Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/04/2024 in all areas

  1. So high speed rail is such a priority to you that you would put it before investing in critical infrastructure required to meet our future energy demands? The government has estimated that our energy demand for clean energy could double or even triple by 2050. I don't know about you, but I don't want to see anybody freezing in the dark. I don't care who's running the country. It's time to get our priorities straight.
    4 points
  2. The construction of the first of four SMRs will be completed by the end of 2028, and the unit will be online by the end of 2029. Media release | Capital Power and OPG partner to advance new nuclear in Alberta – OPG This is already in place. It's already moving forward with two other provinces working together to make sure that technology is available and delivered Even if they green lit a fast train tomorrow it would not likely be finished before the first nuclear reactor is online Once again, you choose Muh FEEELS over facts. Alberta absolutely needs clean energy moving forward. It cannot get by on the energy supplies it has. So a nuclear reactor actually is a viable economic necessity A bullet train would deliver nothing. It would not improve cargo capacity in any meaningful way, there are not enough commuters who would benefit from it significantly to make it worthwhile But of course that's where you and the left would rather see the money spent.
    3 points
  3. So… why is he Tweeting about it? If a rule or law was violated, why doesn’t he enforce it? And if no violation occurred, why doesn’t he STFU?
    2 points
  4. I'm Canadian, so obviously. Do you have any evidence of this? Of course you don't, you never do. lol are you gonna sit here and pretend that the sentiment isn't mutual? No: I'm saying Trump supporters are garbage.
    2 points
  5. He did not 'stack the court'. There were vacancies, and he filled them. Trump never talked about adding more seats to the SC as the Democrats may likely do.
    2 points
  6. Yes, Trump, being the weakest president ever, watched as the Dems stole the election from him while he was in power. To further demonstrate his weakness, he hired a bunch of incompetent lawyers who couldn't produce a shred of evidence, even before Trump-appointed judges. Not only did they outplay him, they made him look like a craven liar. He is a victim of those crafty libbies!
    2 points
  7. I can no longer take you serious @WestCanMan. After ranting about "the left" for years, you now are publishing far left articles, to back your positions. I think you secretly are a left of centre socialist. This should be your new avatar.
    2 points
  8. PS....counterpunch.org is literally Communist, it is extreme left, and backed by Russians: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/counterpunch/ For several years, you ahve been going on about "The left" and "libbys," yet you are too lazy to check your sources. You just posted a far left, pro-Russian website article.
    2 points
  9. All this bltching and moaning about 90 seconds of airtime on a comedy show? Jeebus. As if Trump doesn't get enough media attention? They let him HOST SNL in 2015, FFS. But now Kamala is on for 90 seconds and the MAGA cultists are crapping their pants about how unfair it is? Bullshit. It's just another excuse for faux outrage at established media. No one actually cares or finds this meaningful.
    2 points
  10. There is a thread for this subject. Stop cluttering up the forum with duplicate threads.
    2 points
  11. Why? Hatred. They'd nuke their mother's if they thought it would hurt Trump. They're sick.
    2 points
  12. Brendan Carr is NOT the Chair of the FCC, so yet another thread you've started WITH A LIE. Who is the current head of the FCC? Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications Commission. Jessica Rosenworcel | Federal Communications Commission
    2 points
  13. Sadly, the real joke are the voters that elected this clown . . . "Elect a clown, expect a circus"
    2 points
  14. 2 points
  15. No president "runs the economy." Trump's foreign policy weakened the US. The biggest foreign policy strength the US has is its leadership over the biggest military alliance in human history. Trump weakened our connection to our european allies and instead debased himself before dictators. His policy in these wars will obviously be to side with the authoritarian fascists and further weaken the pro-democracy alliance. Trump was literally willing to make the border worse rather than allow immigrantion reform legislation to pass through congress. He only uses the issue for marketing himself rather than actually fixing anything. His only policy is to be harsh and inumane rather than working towards realistic nuanced policy. Mexico is our biggest trade partner and migrant workers travel seasonally and harvest most of the food in the country. Half of illegal immigration is people who enter legally (mostly through airports) and overstay their visas. The US expels millions of people every year regardless of who the president is. So Trump's cartoonish immigration policies are purely meant for political consumption rather than effective governing.
    2 points
  16. His father was a good guy. I remember David Lewis. I remember Pierre Trudeau. Lewis created the term: "Corporate Welfare Bum". ==== Their sons are awful.
    1 point
  17. Uh... they're both private citizens. And I don't think Chelsea ever hung out with Epstein as a child. The fact that Trump raped women and hung out with Epstein and his children at the same time is why you support him. He's your type of guy.
    1 point
  18. Once they are proven real, they will shift to how Epstein is a liar and it doesn't matter and nobody cares that he raped women anyway.
    1 point
  19. I was laughing because no one could be so stupid as to believe that was serious
    1 point
  20. Except neither link did that. You either didn't read them or read them and are lying about the content. And what's funny about you lying about it is it's so easily proven to be a lie because the links are right there! No I'm stating the fact that you're a liar. Harris has not compared Trump supporters to Nazis. Nope. The NY Post one quotes some chud making that claim, but doesn't actually quote Harris saying anything about it and only quotes Clinton and Walz. The second specifically points out she didn't: So Clinton said it. Walz alluded to it. But Harris did not compare the rally to the Nazi one, nor did she call Trump supporters Nazis (which, again, was your claim). Time to change your diaper buddy, you done shit yourself again.
    1 point
  21. 1 point
  22. Nope, you're just boring me. Narrator voice: it was not. You're making the claim so the onus is on you to provide the supporting evidence. That's how arguments work. LOL like the self-published crank claiming Lincoln owned slaves. Yeah, we know what your standards are. If you're talking about the retarded survey about kids being mean to little garbage Trump kids, I never said that didn't exist. The only claim you haven't supported is the "Harris called Trump supporters Nazis" claim. Turns out it's me! Here we have two links, neither of which features Harris calling Trump supporters Nazis. First one mentions Harris, but only quotes Clinton and Walz. The second one literally makes the point that she didn't say anything about Nazis. Since you're stupid, I'll remind you that you said "She called them Nazis" with "she" being Harris. While I guess you get some credit for finally, after multiple posts, putting in the bare minimum effort to prove your point. Too bad you failed. Miserably. LOL you actually think links that don't actually show the thing you say the show is a gotcha? Holy shit the depths of your delusion are endless. Again: you said she called Trump supporters Nazis. You haven't proven that at all, because you're a piece of shit liar.
    1 point
  23. No its because you never post proof. Here's perfect example: See? If it's "all over the news" then it should be very easy and quick to post a link. But you can't do it because it's not actually all over the news. Because you're lying. Which is what you always do because you're a lying little twat who is incapable of supporting his arguments. Not only am I denying it's happening, I'm calling you a liar for claiming it is. Cite (still) required. I've never seen anyone more deluded about their own behaviour and intellectual capabilities than you. All the emojis in the world won't make up for your mental shortcomings.
    1 point
  24. Yep. Those propalestinian conservatives are up to no good: Ballot Box Fires In Oregon And Washington Linked To Pro-Palestinian Messaging
    1 point
  25. Lol what are you on about. No cite of course lmao. It is true: Trump supporters are garbage. However, Harris has never said that and said quite clearly she disagrees with such criticisms. LOL imagine being so retarded you think Trump cares about the people he would lead. He doesn't even like his own voters. Again, all your claims here are based on your imagination. No thank you for continuing to be a mendacious bad faith actor, terrible debater and living proof that Trump supporters are garbage. He didn't say he would last time. He says he will now. So you're saying Trump is lying when he says he will prosecute his political enemies?
    1 point
  26. I base that on the fact that he didn't do it when he had the chance. If you are being honest, you have to acknowledge this fact.
    1 point
  27. 1. Then you weren't agreeing with me. lol There's no such thing as "sex assigned at birth" in a sane and normal world. You're either a boy or a girl at birth and everyone sees it. 2. People need to be accepting without bending to the trans agenda, which is possible. The problem is that trans activists have gotten overly aggressive. They want more than just acceptance; they want full compliance with their agenda.
    1 point
  28. Trump isn't going to do that. He didn't do anything of the sort in his first term. And how do you feel about sending the DOJ after the political opposition? We have all seen that by the Biden/Harris government.
    1 point
  29. Jody Wilson-Raybould was fired and we all know SHE had no credibility right? 🙄 And in this case the person actually resigned BECAUSE of the dishonesty she saw at the CBC.
    1 point
  30. No, that's not actually accurate. The "voters" were real, but they weren't the original voters elected/appointed by the state process. However the trump lawyers were relying on a law that said the vice president has the right to appoint or accept an 'alternate' slate of voters under various circumstances. So the theory was, if pence accepted those voters without verifying and certified their results, then in fact he has accepted them as alternate voters which IS within his power and therefore they would become legitimate voters and the count would be entirely legal. That was the plan. Whether that would have stood up to legal scrutiny after the fact is another discussion entirely, but the voters weren't 'fake', even tho that's what the left likes to call it. They were real and had pence accepted them as the voters there would have to have been a legal battle to test their legitimacy.
    1 point
  31. They do. And in fact so does gender. The problem is these definitions frequently get in the way of the ideologues and their agendas. So they are constantly redefining words to suit their narrative, and often changing them back and forth. We've seen many times how gender is directly tied to sex, then gender is completely independent of sex, and then gender is back to being part of sex again. This guy seems like he's a lot more up and up and straight talking than a lot of the nut bars we've seen, but again here we're back to There's no such thing as a definition, definition can be many things, it depends on who's talking, and all of that is absolutely utter bull crap. If words have no meaning then there's no point in talking
    1 point
  32. Always liked Ujjal even though I wasn't a fan of his party. He has done nothing to change that.
    1 point
  33. I'm pretty sure the oil and gas companies were happier with the carbon tax because without it the alternatives default to them. A carbon tax helps them shift the responsibility from fossil fuel companies to customers, voters and elected officials. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800923003087#:~:text=This paper has shown that,78% support a carbon tax. Okay, this is happening everywhere around the world and in the meantime PP is still going to be under pressure to maintain Canada's international emissions reduction commitments. I doubt our peer nations who are actually making progress and reducing their emissions are going be any more forgiving about our backsliding than they are towards our military commitments. I suppose PP could simply be honest and admit he just doesn't give a damn about climate change. That would make everything a lot easier don't you think?
    1 point
  34. Incredible... No you do not need to add "cis". Again, it depends on how a given person defines the words man and woman. I actually currently believe that things like hormones and surgery shouldn't be done until the person wanting them done is an adult. Teens are confused about a lot of things, and I've already heard of examples where they've regretted their decision to get these things. That doesn't mean that they shouldn't learn about terms like cisgender, transgender, etc., just that I don't think they're ready to make any permanent decisions such as surgery.
    1 point
  35. Like I said, you've made up your mind and aren't interested in anything that might not agree with it. You fear an inquiry because it might actually answer some of your questions.
    1 point
  36. ...and a lying and corrupt b*tch that nobody liked that illegally used a private mail server. That probably had an impact too. Oh and anthony weiner. Why would you hire a guy named weiner? I mean it's right there in the name....
    1 point
  37. And what is the benefit of this project? It creates jobs for Ontario and Quebec voters! No economic benefit to the country at all but the libtards have amply demonstrated they only care about power the country be damned!
    1 point
  38. OMG he's trying to do something that should've been done 30 years ago! The shameless progressive! PP will revert the GO Trains beck to steam locomotives and put the coal miners back to work!
    1 point
  39. To what end, dummy? You degenerates don't care that he's a philandering, amoral piece of shit. You didn't care about his fraud. You didn't care that he steals from his charities. You don't care that he lies. You don't care that he commits sexual assault. You don't care that he's a rapist. ^^All of that established as fact in court So why would anyone go to the trouble of using AI (which you bumpkins apparently think is MUCH better than it is) to make up a story about him just being sleazy. Which everyone already knows anyway.
    1 point
  40. Success is the perfect word for the very beginning of her political career: 👋🍆💦👅$$$
    1 point
  41. Seriously, when Harris supporters are asked to name any of her accomplishments, they draw a complete blank. They just mumble about how she is a woman, a person of color...and that's it.
    1 point
  42. So if he killed a man and went to court for it it's just political lawfare? lol He tried to defraud voters in several states. His ego is so oversized he can't handle or admit losing. You're part of a cult. This is a lie. Trump has taught you well.
    1 point
  43. And down the home stretch, Trump packs 'em in at MSG...AND Kamala calls him NAZI. Every time she opens her mouth, all people hear is Liar and B1TCH!
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...