Leaderboard

It's not that easy to find. https://tnc.news/2021/08/11/liberals-hide-names-of-media-companies-given-61-million-in-subsidies/ https://www.pressreader.com/canada/national-post-latest-edition/20230527/281745568761869 There are some strings attached however. They do want the recipients to adopt DEI. If there is a choice between layoffs, or taking the handout, I can't blame them for taking the money. But who are they going to shill for? Trudeau who is now paying them, or PP who wants to stop it?

It’s so painfully obvious that the CBC, Toronto Star, CTV and most mainstream media are cheerleading for Trudeau. The government-funded MSM is not a free press and is clearly fear-mongering, painting the Conservatives as extremist, this time because Poilievre shook hands with some anti-carbon tax protesters. The Liberal shills will no doubt continue their propaganda on the CBC’s At Issue panel and in opinion pieces dressed as news all the way up to the election. Jerema says it well: ”To any normal observer, Poilievre was endorsing the protesters’ stance on the carbon tax, a fact the Star’s Raj barely acknowledged, before she issued dire warnings about some nebulous far right threat that she stretches all logic to pin on the opposition leader. ‘There is no doubt people are tired of the Liberal government,” she concedes. But then, Raj goes on to claim that people being tired of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, “doesn’t mean Canadians want to vote for a man who courts support from groups that spew hate.’” National Post

I would be far more worried about the political violence the left will commit if Trump is elected. People cry about Jan 6th but there were riots all over the country when Trump was elected in 2016.

1. Sorry - autocorrect. I meant CTV. 2. TV Networks aren't mentioned here, nor are the channels I mentioned - podcasts, etc. Not to say they won't be begging for money soon. They will. Bell got money to maintain jobs then laid off thousands. I am not a fan of direct government funding but the dead-dumb argument that governments fund media to get favourable stories doesn't make sense. Not a word game. You haven't been convinced of anything on these pages as far as I have ever seen.

This is why the CBC should be defunded and there should be no more subsidies or grants to the media by the government.

Because not everyone is 100% motivated by money? Also lots of MSM isn't funded by the government.

Victim of mass psychosis.

Dude, you are absolutely taking Hamas’ side here. You can’t pretend that a massive terrorist attacked occurred. Hamas is the government of Gaza. Their attack was deliberate and coordinated and they refuse to ceasefire or surrender. That is the issue here. Hamas is the reason why there’s a war going on. Terrorism is the reason why the Palestinians haven’t been able to be recognized as an independent nation. We don’t even need to put words in their mouths; they are clear about insisting on the destruction of Israel.

LOL, wait a minute. You have been saying this is so obviously a coup! It is so apparent! How can I not see it?! Then this: "The charges Smith brought are a) easier to prove" Yeah, if one of us is being disingenuous here, it certainly is not me. Obama outright said DACA was not Constitutional, he didn't have the power... and yet he did it anyway. Just about everyone except left wing Democrats all agreed that Biden did not have the power to unilaterally wipe out the Student Debt as he did... and it was found unconstitutional. There was nothing reasonable about them. They were both pure power grabs they just wanted to see if they could get away with... and Obama got away with his. Just like if any of the stupid plans and legal theories team Trump tried to execute on... they would have been tossed out under judicial review. And what the Democrats were trying to do with Al Gore, while not as convoluted, was just as wrong on its face. They were trying to selectively recount votes in the way that would most favor them to win the election. That was wrong, it was illegal, and the Courts seen through the scheme.

You're warped. Trump did nothing to "scare" Pence. You can scream "SOFT COUP" all you like. It's nothing but a warped joke.

It’s the Palestinians who won’t support a two state solution.

The UN and most other agencies largely employ Palestinians there. The non-Arab members of NGOs are almost all fellow travelers who, like the people interviewed in the Atlantic article, have no issue with lying to make Israel look worse. I don't know why you ask that. I don't agree. An independent Palestine would be a war waiting to happen. Only it would be far, far worse than the one going on now. Those dumb twats who chant about a 'free palestine' are not talking about a democratic state. They're talking about a theocratic dictatorship similar to Iran. Which is what Hamas promised and what they got elected for. I'm talking about the immigrants who are demonstrating in our streets and threatening Jews and demanding my country cater to their own religious zealotry.

Robosmith's brain comes pre-hacked.

I've said this from the beginning, that's why I wrote "before mass use". I also don't think the average person understands what EUA means with regard to a product's safety & efficacy. With EUA use - it is unlicensed, does not go through normal testing and trials, and when presented to the FDA - they only have to claim "possible" efficacy. People should have been informed of this and then, as you say, been given the choice. Instead, even though governments knew it was not true, because they signed the contracts that stated outright that efficacy was unknown - the jabs were publicly presented as 100% safe, 95% effective, conferred lasting immunity, prevented transmission, stayed in the arm, etc. All of which were very quickly proven to be false claims. But all this was warned about by docs and scientists who were censored and silenced. I think we should stop calling them conspiracy theories and start calling them "spoiler alerts."

She was terrible on all kinds of fronts. Honestly she would have been a terrible leader. And she was arrogant enough to think she could win without support in the west. She's a horrible person these days, she'll happily take a cheque to bad mouth current conservatives and past conservatives as well. Canada dodged a bullet with her.

I don't think so. I think the gov't was right to put it out there and offer it to people. In certain at risk groups i think it was a life saver more than a life risker. There was no time to finish proper testing. BUT!! - in my mind that means they SHOULD have sent a clear message - "there could be lots of side effects we don't know. This is PROBABLY safe but we can't be sure - you should think careful about taking this unless you're in an at-risk group for covid deaths" and then not forced people to take it. It would have been as wrong to deny people who were at risk the choice as it was t deny people the choice about taking it when they weren't. They should have been as honest about the risks (including that they were unknown and could be worse than expected) as possible, then respected people's decisions.

so you did not answer.. do you have the choice to not watch it? It does not bother me to have characters in a tv show or movie be black when maybe in the book or in previous iterations, they were white. Its about the story and how well they execute it for me.. the packaging does not mean much.

Aggressive is one word, Invasive is another. They're not prepared to leave you alone. In the past with most things people have been like"you do your thing which I think is crazy and I'll do my thing which you think is crazy and we'll both have a good life". But woke demands that it inserts itself in your life and that you conform to its wishes no matter what. It is no longer okay for you to do your own thing, you must do the work thing or woke will hunt you down and punish you.

As is their right to. AFAIC I can't actually visualize anyone undertaking a University education marching about celebrating mass murder and kidnapping. How do you get a diploma if you can't even pass Sunday School....

Has anyone looked at CTV power and politics with Vassy i forget her last name, she must have a hate on for all politicians because she has no qualms about ripping all of them apart, asking very pointed question, watch her last interview with Freeland...so i'm not so sure CTV has a bias, but its not apparent with Vassy anyways...

Very good. If you're insulted by my words that's a you problem. I'm not telling you you shouldn't be insulted Im saying it's your problem not mine if you are insulted. I certainly wouldn't learn to be an adult human being from you. A child maybe but nothing more. Is it nighttime where I am? It's what you think you know that gets people like you in trouble.

OK Then after the next election we can complain the media is all conservative LOL

Now I see where the miscommunication is coming from: when muslims says they want a 2-state solution they mean alive and dead. 2 states of existence. Say what you want, but at least they're not lying.

Well... but... you accept the premise without evidence, based on your gut feel. 99% of my online life on another forum is convincing liberals and such not to do such a thing. They know Trump is a bad man, so why offer him any justice. They know vaccines should be mandatory so why not fire people who don't take them. You are either for objectivity and political process or against it. You seem to be against it. 1. Ok - so you SUPPORT government funding then for the MSM. Got it. 2. Regardless, you thing the Globe is left-wing then you are staring out the Overton window at a landscape of your choosing.

Please educate us what have the Jews done historically to deserve the this animosity you declare...must have been epic, i mean Germany was responsible for the deaths of 60 million in one war alone ...wiping out a full 1/3 of all jews globally...and yet today germany is a valued defense partner...lets not for get Russia...because they are sweet hearts as well...

Let me guess Israel should have turned the other cheek...I'm curious how would you have responded to this attack or any of the millions of others that palestine has orchestrated... It is to bad you and people that think like you do , don't hold the rest of the globe to the same standards...it is much more convenient to pick out one group of people and turn your hate towards them... When your fighting for your right to exist, to live in somewhat peace...do you really think they care how many anti semites they create, when as you already stated it is a already global thing... Whatever Israel has done to you or your family must have been terrible that you would openly pick a terrorist state over one that was created because of global persecution...How much more do they have to suffer before they earn your approval...

Yes, when I make a post.. I have a distinct focus. If you have nothing to add on to this chosen focal point.. then do not respond. Its not that complex.

CBC & MSM, 'bite the hand that feeds them' . . . I don't think so.

You keep responding... I know why. Second, you assumed that I was in agreeance with them. Assumptions are for the lazy. Well.. your secret is out. Your posts rely on assumptions and if someone points them out, you start with the name-calling and such. Because surely if someone is not you.. they fit your narrowly defined boxes. Now.. where is your usual line about CNN.

How can the MSN be unbiased when they are dependent on funding from this Liberal government to keep them afloat?

Robo thinks history is a gender like herstory.

What you said is completely true, but our robot is programmed to never admit to anything. He has been given his talking point and no amount of evidence will ever change that.

The Palestinians want nothing short of a genocide against the Jews, and they're willing to get to that point incrementally. "First, we demand this..." Then that won't be enough, and they'll ask for more, and more, until Israel is no more and all the Jews are dead. After the massacre, the muslim world will completely accept Palestine as a legitimate nation, just like they do with Pakistan.

Well, they claim they will, if their absurdly unrealistic demands are met, to go back to the borders of 1948, to include a 100% right of return of Palestinians and 100% withdrawal of all Jews. Even then, even if Israel met such an absurdly dead on arrival demand, does anyone really believe all the terrorism and hate for Jews stops there and they live in peace? No. Nothing has really changed since 1948 when they decided to go to war against Israel in the first place.

I never once said that I even endorse Rona Ambrose, should the Conservatives ever wake up. She would have blown Justin out of the water first time out LOL The problem in todays politically correct environment is that having breasts, wearing a turban, changing gender, wearing hajib, skin colour is far more important than qualifications.

There's a little but for sure it's mostly left.

Seriously, your schtick is tiresome. I have already responded to you on this and provided sources as well. Listen to yourself... try to think about it. If they formed a human chain... with the purpose of blocking people, it stands to reason that people were blocked. In fact, the police started arresting the protestors because of that. You just assert garbage and then ignore the inconvenient facts that prove your comments are nonsense. Since you ignored it before, maybe this time you will read it:

You're an open book io. Your posts are formulaic. I don't have to assume anything. You pretend to be some kind of authority on a topic, then when you're asked to display some kind of next-level knowledge you say say that you just don't really care about the topic, you cast aspersions, rinse, repeat. Nothing that you say is ever truly on topic. There's nothing right, that's for sure. Jabs that kill people. Sometimes death-row inmates, sometimes healthy young Canadians who just wanted to keep their jobs.

Not by you. Meanwhile... More than 140 countries have signed up to the Global Minimum Tax deal. The tax treaty imposes a minimum rate of 15% on the profits of multinationals. The Global Cooperation Barometer launched at Davos calls for more collaboration. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2024/02/oecd-minimum-tax-rate/#:~:text=More than 140 countries have,Davos calls for more collaboration. Like the vast number of economists who agree carbon taxes are the way to go, the writing is on the wall for tax avoidance but we do need to get the national governments writing it to act on it.

https://www.voanews.com/a/usa_biden-signs-executive-orders-reversing-trump-immigration-policies/6201520.html He can do more, but he wants to frame it as entirely the fault of the Republicans. Ideally, he wants to appear to be doing something, while still allowing the southern border to remain open.

I do not think that the scenarios outlined by you are realistic. I think that you are too biased and too partisan to say anything of value. A republican could say that 3^3 = 27 and you would object.

We can’t forget that you are taking the side of a designated terrorist organization that states a goal of destroying its enemy. Israel’s goal is to destroy Hamas, not Palestine. As for Netanyahu, he is the unfortunate result of 75 years of nonstop war and terrorism directed at Israeli civilians. You know I don’t support him, but… well, you can see what happens every time terrorists commit terrorist acts. They badly harm their own people. It’s horrible.

Quite a few scientists wondering the same thing: Have we been CRISPRed for the coming Cas-9? (substack.com) I have two questions in my head. How readily would integration events with PAMs occur in any given transfected cell, and did anyone actually have this in mind? If a Cas-9 protein were to be instructed to be made as part of another ‘vaccine’, would the interaction with the Cas-9, the sgRNA (also introduced exogenously) and the integrated fragment result in cutting? Or is this about gene silencing or activation? Theoretically, you could introduce stop codons or alter a mutated gene using this method. You could also add transcriptional activators to the Cas-9 to activate transcription machinery of specific genes, ie: the modular aspect I mentioned previously. You could also inactivate transcription to physically block a gene. The possibilities are wide-ranging. Questions to ponder: Why is this conserved fragment (1252-1289) in all of these products/vectors/sequences? Why are they sitting upstream from a PAM (CGG)? Could they be a target DNA for subsequent gRNA-Cas-9 system administration? Pretty dark questions. What would possibly be the purpose, if the outcome of ‘installing’ this hardware in the genome - logistically - could never really be predictable or reproducible? Is it not predictable/reproducible? With regard to using the gRNA-Cas-9 system to get rid of HIV, you can also use it eat certain bits of the integrated HIV-1 genome to disable it. Take that, HIV. In a paper published in 2013, a codon-optimized gRNA-Cas-9 system was used to target the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of HIV-1. The designed gRNA was complementary to the LTRs. Using transfection, the gRNA along with a humanized Cas-9 was introduced into mammalian cells using plasmids.19 This idea is reminiscent of the trojan horse technology of the LNPs that, according to recent findings, also contain plasmids and plasmid DNA fragments. The gRNA-Cas-9 system can also be used in the context of the ‘shock and kill’ strategy to eliminate HIV from the system. In this case, the gRNA-Cas9 system is used to activate latent HIV-1 viral reservoirs so that drugs (antiretroviral therapy (ART)) can be used to kill latently-infected cells. Kind of like smoking out the bees. A paper was published in 2022 entitled “SARS CoV-2 mRNA vaccination exposes latent HIV to Nef-specific CD8+ T-cells”, where the authors describe what sounds like an unexpected shock and kill result (strategy).20 Basically, the COVID-19 modified mRNA injections shook up (productively-engaged) HIV-Nef-specific CD8+ T cells - the ones that kill virally-infected cells - and resulted in a reduction in cell-associated HIV RNA, which is a measure of HIV persistence. There has been a lot of HIV-related ‘stuff’ in the woodworks with regard to the COVID-19 saga, and it has really left me wondering why. And how. Besides the fact that the spike protein is structurally and compositionally similar to gp120, why was there a specific test group in clinical trials for people who were deemed HIV positive, and why were people being encouraged to be screened for HIV post injection?22 It has been reported that other vaccines can induce increases in cell-associated HIV RNA, and it has also been reported that increases in cell-associated HIV RNA can be accompanied by modest and transient increases in HIV-p24-specific CD8+ T-cell responses, so does this explain why?2324 Were certain people in these fields just curious to know the effects of this new, experimental technology on HIV? Maybe. To me, there seems to be a lot of ‘surprising’ overlap. I mean, yeah, regular screening was probably reduced because of the psychotic 2-weeks to fatten the wallets thing, but still. The aforementioned paper actually states that the “rate of acute HIV infection (AHI) diagnoses per day was significantly higher during the pandemic compared with the prior 4 years”. I personally don’t buy that this is due to higher frequency testing exactly because routine HIV screening in health care settings was reduced (these likely would have balanced each other out, if anything, in my opinion), so what’s with the higher frequency HIV diagnoses? We’re talking about acute infection - the beginning; new infections - so, what is going on here? Maybe more people were being promiscuous? More IV drug use?

however, no politician that can win could have this on his platform. We live in a short term thinking kind of world and this (above) is long term thinking. Lower budgets could (i know unrealistic and no I have not had a beer yet) lead to less taxation. Less taxation would mean more income and less complexity.

Rob, allow me to show you the EVIDENCE you request. The main group on college campuses today is called Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). Right on their home page: “Supporting Palestine solidarity organizations across occupied Turtle Island (“North America”), we aim to develop a student movement that is connected, disciplined, and equipped with the tools necessary achieve Palestinian liberation.” So right there, just for starters, They Reject the Legal Existance of the United States of America AND Canada. Here you can find SJP’s National Day of Resistance Toolkit, which was an event staged just five days after the terrorist attacks of October 7, 2023. “On the 50th anniversary of the 1973 war, the resistance in Gaza launched a surprise operation against the Zionist enemy which disrupted the very foundation of Zionist settler society. On the morning of October 8th, the Palestinian resistance stormed the illegitimate border fence, gaining control of the Gaza checkpoint at Erez, and re-entering 1948 Palestine... Today, we witness a historic win for the Palestinian resistance: across land, air, and sea, our people have broken down the artificial barriers of the Zionist entity, taking with it the facade of an impenetrable settler colony and reminding each of us that total return and liberation to Palestine is near. As the Palestinian student movement, we have an unshakable responsibility to join the call for mass mobilization. National liberation is near— glory to our resistance, to our martyrs, and to our steadfast people.” Dude, that is 100% pro-terrorist. You cannot deny that fact.

You are a male chauvinist pig. You are promoting that stupid comment. And you are so childish. You started downgrading my comments soon AFTER I downgraded one of your posts. So childish and stupid.

In todays sexual climate, it is not. It could very well be someone that "claims" to be female. Anyway, in my opinion, the Conservatives made a real stupid choice when they denied Rona Ambrose the opportuntiy. She would have beat Trudeau and made a good PM.

You mean one that has a vagina?

When Hamas seized power in Gaza, they dragged the Fatah leaders out of their homes and publicly executed them. I dislike Netanyahu, but that does not change a fundamental fact: Hamas declared war on Israel first, and they very clearly stated that their goal is the elimination of Israel as a nation. If Israel pulled out of Gaza tomorrow, Hamas would remain in power, and they would attack Israel again. So, kumbaya all you want, Rob, I want a two-state solution, and that cannot happen with Hamas in charge. They have to go. Who's going to do that? The Palestinians? Egypt? Iran? The US? No. There is nobody who will do that except Israel. And the Hamas combatants hide behind children and inside of hospitals, deliberately, in order to fool you into thinking Israel is the bad guy. That is the absolute truth.

Couple o' quick questions for ya: 1) Which political party was in the WH when Putin snatched up Crimea? 2) Which political party was in the WH when Putin took over the southeastern quarter of Ukraine? 3) Which political party was in the WH when islamic state was formed, and then went on to conquer Iraq and Syria, and commit genocide there? 4) Which political party was in the WH when Iran launched 200 attacks on American troops and bases in the ME, without facing any consequences? 5) Which political party was in the WH when Al Qaeda killed 13 US soldiers at the Debacle of Kabul? 6) Which political party was in the WH when Iranian soldiers captured a US navy boat and forced all the sailors onto their knees 7) Which political party was in the WH when Gaza and Israel went to war in 2014, 2021 and 2023-'24? FYI the answer is the same to all 7: it was the Dems who were in power when the US was busy biting the pillow and the world was going to sh1t in all those instances. 1) Which political party was in the WH when islamic state was destroyed far more quickly than was thought possible by the previous WH administration? 2) Which political party was in the WH when US forces killed 2 of Iran's top generals in retaliation for killing a single American military contractor at a US embassy? 3) Which political party was in power when 200 Russians were greased while advancing on a US military base, with no reprisals? 4) Which political party was in the WH when 4 of the leaders of the world's foremost terrorist orgs were obliterated? FYI the answer is the same to all 4: it was the the GOP (Trump) in power when the US was busy forcing all those terrorist orgs and rogue states to bite the pillow. I guess that a question American voters need to ask themselves this November is, who do they want to see chewing on pillows for the next 4 years: America, or its enemies? What were you saying there Beavey?