Leaderboard

Even mainstream media is starting to clue in: These are just from today, but I'm seeing more "waking up". Rex Murphy: Liberals' 'just transition' a fist to the mouth of Canada (msn.com) Michael Shellenberger: Davos is a grift and a cult but it’s also a bid for global domination (msn.com) Bruce Pardy: ESG will kill capitalism, and freedom along with it (msn.com) Sabrina Maddeaux: The WEF needs to do some serious soul searching, if it still has one (msn.com)

The only hope we have is that, like most government initiatives, in the end nothing will happen. Reality has a way of taking over. Germany, the climate change poster child, has detained Greta at a coal mine site reopening. Right now it's every country for themselves and the devil take the hindmost. Canada is a bad example to use because of the world's four largest oil producers we're the only ones with carbon taxes and a federal government determined to kill the oil industry...we're not reality.

Once again, and louder for the people in the back, who still don't get it: UNVACCINATED DOES NOT EQUAL INFECTED. YOU CANNOT SPREAD DISEASES YOU DON'T HAVE. VACCINATED PEOPLE ALSO SPREAD COVID.

Everyone who disagrees with your politics is a conspiracy theorist. This is your attempt to shut down discussion.

Where's @sharkman for this? This chart is government friendly propaganda! How can you even believe something like this when PARTY CITY JUST DECLARED BANKRUPTCY!

Global solutioning- bleeding the west of wealth. Retooling the economy- bleeding the west of wealth. Addressing new threats - bleeding the west of wealth.

A wrench is useful; you're more like a can of spray paint during an Antifa riot.

Related maybe but not the same thing. Climate begins at a 30 year trend, technically. Weather can be something like a heat wave.

The thread is about serious racism, the OP's accusation is substantiated by the article, the only one making unsubstantiated claims is you. If this is your forum then why don't you ban people for constantly pointing out your hypocrisy and lies? Of course no one believes you MH. You're the guy with the Trudeau pom-poms, and one of the most credulous leftists on this site, who pretends to be a conservative. The guy with you, in your selfie, was actually Gerald Butts. Prove me wrong. You won't even use your little voice on this forum to speak out against the PM for his blatant hate-mongering MH. You even pretended to see a sea of Nazi & confederate flags at the Freedom Convoy when he said they were there, you just couldn't find any pictures of it. Hit the skids you hypocritical whiner.

Saying there's no risks in getting COVID, or no risks getting the vaccine, are both lies, and both easily disproven by mainstream science.

Yeah because nobody would ever want to actually defend their country unless they were profiteers. Right? You’re no better than athos with your shameless and baseless lies

I don't agree with the OP, but why does the CBC article say in big bold letters that "white folks have work to do"? If black people make up a disproportionate % of violent offenders, don't they have work to do also? Why doesn't anyone say that whenever a gang member shoots up a neighborhood, but people say that when a white person in another country shoots people? Why is there a racist double- standard where only white people can be called out on their nonsense? I also don't think entire racial groups should be called out at all, because this is racist. Neither "White people" nor "black people" have "work to do", only individuals who do or say things they shouldn't have work to do. I do agree with the OP that this article contains elements of divisive race-baiting, which should not be tolerated by our public broadcaster. "White people" did not shoot those people in Buffalo, a single nutty white person did. But the article is correct that we need to be concerned about hate crimes and racism towards and from different groups, including against black Canadians.

The CBC and Desmond Brown want you to believe that Black people are threatened by racist, violent whites in Canada. Why? No reason, it's just what they are obsessed with. https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbc.ca/amp/1.6455390 The absurd article above makes nonsensical and racist claims about the danger white people present to Blacks in Canada. The article fails to mention that Canada does not release race based stats on perpetrators of violent crimes to protect Black males aged 16 to 40 who if the data were to be released, would be by far the group most responsible for shootings, gun crimes, and homicide. Doubt me? Release the stats and prove me wrong. This demographic, Black males 16 to 40 make up around 1 % of Canada's total population and would likely be responsible for over 50% of all shootings in Canada. Take a look at one of the few sources of racial identity: https://www.torontopolice.on.ca/homicide/mostwanted.php Look and see what demographic is the most represented in the most wanted list. There is data on victims which is convenient. They won't release stats for perpetrators or suspects but victims because blacks are highly represented as victims. This data shows 44% of victims of shootings are Black. This correlates to the likely race of the 44% of these perpetrators. See the data yourself for victims. https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/new-uoft-research-sheds-light-on-homicides-1.6315931 Again, as Black fragility/black privilege does not allow for the government or media to release the stats for those who committed serious crimes, here are unofficial stats of suspects bases on police and reports from the media that does release the race. Unofficial stats support this projection of around 50% of homicide suspects being Black. In fact, this reports suggests that 50% would be a very low estimate for homicides and especially low for shooting deaths in the GTA. Why won't anyone research this? The above data and the US figures, the FBI data shows Blacks committ 53% of homicides, support the hypothesis of 1% of the population being responsible for about 50% of the shootings and homicides. Try finding a CBC/msm article that will mention a Black suspect in a serious crime. They hide the description when it is non white time and time again. In the US, Blacks are 13% of the population and responsible for over half the homicides. They are also responsible for 24% of hate crimes despite their 13% of the population. https://ucr.fbi.gov/hate-crime/2019/topic-pages/offenders By race, ethnicity, and age (Based on Table 9.) Race In 2019, race was reported for 6,406 known hate crime offenders. Of these offenders: 52.5 percent were White. 23.9 percent were Black or African American. 6.6 percent were groups made up of individuals of various races (group of multiple races). 1.1 percent were American Indian or Alaska Native. 0.9 percent (58 offenders) were Asian. 0.3 percent (22 offenders) were Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander. 14.6 percent were unknown. The article by Desmond, who seems to hate white people, claims that hate crimes increased against Blacks in Canada with no context or citing their source. It is important to note that the article does not reference convictions just reported hate crimes. There is an important distinction, one has been proven and the other is simply a complaint. Desmond also produces zero examples of any hate related white on black shooting. Remember the...oh yeah? There are no examples. The article does not mention the reality of Black on Asian hate or Black on white hate or Black on Jewish hate. Can you imagineif Samuel Opoku were White? Sam was the delightful fella who allegedly threw feces on Asians. https://nationalpost.com/news/it-was-feces-third-poop-attack-in-four-days-has-toronto-students-on-edge Did Desmond write anything about this. Or anything on Darrell Brooks? https://torontosun.com/newsletters/ The real problem with hate crimes, or any crime, does not rest with white on black violence. One should look at the data and examine the Muslim community for hate crimes for insight into the issue. https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/8143311/isis-supporter-pleads-guilty-to-killing-toronto-woman-with-hammer/amp/ https://www.google.com/amp/s/globalnews.ca/news/4347254/danforth-shooting-victim-reese-fallon/amp/ https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_shootings_at_Parliament_Hill,_Ottawa On no level can any reasonable person suggest whites rob, shoot, kill Black more people more than Blacks do the same to whites in Canada. Every week in the GTA there is another serious shooting by Black suspects and no one wants to talk about it but we can talk abour fictional white on black violence in Canada? Our media and politicians have jumped the shark a long time ago. They transcend absurdity with their race baiting fake news. Imagine a state funded media organization publishing an article in 2022 about the lack of safety for Blacks in Canada from whites? I wonder if Mitch Marner, the family of Dante Andreatta, John Wheeler, and the victims of the 400 plus shootings each year just in the GTA agree with the theater of white on black violence in Canada? https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.ctvnews.ca/local/toronto/2020/12/21/1_5240508.html https://www.google.com/amp/s/beta.ctvnews.ca/local/toronto/2020/9/17/1_5109430.html Anyone want to talk about the Just Dessert shooting? https://www.google.com/amp/s/toronto.citynews.ca/2008/05/02/man-convicted-in-just-desserts-killing-back-behind-bars/amp/ This article further proves that the CBC needs to be defended.

Well the group of psychopaths are meeting again to discuss how they alone are going to save humanity. Freeland will be speaking. What crazy nonsense will these loons be imposing next?

You can believe that the climate is warming. You can believe that some part of that is man-made. But what you can't intelligently believe is that anything that sophomoric twat Trudeau and the Buttheads he's surrounded himself with will do anything useful to combat it. All he's likely to accomplish is making Canada a much poorer nation.

You're beginning to sound like Al the Gorical. Odd that.

1. And yet your source included it. Let's look at the others... 2. A professor of Geology is not a climate scientist. Does this person publish Climate papers ? "stated that" ? Where ? When ? 3. Astrophysicist... is embarrassed ? Ok. Did he publish a paper ? Oh wait... he DID ... 20 years ago ... and it was widely criticized as having poor methodology and the publisher admitted it shouldn't have been published. 4. It's a general statement. There isn't much disagreement - and I'm sure you can see why - that greenhouse gasses and solar radiation are the most important factors. Your source was published in 2009. It was criticized at the time, and given what I (a non expert) picked out of it it's not hard to see why. How have things been going since then ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumental_temperature_record#:~:text=The warmest years in the,in the period since 1850.

I'm pretty sure that we both know dressing up as a drag queen isn't casual at all. They don't call themselves queens and then throw on some burlap, genius. Stop pretending that they're not doing exactly what I said they are. If a straight female puts on 4" heels, puts on her sexiest dress, packs clown makeup on her face and wears a push-up bra just specifically to talk to little children, that's a huge problem. If a straight dude trims his junk, goes to the gym to get swole, throws on a banana hammock and then oils up his pecs to talk to some small children, that's a huge problem. FYI you don't need to dress for the boudoir to talk to small children about the kinds of things that you should be talking to small children about, and if you do, that's creepy.

Who knew that a fancy dress is "overtly sexual"? Is that only when a man wears one? LMAO

"A global network of more than 500 knowledgeable and experienced scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have the honor to address to Your Excellencies the attached European Climate Declaration, for which the signatories to this letter are the national ambassadors. The general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is at present founded are unfit for their purpose. Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions of dollars on the basis of results from such immature models. Current climate policies pointlessly and grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, reliable electrical energy. We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation Here are the specific points about climate change highlighted in the letter: 1 Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming. 2. Warming is far slower than predicted. 3. Climate policy relies on inadequate models. 4. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a plant food that is essential to all life on Earth. Photosynthesis is a blessing. More CO2 is beneficial for nature, greening the Earth: additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also good for agriculture, increasing the yields of crops worldwide. 5. Global warming has not increased natural disasters. 6. Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities." There Is No Climate Emergency, Say 500 Experts in Letter to the United Nations | American Enterprise Institute - AEI Trudeau listens only to the U.N. who just made a demand at WEF in Davos that the world must stop using fossil fuels. This is the kind of thing the Church of Trudeau worships and follows blindly. The UK has made a complete mess of their country and economy by following this climate alarmism madness. Why should Canadians have this same kind of insanity imposed on them by the actor in Ottawa. There are countless reasons why he cannot be believed. He just said his "just transition" will help Canada, which could not be further from the truth. It will be a total disaster for millions of Canadians.

I don't have to compare anything to your fantasies. Sure, you don't quote ANY evidence from Fox, but that IS the likely source that is KNOWN to tell the SAME LIES that you post here. Tucker Carlson Successfully Argues Nobody Really Believes Tucker Carlson Is Reporting Facts

Freeland must provide recordings of her meetings with these unelected people. I’m going to agree with Eyeball here. Why are Canadians paying for Freeland’s Alpine vacation so she can plot the next phase of unaccountable government overreach? All government employees are there on the public dime. Really they shouldn’t be there. We certainly shouldn’t be funding these cabal meetings. Freeland can go on her time off at her expense, though I don’t think she should be permitted to attend as long as she holds public office.

Not that at all . . . . Trudeau's total indifference to the needs of this country, uncontrolled spending, distain for anything/anybody that questions his 'messiah-like' preoccupation with global warming, all the while ignoring the economic and environmental benefits of LGN exports, and his total preoccupation with his image . . . . . the list is long. I do recognize your adoration of Justin Trudeau and all that he does to make you and Hardner happy . . . .

Trudeau has psychopathic tendencies. Combined with his cabinet of brain-dead penguins, and the NDP enabler, they are ransacking my country. All are traitors.

Governing is complicated and the people who do it are often much smarter and more informed than us. Humbling I know. But they also make mistakes and need to be held accountable. Ultimately they are supposed to work for us.

I laugh but of course a lot more is happening than that: - Global solutioning - Retooling the economy - Addressing new threats these are high-level areas that we work on today that we weren't working on 40-50 years ago...

You COVID cultists are a hoot. It's funny, in hearing people like you talk about that virus, one would think that you have a special affinity for it. It's like you're disappointed that it's not #3 anymore. lol Hey, did you know that precious death toll may have been somewhat skewed? How many people died from the virus DIRECTLY? Check out the article below: https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/how-are-covid-19-deaths-counted-it-s-complicated We're through the pandemic. Don't you think it's time to get back to something like climate scare? That nonsense has been so much more enduring.

Just because YOU BELIEVE sources that LIE TO YOU, is not evidence that Biden lied. And it entirely POSSIBLE that HE was given inaccurate info. The FACT is, YOU DON'T KNOW, you just TRUST. Unlike the VIDEO which clearly shows that IT RAINED during Trump's inauguration speech. Plenty MORE than "a few" drops. Thousands more.

What pollution? Do you mean this pollution:

Well if Santos is what it takes to get you to support drag queen story hour then you’re might be more liberal than me now! AFAIK Biden didn’t fire the drone missile and them lie about it, the Pentagon did. and hmm. Trump revokes Obama rule on reporting drone strike deaths President Donald Trump has revoked a policy set by his predecessor requiring US intelligence officials to publish the number of civilians killed in drone strikes outside of war zones. The 2016 executive order was brought in by then-President Barack Obama, who was under pressure to be more transparent. Since the 9/11 terror attack, drone strikes have been increasingly used against terror and military targets. The Trump administration said the rule was "superfluous" and distracting. …There have been 2,243 drone strikes in the first two years of the Trump presidency, compared with 1,878 in Mr Obama's eight years in office, according to the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a UK-based think tank… https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-47480207.amp

FTFY.

The Atlantic says it succinctly: THE GREATEST NUCLEAR THREAT WE FACE IS A RUSSIAN VICTORY Putin’s blackmail is dangerous; its success would be even worse. … The invasion of Ukraine has been accompanied from the outset by Russian threats to use nuclear weapons. A few days after the war began, President Vladimir Putin complained that “NATO countries are making aggressive statements about our country” and warned that, as a result, Russia’s nuclear forces would be moved to “a special regime of combat duty.” No apparent change in operational readiness followed that warning. But in state-controlled news media, the almost-daily threats to use nuclear weapons have become central to Russian propaganda, seeking to inspire fear in NATO countries, discourage NATO forces from entering the war, and limit the supply of military assistance to Ukraine. This Russian propaganda has been amplified and endorsed by an unusual assortment of people in the United States, including the Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, the Democratic Socialists of America, and the Columbia University economist Jeffrey Sachs. The propaganda absolves Russia, blames the United States for the war, and has four main tenets: first, that a long-standing American effort to bring Ukraine into NATO poses a grave threat to Russian security. Second, that American shipments of weapons to Ukraine have prolonged the fighting and caused needless suffering among civilians. Third, that American support for Ukraine is just a pretext for seeking the destruction of Russia. And, finally, that American policies could soon prove responsible for causing an all-out nuclear war. Those arguments are based on lies. They are being spread to justify Russia’s unprecedented use of nuclear blackmail to seize territory from a neighboring state. Concerns about a possible nuclear exchange have thus far deterred the United States and NATO from providing Ukraine with the tanks, aircraft, and long-range missiles that might change the course of the war. If nuclear threats or the actual use of nuclear weapons leads to the defeat of Ukraine, Russia may use them to coerce other states. Tactics once considered immoral and unthinkable might become commonplace. Nuclear weapons would no longer be regarded solely as a deterrent of last resort; the nine countries that possess them would gain even greater influence; countries that lack them would seek to obtain them; and the global risk of devastating wars would increase exponentially. That is why the greatest nuclear threat we face is a Russian victory in Ukraine …. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2023/01/russias-invasion-ukraine-war-nuclear-weapon-nato/672727/

N95 Respirators vs Medical Masks for Preventing Influenza Among Health Care Personnel: A Randomized Clinical Trial - PubMed (nih.gov) In case you are thinking that flu virus and SARS Cov 2 are different size wise and therefore cannot be compared, you are wrong. They are similar in size. Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review | Epidemiology & Infection | Cambridge Core Use of surgical face masks to reduce the incidence of the common cold among health care workers in Japan: a randomized controlled trial - PubMed (nih.gov) The use of masks and respirators to prevent transmission of influenza: a systematic review of the scientific evidence (wiley.com) Effectiveness of N95 respirators versus surgical masks in protecting health care workers from acute respiratory infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis | CMAJ Bacterial and fungal isolation from face masks under the COVID-19 pandemic | Scientific Reports (nature.com) ? Sorry you got conned, dude.

Well, it kinda goes without saying I hope.

Make Putin the king of Ukraine. Some “solution” you shameless kremlin propagandist.

if you feel the presence of Christ like a mountain at your back you are not likely to stay poor for very long after that you wont see the rich as your oppressors because the only real poverty is poverty of spirit once you are saved from that, once you fear no man, only God then nothing can hold you back, you will soar

revolution always backfires on the poor the revolution inevitably degenerates into catastrophic war which the poor are conscripted to fight

I was alive then and I don’t remember Canada being a utopia. You sure you’re not lying about this? One example: The Hells Angels we’re around in the 70s, and very prominent in some communities.

Its weird to me that people who are so upset about the past, will turn a blind eye to the corruption and influence going on right in front of them.

Your whataboutisms do NOT prove that Trump didn't LIE 30,000+ times. His TRIVIAL lies just show how pathological he is. AKA, lies when it's completely UNNECESSARY (except to sooth his EGO). LMAO

Putin is the world's greatest statesman.

They’re sick control freaks who think they deserve to micromanage populations. The WEF is an unelected mob of kleptomaniac disaster capitalists who use the cover of solving world crises to commodify every aspect of human existence in order to accumulate more power and money for themselves. Trudeau and Freeland are ardent supporters to the degree that they will foist policies on the public without a public mandate then give us a sell job. It’s gross but most people are simply too removed, gullible, exhausted, and/or disempowered to do anything about it. Make no mistake though, the fascist ESG alignment of big business with government is overriding national constitutions and sovereignty. People generally aren’t getting it and are toeing the party line by calling anyone who calls attention to the undermining of democracy a “conspiracy theorist”.

That is stupid and ignorant. The top EARNERS PAY MOST OF THE TAXES NOW. https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2011/09/21/only_the_rich_pay_taxes/ There is new data for 2001. The share of total income taxes paid by the top 1% fell to 33.89% from 37.42% in 2000. This is mainly because their income share (not just wages) fell from 20.81% to 17.53%. However, their average tax rate actually rose slightly from 27.45% to 27.50%. *Data covers calendar year 2001, not fiscal year 2001 – and includes all income, not just wages, excluding Social Security Here's an original idea: CUT 963 BILLION from Democrat SPENDING, most of which goes to buy votes from the stupid. Tax increases ALWAYS hurt the economy and result in less revenues. Unelected Joe raised taxes and he has the HIGHEST deficits of all time.

1. No 2. Prove it 3. No but it's obvious YOU support the Japanese internment camps. 4. Agreed he's not a beacon of democracy. I support the people of the Ukraine. I have a few whove moved in around me that have had over for dinner.. overall good people who are collateral damage to the military industrial complex. I don't support Zelinsky or the hundreds of billions going to fight a proxy war that should be used to fund clean drinking water at home. I think that coverage of him should be more balance and more questions should be asked about the blank cheque to fund the proxy war abroad Now that we cleared up my position, carry on

So...the Russians can leave the country they invaded. "Oh we want peace. Just put your weapons down, stop fighting us, and let us do what we please. Shh..Shh...it won't hurt so bad."

Show us that footage. Link us to the hopefully untouched up photos. We'll wait. Show us the OFFICIAL document storage area at Mar A Lago. Show us the wide open doors. We'll wait.

Ukraine stays independent and a stopper is put on Russian aggression.

Canada has “hate speech” laws and we’re very free. Is it perfect? No. Is it better than fee speech absolutism where people are free to spew hate, encouraging violence against people like Jews, gay people, etc? Absolutely yes.