Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 04/19/2025 in all areas

  1. Don't get de-moralised by the polls. Just make sure you go out and vote!
    3 points
  2. I voted yesterday. It was an hour standing in line to cast my vote. I overheard a few people grunbling about the wait an I thought about the kids who lived in mud that had the consistency and temperature of ice cream and the smeat of things I won't mention. They spent 2 - 3 years in that hell from 1915 to 1918 with other kids trying to kill them. When my Grand Father returner to Canada, he spent a hear in hospital and convalescence. I was able to stand in line for an hour to cast my ballot because of their sacrifice. So, yes, thank you Betsy. Get out and vote. 👍
    3 points
  3. The political commentators of 24/60 have all insinuated that Mark Carney won the English and French debate and were constantly sending him flowers and the police say that it is caused by the Chinese, but in my opinion it is rather caused by the $150,000,000 bribe that Mark Carney promised to Radio-Canada. The CBC is trying to manipulate the election result in favour of Mark Carney.
    3 points
  4. Got kids? Want them to grow up with micro-plastics in their blood and brain? Or maybe you just don't give a shit about anything except scoring a few political points. This is beyond short sighted politics.
    3 points
  5. All the carney has is fear mongering. His entire platform is based on "Trumpy". The carney is a theif, a liar, and bereft of ideas to actually help Canadians. Bye bye to the carney. GO VOTE CONSERVATIVES. SAVE OUR NATION!
    2 points
  6. Carney's eyes almost popped out of his head when Pierre said "I already got my top-secret security clearance back when I was a cabinet minister." He also didn't seem to be aware of the reason why Poilievre refused to re-up that clearance to read these docs. How did he not know those things? Didn't he even do his basic homework? He wants to become PM and he didn't even have a clue what answer he was going to get there? Kids fresh out of law school know better than to ask someone who's on the stand a question if they're not sure what the answer will be, and Poilievre has answered that question several times now. Even Thomas Mulcaire answered that question for Poilievre, and Carney should have known that as well. How was Carney so utterly clueless there? He seemed so smug there, I know that he felt like he just asked the ultimate gotcha question... My only guess is that Carney must believe everything that he sees on CBC - apparently he doesn't know how propaganda works 😂. CBC has been probably been telling the story of "No top-secret info for Pierre!!!" for months, as if there's really something to it, in order to keep the brainwash cycle on "heavy", and Carney was sucked in by it as well. Luckily for the Carney, CBC burned that footage from their own reels and buried its ashes with radioactive waste. Mulcaire on CTV:
    2 points
  7. What a load of cobblers. I'm a lefty and don't like anything vaguely right and my feelings make me call people derogatory names. I really don't have a cogent argument so lets call everything Trumpy.
    2 points
  8. Now if they could just do something about the woodpeckers......
    2 points
  9. The CBC journalists all had long faces, and really attacked the REBEL NEWS on tv...............for how they claimed, the REBEL NEWS had hijacked the traditional scrum session that happens after debates, and were able to ask questions! They also attacked the Canada Elections guy for letting it happen. They want blood! Here's the other side. Grab your popcorn! Some of these scenes I have not seen on mainstream media.
    1 point
  10. With HDTV, I was surprised to learn that Poilievre is left-handed, like Obama. And like Obama, Poilievre has brown eyes. Carney has blue-grey eyes. Blanchet has striking blue eyes: like Trudeau Snr. -Apparently Lincoln also had blue-grey eyes -JFK had striking blue eyes ===== Carney and Blanchet are short guys. Singh and Poilievre are taller. Carney is fit. ==== With HDTV, in modern democracies, I reckon that a bald man, a fat woman are un-electable.
    1 point
  11. When PP answered this the same way the media and the left went Nanners for a week.
    1 point
  12. Well, if you sum up what pundits on CBC are saying - he won just because he didn't rise up to the bait (apparently he's got a short fuse), and didn't make any serious gaffes. 😁
    1 point
  13. Blanchet did the best and is probably the 'winner'. Jagmeet lost hard. He looked desperate and whiny PP definitely took second. Carney gave him a freebie with that 'security clearance' question. Carney placed 3rd, and it wasn't bad per say but it wasn't great. He probably thought he was better off playing it safe and that's arguably true. But he really could have used a splash of passion, something that made him look alive and in control, and all he looked was either mildly annoyed or cardboard. I thought of that old joke from a comedian - " Listening to him reminded me of those professors in college that really knew how to inspire the kids to do drugs." boring, no hard hitting points, etc. Now in fairness many people have been saying it's his boring nature that has made him appealing so far. People want something relaxed and steady during these turbulent times. But I think he went a little far The problem for him is that poilievre had momentum going into that debate. About a ton but it was definitely there, and he just needed to shore up his fortunes a little bit. And that just didn't happen. I don't know that he made anything worse but he didn't make anything any better. So now people will be discussing this over the long weekend and Monday will start to begin to see some of the polls start to reflect how things went. I think his economic plan is going to hurt him as well.
    1 point
  14. Right. So you take words out of context and then try to tell me I'm out of context. When answering a question about "is it justified" an answer of yes implies support because you think it's justified. I conceed that an assasin has reasons. But reasons does not equal justification. The definition of the word justification is to be justified. Justified means: having or shown to have a just, right, or reasonable basis. If you say you think something is justified you are saying it has a moral and reasonable basis. That's support. Let's stop the pedantic reasoning. You really should since you are demonstrably wrong.
    1 point
  15. The only big elephant in the room in that scenario is that, the people behind Carney are the very same elected people behind Trudeau.
    1 point
  16. Tells me people want change and imo these are PP voters.
    1 point
  17. It's not even a study. It's an opinion piece. And it's a very bad opinion piece. It really has no place in an actual scientific publication Worse for his case, it admits that there are scientists who agree 100% that sex is binary. And indeed the definition of sex is binary in the medical journals. Where many of these people are delusioned is the idea that sex is the same as a person. You have a person. That person may be male or female. In some extremely rare cases that person is both male and female. In other extremely rare cases the person is neither male nor female. But in all of those examples, there are only two sexes. The Sexes are binary. The only reason that activists choose to pretend otherwise is that they often want to define a man as being a woman where it's convenient and yet define the man is being a man where that suits them and vice versa. And they want to conflate gender with sex because they want a person's gender to have the same rights as someone sex does which doesn't always flow. This is why you will very often see them conflate gender and sex in one moment and in the next moment insist that they are two separate things. Males or males. Females or females. All males exhibit some traits we associate with females and all females exhibit some traits we associate with males. But they are still females and males. And the very fact that these liberals can't tell the difference is a perfect explanation for why our reproductive rates have dropped to 1.3 births per female. You can't get them pregnant if you can't identify them
    1 point
  18. But Canadians love those values, ...after 9 years of justin, this is normal behavior, they crave it , that's what they voted for....what they don't like is anyone calling them out on it...
    1 point
  19. Straws are a big issue for you, huh? You didn't know most, if not all, sell cans and bottles of drinks as well. And of course, you don't have to drive while you're eating. And they sell metal straws now.... I wish!
    1 point
  20. No numb-nuts. Virtue-signalling and imposed inflation bad. Common sense good.
    1 point
  21. Sure, Carney had to ask Poilievre a question, but he chose very badly. Poilievre just gave the same answer that he gave a dozen times already, and he alluded to the fact that even Mulcaire said that PP did the right thing. How did Carney not see that coming? He just lobbed Pierre an ice cream cone question like a CNN "reporter" that was busy cupping Joe Biden's balls. Why didn't he ask him about immigration, inflation, deals with First Nations people... I guess that Pierre was going to hoist the poor old Carney on his own petard no matter what he asked him. Who do you think won the debate? 😘
    1 point
  22. "Apple-man wants to end the ban on single-use plastics! WE CHOOSE MORE POVERTY!" Fixed. Now leftists can say: "Orinj man bad" and "Apple man bad".
    1 point
  23. This is an odd question to ask. It backfired.
    1 point
  24. A saliva-spilling cult of rage and plastic? straw nonsense? How do I join?
    1 point
  25. well they kind of lost the whole "didn't get his security clearance" thing when it cooked off in Carney's face (Btw - i think you mean "poilievre wants to end the ban " )
    1 point
  26. By globalism do you mean trade between countries? How is that Marxist for crying out loud? Does anyone learn what Marxism really is any more beyond a slogan that illiterates shout at those they don’t like?
    1 point
  27. It's fairly obvious from your description of that that you mean basically liberals. This is A variation on the I would vote for conservatives if they'd elected Mike Chong as leader protein that we hear constantly from the left. By any reasonable measure poilievre and his version of the conservatives are comfortably center right. They believe in slowly balancing the budget, not radically doing so. They have no interest in messing with gay or women's rights in the slightest. Smaller more effective government and power to the provinces which is a very center right way to think. And their economic plans are very much a right of center series of proposals But according to you there are some sort of hard right group. Nothing could be further from the truth. So obviously your idea of center right is actually what most people would consider to be either center left or perhaps fully left. The left wing frequently suggests that anyone right of Castro is alt right extremist types. The only reason you don't see the CPC as center right is that the left has moved so FAR left.
    1 point
  28. The citizens don't want these rules, they don't care one way or another, sure they talk a good game but as soon as they have to pay our of pocket their done...most of the liberal rules set around getting our resources to market are designed to keep all of that in the ground....And when they do get approved every man, women and dog along it's route needs to be paid off....Carney has no intentions of freeing up all these resources, unless they are green....He has already promised to spend 500 bil in the next 5 years, the old liberal money tree is already pretty bare, where is all this new money coming from....
    1 point
  29. You're so dumb I give up on you. Not to you, on you. You and your family have my deepest sympathy.
    1 point
  30. Drinking a soft drink with a paper straw makes any beverage taste like drinking cardboard. The longer the paper straw stays wet, the more it becomes useless. We need to do what Trump has done in America. Plastic straws are back in America. The little bit of plastic banning that Canada is doing has no real effect on the environment at all because most countries still use plenty of plastic on so many things. It is impossible to ban all plastics which is what crazy people like you want to do. We brought or bought in the use of plastic to save the trees. Now we are trying to stop the use of plastic, and start cutting down more trees for making more grocery paper bags. Dam politicians, always trying to mess with our heads. 🤮
    1 point
  31. the problem is there trying to become the gop lite. they need to go back to being the old PC Party and not the reform party under a fake name lol.. erin otoole had potential but they stabbed him in the back and based on the leaders to choose from this time if he was still leader i think i would of actually voted for the cons.
    1 point
  32. OMG! OMG! OMG! We need to elect the liar! He will protect us from plastic straws! Thanks, guys. Keep talking!
    1 point
  33. UNM Researchers Find Alarmingly High Levels of Microplastics in Human Brains – and Concentrations are Growing Over Time https://hscnews.unm.edu/news/hsc-newsroom-post-microplastics-human-brains#:~:text=“We start thinking that maybe,of proteins involved in dementia.
    1 point
  34. Do you do understand we're talking about numbers right? If the debt is 2 trillion... Should you be worried about 1 million or 1 trillion? Should you be worried about payments only? Or revenues? Why do you believe that foreign aid is what we need to focus on? Who told you that? If it's 1% of expenditure or even 2%, most of that money goes to domestic companies that provide goods overseas. Like Farmers. Pardon me, but it seems that you are falling for some old tropes that aren't true. What about taxes? Shouldn't they go up on the highest orders if we have a deficit? Trump cut taxes in his first term, the deficit went up in good times. And deficit Hawks like Paul Ryan were powerless and eventually he quit the party. Let's talk about facts here.
    1 point
  35. No one's getting out alive.
    1 point
  36. Hey man if it means the end to the anti sematic a holes harassing Jewish people on campuses then great
    1 point
  37. It is amazing how you folks on the left will hang on to these lies. No shame. No integrity. No care at all.
    1 point
  38. The whole point of federal programs like this and even the so-hated-by-extreme right transfer funds is so we don't have rich and poor provinces with totally different standards of living. If you're opposed to that idea, you don't belong here.
    1 point
  39. 1 point
×
×
  • Create New...