Leaderboard

That's what you guys said about covid science too, and now even the NYT admits that it was all bought and paid for. "Someone lied to one of our reporters and we ended up ignoring the truth for 3 years 😭". All you guys say is "So what? We don't talk about covid anymore!" but just remember that your "covid science" is now proven to be "100% false". Your "climate science", in a nutshell: ignores the leading experts in the field while focusing heavily on wealthy climate hypocrites is predicated almost entirely on misrepresenting the overall level of consensus in the field by citing the results of one single study where nearly half of the researchers offered no opinion at all on climate change includes all the biggest liars of the political world (Dems, LPOC...) is funded by energy-starved China in order to drive their green energy businesses and sell their expensive batteries. The Dems and LPOC can commit scandal after scandal, force kids to take dangerous pseudovaxes, destroy the economy, start proxy wars and waste hundreds of billions of dollars on them, and all they need to do to win your vote is say "The sky is falling!". FYI it was only 16,000 years ago that there was ice 3km thick in North America. Grouse Mountain is only 1.2km high... Glaciers have been receding this whole time. Not only have the Chinese duped all of you wee fools into killing domestic energy in your own country, now they have you attacking our own green energy companies 😂 What evidence do you actually have that you're not all just President Xi's useful id10ts? And just remember that, as you give your answer, there are leading experts in the field of climatology who are entirely convinced that you are wrong, and they are willing to show their faces and give their names along with those assertions... They're not just "random, anonymous people who were included in a study".

No wonder Albertan's feel the way they do. Alberta is irrelevant except when they have to fork over all those billions for equalization payments right?

I think he honestly believes that this will force car manufacturers to move back to the united states. But that's not how it's likely to play out, and this will cause a lot of damage to his economy. If the US doesn't radically change course in about 2 months then a recession will likely be inevitable and that's going to put a lot of pressure on the republicans come the midterms.

Yup. Trump turned out to be the Liberal's best friend. Canadian MAGA hats will still worship him.

Zing... Anyway, did those pollsters have Trudeau ahead 3 months ago? If not, what went wrong? 🤔

Only because I'd be ashamed of myself if I did.

Then why were emissions falling under the conservatives long before the economy crashed? What they really showed us is if you want lower emissions don't vote liberal

In the 2000's they showed us the way to really reduce emissions is to crash the economy.

She tried to have Trump interfere in federal elections! She is quite a piece of work.

Now it's a race to see if frogs are smarter than "conservatives." Who will jump out first?

Yes, but now we have Trump.

"Carney says he will double the Indigenous Loan Guarantee Program from $5 billion to $10 billion. Only catch is it cannot be invested in oil and gas. That shows you he will attack oil and gas if elected." Letters, March 27: Carney shows he'll attack oil and gas industry Sounds like Carney is much like Guilbeault, just that he didn't climb the CN Tower.

So what you're saying is you're very comfortable making up something I never said and then arguing against that because you can't cope with the truth. Fair enough I understand. And considering that you are the guy who spent 10 pages arguing that 100% - 50% isn't 50% I dare say that economies and economics are beyond your skill set And once again you can't actually address the points of the issue. and become belligerent Gee you're not proving my point or anything are you This from the guy who does nothing but follow me around on this forum and try and pick fights at random and then loses them but I can certainly understand why you want to try and change the subject. Perhaps you'd care to blame my post size, or how frequently I post? Those are the usual reasons you give for why you said something stupid

She just happened to be a vastly better option than her opponent. And, as you refuse to acknowledge for purely partisan reasons, the economy was strong under Biden--the envy of the world--and dramatically better than the mess he inherited from Trump. I guess because you don't like trans people (or whatever) you have to pretend it was a bad economy. Doesn't make sense to me, but you persist.

If you want to mouth off and rant your deeply uninformed opinions here, they're going to get challenged. If they're particularly dumb, they're going to get mocked. You can be a big boy and calmly reason out and defend those opinions, or your can cry like a little girl about the fight you keep running straight into swinging. If Liz Truss falling into the PM's chair without being elected to it and lasting 49 days before being laughed out of office counts for something, what does that say about Trudeau getting elected 3 times and lasting ~10 years? What does that say about Carney, who was recruited as the first non-brit in 300 years to run the Bank of England? You do know that logic works both ways, right? FFS. You seem to be under the goofy illusion that dredging the interweb for people saying what you want to hear somehow forms your argument for you. The fact that you quoted Liz Truss with a straight face proves that you didn't do anything but Google "Carneyman bad" and then thoughtlessly drop the links into this thread. Thanks for your "contribution". 👌

Danielle Smith must be a Liberal agent. She’s doing yeoman’s work to sink Poilievre all on her own: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/smith-response-national-criticism-1.7494395

The science may be questionable, but the source of the funding is absolute

Fentanyl?

There’s an entire global network of elites—scientists, governments, media moguls, and even space agencies—working tirelessly to maintain the lie that the Earth is round. This isn’t just a mistake; it’s a deliberate effort to keep people under control and distracted from the truth. These powers are using propaganda to manipulate the masses and hide the real nature of our world. The space agencies, especially NASA, are the biggest culprits. They’re behind the so-called "space missions"—Apollo, Mars rovers, you name it. It’s all fake. The moon landing? Totally staged. The photos from space? Photoshopped, every single one of them. They manufacture evidence to make it seem like we live on a spinning globe, but the reality is, the Earth is flat. It’s a flat plane, and all the "images" from space are part of the illusion. Governments are in on it too. They have a massive interest in keeping this truth suppressed because, if people knew the Earth was flat, everything would change. How? Think about it: new geography, new science, and the real reason why Antarctica is off-limits. It’s all connected. They can’t let us question the fundamental structure of the world because that would lead to massive upheaval. And then there’s the media—movies, TV shows, books. They reinforce the globe narrative with every opportunity they get. Take any blockbuster movie, and you’ll notice the subtle nods to the "round" Earth. They’ve been pushing this agenda for centuries, making it look like the idea of a flat Earth is something of the past, when in fact, it’s the real truth. So, yeah, the round Earth narrative is one huge global conspiracy. They want you to trust their "facts" and look at the world through their lens. But don’t be fooled! The Earth is flat, and the powers that be are doing everything in their power to keep you from realizing it.

We don't actually know because he won't disclose yet, and that doesn't account for various pensions and positions or assets held in various trust or venture firms. But either way there's no doubt he controlled and spent billions. He green lit the 250 million dollar loan to musk alone in 2022. The same year he got a ... wait for it... 250 million dollar loan from china while attending on behalf of the liberal gov't a the taxpayer's expense.

Look at the Libbies...defending a b1tch who makes fun of a cripple.

They’re very quiet…. even the ones on this forum!

IF they hadn't looped Jeffrey Goldberg in, NO ONE would have heard about this major clusterfark. And Hegseth would not have needed to tell all his LIES about "nothing classified" when so many people know that impending military ops are ALWAYS CLASSIFIED. But what about Jeffery Goldbloom? LMAO

Let’s not add to the typos here: Jamieson Greer; Jeffrey Goldberg. Actor Jeffrey Goldblum has nothing to do with this story.

Has anyone mentioned the gaffe a few weeks ago, when Carney insisted that Canada supplies the United States most of its semi conductors, and then had to admit the next day that that was completely wrong? It’s actually a tiny fraction.

Carney has made a lot of money serving the rich in various ‘tax-efficient’ ways. I can see that as a legit talking point for the NDP but it’s weird coming from so-called conservatives.

Except for the warming that's increasing. Yeah like 95% to next to nothing...like it always does time after time after time.

OMG the desperation of the Ultimate Pisser. No indication whatsoever, but spits out accusations like they were remotely real. I hope the add to the Liberal platform removing all tariffs on Chinese EVs. Maybe even offer Trump MAID services absolutely free.

You posted the lie that Hegseth never denied that there was classified information. He had. On multiple occasions. That's just the one I could find.

Are you farking nuts. You don't think the timings, sequence and methods of an upcoming military strike are classified? Jeebus. That could literally get people killed.

Oh believe me, he is that stupid. Billionaires don't blink an eye paying an extra $10-$30,000 fora car. Work an extra few minutes. What's more likely, they interrupt their whole process and start building new US plants that won't open for 5-6 years, or they'll hike the price of American built cars to cover the tariffs on others until the m0ron is gone from office?

I didn't post a lie, dumbass. Nor can you point out any such thing. You posted a video of Hegseth lying through his teeth and trying to deflect from the issue with an angry tangent. He's not very bright, if you haven't noticed.

While you're shilling for your Orange Jesus and his incompetent disciples, why don't you show us where it was approved for classified information, hmmm?

"We all know we're facin' a big challenge. And I just wanna say what we're doin' about it." Man of the people right there. I had reservations about him because I thought he might be out of touch and elitist. But now that he has dropped his Gs, I am all in.

The capacity for intransigent right wing stubbornness is just to much of a phenomenon to ignore. It's just plain weird.

During his confirmation hearing, Hegseth acknowledged he was “not a perfect person”. He promised senators that he has stopped drinking and would not do so if confirmed as defense secretary. But he would not commit to resigning if he did drink on the job. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jan/24/pete-hegseth-what-we-know Here's the issue, it's not just me you're accusing of making a baseless assertion. In this case it's also the Guardian you're accusing. It's one thing to call me a liar but you're also calling the Guardian a liar and suspect it will be the same case no matter what source anyone puts before you. You can't even agree with a dictionary when it doesn't suit your...case.

At this point the pretzels Trump's administration and partisan supporters are turning themselves into while denying, deflecting, and decrying it have made it a spectacle.

I couldn't make the process of progress sound any more natural if I tried. I must be getting thru to you.

Hah! $10 says you'd never say this is aloud in the same room as your mom, wife or mother in-law!

This was a classic. It also keeps it in the news cycle longer and PP has been doing a good job of that, keeping Carney's goofs in the spotlight. Conservative support has been a little weak with the elderly so politically this makes a lot of sense. But I'm sure it's something everybody's going to get behind either way, most people have grandparents or someone in their life is going to benefit from this

Adding the journalist was surely an accident, but choosing to have this kind of group chat--with top secret information--on an unapproved publicly available app is sheer incompetence. That, they all did knowingly. At this point it would be an upgrade if they were just using a private server.

Here is another kind move of PP he offers to pay for Carney to come because liberals are cheap....or he is afraid of debating his excuse is because the green party is not invited, i mean come on, what do they hold 2 seats...Ya becasue she has so much to offer, i wonder if she will be sober enough to attend....Maybe PP will pay for both of them...

99% of what comes out of Trump's mouth about Canada is rubbish. Like this is a surprise?

Who could have foreseen that putting a drunken FoxNews TV host in a sensitive position might be a bad idea?

For the Lib supporters here, honest question: What about the last 10 years has been so utterly fabulous FOR CANADIANS AS A WHOLE, NOT JUST ONE AREA OF CANADA, that you want more of it? I mean, our resources have been squandered to the point the US is bullying us, Trudeau invested all our money into EV's and battery plants that have mostly fled with our money, tent cities everywhere, drug epidemics, violent criminals and pedophiles let out into our streets, the longest list of insider trading and ethical violations, government waste was off the charts....it's endless the amount of scandals and during it all, the Libs focus was getting tampons into men's bathrooms. I mean, holy crap, even they admit they boffed immigration, they boffed housing, they boffed the economy. These are basic things, people. And all of them running for leadership said "Ya, we weren't listening to Canadians, but we're going to now." Holy crap! How is that an epiphany in a DEMOCRACY? What about any of this says, "We need lots and lots more of everything we've gotten for the last 10 years."

It's funny that you say that. You're technically right, of course. Nothing you're saying here matters. I'd be more inclined to listen to someone who knew nothing about this topic before I listened to Army Guy, who knows less than nothing but has strong opinions anyway. That's how we know that you have no freaking clue what you're talking about, and that your "research" is nothing more than grasping for folks saying what you've already decided you want to hear. That's why you offered Liz Truss as a source. She was saying what you wanted to hear, and the fact that she's a disgraced clown that was laughed out of office didn't even register. You probably didn't even know who she was.

So you're telling us that your Google search for specifically unflattering reviews of the man dug up some unflattering reviews? Shocking. By this logic, if I go out and find a bunch of negative assessments of Pierre Poilievre, are you going to accept them? 🙃

The vast majority of those things weren't actually him saying the same thing as what trump was saying. They were referring to completely different things but you took half a sentence that sounds similar and tried to pass it off as being the same thing. Got bad news for you, I can find clips of democrats saying almost as exact same words. This is no different than the democrat strategy of constantly calling Trump Hitler, or when they tried to pass off shear as a white supremacist or O'Toole as anti-vax and pro-covid, all your side does is lie about the other guy and hope that they can scare people into silence for a short enough time to win an election

And Carney was chastised for speaking out against Brexit, but history proved him right. Some politicians know populism is an easy route to power, often harnessing what Trump calls his beloved under-educated, but greater wealth is achieved through Free, properly regulated trade.