Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/07/2025 in Posts

  1. Why was it rough? Cuz she didn't whine and carry on like a baby, foment a riot to storm the Capitol or simply deny the fact for5 years? Goddam revisionist asses.
    4 points
  2. You'd be the second one they'd target. Robosmith would be the first. Socialism/Marxism/Communism/Woke/authoritarian
    3 points
  3. Robo is running from this thread now. His confirmation bias just hit DefCon1 - Cocked Pistol.
    2 points
  4. Yup, the demoncrats are being forced to withdraw and rethink their strategy. They're still fascist scumbags, but now they have to find a way to be more subtle with their agenda.
    2 points
  5. That article is pure revisionist drivel. Russia didn't invade Ukraine because of some rebels or some inability of Zelensky. They invaded Ukraine for the land. They did it with total disregard for life. They have targeted and killed thousands of civilians. They were never going to negotiate. Short of Zelensky giving up the land and moving everyone out, Russia/Putin would never have settled.
    2 points
  6. No, it was literally spelled out. "We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities." Keep hiding from me like the coward you are: "We applied the term coordination in that sense when stating in the report that the investigation did not establish that the Trump Campaign coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
    2 points
  7. The evidence is detailed in the report whether you admit it or not.
    2 points
  8. Your response is equally broad. Positive results? Our mortality outcomes were exceptionally good compared to places like the USA, but they didn't come without cost. Do we pretend the Emergency Act never happened? Do we ignore that Trudeau was torpedoing public finances long before COVID ever reared its head, and the economic difficulties we face now are exacerbated by his poor judgment and stewardship? His will be a legacy of failure, cynicism and poor judgement.
    2 points
  9. There was no collusion. The Mueller report spelled this out.
    2 points
  10. Hey Michael, you ever post a critique of a Trudeau interview?
    2 points
  11. And wouldn't you know it: MEDICAID SPENDING HAS PLUMMETED IN THE SUNSHINE STATE. https://news.yahoo.com/news/florida-medicaid-spending-undocumented-immigrants-110000442.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall DeSantis signed a law directing hospitals to ask about immigration status. Medicaid spending on undocumented immigrants plummeted. TALLAHASSEE, Florida — The amount of money that Florida’s Medicaid program spends to provide emergency health care to undocumented migrants has dropped significantly after Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis launched a multi-pronged crackdown on illegal immigration amid his unsuccessful primary bid for president. DeSantis signed a law last year directing hospitals that accept Medicaid to ask patients about their immigration status when they seek treatment. While the law does not force patients to provide hospitals with an answer, immigrant rights groups feared the mandate would scare migrants away from seeking urgent medical attention. The DeSantis administration and other Florida Republicans say any marked decreases in spending are signs his immigration crackdown is working. Florida’s Emergency Medical Assistance program for undocumented immigrants has seen a 54 percent drop in expenditures billed to Medicaid this year — with less than two months remaining in the fiscal year — since the state immigration law took effect, according to a POLITICO analysis. Thomas Kennedy of the Florida Immigrant Coalition said while there is no concrete evidence that the drop in Medicaid spending is a result of the law, which took effect in July 2023. there have been other signs of fallout. Talking points, to the NAZIS who are drooling all over their keyboards wondering how to b!tch about this. 1. Illegal aliens DO NOT BELONG IN AMERICA. They are CRIMINALS. They broke the law to get here. And they are bringing crime, child prostitution and DRUGS to our shores. 2. If a person of Hispanic, Asian, African, or AMERICAN features goes to the hospital for Medicaid, it's very simple: Answer the questions. If you have the proper papers (AND BY THE WAY, ALL AMERICANS HAVE TO HAVE PROPER PAPERS WHEN WE EITHER GO TO THE HOSPITAL OR DRIVE A CAR), there's no problem. Answer the question about your LEGAL immigration status. 3. If you are a WETBACK who swam the Rio Grande (after DRUG CARTELS transported you across hundreds of miles of Central American jungles) think of this as a wake up call. You need to get back to the OTHER side of that river, because if ICE catches you then you WILL be deported. State Medicaid is for poor people in the state, LEGAL IMMIGRANTS as well as native born. That's what we pay taxes for. We DON'T pay taxes for wetbacks to suck up health care in our medical facilities.
    1 point
  12. 1 point
  13. How do you respond to the Prime Minister of the UK, the President of France, and the Chancellor of Germany saying multiculturalism has been a disaster in their countries?
    1 point
  14. He just drops deuces all over the place here. He's like a human version of Black Dog.
    1 point
  15. Trump soundly beat Harris. Nothing was squeaked out. He won every battleground state and a large majority of the Electoral votes. That is not how the Presidency is won.
    1 point
  16. That's because his confirmation bias is cranked to "iron dome/Swiss cheese". He treats unwanted facts like scud missiles headed towards a packed elementary school, and anything that he wants to believe teleports past his cerebral cortex and gets scorched into his long-term memory bank. I've shown him the sworn testimony of Crowdstrike's CEO saying "We don't know for certain the servers were even hacked". He knows that Assange said that his source was a leak, not a hacker, and that Assange has never been caught lying about his sources in his hundreds, maybe thousands of leaks. Yet roboliar still makes declarative statements predicated on the knowledge that Assange got his info from hackers, based on nothing more than the opinion of known perjurers, and every time he does that, it qualifies as a lie. I personally don't know the server wasn't hacked, and I don't know that Assange wasn't lying, and I know that there's a chance that the FBI could really believe that the server was hacked by Russians regardless of how many other things the FBI lied about, but it's a simple fact that all of those maybes don't add up to even a single shred "evidence": it's all nothing more than a Russian collusion conspiracy theory until someone finds an actual trail of irrefutable forensic cookie crumbs. The fact of the matter is that the FBI chose to slander Trump based on a set of allegations that can never be disproven, because it's impossible to prove the negative. It's the same for the slander against Kavanaugh, as well as E J Caroll's slander against Trump. All of those allegations are impossible to disprove. For example, if I say that someone raped me in 2017, how could they prove otherwise, without video of every single second of therr life in 2017? It is absolutely impossible. So the Dems/FBI have this little formula for slandering people that they can pull out of their pocket whenever they want, and Russian collusion is a perfect example of that. As long as the MSM is biased/corrupt enough to keep pimping the Dems'/FBI's lies as credible stories, we're gonna keep having slander presented to us as gospel truth. And one more thing: the Demis, MSM and their leftard cultists continually count it as "a lie" when Trump says "I never colluded with Russia." Do the easy math on that one... Trump can absolutely know whether or not he colluded, and it doesn't require one iota of evidence, because if he did it would be in his memory. By contrast, all of the declarative statements that he did collude with Russia absolutely qualify as lies because CNN and MSNBC et al absolutely don't know that he colluded - they're just buying into a conspiracy theory that was created by known perjurers. A factual statement from the MSM could be no more declarative than "Trump allegedly colluded with Russia", anything more direct than that is. a. lie.... period. FACT: The MSM absolutely has LIED about Russian collusion tens of thousands of times, if not hundreds of thousands of times. No one has any proof that Trump lied about Russian collusion even once.
    1 point
  17. One of the smallest popular vote margins in modern history, but go off.
    1 point
  18. You clearly are not speaking from experience here.
    1 point
  19. Here's the problem with that. Arachnophobia and most of the other phobias aren't just a fear of something. We don't just call anything we're afraid of a phobia. I would not want to be stabbed but nobody would go around saying I have knifophobia. What characterizes a phobia is that it is in irrational fear. Your fear of spiders is irrational, the spiders themselves are actually no threat. So when you throw around words like transphobia what you are trying to do is dismiss the other person's concerns out of hand as being irrational before they even get to discuss them. What you are doing is dehumanizing them and their concerns and saying this person isn't rational, this person is invalid, this person has no legitimate reason for their feelings. That's why the left enjoys putting the word phobia at the end of the description of people they don't like. The vast majority of people are not transphobic. Even the ones that have issues with trans people. For example I am not afraid of trans people, nor are my concerns with regards to issues around trans people irrational. They're perfectly rational, I can describe them with Clarity and point to examples and information which demonstrates their validity. But rather than address my concerns or the concerns of others raised here people like you will dismiss it as "Transphobic" So that you don't actually have to address the issues. And in case you're wondering, that would make you the bad people here. People have come forward with legitimate concerns to be addressed and you have blown them off and dehumanized them and try and minimize them rather than address them. You appear to want a confrontational relationship between trans people and straights. Which is fine. But remember, that's what you wanted.
    1 point
  20. I see: because you're a loser who never logs off you assumed that I must have seen your reply at 6 p.m. on a Saturday night and ignored it when in fact I was doing what normal people do on a Saturday night and not looking at a message board full of mentally ill people (which I know is a foreign concept to a no-life loser like you). I logged on on Monday, saw both your replies including the one where you claimed to have read the manifesto, and posted the link right away. I never "refused to provide a cite" but did so as soon as I saw people asking for it once i was back online But one thing that's a little odd to me is why you would have needed a cite from me to begin with given you said you read the manifesto already. So perhaps you were lying about that. Oh no grandpa are you getting confused? Should we ask the nurse to bring your brain medication? I posted some excerpts earlier, Chrissy1979 did as well, but I was the one who posted the link to the document. Which said exactly what I said it said. Nothing is as hilarious as watching you flounder around like a fish on dry land trying to invent a new reality when it's all here in black and white: you said you read the manifesto but somehow missed large chunks of it and then came up with an insane and ridiculous re-interpretation of a pretty straightforward call to action (but not before lying about saying you had read it). Someday maybe you'll learn that it's far more adult to just admit you were wrong instead of twisting yourself in knots in a pathetic attempt to salvage what's left of your dignity. (which, let's face it, is already in short supply). Right except I quoted him directly saying what I said he said, which was calling for the military to purge the state of Dems. For once in your sad existence just learn to take your L like a man.
    1 point
  21. To you....everyone else?.....well Ill leave that to your kaleidoscope imagination.
    1 point
  22. No. Only 49.9% https://www.google.com/search?q=popular+vote+percentage+2024+us+election&oq=popular+vote+percentage+2024+us+election&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUyBggAEEUYOdIBCDc1MDdqMGo3qAIAsAIA&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
    1 point
  23. Democracy seems to fail in America only when the Democrats lose.
    1 point
  24. Perhaps I'm jaded, but that's pretty much what I've seen of the world... and despite Easter Bunny rhetoric to the contrary, keeping the peace in places with lots of diversity in a small area (that demographic concentration thingy) can be a bit of a challenge. People here (who themselves are incapable of minding their own damn business) often view it through the lens of ethnic food, festivals and colourful clothing. In reality, we can't even decide on which bathroom to use or whether male powerlifters competing in female events have an unfair advantage, Imagine being in a country with real problems and having to explain our little bathroom dilemma to village elders in a scenario where your own credibility is the key to resolving THEIR issues. I nominate Herb for the job. I had a peace keeping tour cancelled at short notice prior to retiring, the UN mandate was modified and my line number was cut. Lot's of issues there to be sure but one of them (at least IMO) was the existence of 64 different tribes and about 60 different languages. I've yet to meet anyone who's ever been to places like that who came back thinking it's EBE (Easter Bunny Easy). Then again, what is EBE, even for Herb, is filling the damn potholes in front of my house...we can't get that sh&^ right. At the lowest level of consideration... I don't know a single person who's doing (or has done) the expat thing in a Muslim country who didn't/doesn't live in company supplied accommodations / compounds... not one, why is that? Well, in my jaded opinion it's because they want to drink beer whilst watching their coworker's wives cavort by the pool in bikinis... and celebrate Christmas like they did back home. In other words, they take their baggage with them whilst expecting everyone who comes here (that would be the people with real problems again) not to do the very same thing. Well, best of luck with that Herb, I'm rooting for ya.
    1 point
  25. 1 point
  26. He has to do something. Do you have any idea what the greenhouse effect is? With regard to citizens who are transgender, you you don't want M2F to be allowed to play sports but you say nothing about the other half, the F2M citizens. Are they prohibited to participate? Canadian voters will not permit the level of spending and participation required to re-build the Canadian Forces capable of defending the country. Inspite of many of the things I have said, I really hope I have underestimated him. We need that level of majority to face down the American government. It would be great if the CPC government could reframe the dynamics with them as a great opportunity for both countries.
    1 point
  27. The sad part about it all is that when you ask one of these liberals or socialists have done for Canada and Canadians that help make their lives great, they can never come back with anything. They just prefer to attack and mock to try and save their lying commie faces. These lefty socialist people are to me the scum of the earth. They prefer to support those thieves and liars and incompetent buffoons rather than mock and attack them like they deserve and do with conservatives here. Just saying.
    1 point
  28. unlike you, who thinks you are going to "smash the far right in the face" on your doorstep don't lie, you won't do anything when they come for you, everybody knows
    1 point
  29. Well I think her argument is going to be that she really isn't a lefty liberal. I think her argument is going to be that the liberal party has to get back to kitchen table and economic issues and away from wokeismgross over spending and that she is the one that can deliver that while still being socially aware and not destroying our systems. Basically she'll claim she can be right for the rights and left for the left and everyone will be happy. I don't know if she'll be able to sell that but I suspect that would be her pitch Freeland may very well run for leadership. I wouldn't say she's gone just yet. She probably has the best chance of winning a leadership race. She's close with carney so it's possible that one or the other may back out to let the other run. Obviously nothing will change. It will be a caretaker government until the election is over, probably sometime in may. Which is pretty horrible considering that we are going to have trump to deal with and a bunch of other critical issues that now aren't going to happen or get addressed because the liberals have decided to put Canada on pause while they sort their own crap out to the detriment of everyone else instead of having dealt with it before
    1 point
  30. Since DUI is still drunk off his ass, I've gone ahead and updated the poll.
    1 point
  31. Everyone lost the politics notwithstanding places where most of the electorate lost their shit. Now the politics is theirs to lose. Shouldn't take long really. Certainly no more than a term.
    1 point
  32. Does that mean the conservatives can steal billions and give their friends and family our tax dollars would that be fair game....
    1 point
  33. Good God some of you people act like if they restricted immigration to solely from the UK the planes are going to unload WASPs to fulfill your fantasies. It's 2025 well past the day you could look at someone and say they're this nationality and this religion. When I was in school in Burnaby 20-25% of the atudents were Chinese. Only they weren't. They were as Canadian as the rest of us, born here. The "immigrant' was the kid from Glasgow who's parents moved here when he was in Grade 5. Like my 1st wife did. When my kids went to school in the Fraser Valley, the same applied to the 10 or15% that were South Asian, born here or came as babes, Get used to it already. We're better for that fact.
    1 point
  34. You are an Absolutely pathetic human with zero moral fiber
    1 point
  35. Poor muffin. if that's an example of your reasoning abilities then please accept my condolences.
    1 point
  36. He’s completely ruined the country. He needs to resign and lead a life in obscurity.
    1 point
  37. This is a glorious day for Canada. Shame on Canadian voters, the NDP, and fellow Liberal MP's for keeping this guy in power so long. Now we have to wait months for a Liberal leadership race, then an election cycle. Uhg. Will the Liberals prorogue to avoid a non-confidence vote? That's the question. I assume the NDP will likely use this resignation as an excuse to not bring down the government and maintain their legislative power. And will the electoral interference issue (and MP's allegedly involved) be cleared up before the next election? Democracy is at stake.
    1 point
  38. Lol, that's the Math definition. You know, Calculus. Differentiation during fetal development is a different thing. In the first trimester of pregnancy, an undifferentiated embryo differentiates to male or female (develops testes or ovaries). And in the last trimester of pregnancy, an undifferentiated brain differentiates to a male or female brain.
    1 point
  39. Yeah, that, too, but what does that have to do with political activism? No, I am right, You are wrong. Transgenderism is not a fantasy. It is real. No, I got the info from a science book.
    1 point
  40. The fact that you think that being interviewed by someone make someone fit or unfit is yet another sign that you are not fit to be a voter
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...