Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 09/16/2024 in all areas
-
Looks like Kamala and Joe are responsibility according to Donnie3 points
-
There is no equating what happened during the summer of BLM violence to J6. It was far worse. More people dead, more police dead, more police attacked, vastly more damage done, and far more government institutions vandalized and attacked. All instigated violence by Democrats like Harris and Pelosi and many others.3 points
-
and his threats of "red lines" have been crossed over and over again, and revealed as impotent. Bullying with nuclear and chemical weapons is an actual red line for the rest of the world (including China). It's not going to happen just for the sake of a murderous dictators' vanity.3 points
-
3 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
When was the last time you saw an actual assassination attempt against any one of those people? The best comparable you have is a crazy guy with a hammer looking for Nancy Pelosi. There have been two assassination attempts against Trump now, both with rifles, plus the shooter at the congressional baseball game who fired a bunch of shots at Republicans, and a guy that came to a Biden-sanctioned protest at a SCJ's home to kill him. What's worse is you guys support all of that. You even say that you'd just drink your a beer if Trump got killed. If you're that serious about it, man up, balk chicken.2 points
-
2 points
-
I don't think you remembered what your own sentence was supposed to mean by the time you got to the end of it.2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
2 points
-
While everything that you say is stupid, this pretty much takes the cake. China has surpassed Russia militarily, and they're incredibly aggressive in their empire-building strategy right now (and it was China's geopolitical program, the one belt one road initiative dept, that the Bidens were working with). China has 100 modern warships and subs built within the past decade. Russia doesn't even have that much old crap. China's missile arsenal and their planes and drones are at the highest levels of modern tech. Their economy dwarfs Russia's. China is by far America's main geopolitical rival, and they're all over the DNC in terms of influence... Hochul, Cuomo and Swallwell all worked closely with Chinese spies. Everything that you understand about geopolitics would fit in a nutshell and rattle around.2 points
-
According to Robo Republicans are violent and evil and yet the only candidate who has had at least 2 attempts on his life is the Republican one. The whole cooling down the rhetoric with Democrats lasted about 2 seconds they gotta keep calling him Hitler and telling everyone he is an evil supervillain.2 points
-
Oh FFS Moscow is allowed to strike Kiev, but some other country is justified in forbidding Kiev to strike back? Give your neighbour a shovel to qwws his garden but forbid him to use it?2 points
-
It was the same crap with Rittenhouse. It was the most clearly and extensively videotaped self-defense shooting I have ever seen, and the Democrats still went after him. I need to see how the NYC subway dude is doing with their prosecution of him for defending the train car from a crazy dude the Democrats let roam free.2 points
-
Donald Trump was once again busily showing off his ignorance about how the stock market works by threatening the NASDAQ after trading in his company was briefly suspended Friday. According to SEC rules, any time a trading in a stock is excessive or price swings are volatile, an automatic “Limit Up/Limit Down” occurs, causing 5 minute trading suspensions in order to let the market cool off. This has been in place since 2013, affects all exchanges, including NYSE and NASDAQ), and affects some stocks several times a day. But the orange “business expert” doesn’t know any of this. https://stocks.apple.com/Av2Yp9xJMQ3OnCMzRTr1yzw1 point
-
Congrats for cracking the code. I thought we were talking over your head. Ohh the irony 🤣 You know that this thread is literally about cultists like you drawing inspiration from the incoherent rants of the dementia-addled criminal who's currently in the WH, right? "Where's my pablum?!?! I think the other guy lost it, or stole it! Don't worry, I can buy boatloads of pablum with the money we got in China and Ukraine!" Oh, and then you pretend to be sane, while calling other people cultists... 🤣 You take the accusation in a mirror technique to a whole new level.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
If everything that CNN and the Demis said about Trump was true, I'd be cheering for the assassin: "racist", "dictator", "intent on ending democracy", "traitor", "Russian asset", etc, etc... Hell the CIA shoulda taken him out by now if even half of that's true. Then again, the FBI would have some evidence of it if any of it was true. I'm out of excuses for leftards now. It's gotten to the point where I like it when idjits like robo, Hodad and Black B yap because they're just making the case against leftists as serious adults now. They're classic cultists, liars, hate-mongers, m0r0ns, etc. There's probably not a pejorative aside from pedo that doesn't suit them all, but obviously they've got more than their share of pedos in that group as well.1 point
-
Joe definitely is. The assassin was quoting Joe's hateful anti-Trump screed on social media, and not citing things that Trump actually did or said as his reasons for hating Trump.1 point
-
Shouting but still unheard. It is well known the left have cloth ears.1 point
-
Would you apply this logic to a man that "believes" he's a woman and wants to compete in women's sports? After all believing stupid sh1t doesn't prove the stupid sh!t.1 point
-
You keep saying that. But 200 people were arrested. People chained themselves to entrances at the Capitol building to block entrance. The difference...the real difference...was the media coverage.1 point
-
I want to see Ukraine repel the invaders. This isn't true, but that's par for the course for you. And don't bother responding with one of your patented wall of text firehose of bullshit responses, I ain't reading it. Again: this guy was an former Trump voter.1 point
-
I didn't lie about a thing. You're dishonestly trying to move the goalposts to normalize and defend indefensible behavior. There's a reason lunatics stormed the Capitol.1 point
-
Dems won't be happy until they kill him. Nothing else has worked for the past 8 years so they are desperate now.1 point
-
IMO...This twit just sold the election to Trump. You Libbies are so stupid. You've lied, cheated, used lawfare, and the man is getting stronger every time. With every dumb attack, Trump gets stronger. Your hatred is a major reason he'll win the election.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
It's like asking how many licks it takes to get to the center of a Tootsie Pop. It doesn't matter, you just keep going till they crack and however long that is is how long it is1 point
-
How many innocent men, women and children do you think one would have to kill to break the will of political and religious zealots--terrorists--who celebrate martyrdom? 100K? 1 million? Every last Palestinian? That's the problem with this whole misguided war. No amount of "collateral damage" (or deliberately slaughtered innocents) will shock Hamas into surrender. It will, however, shock the consciences of civilized people around the world until entire populations abandon the perspective that Israel is "the good guy." Tens of thousands of dead children makes a pretty compelling argument that Israel is as cruel and evil as Hamas would have us all believe. There are plenty of people in Israel who understand this. Bebe is not one of them.1 point
-
LOL ahhh here's the rest of the "fox made me cry" crew You're like the little kid hiding behind everyone else and yelling "Yeah!" when no one's looking LOL Hey quick quiz - what's 100 minus 50?1 point
-
Look at the transcript. He said it once. Once before spending an hour working them into a frenzy and telling them they had to go down to the Capitol right now and fight to stop the the steal or they would've have a country anymore. He gathered a mob, worked them into a frenzy, created the illusion of an existential crisis, sicced them on their target and then sat his fat ass on the couch to watch the violence unfold on TV. You know he did those things. You just don't care.1 point
-
You're not smart enough to hold the information in your head for more than 7 seconds, but the insurrection was only half of Trump's plan for the day. The other half is the well documented effort to use fraudulent electors to provide Pence with cover to overturn the democratic election and install the loser of the contest, Donald J. Trump. The only reason Trump failed to overthrow the government is that Mike Pence grew a backbone and wouldn't go along with the coup. And you know full well that the Trump campaign. Or, well, to be fair, you've been shown the reports multiple times, but it was more than 7 seconds ago...1 point
-
So you are in favour of Russians buying off the media to spread their false propaganda in Canada to try and influence our elections?1 point
-
Yeah, saying Trump caused J6 is ridiculous. He only propagated the big lie for months, gathered a mob, told them where to go, when to go, and to fight like hell "stop the steal" right now or they would've have a country anymore. But it's not like he caused it.🙄1 point
-
What stupid does is post useless cryptic foolishness that a 4 year old could improve on daily on this forum. Maybe you should be less stupid.1 point
-
If i did it would be because i was concerned about the transitional phase. Inevitably when society takes a leap forward there's a period of transition where you can't quite be sure what will change when and what will suddenly become obsolete. That can impact some people in unexpected and negative ways. A famous company made 'whizz wheel' circular slide rule manual calculators when i was in pilot's training for calculating fuel and a bunch of other things - guess how well that business is doing in the age of iphones But even then. I've had these talks before. When the first computers came out i was a bit of a geek and there was much talk about how it would transform and displace elements of society. Paper would be a thing of the past. Likewise we dreamed the internet would allow everyone to work in any country anywhere and there would be no such thing as your 'local office' for many jobs. And to a degree it was all true - the 'dictating secretary' has become the 'admin assistant', we use less paper but we still use paper, SOME jobs are farmed out to other countries, but most are still done relatively local even when they can be done online, etc etc/ There will be change, but AI is not a creative engine. It's a statistical engine. It will remove the need for some jobs, but it will just make it easier for people to do other jobs. Just like accounting software has made it easy for small businesses to operate without a dedicated accountant and word processors have made it easier for businesses to produce business correspondence and records easier, AI will facilitate but not eliminate. I actually tried to get an AI set up to do some of my work. Hey - why not, the less i have to do the better and some of what i do is just kind of tedious stuff. But after talking to a few people about it who were pros it would be very very difficult. And not because what i do is terribly hard, but it does require a certain level of nuanced thinking so to speak that AI simply can't replicate. So it didn't pan out. I even tried to use commo ai to keep notes of some of my meetings just to try it and it was at best "ok", it struggled with certain elemenets of it and i don't use it now. I mean i already use low level AI and probably you do too. Spell checkers these days, many search engines, other predictive stuff. It would be nice if one day AI meant i could do more of my work in less time, be worth even more money and benefit from the tech but i'm not worried at all about it replacing me. Sorry for the long response1 point
-
When you denounced your parties violent rhetoric. I am pretty sure you have lied over and over again about Trump and compared him to Hitler multiple times.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
So let me give my viewpoint as a former PS worker. First, I liked some of the places I worked. One of them, my longest stint, was a great place to work and there wasn't a single day that I woke up and thought "Damn, have to go to work". We were a great group and enjoyed working with and socializing with each other. Everyone ate lunch together, and we all went out somewhere for birthdays. My cubicle was my second home. I had the overhead lights removed and supplied my own lamps. I had a nice radio, a sweater in case it got too cool, a heater under the desk, a special chair that the department paid $1500 for, a little fountain on the desk, posters on the walls, a visitors chair, coat rack, snacks in the drawers (and drugs for headaches and colds), etc. etc. That's not the way things are today. The government, in its wisdom, decided that work from home was the new thing. They encouraged it, then required it, especially during covid. So sure of themselves were they that they started closing down buildings, something like twenty, and readying them for sale. The others, they removed all the cubicles and put in place an open-concept 'hot desk' environment where nobody had a desk. Instead, they have to reserve a desk online, and they can't keep reserving the same one, either. Don't want people to get too comfortable there! There are... problems with this. For some, quite a few of them in fact, talking is what they do all day. Customer service people answering the phone and talking non-stop, for example. Managers and executives in endless meetings, almost all on-line now, many discussing confidential matters. But even managers and executives don't have offices anymore. So I'm sympathetic to the people I know who have to pack everything, including their laptop, take the bus and LRT into work, unpack it all, set up, hope the chair functions, hope they can get things plugged in right, and then just sit there and talk into the microphone and looking at their TEAMS screen the same way they did at home. Especially when they're no longer even sitting with their own groups and managers. You think they can be better supervised? Hey, I tried to manage people once in a directorate where my people were on three different floors. What a pain in the ass that was! Try it with them on ten floors, and where you don't even know where their desk is and have to keep looking because they move around every day! This is a complete screwup and the government is responsible, not the schmucks suffering on that ridiculous mess of an LRT (another complete screwup) to get to and from work. The time wasted in setup and breaking down is a complete loss. And people were already fighting over the better desks and chairs and telling each other to SHHHH! It's just gotten worse. There's no way in hell this is not leading to a productivity loss. And even after the tories start laying people off there won't be enough offices for those remaining. Some departments are now frantically trying to rent space in other buildings. Imbeciles.1 point
-
That's intensely honest writing (from your limited POV), herbie. I feel like I can hear the snot bubbling from your nose as you wrote it.1 point
-
LOL. Not sure if you have been on Twitter in the past year, but its increasingly resembles a far right echo chamber. I mean if you are on Truth Social religiously, i suppose one can describe it as woke1 point
-
From my understanding, Reagan deregulated the industry in the mid 80s. Its not a coincidence that Rupert Murdock launched FOX TV around the same time1 point
-
For the Quebec riding, recent federal polls in Quebec have been trending toward the Bloc. The most recent two elections and byelections, inclusively, however, in that riding and the one next to it, have been Liberal defeats to the more leftist party, albeit at the provincial level: https://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/en/results-and-statistics/by-election-results/2023-03-13/326/ https://www.electionsquebec.qc.ca/en/results-and-statistics/general-election-results/2022-10-03/300/ The Quebec Liberal party has been perhaps more weakened than the federal Liberal Party at the time of these elections. But the federal NDP is also not exactly at a strong point in its support. Also, votes for QS are not guaranteed votes for the federal NDP even though those two parties share a significant portion of their voters. Since part of the QS platform is pro-sovereignty, easily some QS voters might vote Bloc instead of NDP. It is rare for Anglophones in Quebec to switch their Liberal votes to another party. Even in the 2011 Orange Wave in Quebec, most federal ridings where there is a high percentage of Anglophones remained Liberal while most other Quebec ridings voted NDP. Since this riding is not nearly as Anglophone as reliably Liberal high-Anglo Quebec ridings, and the riding did vote NDP in 2011, it is not a Liberal stronghold. In the last Federal Election, the Liberals had a commanding lead, about twice that of the NDP and Bloc Québecois: https://www.elections.ca/res/rep/off/ovr2021app/53/11707e.html While Liberal vote losses across Canada currently tend to go Conservative, this riding has a historically low support for Conservatives. Toronto—St. Paul's was a narrow Conservative victory. Due to the Liberal and NDP candidates being city councilors representing different municipal divisions of the same federal riding, while overall trends are toward the Bloc, this riding remains a 3-way coin-toss, and the margin of victory will be narrow.1 point