Leaderboard

https://x.com/MAGAIncWarRoom/status/1796188943743889572/mediaViewer?currentTweet=1796188943743889572&currentTweetUser=MAGAIncWarRoom This just took away the convicted felon attack. Calling Trump a convicted felon indicts you in the conspiracy.

If it came from a lab, why would it not matter? A) would be the a point in a lawsuit against the US government B. would help to limit or prevent future incidences from happening in the future. C. It would vindicate those of us who have been maligned for simply asking questions.

What comes around...goes around. They set the ground rules. Turn them on the Democrats. All of them.

You've seen what 4 years of a Trump presidency actually looks like. You've seen what effect it had on the country and the world in general. Ditto for Biden. Only a total cultist/liar would try to pretend that they don't see things getting much worse in every way under Biden. The world went from "at war" when Trump came in, with the ME becoming more peaceful, to "Europe and the ME in brutal wars" under Biden. Inflation has caused Americans a lot of grief under Biden. Illegal immigration spiked under Biden and he has never done anything to get it under control. Biden has stoked fear and political division like no other leader in American history: Biden's administration openly floated the idea of assuming control of the Supreme Court. Biden's Afghanistan withdrawal was the biggest military debacle for America since Little Bighorn. Gimme a break Michael. In what way are things noticeably better under Biden? In what way has America even broken even? Are you too much of a cultist to see any negative changes under Biden?

I just learned last night that if the Trump organization had designated the payment as a campaign expense, that would have violated campaign finance regulations. To make that clear to the left, if he had done what Bragg claims he should have done, the FEC would have gone after him. So, in the FEC's eyes, the way he categorized it was the only legal way to categorize it. Now, what Cohen did was probably a violation of campaign finance. The $130k is in excess of the maximum contribution. Even though it was repaid, loans are.covered in the FEC rules. But, the FEC didn't consider the loan a campaign expense because it was personal in nature, was related to events before the campaign and likely would have happened if there was no campaign.

The instructions were clear and proper. People who have never read a set of jury instructions in their lives are here to play armchair quarterback. As if Merchan wasn't fully aware that these would be the most scrutinized jury instructions this century.🙄

You literally just used the Uncle Tom insult against Tim Scott and Clarence Thomas and you have the gall to accuse me of implying blacks are stupid to support Democrats? If anyone is clearly racist towards blacks, it's white liberals. How demeaning is this prominent white liberal?

Nah, Bidenomics is more like $2/gal plus an additional $2/gal = "No inflation".

Trust is earned.

No, it's not. It's about public safety. I posted the evidence in the Trickle thread that proved it came from Daszak's research - it's the same evidence that 2 US Departments used to determine the lab leak was very likely. Daszak was working on the very virus that leaked or was deliberately released. Here it is in basic form: The funky furin cleavage site and the ACE receptors are just part of the smoking gun.

Because it was gain-of-function research, which is very dangerous. Even the first SARS-CoV was leaked from a lab. Covid was leaked form the Wuhan lab, the gain-of-function research there was funded by Fauci, who then profited from providing the "cure". It's very possible it was released deliberately. It matters because: 1. Gain-of-function research is still going on. and 2. What is to stop the next Fauci/Daszak from releasing a virus from a lab and then profiting from it? Or are you okay with this? Because many of us are not.

^ Comment of the day.

Nothing Israel has done has harmed Egypt except insofar as Egypt making war on Israel and failing. Repeatedly. If the Arabs in the region hadn't been so relentless in hating and despising Jews that little country could have had a wonderfully beneficial effect on the barbarism and backwardness of the surrounding states. Not to mention helping to uplift their economies.

Every successful endeavor this Liberal government has achieved can be written on the back of a dime in foot high letters.

The majority of Palestinians support Hamas, i mean during the election there were multiply groups most were terrorist groups but not all of them were and yet they did not get elected....Hamas made it very clear what their intentions were when they got voted in...and they still end up with winning the election...So not all palestinians voted for Hamas, but if you look at the election results you'll find a vast vast majority did vote for terrorist groups...that has to tell you something about the people and what they were looking for in their government ... these are the people you support...someone once said actions speak louder than words,have you seen any attempt to remove Hamas by palestinians , even when they are almost destroyed, or even speak out against the movement... see any protest across the globe for the removal of hamas by palestinians, why is that..... the palestinian people actions speak loud and clear...They are not going to be satisfied with anything other than the destruction of Israel....Thats what you support... The line in the sand has been drawn a long time ago...which side are you on?

If you answer one question, the buzz will throw ten more. It's not the answers they are seeking: only the buzz, the wider and louder the better.

Celia Farber's book is one the best, describing what Fauci did regarding HIV. On April 23, 1984, in a packed press conference room in Washington, DC, the secretary of health and human services declared, “The probable cause of AIDS has been found.” By the next day, “probable” had fallen away, and the novel retrovirus later named HIV became forever lodged in global consciousness as “the AIDS virus.” Celia Farber, then an intrepid young reporter for SPIN magazine, was the only journalist to question the official narrative and dig into the science of AIDS. She reported on the “evidence” that was being continually cited and repeated by health officials and the press, the deadliness of AZT, and Dr. Fauci’s trials on children, infants, and pregnant mothers. Throughout, Faber’s reportage was largely ignored. She was maligned, maliciously attacked, and ultimately canceled. Now, forty years after her original reporting, Farber’s Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS is reissued with a new foreword by Mark Crispin Miller, shining much-needed light on her groundbreaking work once again. More relevant than ever, this book serves as an essential foundation to understanding its catastrophic sequel: COVID-19. Serious Adverse Events makes clear that the tactics employed at the height of HIV/AIDS—the fearmongering, cancel culture, and “woke” takeover of science, medicine, and journalism—persist today. The response to COVID-19 isn’t new: it is a well-trod and dangerous path in the social landscape. Devil in a labcoat, indeed. Notice he experimented on "children, infants and pregnant women" - same as with the covid injections. This is morally and ethically WRONG. @eyeball staunch defense of it, is immoral. The fact that eyeball looks up to this man and thinks he's the "expert" we should follow and agrees with experimenting on children and pregnant women......pure evil. He's done the same thing to Africans - killed many children and young women with dangerous experimentation.

Clearly you don't understand basic "bidenomics" math. Also, 2+2= 22 -joe biden, probably

2+2=4, you stunted pervert. Burn your African lesbian studies diploma and go back to school.

In other news, the sun rose in the east this morning.... that trudeau breaks the rules to give money contracts to his 'friends' is simply not news. The scum has to go, and anyone who supported him in the last election is basically a piece of crap who should have known better.

You can't say that his answer was wrong when he says 13 until you know 13 WHAT. -democrat apologists, probably

This has been discussed. It's worth remembering that he has never been charged with election financing crimes. But you can't just say that any old thing is an election expense. Their argument is that because repressing the story may have helped the election it's an election expense. So if you go get a haircut is that an election expense? Looking better helps you win the election right? How about your gym membership? Looking fit and healthy is important to an election campaign right? You can't just write off all of the food you eat during the election, presumably under the argument that you'll die if you don't eat and that would affect the election (tho it didn't for biden ) So there has been a real question as to whether or not this actually constitutes an election expense. Certainly paying for advertising would, but does paying not to advertise constitute such an expense? Most experts seem to suggest that it is unlikely that it should have been considered an election expense.

Covid was not Fauci's first rodeo, but certainly the biggest. Read some of the books about his actions with regard to HIV/AIDS. He did the same thing with HIV that he did with covid. For AIDS, he dusted off a dangerous, but money-making drug that was sitting on the shelf - AZT - which ended up killing massive numbers of people. And he suppressed treatments that worked, like Bactrim. He got away with it then because nobody really cared about gays, so he used the same playbook for covid. Suppressed early treatments and drugs that worked at saving lives, in favour of expensive, money-making experimental injections.

Hand them a molsen Canadian bottle and if they take more than 3 seconds to figure out how to open it - BACK OF THE LINE! It is not even remotely our fault. You're far too eager to take up the white man's burden.

The polling indicates that the middle voters and many of the dem voters also feel this was politically motivated. The polls put that into the 70's as i recall (early polling so we'll see if that changes). The only real difference was that dem voters were much more likely to be ok with that. But still at least about 50 percent of the population give or take a point or two has already got serious concerns with it and doesn't feel it was the right thing. So already half the population has lost faith in the political process and the courts, and most of the rest think there was political motivation which means when a democrat gets treated the same way those people will have no problem believing the courts and the politicians are corrupt. Many already expressed that with the abortion decision. Al capone wasn't running for office, and the charges against trump weren't "Being a garbage human". As i said before if the charges had been legit, like the ones for his document handling, and he got convicted it wouldn't be an issue. But these are not legitimate charges, they've been cobbled together in a very questionable way that's never been proposed before. For these charges to be legit there has to be a larger felony crime and nobody's said what that is supposed to be, they just said 'well as long as you believe there is one SOMEWHERE...." . Al capone got nailed for tax evasion which is a real crime that lots of people got nailed for. Imagine if they'd arrested him for jaywalking and claimed it was a felony as long as the jury thought he MIGHT have been crossing the street to commit some sort of crime. Partisan bullcrap aside - if trump loses the election do you think ANY of his supporters will think the election was fair? You think j6 was bad? You think that it's been a divided country so far? People will lose their goddamned minds and the next person in office will make trump look like an angel. This is bad. Don't kid yourself.

Look, to me, it is just one pissed of neurologist that got cut off of his cash cow. I have beaten this dead horse. Have a good day.

@ExFlyer something like this sheds light on situations if framed right. Questions asked - questions answered. It's on the record. All you need to do is package this so that people understand that the questions have been responded to. If people aren't satisfied with an open process (of some kind) then they will never been satisfied.

Can one have a trial for alleged offenses in New York in Arizona or Kentucky? How? The buzz crowd not interested. One living brain cell would have sufficed to see it but no. Throw up as much dirt as possible add some more and see what happens. Maybe some would stick. Don't feed it.

Statue honouring Royal Regina Rifles to be unveiled at Juno Beach to mark D-Day’s 80th year The names of 458 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during that conflict are etched in the statue's base The Canadian Press Jeremy Simes Published Jun 03, 2024 A soldier stands next to the Royal Regina Rifles statue during a preview ceremony at the Saskatchewan War Memorial in Regina, April 6, 2024. It's to be unveiled Wednesday at Juno Beach at la place des Canadiens in France. The names of 488 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during the Second World War are etched into the statue's base. Photo by Brandt Industries Media Team /THE CANADIAN PRESS REGINA — A statue depicting the Canadians who fought Nazi Germany 80 years ago will have a permanent home near the beaches they stormed on D-Day The Royal Regina Rifles statue is to be unveiled Wednesday at Juno Beach in France, a day ahead of the milestone anniversary of the invasion that launched the beginning of the end of the Second World War. The names of 458 soldiers from the infantry unit who died during that conflict are etched in the statue’s base. The Regina Rifles were among the first Canadians to storm Juno Beach on June 6, 1944, also known as D-Day. The soldiers battled alongside troops from the United States and United Kingdom to dislodge Nazis from northern France, marking the decisive turning point in the conflict. Alberta artist Don Begg sculpted the two-metre bronze statue of a soldier on the move, weapon raised. It’s meant to depict the Everyman from Saskatchewan, said Kelsey Lonie, a military historian and spokesperson for the project. https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/statue-royal-regina-rifles-unveiled-juno-beach

Perception is a matter of perspective. In the MAGA cult's case, the perspective is the reality. You say any sane or rational observer sees this as a political hit job, but anyone not subscribing to the cult sees it as a garbage human being finally getting held to some sort of account. Al Capone didn't go down for murder, racketeering and bootlegging. He went down for tax crimes. Trump isn't being persecuted. He's reaping the rewards of all his hard work. It's cosmic irony to hear him try to spin and lie about this stuff now that he's been convicted. He's claiming now he never said "Lock her Up" when he was campaigning against Hilary. Like...Jesus Christ. How dumb are the rubes following him to believe that?

Anyone who can't eat Canadian Bacon should be denied.

First, eastern European isn't a race. So on the face of it what you just said is stupid. Secondly, it is neither prejudicial nor racist to suggest that people who are raised in a culture very similar to our own will have an easier time assimilating then people who are raised in a culture very different than our own. That's just a simple truth. It's just like language, someone who speaks English fluently will be much more successful as an immigrant to Canada then someone who doesn't speak English well. That's been documented a million times over. So what appears to be happening here is you know you're wrong and that he's right and understand why and that it's valid. But that annoys you and therefore you are trying to pull the race card in order to distract the debate and present a reason why you can just ignore what he says rather than address it. For @blackbird To be wrong, you would have to demonstrate that the differences between our culture and Eastern European culture and the difference between our culture and Palestinian culture is about the same. You have not made that argument. Good luck with that.

That is absolutely false. I clearly demonstrated the HE has no evidence for uis claims. Are you seriously claiming that I need to present evidence that he didn’t present evidence for his accusation ? You don’t understand how burden of proof works I clearly articulated how his arguments and claims are false and provided links. For example he claims he has footage of “mules” stuffing ballot boxes and dropping votes in boxes more than once but for 2 years hasn’t shown it, so you absurdly claim that I am the one who needs to present evidence he doesn’t actually have this footage otherwise we must assume his no-evidence claim is true??? Same for the addresses of the so-called Democrat “stash houses”, the names of the Democrat groups supposedly linked to them or any proof of their existence. I could go on and repeat myself for the third time but there’s no point No I think you’re just being a troll because you’re not this dense I think you don’t even know what ad hominem means Another absolute lie on your part. LOL no it is not the definition! Being convicted of felony election fraud for Republican candidates is directly relevant to his attempt to discredit the 2020 election for a Republican candidate….the one who pardoned him no less. What are you suddenly soft on convicted criminals now too? How do you not understand that being exposed as a fraud destroys your ability to credibly speak on the same subject where you committed your fraud? That’s absolutely false! One of them even says it has “gaping holes” right in the title! You didn’t read's cites. Trump’s AG Bill Barr’s criticism was then only one that pulled punches because he’s also a Republican and he was testifying before Congress, but I included it just to show you that even HE doesn’t buy it. He has also called Trump’s stolen election claims “bullshit” Absolutely false! The sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t really evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes” and they don’t mean it in the way you’re hoping. 😝 Again CLAIMING you have video footage of someone visiting a drop box multiple times but only showing them visiting one time is NO evidence, it’s not half the evidence. Claiming cellphones can be geolocated within 18 inches when NO expert agrees that is possible is NO evidence. And that is exactly what the links I posted say. NOWHERE DO ANY OF THE ARTICLES SAY IT IS PLAUSIBLE You clearly skimmed the articles with your MAGA dementia lenses on and saw what you wanted to see False. The sources I posted systematically dismantle his claims and clearly state that what D’Souza claimed to be “evidence” was nothing of the sort. As I said, the sources say the things he claims to be evidence aren’t actually evidence at all. One headline has the words “debunked” and two have the words “no evidence” right there in the title. Another uses the words “gaping holes”. Seriously you can’t possibly be this deranged. You admit that you don’t even know anything about what is claimed in 2000 mules and you shamelessly completely misrepresent the criticism of him that totally dismantled his claims, in an effort to suggest the jury is still out or that he has most but not all of the evidence You know sometimes you come off as one of the more reasonable conservatives on here but sometimes you are in an alternate reality.

And looking back, some might say they had a point. It does seem to have caused some trouble in the region. But at the end of the day the Jews weren't our people per se. The Palestinians are the people of Egypt, Jordan, and Syria. If they won't take their own people then why would we?

You post woke propaganda. You're the biggest shill on this forum.

Well, Trump is a native New Yorker and New Yorkers know Trump better than anyone. That's why they don't belong to his cult.

No I spelled out in detail the flaws/ errors in his argument. But like all conservatives in this forum when you hear something that’s inconvenient to your ideology you just make a blanket statement that it’s somehow not relevant. That is entirely false and none of it is wrong D’Souza is a convicted felon having previously convicted of election fraud, which is completely relevant to a “documentary” he’s made to discredit the 2020 election and demanding that we take him at his word. He is absolutely and in no uncertain terms arguing what I said he’s arguing the flaws in his claims and logic are so wide you can drive a truck between them and I described in detail what those flaws are. Ironically you’re not even able to describe how any of MY arguments are inadequate. Again typical for a conservative on this forum: you complain that detailed and specific criticism was detailed and sepecif enough, while refusing to provide ANY details or specifics yourself. But of course shameless hypocrisy has become the Republican brand. It’s not ad-hominem to state the fact that this man RECENTLY went to jail for trying to undermine free and fair elections considering this conversation is about his attempt to under the 2020 election. which statement is that? LMAO clearly you don’t understand how evidence works You are the only DERP here if you think anyone is supposed to believe his grandiose and outrageous claims and overturn the election based on secret evidence he has but won’t show anyone, even 2 years later And you admit you don’t even know if he’s provided any evidence or not but you don’t seem to even care. What would a legitimate reason be? Again more of your hypocrisy that when the accusations come from a Republican, even a convicted felon who pleaded guilty to election fraud NO EVIDENCE IS REQUIRED to believe his claims, you tak him at his word. But yet when the accusations are against any Republican suddenly your criteria for evidence is an impossibly high standard that nobody could ever realistically meet. That’s a lie it was a factual critique that you don’t want to accept so you pretend it was as you wish it was. RECAP OF FACTS: he hasn’t shown how he can locate a phone that close despite industry experts disputing his claim, he hasn’t shown how he ruled out the device of people who routinely pass by boxes located near where they live and work particularly since drop boxes are deliberately located in high traffic areas like malls and libraries, he hasn’t provided the addresses of supposed Democrat “safe houses” or even described how he knows the locations to be such, he hasn’t shown footage of anyone stuffing a box or visiting a box lore than once despite claiming 2 years ago that he has it And fact: claiming to have secret evidence that you refuse to show anyone means that for all intents and purposes you have NO evidence. Otherwise that kind of defeats the whole point of evidence in the first place. If I call the cops and say I have secret evidence that you’re a criminal but I refuse to show them or anyone, should they or anyone else believe me and come arrest you? I don’t think the technology has been invented that could help find you a friend 😝 We all have mobile phones. We’ve all experienced where it shows the device is in the backyard or the neighbours yard when in fact it is in the house and I’m not certain find my phone is even the same tech as the geolocation data anyway. And D’Souza absurdly claimed his cell phone location is accurate to 18 INCHES not 18 feet. In fact he said “12 to 18 inches” which is hilariously false. Experts said accuracy is 2-10 METRES at best under ideal lab conditions never mind real world environments Also geolocation can’t tell the difference between a moving object and a stationary object, it’s just the approximate location of the phone in the split second it was pinged. So there’s no way to tell if someone who was pinged was standing still directly at a box or speeding past the box at 100 mph on a nearby road Debunking links here: Does ‘2000 Mules’ provide evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. presidential election? https://www.reuters.com/article/idUSL2N2XJ0OQ/ FACT FOCUS: Gaping holes in the claim of 2K ballot ‘mules’ https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-covid-technology-health-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762 Conservative group tells judge it has no evidence to back its claims of Georgia ballot stuffing https://apnews.com/article/georgia-elections-true-vote-ballot-stuffing-199113b47bc2df79c63fdf007cd23115 Group featured in debunked ‘2000 Mules’ election doc admits it has no evidence https://www.nydailynews.com/2024/02/15/true-the-vote-2000-mules-no-evidence-debunked/ Former AG Bill Barr discredited the ‘2,000 Mules’ voter fraud film in a Jan. 6 hearing https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2022/attorney-general-bill-barr-trump-2000-mules-voter-fraud/

Lol. If that's the case, he was REALLY bad at pursuing that mission for decades. Biden famously spent most of his career with very little money. He didn't start to command big speaking and book fees until he added VP to his resume.

What's your argument for that based on?

Oh look, you've risen to the intellectual level of robosmith and myata Well done Joking aside the perception of many regarding this is going to be a problem moving forward. Any sane or rational observer aware of the facts of the trial will almost certainly see it as a political hit job. And in fact the initial polls would seem to support that. Whether or not it was is irrelevant, it will be seen that way. A lack of faith in the gov't and the courts is the beginning of the end of a society.

About as bizarre as reposting it and then defending why you did. I doubt you're a silver-spoon-born guy but you're obviously not above setting the new standard for stooping.

How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force runs a 3-yr show trial against an incumbent politician, and commits crimes to get that show trial started and keep it going, only to be covered up by the MSM? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when its federal police force controls social media disinformation campaigns to influence elections? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when the PM slanders a large group of people and the MSM doesn't even say anything about it? How many books would describe a country as a democracy after they force millions of people to take a dangerous experimental drug that they don't need or want? How many books would describe a country as a democracy when they exclude people from society for refusing to take a dangerous, experimental drug that they don't need? No one gives a sh1t about your cheaply bought definition of a democracy myata. You wouldn't know authoritarianism if it was forcing minorities into the gas chamber.

That doesn't count bullshit banana courts, dumbass. Trump is right, and It's going to take a lot work to remove all those fake DA's. Anyone with a working brain no longer votes democrat; they can't without being infected with the woke mind virus.

They've cheated on debates, had the FBI commit crimes and run show trials for them, had activist judges run kangaroo courts to persecute their political opponents, used the National Guard and razor wire at Capitol Hill for fear mongering photo ops, pushed false narratives to cause racial division & incite mass rioting and bloodshed, and then after 4 years of them pretending that the 2016 election was illegitimate they won a dodgy election with truckloads of midnight ballots and then declared election skepticism to be a crime. Still, after all that, they don't appear to be on track to win the 2024 election. Do they have another trick up their sleeves? How much deeper into the role of banana republic governance can they possibly go, without openly going into full-authoritarian mode? TBH, a lot of their cultists are ready for it. The Dems could run every Republican congressman and senator into prison and the cultist dolts here would march along in lock step with all of their excuses for it. "They were gonna do some more insurrection stuff! They were gonna get some more seditious mobs to attack the capitol!" What do you think the Dems will do if they're still losing come October?

@Venandi Here is some info on the p53 - the tumor suppressor protein that may lead to increased incidences of aggressive cancers: 1. S2 subunit of SARS-nCoV-2 interacts with tumor suppressor protein p53 and BRCA: an in silico study - ScienceDirect 2. SARS-CoV-2 spike S2 subunit inhibits p53 activation of p21(WAF1), TRAIL Death Receptor DR5 and MDM2 proteins in cancer cells | bioRxiv The scientists set out to determine if the S2 component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein interacts with a tumor suppressor protein called p53. This particular protein is called the ‘guardian of the genome’ for its important role in DNA damage response and repair. The authors found that S2 had a suppressive effect on p53, which suggests that “the SARS-CoV-2 spike causes an altered DNA damage sensing and repair response in cancer cells.” This finding “provides a potential molecular mechanism by which SARS-CoV-2 infection may impact tumorigenesis, tumor progression and chemotherapy sensitivity.” In other words, a component of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein can lead to the development of tumors and may inhibit positive effects of cancer therapeutics. 3. Rubio_Casillas_Methylpseudouridine_Promotes_Cancer_Wow_2024.pdf The above study was behind a paywall, but I found it in PDF. The authors were pressured to retract it, but it does agree with the findings from the other papers. 4. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro - PubMed (nih.gov) This may have been the right scientific conclusion to draw at the wrong time. The paper was retracted in May 2022 under strange circumstances, a move that appeared to be politically motivated. Arkmedic covered this paper and the scandal surrounding its retraction in a post: (17) Welcome to Gilead - by Dr Ah Kahn Syed - Arkmedic's blog Here are 3 discussions on the subject of p53 activation: Dr. Jessica Rose: S2 of SARS-2 spike buggers up p53 - by Jessica Rose (substack.com) Dr. Peter McCullough: https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-new-manuscript-concludes?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email Professor of Oncology, Dr. Angus Dalgleish: The covid booster cancer time bomb - The Conservative Woman

Please remind him to bring his cue cards, steel walker and lots of adrenaline needles. 5 months is a very long time for a decrepit old pervert to be on the campaign trail.

OMG you have tunnel vision. Allow me to introduce you to The West...where the name Trudeau is spoken and followed by spitting on the ground. Where do you get the nonsense you spout?

Considering I have an MS degree and you obviously don't, you must be talking about yourself. Have you EVER even read a peer review climate science journal? I have read several.

I know the difference between science and BS, and you never will.

Mainstream? There's more moisture in a damp rag.