Leaderboard

https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796188943743889572/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1796188943743889572&currentTweetUser=MAGAIncWarRoom This just took away the convicted felon attack. Calling Trump a convicted felon indicts you in the conspiracy.

If it came from a lab, why would it not matter? A) would be the a point in a lawsuit against the US government B. would help to limit or prevent future incidences from happening in the future. C. It would vindicate those of us who have been maligned for simply asking questions.

What comes around...goes around. They set the ground rules. Turn them on the Democrats. All of them.

You've seen what 4 years of a Trump presidency actually looks like. You've seen what effect it had on the country and the world in general. Ditto for Biden. Only a total cultist/liar would try to pretend that they don't see things getting much worse in every way under Biden. The world went from "at war" when Trump came in, with the ME becoming more peaceful, to "Europe and the ME in brutal wars" under Biden. Inflation has caused Americans a lot of grief under Biden. Illegal immigration spiked under Biden and he has never done anything to get it under control. Biden has stoked fear and political division like no other leader in American history: Biden's administration openly floated the idea of assuming control of the Supreme Court. Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was the biggest military debacle for America since Little Bighorn. Gimme a break Michael. In what way are things noticeably better under Biden? In what way has America even broken even? Are you too much of a cultist to see any negative changes under Biden?

I just learned last night that if the Trump organization had designated the payment as a campaign expense, that would have violated campaign finance regulations. To make that clear to the left, if he had done what Bragg claims he should have done, the FEC would have gone after him. So, in the FEC's eyes, the way he categorized it was the only legal way to categorize it. Now, what Cohen did was probably a violation of campaign finance. The $130k is in excess of the maximum contribution. Even though it was repaid, loans are.covered in the FEC rules. But, the FEC didn't consider the loan a campaign expense because it was personal in nature, was related to events before the campaign and likely would have happened if there was no campaign.

The instructions were clear and proper. People who have never read a set of jury instructions in their lives are here to play armchair quarterback. As if Merchan wasn't fully aware that these would be the most scrutinized jury instructions this century.🙄

You literally just used the Uncle Tom insult against Tim Scott and Clarence Thomas and you have the gall to accuse me of implying blacks are stupid to support Democrats? If anyone is clearly racist towards blacks, it's white liberals. How demeaning is this prominent white liberal?

Holding those who allowed this to happen to account is critical to helping prevent it in the future. It's like saying we shouldn't investigate a murder because "what does indentifying the murderer actually change anything"? Your comment is something only a die hard leftist who cared more about his party than people would say. Of COURSE knowing how this happened is important. If that's the case - then the problem is with the ignorance bias and hatred of the listeners, not the messenger.

First off there was plenty of evidence. The FBI team that was leading the investigation fully and 100% expected her to be charged and convicted. They were shocked when they were ordered not to. But at the end of the day trump didn't do it. He said that we don't do that kind of thing in this country. Had his followers accepted that and moved on. Now the very thing he was talked out of doing has been done to him by the very people that said we don't do this kind of thing. So of course people are furious. If someone tells you that these are the rules and you have to play by the rules and you then play by the rules, you're going to be pretty pissed off when somebody else breaks those rules and laughs at you. Now the gloves will come off and we'll see what happens when both sides decide they don't want to play by the rules.

there is nothing illegal per se about writing off an NDA as legal expenses. It only becomes illegal when you do that in order to conceal a greater felony. And here's where we run into trouble. The judge suggested it was done to commit a crime involving the election. But - such a crime would be federal law. he's never been charged with that crime nor is the state judge allowed to charge him or prosecute on that crime. So what the judge said was even though he has never been convicted and even though we can't prove it, as long as you believe that he committed some sort of crime in the election related to this payment then that makes these payments a crime. He went on further to say there are four possible crimes that may have been committed in relation to the election. You don't even have to agree on what crime you think it was he may have committed, you can all think it was a different crime but as long as you all think some sort of crime happened I will consider that to be unanimous. So the only reason this is a crime is because of some other crime which he was never charged with, which was never proven nor was evidence given, nor is this court even allowed to address it, and they couldn't even narrow it down to one the jury just had to believe that it was something. That is the biggest problem with this case.

That's me. I did win a race once.

I don't know what public officials you're talking about, but 2 US government departments determined it's most likely a lab leak and the medical studies and datasets show all is NOT well. I believe the datasets over public officials who are nothing but bureaucrats. So no. I'm not satisfied. And I trust the doctors and scientists who have been right about everything so far, over the public officials who have lied their faces off.

Nah, Bidenomics is more like $2/gal plus an additional $2/gal = "No inflation".

I dunno I think it's refuted among some of the different government departments. As an example, Mike Pompeo who was the CIA director was all about the lab leak theory.

SARS-CoV-2 is the only betacoronavirus possessing a furin cleavage site. This unique feature boosts SARS‑CoV‑2’s ability to infect humans, making it capable of causing a global pandemic. In 2018, scientists funded by Dr. Fauci proposed inserting a furin cleavage site into a betacoronavirus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which reportedly operated with insufficient biosafety protocols. In 2019, the virus responsible for the COVID-19 pandemic, featuring the aforementioned distinctive furin cleavage site, emerged in Wuhan, the city where the world’s foremost research lab for SARS-like viruses is located. SARS-CoV-2 emerged in Wuhan equipped with this unique furin cleavage site one year after Fauci-funded scientists proposed inserting furin cleavage sites into betacoronaviruses under already known substandard biosafety conditions in Wuhan. In previous coronavirus outbreaks, SARS and MERS, scientists were quickly able to demonstrate natural origin by collecting multiple pieces of evidence linking infected humans to infected animals. For SARS-CoV-2, these same key pieces of evidence are still missing more than four years after the virus emerged. Over the past decade, Dr. Fauci has been a prominent advocate of risky gain-of-function research, funding such experiments and facilitating technology transfers to various questionable laboratories worldwide. Despite a pause in 2014 due to lab leaks in the United States and opposition from hundreds of scientists, Fauci continued such research, moving experiments overseas to labs like the Wuhan Institute of Virology. In summary, the evidence strongly indicates that Dr. Fauci's funding and technology transfers contributed to the risky gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute, ultimately leading to the creation of SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19. If we don't acknowledge the truth, these dangerous experiments will continue.

^ Comment of the day.

Nothing Israel has done has harmed Egypt except insofar as Egypt making war on Israel and failing. Repeatedly. If the Arabs in the region hadn't been so relentless in hating and despising Jews that little country could have had a wonderfully beneficial effect on the barbarism and backwardness of the surrounding states. Not to mention helping to uplift their economies.

Every successful endeavor this Liberal government has achieved can be written on the back of a dime in foot high letters.

You get a much clearer picture of what's gone on when you pull back and look at the macro picture. Fauci is not a medical professional, he's a bureaucrat. He has been for 38 years and he knows how to game the system to get what he wants and concentrate power in himself. The AIDS epidemic in the 80's was when he really honed his manipulative style. AZT was a drug that had proven adverse effects - it shut down liver function (exactly like Remdesivir does). But it was a money-maker for Fauci. He pushed it by funding fraudulent research, silencing and blacklisting other scientists and the media and journalists. He experimented with AZT on babies, children and pregnant women. No one cared about the deaths because they were amongst the gay community and you know how *they* were viewed in the 80's. He's done the same thing over the years with various populations of African countries. Again - no one cared because it was black people in Africa. He's gotten away with it and made a f*ckton of money off it. Like anyone who has gotten away with evil for a long time, he has been emboldened. My gut tells me that the virus was deliberately released in Wuhan, under his direction and in conjunction with the Chinese CCP. It wasn't the "killer" virus it was touted to be, but it was deadly enough to certain populations that panic could be created and it could be sold to the public as a "pandemic". Science-proven hospital protocols for dealing with respiratory viruses were ordered by top-level bureaucrats to be changed into protocols that would hasten death and front-line docs and nurses who protested, were fired. Did you know they weren't even allowed to give Tylenol to alleviate fever? I believe this was done to make it "look" like more people were dying from this novel virus than actually were. Remember the initial videos that came out of China, people dropping dead on the streets, twitching and writhing? Did we ever see that here in N. America? No, we did not. I think it was staged to frighten people here. The vaccine was not brought in for the virus. The virus was brought in for the vaccine. I haven't touched on it here because it's a very involved topic, but now that it has come out in the media that it was actually the US Department of Defense in charge of the whole thing, well......I'll leave it at that. It was the US DoD in charge of the whole thing. The FDA and CDC were only rubber-stampers to get the jabs out. There was no real testing or trials, only shams. People who were in the trials who had adverse events - were not even tracked. They were ignored. It was all just a show for the public. The jabs were going to get EUA approval no matter how they performed. I'm not sure how that information fits in now, other than the US military has a very long history of experimenting on troops. Maybe they viewed this as a live-action drill for pandemic management, I really don't know. Our own Canadian Military used the pandemic to try out psy-op techniques on the public - how much can you scare them into compliance? How to control the media. How to deal with non-compliance. They're gathering information for next time.

Also from Goddess: For instance, right from the beginning - the science said these jabs would not stop transmission. Conspiracy theorists said they would. The science said these jabs would not be safe. Conspiracy theorists said they were 100% safe. That was straight from Albert Bourla's mouth - CEO of Pfizer. I posted his tweet saying it. The science said vaccinated people would experience waning immunity very quickly. Conspiracy theorists said, 2 jabs and you're good. No, wait - 3 jabs. Oooopsy-doodle, we meant 4. Okay, 5. Probably more. Like for the rest of your life. The science said vaccinated people would experience recurring bouts of covid because the jabs are leaky and non-sterilizing. Conspiracy theorists said if you got jabbed, "The virus STOPS at you." The science said the jabs would cause heart attacks and myocarditis. Conspiracy theorists try to cover up the heart attacks and myocarditis. The science said healthy children had no risk of covid. Conspiracy theorists said children need to get jabbed. The science said the elderly and obese were at risk. Conspiracy theorists said we were ALL at grave risk. The science said lockdowns would be ineffective and ruin lives. Conspiracy theorists said lockdowns were great. The science said masks were ineffective and would ruin children's development and education. Conspiracy theorists said masks would have no effect on children. I also believe in common sense. Common sense tells me to question an experimental medical procedure, using a method that had not been perfected, manufactured by companies with billion dollar fines for medical fraud and forced on everyone by holding their careers and livelihoods and civil liberties hostage. Maybe if you trusted in science more, you wouldn't have followed the conspiracy theorists. Yeah, post-bumping... Sorta. Some posts warrant a re-read though.

Clearly you don't understand basic "bidenomics" math. Also, 2+2= 22 -joe biden, probably

2+2=4, you stunted pervert. Burn your African lesbian studies diploma and go back to school.

well he won't make that mistake again

You can't say that his answer was wrong when he says 13 until you know 13 WHAT. -democrat apologists, probably

Did Biden honestly say that? I'm surprised his handlers let him try to answer a math question, but I'll give the devil his due credit: that wasn't a bad guess for ol' kid sniffer. At least his answer was number. He only had a 50% chance of getting it 'right'.

Look, to me, it is just one pissed of neurologist that got cut off of his cash cow. I have beaten this dead horse. Have a good day.

He'll have to pay in the rest home. No more Thursday jello nights for that pedophile. No he isn't, you closeted communist. lol

Brandon obviously directed this rape of the justice and legal systems in order th "get Trump". He will pay for his abuses.

ROFLMAO! You're a chickensh1t. You won't address my post because you know who's kicking the dog and want to paint the dog as rabid, before it bites you in self defense. The people know lawfare and they know who's imposing it. Oh BTW...Trump it still leading in the polls.

Anyone who can't eat Canadian Bacon should be denied.

Since you brought them up, Egypt's concerns here are a case in point... they're right next door, they need only unlock the fence and yet they won't do it. Any sage advice for them? Right now they're worried about importing extremists and having those extremists launch attacks against Israel from the Sinai. They know Israel will have to respond to the attacks and that would mean incursions on Egyptian territory... they have a lot invested in peace and don't want to jeopardize their investment. Are you suggesting that their concerns are groundless? That their thinking is flawed? That their threat assessment is unrealistic? That it simply wouldn't happen? Or, is their reluctance to help their "Arab brothers" simply based on racism that's supported by manufactured reasons and weak justifications as you suggest below: One things for sure, somebody has this wrong... meaning BIG TIME WRONG. Given the very real possibility that Israel will indeed block the right of return for Palestinians who leave (that's what I would do) and the fact that Egypt (or others) would have to keep these folks in perpetuity, is their hesitancy based on mindless racism or are there some potential long term problems they're trying to avoid? Instead of staggering all over the map and making me dizzy in the process, perhaps you could simply provide a convincing argument that suggests those Egyptian concerns are groundless. If you can do that, Canadian objections would be a whole lot easier to address. Simply screaming racist, or asking "Oh ya, well what about this?" type questions reminds me of in-laws digging up long dead relatives during Christmas dinner. Unless you enjoy this sort of unproductive banter for its own sake you are going to have to move beyond it and address the underlying concerns. If Egypt has this wrong then maybe others do too, convincing them of it will now take more than shouting racist. Those days are over IMO. In fact, I think you have your work cut out for you and not just on this issue. The epidemic of madness on a litany of issues no longer resonates with people. It seems to me that progressives have traded on the good nature and tolerance of Canadiens in a way that now has consequences for them. One of those is that name calling no longer works. If that's all ya got then get a full length mirror and shout at yourself. Apparently I'm not alone... https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/agar-conservatives-appear-to-be-steaming-toward-victory If you think about it, all progressives had to do was not be crazy, they couldn't do it though. I suspect the backlash here will run deeper and last longer than some expect, even if it doesn't, I think the days of getting results through screaming and intimidation are over... they sure are with me.

Not every foreign culture or religion fits into Canadian society. What you claim is false. There is nothing racist about wanting a country made up of people that share the same values and culture. Some of these immigrants are only interested in fighting for their causes in the places they came from. How is that assimilation in any way?

There were already tens of thousands of Jews in those countries in the time frame you are referring to. Additionally, Jews did not bring their wars into any country they immigrated to, like the Palestinians. It's like the blind leading the stupid here. People who support Palestinians coming to Canada, need to stop posting, since they lack brain cells.

That is absolutely false. I clearly demonstrated the HE has no evidence for uis claims. Are you seriously claiming that I need to present evidence that he didn’t present evidence for his accusation ? You don’t understand how burden of proof works I clearly articulated how his arguments and claims are false and provided links. For example he claims he has footage of “mules” stuffing ballot boxes and dropping votes in boxes more than once but for 2 years hasn’t shown it, so you absurdly claim that I am the one who needs to present evidence he doesn’t actually have this footage otherwise we must assume his no-evidence claim is true??? Same for the addresses of the so-called Democrat “stash houses”, the names of the Democrat groups supposedly linked to them or any proof of their existence. I could go on and repeat myself for the third time but there’s no point No I think you’re just being a troll because you’re not this dense I think you don’t even know what ad hominem means Another absolute lie on your part. LOL no it is not the definition! Being convicted of felony election fraud for Republican candidates is directly relevant to his attempt to discredit the 2020 election for a Republican candidate….the one who pardoned him no less. What are you suddenly soft on convicted criminals now too? How do you not understand that being exposed as a fraud destroys your ability to credibly speak on the same subject where you committed your fraud? That’s absolutely false! One of them even says it has “gaping holes” right in the title! You didn’t read's cites. Trump’s AG Bill Barr’s criticism was then only one that pulled punches because he’s also a Republican and he was testifying before Congress, but I included it just to show you that even HE doesn’t buy it. He has also called Trump’s stolen election claims “bullshit” Absolutely false! The sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t really evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes” and they don’t mean it in the way you’re hoping. 😝 Again CLAIMING you have video footage of someone visiting a drop box multiple times but only showing them visiting one time is NO evidence, it’s not half the evidence. Claiming cellphones can be geolocated within 18 inches when NO expert agrees that is possible is NO evidence. And that is exactly what the links I posted say. NOWHERE DO ANY OF THE ARTICLES SAY IT IS PLAUSIBLE You clearly skimmed the articles with your MAGA dementia lenses on and saw what you wanted to see False. The sources I posted systematically dismantle his claims and clearly state that what D’Souza claimed to be “evidence” was nothing of the sort. As I said, the sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t actually evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes”. Seriously you can’t possibly be this deranged. You admit that you don’t even know anything about what is claimed in 2000 mules and you shamelessly completely misrepresent the criticism of him that totally dismantled his claims, in an effort to suggest the jury is still out or that he has most but not all of the evidence You know sometimes you come off as one of the more reasonable conservatives on here but sometimes you are in an alternate reality.

You post woke propaganda. You're the biggest shill on this forum.

Well, Trump is a native New Yorker and New Yorkers know Trump better than anyone. That's why they don't belong to his cult.

No I spelled out in detail the flaws/ errors in his argument. But like all conservatives in this forum when you hear something that’s inconvenient to your ideology you just make a blanket statement that it’s somehow not relevant. That is entirely false and none of it is wrong D’Souza is a convicted felon having previously convicted of election fraud, which is completely relevant to a “documentary” he’s made to discredit the 2020 election and demanding that we take him at his word. He is absolutely and in no uncertain terms arguing what I said he’s arguing the flaws in his claims and logic are so wide you can drive a truck between them and I described in detail what those flaws are. Ironically you’re not even able to describe how any of MY arguments are inadequate. Again typical for a conservative on this forum: you complain that detailed and specific criticism was detailed and sepecif enough, while refusing to provide ANY details or specifics yourself. But of course shameless hypocrisy has become the Republican brand. It’s not ad-hominem to state the fact that this man RECENTLY went to jail for trying to undermine free and fair elections considering this conversation is about his attempt to under the 2020 election. which statement is that? LMAO clearly you don’t understand how evidence works You are the only DERP here if you think anyone is supposed to believe his grandiose and outrageous claims and overturn the election based on secret evidence he has but won’t show anyone, even 2 years later And you admit you don’t even know if he’s provided any evidence or not but you don’t seem to even care. What would a legitimate reason be? Again more of your hypocrisy that when the accusations come from a Republican, even a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud NO EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED to believe his claims, you tak him at his word. But yet when the accusations are against any Republican suddenly your criteria for evidence is an impossibly high standard that nobody could ever realistically meet. That’s a lie it was a factual critique that you don’t want to accept so you pretend it was as you wish it was. RECAP OF FACTS: he hasn’t shown how he can locate a phone that close despite industry experts disputing his claim, he hasn’t shown how he ruled out the device of people who routinely pass by boxes located near where they live and work particularly since drop boxes are deliberately located in high traffic areas like malls and libraries, he hasn’t provided the addresses of supposed Democrat “safe houses” or even described how he knows the locations to be such, he hasn’t shown footage of anyone stuffing a box or visiting a box lore than once despite claiming 2 years ago that he has it And fact: claiming to have secret evidence that you refuse to show anyone means that for all intents and purposes you have NO evidence. Otherwise that kind of defeats the whole point of evidence in the first place. If I call the cops and say I have secret evidence that you’re a criminal but I refuse to show them or anyone, should they or anyone else believe me and come arrest you? I don’t think the technology has been invented that could help find you a friend 😝 We all have mobile phones. We’ve all experienced where it shows the device is in the backyard or the neighbours yard when in fact it is in the house and I’m not certain find my phone is even the same tech as the geolocation data anyway. And D’Souza absurdly claimed his cell phone location is accurate to 18 INCHES not 18 feet. In fact he said “12 to 18 inches” which is hilariously false. Experts said accuracy is 2-10 METRES at best under ideal lab conditions never mind real world environments Also geolocation can’t tell the difference between a moving object and a stationary object, it’s just the approximate location of the phone in the split second it was pinged. So there’s no way to tell if someone who was pinged was standing still directly at a box or speeding past the box at 100 mph on a nearby road Debunking links here: Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election? https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2XJ0OQ/ FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762 Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing https://apnews.com/article/georgia-elections-true-vote-ballot-stuffing-199113b47bc2df79c63fdf007cd23115 Group featured in debunked ‘2000 Mules’ election doc admits it has no evidence https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/ Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/attorney-general-bill-barr-trump-2000-mules-voter-fraud/

You sure like saying 100% a lot. I doubt you could find a single post where I do. This one doesn't count.

It is an annoying debate tactic for those on the left. Constantly demand that you repost the same information and data again and again. And if you refuse to play that game they'll insist you've never posted it. And if you dare repeat anything they say they want you to repost that 15 times as well and then they'll still demand that they never said it. It's frustrating trying to have a conversation with that going on. But I guess that's the point, they pull it out when they want to derail the conversation because it's not going the way they wanted

He said ,while belching out kernels of truth and serious content.

Of course you are. It's probably tucked away in some laptop or dossier somewhere.

Oh look, you've risen to the intellectual level of robosmith and myata Well done Joking aside the perception of many regarding this is going to be a problem moving forward. Any sane or rational observer aware of the facts of the trial will almost certainly see it as a political hit job. And in fact the initial polls would seem to support that. Whether or not it was is irrelevant, it will be seen that way. A lack of faith in the gov't and the courts is the beginning of the end of a society.

It's their fault, and they're paying the price right now for that. This really is that simple. If they wanted peace there would be peace.

How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force runs a 3-yr show trial against an incumbent politician, and commits crimes to get that show trial started and keep it going, only to be covered up by the MSM? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force controls social media disinformation campaigns to influence elections? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when the PM slanders a large group of people and the MSM doesn't even say anything about it? How many books would describe a country as a democracy after they force millions of people to take a dangerous experimental drug that they don't need or want? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when they exclude people from society for refusing to take a dangerous, experimental drug that they don't need? No one gives a sh1t about your cheaply bought definition of a democracy myata. You wouldn't know authoritarianism if it was forcing minorities into the gas chamber.

Please remind him to bring his cue cards, steel walker and lots of adrenaline needles. 5 months is a very long time for a decrepit old pervert to be on the campaign trail.

No, you just promote their agenda and spend years arguing on behalf of their closest allies. The fact that you're too stupid to know what you're doing is irrelevant. More comedy. In a thread where you're defending the criminal behavior of a twice-divorced, orange sleazebag who raw-dogs pornstars while his young wife is recovering from child birth, you are questioning other people's moral compass. 🤡🤡🤡

In the caldera, I presume. Good spot. If you smell sulfur, grab your camera. It probably means that some of Hillary's cousins are coming to the surface.

Considering I have an MS degree and you obviously don't, you must be talking about yourself. Have you EVER even read a peer review climate science journal? I have read several.

Normally I'd want a guy who's more libertarian in his views, However, the woke are becoming increasingly hostile to freedom and democracy so I wouldn't be too upset with a fighter to start going after these people