Leaderboard

The FBI loves talking about the dangers of whitey and all of Whitey's political violence and extremist attacks, but Whitey is lagging way behind Blackey and Muzzy in terms of political violence, and obviously Muzzy is the terrorist attack champion of all time. A left-wing dummy here was trying to say that whites commit the vast majority of political violence in the US, and I have no idea where they think they got that stat from, but BLM and Antifa - both Dem militias, and majority non-white - committed 99% of the political violence in the USA in the past ten years. Obviously muslims commit the vast majority of terrorist attacks. Their ratio of attacks vs their % of the population is off the charts. No one puts up guards around Christmas villages or puts metal detectors in American/Canadian airports to thwart the Buddhists or Hindus, but as soon as you have even a small population of musli you need to spend major dollars on security just to prevent children from being blown up. So why is the FBI such a bunch of lying wipeouts? Everyone knows that they're talking out of their asses, but they just can't seem to stop.

Canadian dollar jumps on Trudeau and tariff reports The mere thought of Trudeau leaving boosts our dollar. That's how bad the liberals are

You couldn't refute what he was talking about, could you? His list directly disproved robosmith's hypothesis that government regulations only address abuse of power. What is more accurate is that some regulations protect people and some regulations protect businesses. It is no secret that large corporations can easily mitigate burdensome regulations as the cost to comply is a small fraction of their operating cost. However, smaller businesses strugle to comply as the cost to comply is a much larger percentage of their operating costs. That is why cutting regulations stimulates small business growth.

I have to say, I posted a Politico article and robosmith just ignored it. Sounds like he doesn't have enough news orgs in his rotation.

Dude..I am a national socialist. I am the last person who would oppose state management of the economy. That was not the subject at hand. What I am mocking is your idea that anyone who identifies as 'left' cares one bit about causes. If you were serious and engaged in politics at all then you would actually seek to solve the problem of monied elites exploiting workers and consumers. Instead you focus on crying whenever Trump makes a mean tweet. You are not serious. You are not engaged in politics. And you do not know or care about cause and effect. As I said...nobody who cares about the left or right directions do.

That is the literal definition of trying to change the channel. Instead of addressing the issues you wanted to talk about a typo. A typo you very clearly knew was a typo. You're dishonesty is becoming of epic proportion. Have you considered running for the liberal party as leader?

I was actually shocked to see that lol. These numbers are staggering. According to Fondapol, a French think tank, between 1979 and May 2021, at least 48,035 Islamist terrorist attacks took place worldwide, causing the deaths of at least 210,138 people.

Maybe but so far " he is trolling" is the only defense of his actions from the pro MAGAs on here.

"Proving that what i said was wrong doesnt' make me wrong! And only a dunce would think that proof i was wrong was somehow an indication that i was wrong!" I'm saving that to show the newspapers when they ask if there was ever signs he was mentally unstable in the past.

I bet you're too stupid to realize that would be even worse.

I'm sure this is mentioned in other threads, but I don't see a thread ABOUT it. This is obviously a troll job. Getting Canadians all worked up. Now he can take credit for JT's resignation. But why does everything this guy talk about have to be taken seriously. Is he going to annex Canada? Make us a singular state? Or treat us fairly and admit each province as their own sub-sovereign territory. PEI gets a congressman and two senators? Quebec can form their own alternative party to screw with their two-party system? We know he hasn't thought this through. It's just rhetoric. But I know this site is full of people that support Trump. What do you think the end-game here is? And if you are taking this seriously, how does this get done?

Sharing the dollar might be challenging but as a general principle it's not a bad idea. And to be honest in the seventies and 80's that's kind of what it was like. You just drove across the border and sort of waved at the guy and declared anything you needed to declare, but you didn't need documentation or a passport or anything like that, and lots of people worked just on the other side of the border from where they lived But yes it would be economically beneficial, although it would mean we'd have to harmonize our import and tarrif laws and such.

OOOHHH , i see you got more space to rent in that huge mellon of yours.....PP has said he is going to handle all of this....but the small print says only those voting for conservatives will be safe....the rest, like you liberals well they are going to become american citizens in Alaska, they call it a reeducation camp, but it is really just a big old camping trip....lots of hunting and fishing you'll like it...

Maybe they can get his son to run for the leadership? There was the old man, then there was his young punk kid, and now there is the young punks kid. Maybe make it a tri-fecta. I am pretty sure that there are still some lefty liberal dummies out there who would like to see that happen. Let's get his kid in there and let him finish off this gawd forsaken sad and pathetic country. Maybe it is time to join America. Could it be much worse? 🤔

And HOW do you know that the ^example you've cited was perpetrated by "leftists" in the 1800s when your cite says NO SUCH THING? FACT IS, YOU DON'T and are just TROLLING AGAIN. It was most likely perpetrated by LAND OWNERS who wanted LUMBER, like your cite actually says LMAO.

You claimed Minassian was an Islamist: where's your evidence? lol bullshit, people were speculating about it right away (he was wearing a keffiyeh) and it was confirmed that he was weirdo Mulsim convert within days. And you have no evidence to the contrary other than his last name. LOL violent Islamic extremism can't be that big a problem here if you have to try and shoehorn unrelated incidents into that category. Here's a novel idea: give us an actual example of this phenomenon. Name an incident in which the perpetrator was ideologically motivated with a manifesto and everything but didn't get reported as such. You're full of crap. That incident took place in January 2017, a full three years before the BLM protests took off.

It's your link. Where did you get your bogus chart from? That's old reasoning. Leftists are far more inclined to behave as fascists now that right-winger are. Mass-killings by islamists like Minassian and Hussein are quickly shuffled off to other categories, but anyone who's white who ever killed anyone of a different race or religion is automatically an extremist. I think it was Hussein where the whole immediate family is muslim but he was theoretically not. It gets tiring seeing all the excuses. Whenever there's a mass-attack in Canada, it's more than a 50% that it came from that 1.5% of our population. And the biggest attack against muslims in Canada was just retaliatory... it happened within a few months of 3 separate attacks by muslims.

Well clearly, especially if what you are claiming is true, there is nothing ridiculous about the fbi being obsessed with white people. White people have the greatest justification from abstract principles, such as the right to self determination, to engage in political violence. Any responsible law enforcement agency should recognize that and do whatever it can to inb4 it.

It's just winning back the uncertainty created when this whole drama started in December. But yeah, a change in government is required to win back confidence in Canada.

Frum probably should have said right wingers, I think the difference is less subtle than imagined. The results of redistributing power to the wealthy are far worse than sharing wealth with the powerless.

Let's try this slower fit the Velcro shoes crowd. 1. You complain regulations restricting water diversion. 2. Then you complain about what you view as harmful case of water diversion. 3. Then you complain that the "asinine" law restricting water diversion should be repealed because it causes damage. And even after I point it out explicitly, you can't seem to understand that you're arguing against yourself.

Its not a case for diversion at all, Dimwitty. Its a case for no diversion. Are you fcking stupid? Or just stupid?

As a matter of fact, I can give you a very good example of why water diversion should NOT be allowed. Currently the Klamath dams in Oregon are planned for demolition. They are because: 1. These dams have all but destroyed the salmon and trout in the river system. 2. California happens to need much more fresh water. In Canada, nobody can "own" the water. Thus there are many small lakes where a single family owns all the land around them, but if one flies a pontoon plane onto the lake, one can fish and stay all one likes. I happen to know a family in just that position. That asinine law in Oregon has caused all sorts of damage. It needs to be revoked.

Why are you making your insanity normal? Just be sane. You can choose this now. No more excuses. You know this.

Hodad is going to hide from the simple question and play these dumb games instead.

Explain this then: The state of Oregon owns the rain? Who can they put in jail when rain falls in Todd Lake?

Go on. Rant about abandoning the Red Ensign next and you can check every f*cking box.

You say the craziest things. Have you not seen pictures of the blackened toxic moonscape that is the Alberta Tar Sands?

Well, just imagine someone much like yourself in charge of the Emergency Satchel and the most powerful military on the planet.

They say when s**t hits the fan, the true character of people emerges. At this point of time, we can accurately say that the people who happen to be Canadian, who defend Trump, are either cowards, or worse- traitors.

Lol...ok so you're full o' sh1t again.

Lmao...oh gawd that was worth reading twice to make sure he said what he said! I accept your concession.

If you have not noticed lately that most commercials that we watch on TV today are made up of approx. 70% black people of color. For a minority, that is always whining and crying about being oppressed, well, they sure do take up a lot of commercial space and time on TV. Indeed, it is thanks to our left wing liberal controlled governments, that we see how white people of color are being unfairly treated and discriminated against. Creeping in woke liberal socialism programs and agendas at white people of colors expense. I, as a white people of color, am getting quite tired of seeing how white people of color are being shoved to the side for non-white minorities. We can all thank woke, multiculturalism/diversity programs and agendas for that bit of racism and discrimination being applied towards white people of color. Our left wing liberal governments are the ones behind all of this anti-white racism going on in Canada. If you are white, you need not apply is their game. Just my opinion.

Insane. I hope someone gets fired for this BS.

Boor. Pitiful that the man pretending to be a leader can't rise above that. But of course those choosing a rapist liar with a criminal history as leader will overlook being an insensitive lout as a minor transgression.

despite risk of foreign interference Completely ignoring the real foreign interference is mainly coming from the USA, from someone not even in office..... 14 year olds are smart enough to see that. Traitorous antiCanadian old farts pretend it's not relevant.

Never mind the potholes, look at that foreigner picking your blueberries! Never mind reading your pay stub, the guy in the next cubicle is allowed to have an ear ring! And soon you too will believe you can buy a house in West Vancouver if only we cut pensions, got rid of universal health care, the CBC and cut corporate taxes.

Trumps public reasons are different than his private reasons. Trump in public: "We need to impose 25% tariffs, since there is a serious problem with fentanyl smuggling, and illegal migrants crossing the border. We are also tired of subsidising Canada." (reality: the fentanyl problem is almost non-existent. The amount of illegal migrants is not a serious problem) Trump in private: "We need to annex Canada, to drain their natural resources, especially their oil deposits, and freshwater, as well as important minerals. And of course, we owe Canada $40 billion dollars in trade deficits." We would be the equivalent of Puerto Rico. We would not be allowed to vote in the US elections, since we would essentially be a US territory.

Sure, but this only proves to make life more expensive for Americans. This is a bait and switch on the US electorate. Do you think these tariffs are going to drop the price of Big 3 car?

Yes Dear...

Anyone that voted liberal two or more times....at least according to webster's dictionary.

NO BILL is required. If you're in the country illegally then your ass is gone. We start with the gangbangers and criminals and work from there. THAT is the Homan approach, and THAT is the right approach.

🤣🤣🤣

DING DONG, the b!tch is dead, the wicked li'l b!tch is dead.

I'll fix that for you, because I'm a nice guy: "We cultists, who consume ridiculous BS from a wide variety of constantly discredited sources [aka TNI disinformation outlets] and then regurgitate it without ever weighing its merits, feel like you conservatives only get half the story, because your posts always show that you're completely disregarding the infantile drivel we hold so dear😭. In short, we're butthurt losers and we want you to play along sometimes so that we can feel gooder."

That was already proven that 95 % of those fires were caused by moroons, starting them.....one has to ask if climate change is the real factor here why are they not doing more to prevent fires like forrest management, or preventive maintenance, nope we'll blame it on climate change call it a day, next year we'll boost carbon taxes so we can lie and give them back more than they put into it....nope not really , cause that has reduced climate change here in Canada....nope not really...here is a suggestion keep the moroons out of the Forrest....

Yeah but the last thing Labrdorians (Labradites?) wanted is to be part of Quebec so they chose Newfoundland and Newfoundland chose them. Wise decision on both parts LOL