Leaderboard

That's what you guys said about covid science too, and now even the NYT admits that it was all bought and paid for. "Someone lied to one of our reporters and we ended up ignoring the truth for 3 years 😭". All you guys say is "So what? We don't talk about covid anymore!" but just remember that your "covid science" is now proven to be "100% false". Your "climate science", in a nutshell: ignores the leading experts in the field while focusing heavily on wealthy climate hypocrites is predicated almost entirely on misrepresenting the overall level of consensus in the field by citing the results of one single study where nearly half of the researchers offered no opinion at all on climate change includes all the biggest liars of the political world (Dems, LPOC...) is funded by energy-starved China in order to drive their green energy businesses and sell their expensive batteries. The Dems and LPOC can commit scandal after scandal, force kids to take dangerous pseudovaxes, destroy the economy, start proxy wars and waste hundreds of billions of dollars on them, and all they need to do to win your vote is say "The sky is falling!". FYI it was only 16,000 years ago that there was ice 3km thick in North America. Grouse Mountain is only 1.2km high... Glaciers have been receding this whole time. Not only have the Chinese duped all of you wee fools into killing domestic energy in your own country, now they have you attacking our own green energy companies 😂 What evidence do you actually have that you're not all just President Xi's useful id10ts? And just remember that, as you give your answer, there are leading experts in the field of climatology who are entirely convinced that you are wrong, and they are willing to show their faces and give their names along with those assertions... They're not just "random, anonymous people who were included in a study".

No wonder Albertan's feel the way they do. Alberta is irrelevant except when they have to fork over all those billions for equalization payments right?

I think he honestly believes that this will force car manufacturers to move back to the united states. But that's not how it's likely to play out, and this will cause a lot of damage to his economy. If the US doesn't radically change course in about 2 months then a recession will likely be inevitable and that's going to put a lot of pressure on the republicans come the midterms.

Yup. Trump turned out to be the Liberal's best friend. Canadian MAGA hats will still worship him.

Zing... Anyway, did those pollsters have Trudeau ahead 3 months ago? If not, what went wrong? 🤔

Only because I'd be ashamed of myself if I did.

CBC specifically said on their panel that it's a big deal and PP is right that it's a conflict. I don't think it's nothing.

Its all a ruse anyhow. The "west" is just outsourcing its pollution to China and other countries. They get to brag about reductions in emissions, but the reality is that all they did was push production to other countries like China that doesn't care. Just like the stupidity of Biden attacking oil production in America while begging Venezuela for oil instead.

Then why were emissions falling under the conservatives long before the economy crashed? What they really showed us is if you want lower emissions don't vote liberal

In the 2000's they showed us the way to really reduce emissions is to crash the economy.

Dude, read the memo. This debate over man-made climate change is over. The fossil fuel industry knew the truth decades ago and the science is in. Now the smarter anthracophiles focus on the politics of how much carbon we can get away with burning and on what China is doing.

She tried to have Trump interfere in federal elections! She is quite a piece of work.

Yes, but now we have Trump.

So what you're saying is you're very comfortable making up something I never said and then arguing against that because you can't cope with the truth. Fair enough I understand. And considering that you are the guy who spent 10 pages arguing that 100% - 50% isn't 50% I dare say that economies and economics are beyond your skill set And once again you can't actually address the points of the issue. and become belligerent Gee you're not proving my point or anything are you This from the guy who does nothing but follow me around on this forum and try and pick fights at random and then loses them but I can certainly understand why you want to try and change the subject. Perhaps you'd care to blame my post size, or how frequently I post? Those are the usual reasons you give for why you said something stupid

Coming from the guy saying the economics doctorate isn't an economist, I'm pretty comfortable where I land in comparison to you on what the word "facts" means. Thanks for the laugh about belligerence though. Your projection is showing again. How many internet fights are you getting yourself into today? 🤡

If you want to mouth off and rant your deeply uninformed opinions here, they're going to get challenged. If they're particularly dumb, they're going to get mocked. You can be a big boy and calmly reason out and defend those opinions, or your can cry like a little girl about the fight you keep running straight into swinging. If Liz Truss falling into the PM's chair without being elected to it and lasting 49 days before being laughed out of office counts for something, what does that say about Trudeau getting elected 3 times and lasting ~10 years? What does that say about Carney, who was recruited as the first non-brit in 300 years to run the Bank of England? You do know that logic works both ways, right? FFS. You seem to be under the goofy illusion that dredging the interweb for people saying what you want to hear somehow forms your argument for you. The fact that you quoted Liz Truss with a straight face proves that you didn't do anything but Google "Carneyman bad" and then thoughtlessly drop the links into this thread. Thanks for your "contribution". 👌

Danielle Smith must be a Liberal agent. She’s doing yeoman’s work to sink Poilievre all on her own: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/smith-response-national-criticism-1.7494395

You forgot the most important thing, lowering themselves to acquiesce to the whims of their benefactors.

We don't actually know because he won't disclose yet, and that doesn't account for various pensions and positions or assets held in various trust or venture firms. But either way there's no doubt he controlled and spent billions. He green lit the 250 million dollar loan to musk alone in 2022. The same year he got a ... wait for it... 250 million dollar loan from china while attending on behalf of the liberal gov't a the taxpayer's expense.

This is important to note. One of the hallmarks of science and it's measure of success for any of it's works is the ability to make accurate predictions. General relativity for example is noted for having made a huge number of very specific predictions which turned out to be true even tho it took many decades to prove it. It's stunningly accurate. However climate change models are NOT accurate in their ability to predict even how things will be one or two years from now. And the models produce "possible" outcomes with absolutely massive variances. It's so inaccurate and unreliable at this point that it's really hard to even call it 'science' except in the most general sense.

Who could have guessed electing a mentally deranged rapist might be a bad idea?

I'd say that video is pretty credible, wouldn't you? Or is it a 'cheapfake'?

They’re very quiet…. even the ones on this forum!

IF they hadn't looped Jeffrey Goldberg in, NO ONE would have heard about this major clusterfark. And Hegseth would not have needed to tell all his LIES about "nothing classified" when so many people know that impending military ops are ALWAYS CLASSIFIED. But what about Jeffery Goldbloom? LMAO

Let’s not add to the typos here: Jamieson Greer; Jeffrey Goldberg. Actor Jeffrey Goldblum has nothing to do with this story.

Carney has made a lot of money serving the rich in various ‘tax-efficient’ ways. I can see that as a legit talking point for the NDP but it’s weird coming from so-called conservatives.

Except for the warming that's increasing. Yeah like 95% to next to nothing...like it always does time after time after time.

OMG the desperation of the Ultimate Pisser. No indication whatsoever, but spits out accusations like they were remotely real. I hope the add to the Liberal platform removing all tariffs on Chinese EVs. Maybe even offer Trump MAID services absolutely free.

You posted the lie that Hegseth never denied that there was classified information. He had. On multiple occasions. That's just the one I could find.

Are you farking nuts. You don't think the timings, sequence and methods of an upcoming military strike are classified? Jeebus. That could literally get people killed.

This is seriously bad news for Poilievre. Once again, Trump offers a noose rather than a lifeline for his conservative comrade: https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/federal-election/article-carney-calls-trumps-tariffs-on-vehicles-imported-to-us-unjustified/ https://www.ctvnews.ca/toronto/article/tariff-for-tariff-doug-ford-says-he-supports-retaliatory-tariffs-in-light-of-trumps-25-per-cent-auto-levy/

While you're shilling for your Orange Jesus and his incompetent disciples, why don't you show us where it was approved for classified information, hmmm?

The capacity for intransigent right wing stubbornness is just to much of a phenomenon to ignore. It's just plain weird.

During his confirmation hearing, Hegseth acknowledged he was “not a perfect person”. He promised senators that he has stopped drinking and would not do so if confirmed as defense secretary. But he would not commit to resigning if he did drink on the job. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/24/pete-hegseth-what-we-know Here's the issue, it's not just me you're accusing of making a baseless assertion. In this case it's also the Guardian you're accusing. It's one thing to call me a liar but you're also calling the Guardian a liar and suspect it will be the same case no matter what source anyone puts before you. You can't even agree with a dictionary when it doesn't suit your...case.

I couldn't make the process of progress sound any more natural if I tried. I must be getting thru to you.

Hah! $10 says you'd never say this is aloud in the same room as your mom, wife or mother in-law!

This was a classic. It also keeps it in the news cycle longer and PP has been doing a good job of that, keeping Carney's goofs in the spotlight. Conservative support has been a little weak with the elderly so politically this makes a lot of sense. But I'm sure it's something everybody's going to get behind either way, most people have grandparents or someone in their life is going to benefit from this

Here is another kind move of PP he offers to pay for Carney to come because liberals are cheap....or he is afraid of debating his excuse is because the green party is not invited, i mean come on, what do they hold 2 seats...Ya becasue she has so much to offer, i wonder if she will be sober enough to attend....Maybe PP will pay for both of them...

Not clowns, but lying clowns.

Holy shit. Kid, that is about the loudest cry for help i've heard in ages. You need to go see someone, you're becoming unstable! (fbcp??? LOLOL) That's because you're reading your own posts over and over. Nobody says that about him except people who are trying to convince others that people are saying that about him. He has never said he would kill pharmacare. Nice try. And you're lying, he did say he'd protect pharmacare Pierre Poilievre says he’d support pharmacare, dental care The question would be would he expand coverage over time to other people. Lies and dishonesty. That's all your side has. why would anyoen want to vote for that. See you on election day

I'm not sure that's a gaffe.

Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea?

So you didn’t answer the question just more empty insults. No wonder you’re a PP follower. I know you folks on the far right live in a black hole if information but post-truth has been a thing for a decade now. So far your response in every linenof both posts is just you with your fingers in tour ears baselessly say “whatever you say is a lie la la la”. You don’t even offer an attempt at rebuttal. Or do you think “you’re a liar” is an intelligent rebuttal to any argument you don’t want to believe? So childish of you. Cmon NOBODY lies as much as Trump. In any western country. Nobody. And he can’t possibly believe all of them. He tells tall tales like he knows more about the military than generals or as much about COVID as scientists. He completely makes up numbers and invents stories that never happened. As I said before, the ones he repeats often enough he will probably forget that he was the one who invented them and he believes them to be true but he has absolutely no problem repeating things he knows to he false. His objective is to get people to agree with him and he will say anything to do it. It’s classic narcissistic behaviour and Trump is a textbook narcissist. Sure he does truly believe that he is one of the greatest people alive and so people should follow and revere him, so there’s one thing he believes as true. But he will tell any lie to achieve that goal with the belief that the truth doesn’t otherwise matter As I said originally, they don’t have well-formed beliefs Trump probably believes that tariffs are good, but he probably couldn’t write a high-school level paper on what they are and how they work. He thinks somehow the exporter pays them (false) and the cost doesn’t get passed on to the buyer (also false) But since he has this belief that is little more than memorizing “tariffs good” he will say anything to promote that even if happens to know or ought to know it’s untrue like fentanyl pouring over the border from Canada. He simply doesn’t care id it’s true or not its a means to an end: if it’s true, great; if not, so what tariffs are still good YOUR EXACT WORDS: “There's little doubt in my mind he would prefer a liberal government. “ No It’s not obvious why especially since on multiple occasions he has complained the Liberals were the most difficult to work with and that he didn’t know anything about PP. And you still won’t explain your argument other than to say “it’s obvious”. Because you don’t have an argument. Everyone knows his fentanyl claims are bogus and you ought to also. The amount crossing from Canada is about as close to zero as any can realistically achieve. Trump lied and said it is “pouring” across the border “at levels never seen before”. The drug problem at the border is largely US drugs flowing into Canada not the other way around. So childish. You have not made a single intelligent argument. Seriously you ought to be embarrassed. Do you not realize how ridiculous you sound? There’s nothing inconvenient for him about accidentally tanking conservative parties and boosting left wing parties in Canada all over the western world? Especially the party of people he hates and has openly lambasted multiple occasions? He has no reason to lie about his screwups? Lying about his screwup that he can’t admit to is a 4D chess move? More of your juvenile insults, and YOUR irrational argument which is nothing other than “but Trump denied he screwed up”. TRUMP IS THE MOST SHAMELESS LIAR It’s pretty obvious he was bullshitting “In the moment” because he is incapable of admitting he is incompetent

For the Lib supporters here, honest question: What about the last 10 years has been so utterly fabulous FOR CANADIANS AS A WHOLE, NOT JUST ONE AREA OF CANADA, that you want more of it? I mean, our resources have been squandered to the point the US is bullying us, Trudeau invested all our money into EV's and battery plants that have mostly fled with our money, tent cities everywhere, drug epidemics, violent criminals and pedophiles let out into our streets, the longest list of insider trading and ethical violations, government waste was off the charts....it's endless the amount of scandals and during it all, the Libs focus was getting tampons into men's bathrooms. I mean, holy crap, even they admit they boffed immigration, they boffed housing, they boffed the economy. These are basic things, people. And all of them running for leadership said "Ya, we weren't listening to Canadians, but we're going to now." Holy crap! How is that an epiphany in a DEMOCRACY? What about any of this says, "We need lots and lots more of everything we've gotten for the last 10 years."

It's funny that you say that. You're technically right, of course. Nothing you're saying here matters. I'd be more inclined to listen to someone who knew nothing about this topic before I listened to Army Guy, who knows less than nothing but has strong opinions anyway. That's how we know that you have no freaking clue what you're talking about, and that your "research" is nothing more than grasping for folks saying what you've already decided you want to hear. That's why you offered Liz Truss as a source. She was saying what you wanted to hear, and the fact that she's a disgraced clown that was laughed out of office didn't even register. You probably didn't even know who she was.

So you're telling us that your Google search for specifically unflattering reviews of the man dug up some unflattering reviews? Shocking. By this logic, if I go out and find a bunch of negative assessments of Pierre Poilievre, are you going to accept them? 🙃

Going to call it here now. The Liberal party will never let Carney debate Poilievre. They will cancel the debates.

The vast majority of those things weren't actually him saying the same thing as what trump was saying. They were referring to completely different things but you took half a sentence that sounds similar and tried to pass it off as being the same thing. Got bad news for you, I can find clips of democrats saying almost as exact same words. This is no different than the democrat strategy of constantly calling Trump Hitler, or when they tried to pass off shear as a white supremacist or O'Toole as anti-vax and pro-covid, all your side does is lie about the other guy and hope that they can scare people into silence for a short enough time to win an election

And Carney was chastised for speaking out against Brexit, but history proved him right. Some politicians know populism is an easy route to power, often harnessing what Trump calls his beloved under-educated, but greater wealth is achieved through Free, properly regulated trade.