Leaderboard

Notice how the 3 stooges can't reply to the subject so they post things imagined and not said and reply to argue to that instead....

The polls are saying a weak Liberal majority: https://338canada.com/ I think the Liberals will win. If so I hope a minority. PP has ran a really bad campaign. You've got to be a brain-dead fool to run on a Trumpian "Canada First" election slogan in a country that hates Trump more than ever, and also promise to use the notwithstanding clause for the first time ever for the feds. I agree with "Canada First" in principle, but just don't use a Trump slogan if most of the country hates the guy FFS. I think Trump cooked the CPC's chances and PP didn't do anything to quell the fears of Canadians that he's pro-Trump.

All that methane will only fuel gas-bags like robo.

Well the CPC was polling in the mid-40's until Trudeau stepped down. Some of that support went to the Liberals, none of it went to the Bloc or PPC. I agree a big # of NDP and Green supporters went to the Liberals when Carney came on. If I were PP i would have distanced myself from Trump in any way possible, not painted "Canada First" in giant font on the side of my campaign plane. There's other ways he could have expressed his stance on prioritizing Canadian interests more (which I 100% agree with) without copying a Trump slogan. He also copied Trump's policy of defunding university research grants that are woke. I'm as anti-woke as they come but PP has to understand the message these things send to a country where many fear Trump and Trumpism. The Trump campaign strategy won't work as well in Canada as it does in the US. I think Canadians want change, but they also want a PM who will best stand up to Trump. That's why the polls are so split IMO.

Michael Chong and Erin O'Toole aren't chuds. Nor Mitt Romney. You're just assuming I'm a Liberal supporter because I'm not a Trumpster like yourself. Again, anyone to the left of you is a leftist LOL. I was literally defending conservatives in my first post in this thread you fool. I really don't care what you assume I am. Have fun.

They say that left Wingers tend to have far more mental health issues, but gee where's the proof???

^Look at inEstiNe talking about reasonable, intelligent discussion. 🤣 And as if that wasn't enough, the illiterate twerp actually said "(and intelligible)", then followed it up with this balderdash: You already know the truth, all of and final of it and the only problem is what others don't see or wouldn't accept it. It's like English is your second language but you learned it from reading napkins. Honestly, your posts should have to be in the Crayola font from now on, so that people don't waste 1.3 seconds figuring out what an id10t you are.

ok then....hope your feeling well

This was predicted at least 30 years ago. If all the world's ice melts, sea levels will rise 216 ft. That doesn't include rise from thermal expansion which depends on water temperature and accounts for about half the sea level rise over the last century. I leave it to the individual to decide whether that would be a problem.

When an incel shoots up a school, in the US, is that an act of terrorism?

How could you ever prove definitively that it was the tumor and that there was no further risk? Lock them up in a minimum security prison for the rest of their lives. If they have already taken several other people's lives, why risk anyone else? He stated that his goal was to protect society. "That is the guaranteed way to protect society."

Interesting. People now know that the carney is a liar and a thief. Regardless of the polls. Get out and vote conservative or have the carney sell Canada out.

Why listen to election interference from a lesser evil?

Carney had said specifically that the president respected Canada's sovereignty but it turns out trump had told him that he still wanted Canada as the 51st state. further carney told him that they would agree to disagree, not that it was off the table. Trump talked about the '51st state' during call with Carney: Radio-Canada sources | CBC News Blanchet is reacting to this news strongly rapidsave.com_blanchet_calls_out_carneys_lies_about_his_call-yor49vz71twe1.mp4

Tell ^this to all the people whose homes were destroyed by climate change in Pacific Palisades at a cost of $250B. Then add all the record setting East coast fires which burn out of control.

Socially engineered demographic change is a far greater existential threat to Western civilization than man-made Climate change ever was. Liberals are guilty of the former. Things will only devolve & divide further as we approach tipping point. Millions dead, societal collapse within our lifetimes.

Michael Chong is my MP and he's a great guy. That's the sort of Conservative I can (and usually do) get behind. Erin O'Toole isn't one of the chuds, but he couldn't convince people that he wasn't listening to them. Stephen Harper knew how to control and squelch the dumbest parts of the rabble in the CPC, but Pierre Poilievre is embracing them. If he loses, that's going to be why.

Nope! Carney's polled close to 50% favorable and sometimes above. Poilievre can barely hit 40%, with the unfavorable percentage growing to upwards of 60%. https://angusreid.org/all-down-to-e-day-carney-poilievre/ Net favorable of +13%, vs net unfavorable of -20%. Ooof. Don't worry too much though. The CPC still has a chance here, in spite of their creep leader. As I've said before, if the Liberals win, it'll be because of Carney vs Poilievre, and in spite of the Liberal record. Take the Leaders out of the equation, and the Liberals are down to 28% and the Cons are up to 40%. If the Conservatives win, it'll be in spite of Poilievre. That doesn't mean you have to take down all of your posters though. You can still worship the guy if he loses.

Doctors are not professionals dedicated to evaluating the risk to society of crime. The ability to be "stable" or "function on their own" has nothing to do with a criminal risk to the rest of society. They are not just patients, or we would not be talking about this in a thread regarding the justice system.

I don't think that is correct. A mentally ill person who murdered someone, for example, could still be a threat to society. The problem with the system is mentally ill people who commit murder could wrongly be released into society who are still a danger to other people. In fact I posted some examples earlier to show at least one person who has received day passes with an attendant but who is still considered a serious danger by a committee or board. Releasing such people cannot be based on the opinion of just one doctor who may have poor judgment and is just guessing. No doctor can say with certainty that someone who committed murder is now safe to release. He is not god and is unable to know how mentally ill person's mind works. He simple cannot guarantee what the patient will do. It is better to err on the side of caution and protect society.

Oh he'll call it something else or he will just double down on the taxes being charged to industry. If he charges twice as much to all of the industries then we'll pay more but we won't see it and at least 40% of Canadians are too stupid to realize They still pay a carbon tax

You brought it up again, you donkey. If you want to respond to my last post in that thread rather than tuck tail after clowning yourself as you did, bring it. I'm always game to watch you make a fool out of yourself, as you're doing even here. These unhinged, spastic rants where you insist on fantasy re-imaginings of your past humiliations, however, are useless. Nobody reads them. Nobody even know what you're talking about except me, and I'm just laughing at you.

He said he was sticking around if he loses. Who knows? Not you or I. PP has never had a job outside of barking slogans and insults at opponents. Good at it? Maybe if what counts is riling up the base, but judging by the fact that the majority of Canadians don't like him and he seems poised to lose what should have been an unlosable election, I'd say that's up for debate!

I'm sure you convince yourself anyone you don't like doesn't qualify as 'people'. Worked for hitler and he was a socialist just like you

You mean you posted something online about a decades ago and did nothing else as well? A very white of you If I did you'd be my best friend because you'd think I was a victim Is it? Okay The problem is I'm not. That's why you get so angry. You know I'm actually correct and you cannot defend your position. When you side with terrorists for the slaughter of innocent people and I point out your bullshit you get angry because your position is indefensible. When You claim that a repeat violent offender who attempted to murder a woman is the victim here and I point out what a load of garbage that is, you get angry because you can't defend your position. It all boils down to the same thing. You're dishonest scudball who believes more in the rights of whomever your echo chamber tells you to rather than people and when you get called on it you become frustrated because there's absolutely no moral defense for your position. Then you make some stupid claim about how none of this would be a problem if harper was better and we all wore body cameras, claim you've been saying the same thing for decades when Half the time the issue hasn't been around for decades and then blame me for your stupidity

Oh, would you look at that... The cowardly little twit came back but still can't answer the basic questions about his hate speech, which still remains unsupported by a single fact. Where's the vandalism, dingus, aside from on some Teslas, by left4rds? Where's the rage and vitriol? Who has said or done anything beyond the pale from this side of the aisle? What personal attacks are you referencing, stupid child? And FYI you're not supposed to use the underline feature to disguise your id10tic comments as hotlinks to websites which support your bogus claims. You can bold, italicize, or change size or colour for emphasis, but don't pretend to have a cite, which is something that left4rds just never have. Bottom line, your snotty little invective is 100% unsupported by even the attempt of a supporting fact. All that you have here so far is hate speech. Grow up. Man up. Tell the truth for once you slithering loser.

yea true but unlikely any party wins again after 14 years lol

And if those killed where your family, would you still hold this line of thinking, 25 years per life taken...end of story...no excuses....

I'm going out on a limb here and predict a Conservative majority, with younger Canadians showing up in force to make the difference.......because they want change not the same stuff we have had over the last 8 plus years...as for the polls well i'm hoping for the same results the Last American election had and Thats what we have with Carney, the same party, same MP's , same sh!t.... Wrong question what is Carney going to do if he loses, think he will stick around....his bags are already packed...

Oh no they won't. And yes, we WILL lock them all up in either jails, or institutions for addiction.

Today is the day. We'll know tonight which party the Canadian public prefers. And myata, it might be a good idea for you to hide or get rid of all the potentially lethal things in your home.

I wouldn't go past this. If you were interested in a reasonable, intelligent (and intelligible) discussion, it would have been stated very differently. You are very obviously, not. And that's representative and indicative of the problem. You already know the truth, all of and final of it and the only problem is what others don't see or wouldn't accept it. So it has to be sold to them or forced on them under any guise and/or by any means because you already know that you couldn't be wrong. Yes, this is the problem.

Not a prediction but more of a wishful thinking. At the very least......a Conservative minority.

rapidsave.com_this_guy_is_great-jziesn6kfbxe1.mp4

Translation: "DAMMIT! Why didn't he use guns instead of a car???? This would have been the PERFECT time for a terrorist attack by a white supremacist Mexican like Zimmerman, or imaginary MAGAs outside of a Subway restaurant, or an imaginary Chinese-Canadian white supremacist hijab attack in Toronto. Where's that Trudeau photographer who wore the confederate flag jacket? Save us confederate boy!!!!!"

Some of the psychiatric science of 30 years ago is ow quackery. Some of the psychiatric science of today will be considered quackery in 30 years. Some psychiatrists call other psychiatrists quacks today, and maybe they're both right sometimes. Who knows, some of it might come full circle and change sides again. I get that there is a lot of knowledge out there, and there is no doubt constant progress, but I think that times change and psychiatry is always changing. Two things spring to mind: life changes constantly, and I think that the kids of today, whose minds were formed while playing iPads instead of hunting frogs, are probably quite different from the kids of 80 years ago the philosophy of legalizing drugs but getting users more involved in society so that their dependency lessened, which allegedly worked in Portugal 20 years ago, probably doesn't work anymore in the age of fentanyl. I'm no expert so I'll shut up now, but long story short, I consider psychiatry a thoroughly inexact "science". And I understand that's just a layman's opinion.

Another mentally ill criminal committing violent crime this time mass murder. According to eyeball, send him to hospital at taxpayers' cost the families of victims have to pay for his free food and treatment. Leftists' justice at work.

And anyone who isn't left of Castro is a chud The very fact you'd have to use dehumanizing language like that shows that you know you're in the wrong. Erin really did lie and break his promises, he got tossed. Simple as that. He said no carbon tax, came up with a new carbon tax. Said he'd balance the budget and came out with a budget that trudeau could have written. Said he'd support gun owners, spent 3 days flip flopping. And a bunch of other things. The guy was right up the liberal alley and that's the simple truth. The problem is you guys have gone too far to the left. Now anybody that doesn't openly call for quadrupling funding to the CBC and providing gender transformation surgeries ahead of heart surgeries which you consider to be less important is a chud hey sparky. You obviously don't detest the liberals. And look at what the hell they've done to our country in the last 10 years. Poilievre has put forward a very reasonable and very light conservative plan that focuses the country on solving the problems over the next. Of years in a fashion that isn't radical or jarring or anything. Yet according to you it's a far right almost nazi-esque budget Get real. And remember this, there is always a backlash. If you pull too hard for one way for too long history tells us that eventually it snaps back and it snaps back harder . Something to keep in mind

Yes, either way a nice bottle of Scotch on standby is called for

Kudos to you, Queen, I should never be as brave as you to make any prediction let alone one is bold as this. I do agree that anything can happen in these turbulent times...

But if a conservative gets into office, people will stop reporting individual incidents and blaming the PM for everything that happens. So we'll be safe at that point.

What "topics" are mentioned in the OP, ret4rd? You said "look at the topics here" in the thread title.... What topics, ret4rd? You've just made diabolical accusations against a massive chunk of the population for which you have provided absolutely ZERO proof. FYI in England people actually go to jail for spreading hate in a far less egregious manner than you just did there. Or, excuse me if I missed it, but what "proof" did you even provide to back up the alleged topics that you didn't even name, ret4rd? Where's the "cesspool of negativity, rage, wild groundless accusations and pure distilled hatred" that you referred to? Is it a "cesspool of rage" to point out that Mark Carney is a serial liar, whose most consequential statements to date have all been proven to be 100% false"? What's wrong with telling the truth, ret4rd? What change would conservatives make to this world that would make it more dark and dangerous? Can you name it, ret4rd? Because I can name several changes that left4rds are making that make the world more dark and dangerous: forcing young, healthy adults to take experimental medications which they don't need dividing citizens into two groups based on false medical (political) determinations and then providing one group with a gesundheitspass so that they can ostracize the other letting violent re-offending criminals out onto the streets who end up harming other innocents bringing in hundreds of thousands more people than we have created shelter for, making it inevitable that hundreds of thousands of people here end up homeless spinning fabrications of mass-murders of children by Canadian citizens, not bothering to even investigate them for years while the accusations are inciting violence and destruction within our communities, and racial division is growing, and then lying about the level of evidence that is finally gathered (as in Rosemary 'Lying b1tch' Barton's recent statement about the existence of unmarked mass-graves Can someone put that ret4rd back in his cage, and unplug his mom's computer?

This guy just goes on the ATTACK after his heros are arrested for not following the law..sad

If we could use that meltdown to power a steam turbine we could generate approximately 1.3 megawatts of power! Robo! You're this close to being a renewable resource!

The US constitution doesn't specify that due process is only set aside for citizens. But you bring up a good point. The narrative that non-citizens can be shipped off to a gulag without due process is an excellent reason to stay away from the United States. Which is a big reason why their tourism sector is tanking.

Gamblers lose money when they're wrong. Pollsters make money when they're wrong.

You should care the guy your voting for or sticking up for has lied on national TV,he mislead canadians telling them he had things under control, only now we find out Trump does not respect Carney, trump's latest rhetoric is proof of that..Carney is not the hero he is leading us to believe....he is just another lying liberal just like the others....

1) Whoa, another Carney lie. Whodathunkit! CBC must be going APEshit 2) Go Yves Blanchet! 3) I bet this is the last straw for LPOC cultists 🤣🤣🤣🤣

You just admitted that Harvard is antisemitic and that you support it.