trudeau’s extremist environment minister, did to us — and he was smashed in Federal Court,” said Rebel News. Guilbeault allegedly ordered his government department to block Rebel on X. The news organization could not receive any government news updates from the environment minister’s department. “We couldn’t read anything, we couldn’t reply, and of course we couldn’t ask him journalistic questions on Twitter. We were effectively kicked out of the public square, which is what Twitter has become,” said Levant. “We were banned from a government service just because we disagreed with a politician.” “The Federal Court ordered three more Liberal ministers to unblock Rebel News on Twitter. Ya’ara Saks, Marci Ien, and Karina Gould are forbidden to block us for the rest of their careers. They were also ordered to pay us $1,750. The money arrived. They made taxpayers pay!” https://tnc.news/2024/02/27/federal-court-ordered-liberal-unblock-rebel-fine/

That doesn't mean your experience with racism was universal. I doubt those. people who were Indigenous, Asian, Black etc who were around back then would tell the same story. And as I pointed out to DumbFux, Canada's immigration policies were quite explicitly racist for the first half of the country's existence, which kinda undermine's PP's point about racism not really being a thing in the past.

Hmmm, I guess that explains why Trudeau gave at least $20.2 billion to the oil and gas industry in 2022 including the purchase of the Trans-mountain Oil Pipeline.

Progressives always complain about how racist Western nations are, but are at a loss to explain why millions upon millions of black and brown people are willingly going to live in those same countries.

No thanks. Go knock on the basement door at Herbie's mom's house.

Your a perfect example of a liberal voter, nose blind to all the sh!t they have done in the last 9 years. Thats normal practice for you liberals happens in all governments, your moral values are at the bottom of the scale....supporting a party that has made a practice out of lying to Canadians on a daily basis, deceiving Canadians , stealing from Canadians to benefit their own needs and wants...these are Canadian heros to you....because you are just like them...

Summary of the above post.... I don't like Peterson so I scoured the internet to find something that fits my dislike. Amiright?

😆 I can't take anyone serious who wants to be pm and uses the word wokeism for everything the more he speaks the more it has convinced me to just go vote for whichever party has the best chance in my riding vs his at this point. Also thinking company's are gonna pass money down in wages to workers is hilarious that has never worked either they will pocket it for themselves. to be honest i was gonna just sit out the next election but him babbling on about wokeism and just being an annoying turd the past couple month has convinced me to go vote instead of staying home so congrats PP 1 more vote against you cause of your big mouth 🤣

Context seems to be lacking here. The accusation was made by JT when he was asked about the effect and role of Russian disinformation in anti-vaccine messaging... keep in mind that bogus Russian funding was his excuse for seizing bank accounts. The idea was that RT (Russia Today) had provided some funding to a number of Bloggers and the like in support of their anti vaccine messaging. He simply used Peterson as an example of the type of programming IMO but perhaps it was directed at him personally as well (not sure about that and don't care enough to go looking). In any case, Peterson denied it... then again, so did all of the single mothers who contributed to the Go Fund Me effort and had their accounts seized... you'll have to decide for yourself who you believe, I already have though. In the meantime, here's a link to RTs website for today, like Al Jazeera I look at it occasionally. Does that make me a traitor? https://www.rt.com/news/ Did you peek? If so, you're just as guilty as Peterson. Since you're the one throwing stones maybe more so, you clearly know better... right? See how this works? Now imagine if I went on TV and doxed you as being Russia Today fan... and supporter. I bet I could even match up a few of your views with there views... and everyone you've ever insulted here would likely be happy to believe it.

I love this dude saying he grew up in a homogeneous bubble and then pretending his was a universal experience. For most of Canada's history, white Europeans were the only people allowed to come here (and even some of those groups had restrictions placed on them).

I am placing you on ignore. You are an old man, and time has passed you by. This is not the early 1970s, when you would spend your nights crying in your room, with Elton John playing in the background, since the high school girls rejected you. It's 2025.

Haven't watched this yet. I'm just not that into the guy. I'll see if I can put it on in the background later when I'm doing something more interesting. Frankly, there's never been a politician I'd want to hear talk for an hour and forty minutes. But good on him for doing it. Doubt Trudeau ever did or would. The thing now has 36 million views on YouTube, apparently, which is fascinating in itself. It suggests a lot of non-Canadians must be watching. Why!? Perhaps they're just that starved for leaders in the West who speak fairly plainly and address the things that concern them. You are an ignorant little twat. Racism is not a synonym for prejudice no matter what your internet dictionary tells you. But again, as someone almost entirely uneducated you wouldn't know that. I think many, if not most of the problems in our society today can be traced to the poor quality of our education systems.

You're a child. When I was growing up in the 1960s and 1970s there was no one to be racist TO. I had no non-white classmates until two Chinese girls in a college class. I remember a friend and me passing a church back when I was in grade 6/7 and he said that was where his family went to church, that they were Anglicans. I had no idea what that even was. I knew there were protestants and Catholics, but not what the difference was. Religion just didn't matter much to me and I never heard anyone mention it or race in school. Television didn't mention race. The papers didn't either. Hard to have racism in largely homogenous communities. In the 1971 census there were only around 30k blacks in all of Canada. There were even fewer Asians, mostly Chinese who kept largely to themselves. Nobody wore funny costumes and no one had an accent. That's the world of then. Virtually all the races other than whites were imported, and no effort made to integrate them. Needless to say, wildly different cultures did not and do not entirely get along. Resentments arise, and with poor government, grow worse. And we've had very, very, very, VERY poor government that now gives openly preferential treatment to some races. And is proud of doing so! It tells them they're victims of evil white oppression and tells white people to feel guilt and shame about a past they had nothing to do with (and which they largely lie about anyway). Yeah, like that's not going to cause resentment...

Jurisprudence artfully convicted and bottled.? Sounds like a jam you would find at your local yuppie emporium. They also sell fructooligosaccharides (FOS) as artificial sweeteners. Robo, you must stay away from those places, the aroma from the scented candles is making you dizzy.

https://www.newsweek.com/gavin-newsom-bans-california-requiring-id-vote-1961685 Is that better? This was written by Jesus himself.

You'd rather get the editor's biased opinion than the information straight from the source? The Homan X post is what Homan thinks. In a thread about Homan, it seemed appropriate.

So what you're saying is the dems definitely don't want to win in 2028

Only because you refuse. Seriously? It pains you to rise even that little above yourself? I mean, do we need the hurt dolly to get to bottom of this?

The definition of a transgender female is a male. If they want to be called a transgender female then we can certainly look at accommodating that but really if you wanted to find tune it then they would just be transgender. But their biology doesn't change just because they're perception does. A transgender female is a male

These Anaheim Ducks uniforms are wild, but they're growing on me. Still wish they'd gone with the jade and eggplant though.

@CdnFox is a lonely old man, with health problems. I actually feel sorry for him.

Just remember whenever a right wing gun nut shoots up a school or mall nobody is allowed to talk abut guns without the right wing nutjobs on this site falsely accusing them of being “happy” and not showing respect for the dead. But if there’s even the most remote possibility the killer is Muslim or can somehow associated with “the left” then its all good, it doesn’t count Notice how their tone changed once the Tesla bomber was revealed to be a Trump supporter.

Actually, that is your source quoting another paper. Your source came to the conclusion: "First, homophobia was associated with increased odds of straight identification in all groups." Your source says homophobia is associated with identifying as heterosexual. As a man that identifies as a woman and demands everyone else believe that, how can you claim that homophobic people that identify as straight are anything other than straight? Unless....you are a hypocrite?

Bravo. When ur right...ur right.

Well that's just ridiculous People are not going to elect him because they like the sound of his rhetoric, they want a better economy.

The plea deal was not offered by Biden or by a Biden cabinet member, or by a Biden appointee. It was offered by someone to whom the authority had been delegated. Austin tried to take back the plea offer once he became aware that it had been made. And if you really care, this plea has been in the works since the Trump admin. "Mr. Wood, a colonel in the Arkansas National Guard, was appointed to the job during the Trump administration, in April 2020. In March 2022, he empowered prosecutors to negotiate a plea agreement in the Sept. 11 case. Under the proposal, Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the accused mastermind of the attacks, and four other men would serve life in prison rather than risk the possibility of a death sentence at a trial, in exchange for admitting to conspiring in the hijacking attacks that killed 2,976 people. The talks have been stalemated, awaiting a response from the Biden administration." Does this mean your misplaced outrage will shift to Trump? Or will it suddenly fizzle out, mysteriously vanishing as quickly as it appeared? Sorry to spoil your finger-pointing fun. But on the upside, you'll have time to ponder the actual substantive questions.

Wrong. I've posted two empirical studies (one from 2009) that supports my contention. You attempted to debunk empirical studies with a blog/opinion piece. What a halfwitted buffoon you are. I think you'd be much happier if you'd crawl out of the closet you're hiding in and visit your local "bath house". Get your freak on, so to speak.

Where else would Yankee brown nosers eat? Proud Canadians eat out at the Y

This is a pretty interesting channel called Forgotten History. There is a series called Most Corrupt, and he did name certain Democrats and Republicans.

As evidenced by Dim Biden and his even dimmer vp.

Eh, the bar for presidential conduct has been lowered again.

Canada chows down on the pizza, complains about the crust, cheese, etc., and Alberta picks up the tab yet again. Quebec is a parasite, and the rest of Canada wrings its hands rather than taking the medicine to sh!t this parasite out. Canada is f'ked as long as Quebec is involved.

4,732. Unfortunately tho even completing the requirement won't change the fact you have no idea what a duck looks like. To you in this case a 'duck ' or neo nazi is anyone who disagrees with you or is right of castro. We have one nazi on the board, he doesn't try to hide it, and he's pretty left wing. The rest is your imagination.

I'm not 'fabricating' court cases, or Wikipedia articles detailing the new uses for terms like gender. You have an amazing inability to actually respond to what is said. I did not say you were fabricating court cases or Wikipedia articles. I respond to what you say, you just don't like my responses. True, you did not say I was fabricating court cases or Wikipedia articles. You -did- say that I was fabricating a problem, though. I'm just trying to point out to you that the new gender terms are not something I invented, and they are being used in court cases and Wikipedia articles. You can try to deny these new definitions exist all you like, but Wikipedia and court decisions aren't going to just go away because you don't like the fact that they're there.

Happy new year to you too ?

This thread went well

I've noticed some of the MAGA hyenas will call pretty much everyone they debate with, a "liar" to distract from the fact that they have no idea what they are talking about.

You mischaracterize me as "hiding" when I just try to avoid you. You call me a liar. Do you expect me to engage with you ? Why do you want to engage with me ? It's pathological, as far as I can see.