Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/12/2022 in all areas

  1. In Canada 80% of the deaths between March 27 and April 10 were from vaxed people. Over 50% were from 3xers. When you take into consideration that 1) there are significant known side-effects from the vaxes and 2) we still don't know if there are any longer-term side effects, the drugs' ineffectiveness is making it a complete farce as a mandatory injection. The real debate now needs to be about whether or not it's even worthwhile for the government to keep on paying for it. We've sunk tens of billions of dollars into it and we're getting bupkis.
    3 points
  2. Personally, I think the wives, daughters and mistresses of rich men will still be able to access safe abortions whether they are legal or not.
    2 points
  3. Maybe if they had maternity leave and universal healthcare and assistance for single moms they wouldn't have to fight for forced pregnancy and birth?
    2 points
  4. Definite possibility. According to the transfer payments section of the 2020-2021 Public Accounts of Canada, the WEF received $2,291,095 from Canadian taxpayers in the form of grants and contributions. Funding came from 2 departments - Department of Environment and the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development.
    2 points
  5. I believe what’s happening in the US is a new understanding of how precious life is. This nonsense that Elizabeth Warren quotes, saying 68% of Americans wanting abortions to stay legal is wildly inaccurate propaganda. And women have the same right to control their bodies as men. But, the baby in the womb is not their body. They are starting to realize this. Over 60 million abortions have occurred in the US since 1972. It’s been a curse on that country, but hopefully the curse will be lifted soon.
    2 points
  6. Coyne is pretty respected as a Conservative commentator, unlike the YouTube street corner prophets of late. Conservatives used to be known for pragmatism and listening to their elders. This Bitcoin nerd Poilievre seems unsound.
    2 points
  7. Defund CBC fire bank of Canada governor cryptocurrency push anger and division yell scream ol then skipping questions from reporter at end conservatives really have gone the populist route if that clown is the front runner
    2 points
  8. Pierre promises to axe the carbon tax. Go Pierre.
    2 points
  9. Fitting. It's the perfect metaphor for the LOPC, and probably the most productive ten minutes of his career as a politician.
    2 points
  10. Dude, people weren't harassed at all and neither were businesses. Those are all lies by our msm that were debunked. The only interruption to local businesses was at the discretion of the local and federal government. We've heard all the nonsense from CBC, CTV etc about all the awful activity at the Freedom Convoy protests and how peaceful the BLM protests were, we're just not buying it. You can say it 'til the cows come home but I'm not going full-retard with you. Pretty much every minute of the Freedom Convoy was surrunded by our MSM, desperate to catch them on something.... Do you have any evidence of the illegal activity, or is it just your own esteemed opinion? Do you have a cite with some video evidence? The story about the flaming dogshit, PLANTED BY SOME VILE TRUCKERS!, in the apartment building was a bust, there's not much other video evidence that I'm aware of. Your post sucked blackbird. It was really atrocious and repugnant based on the level of accusations and the complete lack of evidence.
    2 points
  11. What is life? What is a living thing? Is life defined by the soul inside? What happens when we die? Do we have souls? Are we both body and soul or just body? If we do have soul then where is it and what happens to it after we die. I don't want religious mambo jumbo like what this religious book or that religious book says. I want your opinion as an intelligence being without what may have been said thousand or thousands years ago. Any thought or related experiences please share. I don't know the answers. I believe there is a good chance we do have souls. They are in our brains or hearts. They enter the fetus before birth and leave our body after death. They reincarnate in different bodies maybe within families. Those with good deeds will be rewarded a rebirth in a good family in a good region of the world. And those with evil deeds will be reborn in poverty or difficult regions . I don't know all these for sure but this is the closest to reality in my view.
    1 point
  12. You are totally ignorant of the facts. The Legislature voted. He did not act on his own. And what did they vote for? To make Disney pay the same taxes as all other business. You call that an extreme abuse of office? You have no clue what you are talking about.
    1 point
  13. I just did a 10 minute search online and this is one of the links I came across: https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-trudeau-acuitas-idUSL1N2UT27X Fact Check-Neither Justin Trudeau nor the Trudeau Foundation have shares in Acuitas Therapeutics I wasn't able to find any information that showed proof that Trudeau owns shares. Is there actual proof that Trudea owns shares that you can point to?
    1 point
  14. Your decision not to get vaccinated had nothing to do with mandatory vaccination. Entering a restaurant is not your right. A restaurant can still require a vaccine passport if they wish, even though there is no longer a requirement to do so. A business can also require masks if they so choose.
    1 point
  15. You claim to be a nationalist, but for what nation? ************ I say that and then I read your moving posts in the Altruistic love thread and I see the real you. Thank you. I'm not doing very well today. I need to learn to put mind in gear before mouth in motion. I'm retiring for the day. Quit while I'm behind.
    1 point
  16. When a candidate says something that stupid, it doesn't really matter who calls him out. Electing a moron as leader is not a winning strategy for the Conservative party. I am sure Mr. Poilievre is a nice guy and he certainly has a reputation for integrity, but he has shown a pattern of lapses in judgement. The attacks on the Bank of Canada is by far the most serious. A Poilievre victory in the leadership campaign is not scary, just disappointing. It means we will have a leader incapable of defeating the Liberals for the next 7 years. Prime Minister Trudeau can relax and enjoy the office, while he keeps the seat warm for Xavier who will be in his twenties.
    1 point
  17. Sure they did...with illegal ballots and uncontrolled counting. NT ballots trucked to Pennsylvania. Broken water mains...I mean plugged toilet in Georgia. Tons of BS in Michigan. Several other embarassing little "mishaps" as well. Ya...Biden is POTUS...that's as far as anyone can honestly go.
    1 point
  18. NDP supporter. Funny. The court decision involved mandatory vaccination for health care workers in order to keep their jobs, not your "right" to eat at a restaurant. No doubt this will be appealed.
    1 point
  19. Mr. Poilievre failed to consider the ramifacations of his promise to replace the Governor. The immediate impact would be a loss of confidence in the Canadian economy. The inflation situation is world wide. Canada's inflation is lower than the US, thanks, not to the grits, but to the Bank of Canada. The long term effect would be the precedent of interferring in the Bank, breaking a long tradition of the B of C being at arms length from government.
    1 point
  20. I didn't notice President Biden or President Trump in the debate last night. I'm not sure why they are in this topic. Neither are Conservative. Conservative values can be summed up in three words: God, Queen and Country. The grits are more stream lined: Money, Money Money.
    1 point
  21. They didn’t really know what they were getting. I thought Biden seemed like a nice enough guy who endured personal tragedy. I thought he was cool as Obama’s second in command. He said what he thought. The problem is that he is clearly displaying signs of dementia. He isn’t on top of major issues and his gaffes have driven America closer to all out war with Russia. His naïve moves on energy have added to energy security concerns. At least he hasn’t imposed carbon taxes on citizens the way Trudeau has, but his attempts to inflate infrastructure spending are just that, inflationary. I also think he’s compromised by the extreme left forces that he has allowed to hold sway in his party as well as sketchy involvement with his son in Ukraine. He isn’t a strong president.
    1 point
  22. Wrong. The world of Charest, Coyne, etc. is gone. Don’t be naive. We’re struggling to protect living standards and Constitutional rights. The forces undermining our way of life are mostly international. They involve radical restrictions on human behaviour to fight climate change and the removal of the traditional institutions that ground a society and support individual liberty: family, religious traditions, private property, etc. The threat of Chinese style digital totalitarianism is real. Trudeau is a willing though naive champion of this new society. You don’t want it. Polievre is in the minority of politicians who sees what’s at stake.
    1 point
  23. And PP is from fantasy land. If you agree with Mr. Poilievre, I have to ask what colour is the sun on your planet? Your use of terms like fascist and communist are immature.
    1 point
  24. Typical MSM Liberal cheerleading from Coyne, a formerly conservative columnist. He’s another old-worldy Charest type. Other than fiscal conservatism, I don’t see much meaningful critique in his commentary. The influence of the WEF and other international bodies, as well as the special interest so called “philanthropy” of Soros, are anti-democratic forces. Did any Canadians vote for digital identification systems and politically-motivated asset seizures? The fact that you’re so dismissive of these influences is exactly why we cannot have Liberal post-nationalist enablers like Charest in charge. He doesn’t understand current issues. That’s why Polievre has the support of the youth. Coyne is legacy media. Lewis understands these issues too, but Polievre took an early lead discussing them.
    1 point
  25. Is that bad? I mean...Trump's presidency was wildly successful.
    1 point
  26. 1. Exactly. We can see what happens when the loonies have an impact on health policy (see USA death rates vs. Canada death rates due to Covid). One can imagine the unmitigated financial disaster when these moronic know-it-alls start preaching to use from the YouTube bible on how we need to float the currency on clown coins or some f*cking such. Get your hands off my savings, please and thank you.
    1 point
  27. Let's just hope Jagmeet has learned our toiletry usage better than our languages. Or that winning hand will be...a tad messy.
    1 point
  28. LOL...Why is it always libbies? Masterbating at work...getting caught in undies on air...pooping online... Libbies...I know you like to "share" but please...a little decorum?
    1 point
  29. He was the worst of them all. Registered Republicans like me ARE the party. We chose Trump to run against Hillary because WE are sick of the RINO's. There are good Republicans and there are RINOs, and the rank and file Republican voter - ME - sent a message, and are continuing to send a message with our votes, that we want the RINO's out. Liz Cheney is out, others are out, and those who are still in don't even understand all this and they are on their way out. But it takes a little time to accomplish this. But we also have to win, and that is a consideration, because if we do not then the Marxists win, and right now we are on the precipice of disaster. And trust me, Canada does not want us to have the disaster that we are facing.
    1 point
  30. I thought you'd like this thread. I am an American nationalist. You are a Canadian nationalist. And that is great. That is as it should be. If you and I were the leaders of our nations we could still negotiate and cooperate, because cooperation is in the best interest of the nations, and negotiations would always be based on us each trying to get the best position for our own country. And there is nothing wrong with that. Well, the question there would be: Are Canadian interests best served by a Europe dominated by an authoritarian Germany and by a Great Britain defeated by that Germany? That is where you start. Not sure what that means
    1 point
  31. YOU are 100% correct. I make you an honorary Great American. LOL ??
    1 point
  32. Although already mentioned, if your magical being, "God", can create from nothing, I think your own logic is amiss. The correct logic is based upon the following argument: (1)Assume absolutely nothing. (2)Then one thing exists. (3)The prior statements. (1)and (2) are 'contradictory' but where only an Abolute nothing exists, it necessarily follows. The alternative is to have Absolutely Everything. So... (4) Assume Absolutely Everything. (5) Then Absolute Nothing is included as ONE of these truths. This requires interpreting worlds like a monitor in which every pixel in every possilble resolution define distinct worlds. Most 'images' are nonsensical and so lack meaning. But for those worlds that happen to FIT a consistent pattern, these are worlds that act as 'consistent' and like our as one of them. Contradiction-free versions perist and define what 'evolution' is on a logical and physical level. Note that it is alright for Absolutely Nothing itself to BE 'contradictory' afterthefact looking back because at its origin, if an origin does exist, then it has no LAW (nor lawgiver) to ABIDE by, in the same way you would interpret your 'god' as having.... minus any complex human-centric imposition upon it as a function of Nature.
    1 point
  33. I just have to stop you here. The "Torah" is the first five books. I am well versed in my history and strong skeptic against religion in ANY form of government position.. A 'god' would not be so powerless as to require human will power to make if feel adequate. The ONLY reason religion has even gotten as far as it has so far is due specifically for those who want to rule with a means to excuse their accountability to God's command and to entice the dumbing down of the average intelligence to encourage BLIND faith in PEOPLE, not God. If God is powerful, it doesn't need your arragant DICTATORIAL means to inform us of its exitence. Given you are anti-evolution, you lack even the respect of what "Nature" does that you oddly go against. Didn't your 'god' create nature? I was born of nature. If you were not a product of evolution, you are not a product of Nature and so should just go back to whatever alien planet you came from. Governments that permit religion are severely intolerant and dangerously unaccountable to the people for "democracies". Jerusalem (from "Je Ra Sol amen" [the last post of the fallen Egyptians meaning the "The end of the sun's rays" and was at "David" (the 'divide') between the 'Asher Ra El' [Assyrian people which where "Israel" comes from], and Judahs ("judges" given they were literalists of the original Egypt consevatives before the divide of "Saul" who is also the reference to the original "Sol" Intentional distinct spelling is political; most didn't even write and based their words on how the SOUNDED, not spelled.] You most certainly get your own propaganda through your religion and given most other COMPETING religions your news is the perfect reflection of "fake news" throughout history. All religions begin by utterly destroying any prior history that might competently point to them as being less genuine. Egypt was the original home but since the fall of that ASSYRIAN-related dynasty fell, Babylon took over the Middle East while those in Judah (not 'Israel') had the last remaining Egyptian temple. The 'ark of the covenant' was literally a ceremonial boat that held likely a broken obelisk of Akenaten's city moved to the 'desert', "Amarna". [That was the foreign Assyrian 'moses' who tried to impose his single religious 'culture' but got kicked out to the desert for a generation (40 years). [https://news.cnrs.fr/articles/the-lost-city-of-akhenaten] Notice the similarity to the temple of Jerusalem. The reason others didn't accept his attempt to unify others to a single culture relates to the fact that the general Egyptian society was relatively 'multicultural' and the 'temple' was originally a public place for ALL people. They were kind enough to at least just kick him out. That chase where god supposedly 'divided' that last dynasty is why "David" is a common reference for Palestine. I can go on. But even if you disagree, you have to repect that politics that utilizes religious laws are dangerous for all given anyone can make up a story that some magical being came to them and told them to do x, y, and z, arbitrarily. As for your own Rightwing Christianity, the renewed version that praises the rich and annihilates the sick and weak in direct opposition to the original communistic version that appealed to the poor, your leaders do not approve of anything referencing 'evolution' of which the Big Bang happens to differ from Steady State in regards to assuming physics at a prior time was (magically) different than today. It is NOT related directly to biological evolution or evolution of physical stages of development (using a universal physics). THAT evolution is thus still true about reality of which ANY physics theory would accept other than the religious extremes that WANT their religious mythical interpretation of reality of the past to be true. Rich and powerful 'lords' (originally a derogatory reference in which asserting the source of life (YWYH == ye oveh meaning 'the egg' or 'source') was argued to be the ONLY true owner of land and so did not approve of those who did settle. "Jew" means 'wander' and referred to the non-owners who had not settled, similar to the American Indians. Your PARICULAR religions thus EVOLVED memetically, a word referencing the social evolution of words like 'genes' (and why the name "meme" came about). But it 'devolved' in that it once begun as non-religious as those hated communist countries that tend to fall by first recreating religion through its leader-worship. In time, the real history gets distroyed OR mislinked to its origins and ta da.....we get EXTREME religions that have their realities misplaced in myth and other magical thinking. ....OR..... ...you are as clever as the most 'evil' (from Eve and el, meaning the "fallen one") athiest. I mean, if we were so disgracefully the most cunning deceivers, wouldn't it be most rationally evil for an atheist to CREATE religions? You should think about this one hard given such deception would more likely have such leaders PRETEND they were 'religious' to rule as your church leaders!! So if you are NOT just another wolf dressed up as a sheep, would you rather gamble in those politicians who ARE 'religious' but more incentivised to BE atheists? Are you not actually intentionally discrediting non-believers as a means to innoculate the masses into FAVORING the trickster's capacity to USE religion in politics? Would you PREFER that I hide my atheism and PRETEND to be religious like the rest of you? I assure you that such people exist!! And the ONLY rationale for Rightwing ideals of capitalism to be againt evolution is because pure capitalism IS a form of 'economic Darwinism' that proves just how natural evolution works when left free to act. So strong conservatives who sell religion are either the stupid members of the flock or are deceptive atheists conning others. Which is it?
    1 point
  34. I never did say anything about your mother. You are taking what I said out of context. Get lost with your lying bullshit, will you. ?
    1 point
  35. You can have a lucid debate with woke people? It might be possible in theory but in reality it is likely very rare. This to me is an insane debate. It's not limited to gender either. Many woke ideas and policies range from crazy to unsustainable. But at least they were just talking and not going full on Antifa on Charlie Kirk.
    1 point
  36. What kind of meeting was it to take your computer and take a dump... I mean who does that, first, it was hey take the meeting naked, now they have a meeting in the toilet stalls... got to be the new generations... I know my generation took a book to read, today you show everyone your poo face, and grunting is the new norm...
    1 point
  37. Quoted: Wilson also clarified that the Freedom Convoy protest was not illegal at any point, even though Prime Minister Trudeau called it illegal, and big media went along with it. In fact, an Ontario superior court judge sided with the convoy. When an injunction against honking horns was declared, the court also stated that “provided the terms of this Order are complied with, the defendants and other persons remain at liberty to engage in a peaceful, lawful and safe protest.” Yes we should be very worried with the direction the country is taking.
    1 point
  38. Smaller donators also had their accounts frozen. You should stop saying this. It was ruled a legal protest. Freedom Convoy Truckers Were Right - Judge Rules Protest Legal - City Of Ottawa To Be Sued - The Washington Standard
    1 point
  39. I think that is a decision that should be made between a woman and her doctor. I don't think it's anybody else's business. Certainly not yours.
    1 point
  40. I am a nationalist and I believe in the supremacy of Western ideals. So much of one that I cringe at the thought that we joined Britain in WWI just because. We should be no one's biatch.
    1 point
  41. Yes a good example. Liberal, Conservative I lost count of his transitions who cares you can change them like gloves, the important part is: to rule. Without any checks, accountability or indeed, responsibility. And that never changes.
    1 point
  42. So when are you donating a kidney to save other children?
    1 point
  43. I watched part of the debate. I am a member of the federal Conservative Party. At present, I plan to vote for Charest. ----- The perfect is the enemy of the good. a) If Poilievre wins, he'll want nothing to do with Charest. b) If Charest wins, he'll keep Poilievre on his team.
    1 point
  44. I thought you might be more enlightened about the Bible. Obviously you never studied it. However, I will not try to refute the nonsense in that comment as it does the job itself.
    1 point
  45. so, what you are feeling are the effects of monarchy Section 1 is the power of the Queen being used against you and that is Canada, that is the true nature of Canada Canada itself is repressing you Canadians you meet on the street will often say that they "love Canada" but that's probably because they don't actually know Canada. they don't know what Canada is they fill that void with a benign Canadian People's Republic of the mind, even tho no such country actually exists
    1 point
  46. I am sure most developers are also significant (fill in any political party) donors. Businesses of all stripes donate to all political parties just to butter their bread. Lobbyists are also apolitical. Whomever sits on the throne gets visits from lobbyists. Even if not sitting on the throne, lobbyists are active to get anyone on their side to move whatever project they have forward. That is the entire reason for lobbying. For sure Ford has lobbyists, as did McGunty and Wynne and even Horwath gets funds and lobbying action (primarily unions ). As for land, most land is owned by private persons or businesses or developers.
    1 point
  47. I hope you're wrong about this. I have a gay son...
    1 point
  48. My view, soul is a concept and does not exist at birth, but a soul can be grown through life experiences. Likewise, it can also die.
    1 point
  49. I want to shine on, in the hearts of man I want a meaning from the back of my broken hand.(All these things that I have done) In my humble opinion, if there was no soul, there would be very little music. BTW, you said no mambo jumbo and then you gave some mambo jumbo at the end of your post. But everybody has some mambo jumbo, because life is a mystery. Love is a dancer. Some stand and fight evil because it’s the right thing to do, even though they risk their lives. Why? Soul.
    1 point
  50. I had a rich uncle who used to say, "Son...Love is an abscess of the heart, that grows to a head at the crotch." I always found that shallow. Today I have a 30+ year marriage and mostly-baked spawn, and I have come to this conclusion; Love encompasses a wide array of feelings and causes. My wife is a tiny little Czech woman who grew up under communist Czechoslovakia. She's a very strong-willed woman who can make paint peel with her scream. She's also incredibly healthy. The woman had breast cancer and would go for chemo and go straight to work afterwards. Never up-chucked or had any side affects aside from the hair thing. I figure The Rona catches her scent, and runs away. I never seem to get sick. When I do...I sneeze, eat a box of oranges, sleep and done. Our kids are all in shape, strong and healthy. My love for her WAS lust. Then it WAS the adoration of a man who'd been given 3 amazing kids and a new reason for living. Now...its thankfulness for driving me to be my best at all times. In the future, when we retire, she'll be the doll who makes me peanutbutter and honey sandwiches for my golf rounds...
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...