Leaderboard

I doubt the government will do any screening. In practice, we have no standards any more. Canada has become a haven for terrorists from all over the world.

Common sense would be great, but frankly I'll settle for someone who isn't actively working against us

How can I put it mildly without being accused of bigotry..... These refugees (likely most if not all) will not be compatible or adoptable like Ukrainians.

No this is par for this government we paid out little omar 10 million dollars , for his terrorist activities... why not continue the tradition of importing terrorist, Actually Canada has long been known for its harboring terrorist...This is Canada we like no we love terrorist here... I wish they put in this much effort into bringing back friendly Afghani's that help Canadian soldiers during that conflict... I can't wait until this government falls, and we get in one that hopefully has some common sense...

This is the kind of info that is mout really, ...nobody cares if the person is liked or not...what matters is how many Canadians are going to vote for your party...in this case the Conservatives have a huge majority lead in the polls as of today...and for many reasons the majority of Canadians are sick or feed up with Justin...my pet hamster could outperform Justin in the polls becasue of that very reason....and some of those that voted NDP are most likely parking their vote or voting conservative for those same reasons... At the end of the day, providing Conservatives do not step on their own di*k , they will be the next government...Now will anyone like PP after election, who cares...to be honest i will be judge him by his performance, i don't envy him at all , Justin has coc* a lot of things up and it is going to take a long while to fix all of that.

Wow, crapping on a guy because he's adopted. And because his wife is foreign. How would you know, you're in quebec.

Are you honestly gonna say that to Robo every time it's true? Just put it in your signature. It will be accurate 99% of the time when you're talking to him, and the other 1% of the time, it will still be accurate.

Adopted? His wife is foreign. What is Canada?

These are the facts, boys and girls. And FACTS DO NOT CARE ABOUT YOUR FEELINGS. https://www.jns.org/10-pro-palestinian-lies-told-by-the-useful-idi0ts/ Lie #1: “Zionists are white supremacists.” A white supremacist believes that white people constitute a superior race and should therefore dominate society. The Jewish people originated as people of color in the Middle East. Zionists believe in the right of Jews to have a state in their ancient, indigenous homeland, where they have lived continuously for 3,000 years. Today, over two-thirds of Israel’s population are people of color. Lie #2: “Jews go back home, Palestine is ours alone.” In other words, the Land of Israel belongs exclusively to the Palestinian Arabs even though they never owned any of it or ever had sovereignty or a state there. This denies the right of Jewish people to self-determination in a land they purchased, settled and defended against Arab invaders and the United Nations recognized as their country in 1948. Lie #3: “Zionists are oppressors.” An oppressor is someone who maliciously exercises power to discriminate against specific groups. Israel completely exited Gaza in 2005. It has no power over the daily lives of Gazans. However, Hamas’s acts of terror—like killing Jews and attempting to destroy the Jewish state—caused Israel and Egypt to blockade Gaza. In Judea and Samaria, the Oslo Accords deny Israel virtually any role in governing Palestinians’ daily lives. There is no oppression. Lie #4: “Israel commits genocide.” Genocide is the intent to destroy a national, ethnic, racial or religious group by killing its members. Israel does not nor has it ever targeted innocent Palestinian civilians for killing. All Palestinian civilian deaths have occurred as Israel fights terrorists hiding in residential and public areas. Tellingly, the Palestinian population in “Palestine” has mushroomed since 1948 from about 700,000 to seven million today. There is no genocide. Lie #5: “Israel is an apartheid state.” Apartheid is a system of legalized racial segregation in which one racial group is deprived of political and civil rights. Israel has no laws or policies separating or limiting the rights of any of its citizens, including its two million Israeli Arabs. The political and civil rights of all Palestinians outside Israel are controlled by two brutal dictatorships that allow their people virtually no rights or freedoms. There is no apartheid. Lie #6: “Israel is a colonial settler state.” A colonizer is a foreign nation that conquers and exploits another nation. The Palestinians never controlled land in Palestine, nor were they ever a nation. However, Jews have for 3,000 years fought colonizers such as Romans, Muslims, Turks and the British. Jews are not foreigners, they are decolonizers. Lie #7: “End Israel’s occupation, no peace on stolen land.” An occupation exists when one country illegally controls the territory of another country. Palestinians never owned or controlled any part of “Palestine,” nor was it ever a “country.” Israel has never stolen or occupied Palestinian land, but it made many offers of a Palestinian state, which the Palestinians always refused. Lie #8: “Free, free Palestine.” Protestors imply that Israel keeps Palestinians in chains. On the contrary, it is the Palestinians’ own dictatorships that prevent their freedom. Palestinians are denied virtually all civil rights, such as speech and the press, women are treated as property and often beaten or killed, and LGBTQ+ people are frequently murdered. In fact, not a single Arab nation is free, while Israeli Arabs enjoy more freedom than Palestinians anywhere in the region. You won't see fags thrown off the top of ANY large building in Israel. That's a Muslim Raghead thing. Lie #9: “Right of return for refugees, by the millions we’ll return.” This slogan refers to millions of descendants of Palestinian refugees from Israel’s war against invading Arab armies in 1948. No refugees in world history have ever been granted a return to land that they and their brethren attacked, let alone such rights for their grandchildren and great-grandchildren. Of the original 700,000 refugees, only about 20,000 are still alive. There is no legal right of return. Lie #10: Zionist settlers, leave us alone.” After Israel defeated Jordanian invaders in 1967, Israeli “settlers” began moving into relatively unpopulated parts of Judea and Samaria. Palestinians never owned this land. In the Oslo Accords, Israel and the Palestinians agreed to Palestinian autonomy in areas where 97% of the region’s Palestinians live. Israelis living in Judea and Samaria do so legally. Basically, the modern day Jew Haters (who support those raghead Hamas animals) only want to return to THESE good old days. Seig Heil, you creeps.

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/1/31/canada-trudeau-denounces-anti-vaccine-trucker-protests Trudeau is a liar and a disgusting hate monger. There were a hundred thousand people taking part in demonstrations all across the country and he's educing them all to what couple of people were not even credibly accused of.

The simple fact is Canada, the U.S. and other countries demanding a two state solution for Israel is completely unrealistic and shows their complete ignorance of the situation. The Palestinians have a number of terrorist organizations in their midst which have absolutely no interest in living in peace with Israel. So to carve up Israel to give them their own state would only weaken Israel and threaten Israel's very existence. The Israelis know this well but it appears many countries and leaders outside Israel have no understanding at all about this. It is frustrating to see Trudeau adoringly bow to the ICC ruling saying Israel must stop fighting Hamas and create a two-state solution. He knows nothing about what he is talking about. He proves again he is just a puppet globalist who blindly follows whatever the U.N. and it's sister organizations say. Some European countries have even unilaterally declared they recognize a Palestinian state or will do so. This is reminiscent of the 1,500 years of European antisemitism that the Jews lived through. Apparently antisemitism in the world still widely exists and in fact is getting worse. Unfortunately, Canada is doing a poor job of opposing it and it is worse in Canada as well. When we have leaders that talk the way they do about the situation in the middle east, what can we expect? The Liberals and NDP are not helpful. " The sad fact is that the only Palestinian state that might arise at the moment would permanently be at war with Israel. A state that supports and glorifies Palestinian suicide-bombers, missile launchers, and rapists against Israel’s civilian population; a state where the airwaves and newspapers are filled with viciously antisemitic and bloodthirsty anti-Israel propaganda; a state whose leaders crisscross the globe and lobby every international institution to vilify and criminalize Israel. The only Palestinian state that might arise at the moment is a state whose political and religious figures outright deny the historic ties of the Jewish people to the Land of Israel, and demand settlement of Palestinian refugees in pre-1967 Israel as a way of swamping and destroying the Jewish state. The only Palestinian state that might arise at the moment is, in fact, a state like the current Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, aside from being corrupt and tyrannical towards its people, commits all the above crimes against Israel; or a state like “Hamastan” in Gaza that would repeat the October 7 massacres one thousand times over. And therefore, the war against the Palestinian threat in Gaza and the West Bank cannot be cut short. That’s an Israeli consensus; rare, but real and valuable." Preventing peace: The cost of rewarding Hamas with statehood after Oct. 7 - opinion (msn.com)

It is my personal opinion that this massive immigration policy is the problem that is creating a mess and is causing our waiting list and medical crisis to become overburdened. Canada does not have all of the doctors and nurses that are needed to take care of Canadians who should come first. What is needed in Canada is a moratorium on immigration for at least 7 years, if not longer if required to do so. This present day massive immigration policy is killing Canada and it's medical and government social services. It's a crime to keep this immigration and refugee policy in effect.

Are you comfortable and prepared to import hatred and antisemitism? Bringing in 5000 Gazans will guarantee that 100%. Are you willing to accept the responsibility for supporting that decision? The dancing in the streets of Toronto on Oct 7 and shooting at Israeli schools and firebombing synogogues etc? You can explain why these Jewish families have to live with more of that. All for what? Why can't Arab countries take in 5000? They sure as heck would never take in any Jews.

Unfortunately we see exactly this in Western Europe, in particular in Britain. France, Germany and Holland. The mayor of London is a Pakistani and they have eight Islamic centers there. Prayers on streets of Paris. White females not feeling safe in some areas. Keep Canada's future safe by screening out the undesirables.

Canada screens people for health/disease and past criminal record (according to the government records of their country of origin). For refugees, nothing else than that. Most Gazans are taught in school and from their parents from a young age to hate Jews and Israel, to cheer their deaths and Hamas. There are many Arab neighbours perfectly capable of taking in Gaza refugees. Canada could help refugees escape, provide humanitarian aid, transportation, possibly provide temporary refuge. The number of permanent residents from Gaza that Canada should accept is probably zero, unless there's some method of weeding the good from the bad, which there isn't. Canada should be in the business of eliminating racial and religious hatred from its society, not importing it. If Arab countries couldn't take them in it would be a different situation.

Has a Starlink dish on their igloo

This is nothing compare to what I have heard. I have heard of cases (true or false I don't know) in which patients were diagnosed with cancer and had to be on waiting list for a long time. By the time they got to the top of the list cancer spread and it was all over and died. Many Canadians die due too medical errors too. https://www.guelphtoday.com/spotlight/medical-mistakes-are-the-third-leading-cause-of-death-in-canada-5787771#:~:text=The statistics are alarming.,die due to medical mistakes.

If you say so. Nobody thinks about you at all when they're not witnessing your latest self-defecation. 🙄

Australia, whom you insist we should mimic, uses the westminster system. You're not exactly making yourself look knowledgeable at this point. So here's what it's looking like to me. You have absolutely no education or understanding of this political systems involved or how they work. But somehow somewhere you read that other places have fewer representatives per person and you got it in your head that means we're paying for too many. And now that someone has questioned why you believe that you're not able to give a good answer because your original thought wasn't founded on anything but repeating something you heard somewhere else. Look, lots of people make that mistake. But if you're going to be taken seriously by people who actually think you're going to need to be able to defend your positions a little better than that. One MP for every approximately 100,000 people has worked very well for us for a long time. If you can't explain why it would work just as well with one for every 200,000 then there's no reason to change it. And yes, democracy costs money. If you want cheap you have to go with a dictatorship

I call that you're clearly illiterate. SHOW ME WHERE YOU ANSWER THE SIMPLE QUESTION "WHY SHOULD WE HAVE LESS". Anywhere. The fact other people have less means nothing. Australia and the us could easily say they should have MORE. Make your argument or admit you're a loser who can't think his way out of a paper bag. You can't just say "cause austrailia!!!!" and call that an argument. Why is ours too many and why isn't theirs too few.

And yet when you talk about other countries, you average dumb Canadian will boast that our health care system is FREE, as if doctors work for free. The issue is it is run by the government and anyone that is intelligent will know how terribly inefficient the government runs things.

as much as I really don't think that the FBI did anything horrendously wrong during the execution of this search warrant, even I have to admit you've got a point. As Hewart said, it's not enough for justice to be done, it must be seen to be done. In other words even if the FBI wants to CLAIM it was in the right, because of their past issues it doesn't look that way and that creates trust issues in the public. It really should be some other branch. Plus they screwed up the evidence chain anyway so.... Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? That problem has been around for a while too.

that is a childish argument that has absolutely no merit. I've never been raped but I know that it's wrong. I've never murdered anyone but I know that murder is wrong. I will never be a slave but i know slavery is wrong, The idea that somehow you only get a say or can only tell if something is right or wrong if that has happened to you is insane. It's a cheap and cheezy argument based on feelings rather than logic or reason and it's used by those who can't make an intelligent argument to hide that fact behind moral outrage. Of course a man can say whether or not it's wrong to kill a baby. And having a uterus has absolutely nothing to do with determining when it goes from being a fetus to a person. This is just your way of saying "I can't make a sensible argument therefore I'll go with Muh Feels"

Nobody believes you. Common sense (which you obviously lack) tells us that if everything you've said here has been supportive of Putin, and critical of his opponents, then you support Putin.

I think if Biden bows out they will be forced to use Kamala. If Trump bows out I think the Republicans will put up Nikky Haley.

What I think about it doesn't matter. The fact is that I wasn't part of this thread, hadn't posted in over a day, but you still felt compelled to bring me up in this nothing of a thread. 🙃

OMG...you surely do not want me to post that selfie of you coming out of PP's rear again do you LOL Again, disagree with you and a person is a liberal.... you are falling further and further down that 1diot hole again. LOL

I dont get why you lie when the lie is so easily demonstrated. Didn't you say I was promoting violence against LEOs? Then why did I say what I said above? Oh look. Weren't you just attacking me for not knowing Trump wasn't home? I said you didn't read my posts. You proved me right. And look at that. I can disagree with Trump. Did you know that was possible? Are you capable of disagreeing with anyone on the left? You got flat out pwned here because you are an anti-anti-communist. You just take a position that is opposite to me regardless of how stupid the position is. Grow some integrity. Develop your own thoughts.

You Americans manage your problems. This 2024 election is like most - months before, a critical change.

C_2015, In summer 1942, Canadian soldiers died in Dieppe. What's your point?

There's no "Canadian oath of allegiance to the British Crown". It literally doesn't exist except in your imagination. The Canadian Crown reigns in our constitution. Long live the King! But start a new religion and believe whatever fables you wish you convince yourself of.

Get back to me when she can do all of that without sperm. You are literally arguing that a man has no emotional stake in his child, no physical stake in his child and should have no say in his child. Yet I'm certain you will argue that he should have fiscal responsibility Imagine if you were the kind of person who legitimately thought that abortion was murder. Then find out that a woman did that against your will without consultation to your child and you had no rights. How would that feel? You would legitimately believe your child had been murdered by someone else and there's nothing you could do. But I guess in your books men are scum and don't care for their children anyway so what the heck

Yes. There is an SOP for executing a search warrant. That doesn't change because it was Maralago. The fact that there was or was not any Secret Service there has nothing to do with anything.

Why do yall only care about the mother's rights? Why isn't the child ever a factor?

How about Sir John A MacDonald, the man who put this country together?

Oh Jeez can I be in the Fifth Column too? I married a Scot, her family came to Canada when she was 12. Her parents told her they chose Canada because Australia was so hot her dolls would melt. Nothing in Canada was any good, they crossed the border every weekend because the golfing was better, the gas cheaper, clothes were better quality, cafes were cheaper with bigger portions, etc. etc. etc. Yanks had a Trident base in their home town and Canada didn't even have atomic submarines... I was only 'half white' cuz one Grampa came from Italy 65 years before they came to Canada. I used to tease the wife that they were the real boat people. Plates with the Queen and Prince Phillip in the display case, insisting on Scot dancers perform at our wedding, a Diana haircut for the wife. Why some of their good friends were woggies.... I did like them, eccentric as hell but they acted like natural born Canucks were the oddities. I swore oaths to the Queen in Scouts and Cadets. She's dead. It's all over now, the Royal family are just historical quirks, leftovers from an era long gone. We can swear oaths to the Canadian Constitution from now on. The Comonwealth is just a club, an historical association we can share sports contests with. Maybe turn into a Trade treaty and give some meaning to.

The only thing I said it was is that it's not called "the British Commonwealth". They share or shared the same monarch, that is all. There is no British monarch in Canada. British citizenship has no title here. They can't vote in federal elections here. Only Canadians. If you don't want to be a Canadian anymore then do the honorable thing and give up your citizenship and leave, instead of trying to break up the country on behalf of a foreign nation. You're a fifth column.

That is all you got? You are not telling the truth here. You started off this whole thing trying to post this dishonesty of trying to say there was an agreement to not expand NATO to Ukraine. No such agreement existed. You tried to claim that it was Clinton that started the expansion... NATO has been expanding since its inception. I outlined how many times and how many countries. You are the one who doesn't like the truth here. You are the one pushing Putin's propaganda to help Putin justify his invasion, an invasion you want to further support by abandoning Ukraine.

DEmocracy ended when THIS happened, you More On.

You can't call it a lie without EVIDENCE, just like your middle school remedial math tells you show your math.

You don't reward a terrorist massacre and ongoing hostage crisis with calls for statehood. This only incentivizes that activity. Nor do you ever give statehood to a government bent on Israel's destruction. Has nothing been learned from Israel's deoccupation and elections in Gaza in 2005? Calls for restraint in Rafah are fine.

No... in our last discussion I asked you for a couple of cites but you didn't come forward. You could also just say you withdraw the claim. I had to show my own cites for your post that I didn't care for the Convoy folks or whatever. I don't have any kind of grudge against you, you know. I think you do post from the heart. You said about me (and eyeball) "You claim it is virtuous to blindly obey and believe anything the government or its departments tell you." And... "I dont' remember you speaking up about much or expressing any kind of sympathy at all and I see you raising long debunked nonsense about what happened during the Convoy," The second one is pretty objectionable, and tells me you don't know me at all. I think you just fill in the gaps based on my snarkiness and refusal to accept broad and emotional claims about the system/the government/institutions ... but I resent the implication that I would not care about people involved in a grass roots movement. Anyway, if you don't want to give me the satisfaction that's fine. I'll move on. But it's pretty noticeable for you to make claims about me and then go silent... only to ask others for cites. Anyway, have a nice day sincerely.

Not MAGA, MAMA. Make America a Mockery Again. Ten entire world laughed at the Oaf so hard they puked. And they puked even thinking about him from 2017 onward. You want to present a lying fraud rapist appeaser to the world as your leader and expect respect?

Ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the replication of SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures.3 However, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies suggest that achieving the plasma concentrations necessary for the antiviral efficacy detected in vitro would require administration of doses up to 100-fold higher than those approved for use in humans.4,5 https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/miscellaneous-drugs/ivermectin/ Speaking of which, how's that search for your evidence of a global conspiracy to kill millions so big Pharma could earn billions?

You want a cite from me about IVM? I've been posting them for years now in the Trickle thread.

There should be a rule here that you need to provide cites before asking for one IMO. 🤨

Taking pride in one's race is hollow and in my opinion shows a profound lack of intellect. Why? Because one has zero control over being born caucasian, black, etc. To take pride in something that you do not control is simply hollow. Take pride in your accomplishments, decisions, etc but your race, height, or hair color is meaningless.

When people, mostly doctors, say that nurse practitioners are a poor alternative, I have to ask, alternative to what? One quarter of people in my province have no GPs. The alternative to NPs for them is no care at all, ie, suffering, and possibly dying, quietly at home or braving the tedious chaos of the emergency rooms where they don’t belong. We have a third possibility called health hubs here which are a complete joke. I have reluctantly come to the conclusion that a larger private sector is needed in our health care system. For me, the opportunity to be able to access a nurse practitioner in my town is preferable to talking to some random medico by zoom or having a GP who is plotting to leave as soon as they arrive. At this stage I would be willing to pay for a local NP. In terms of reform on the public side, I would favour the Dutch model of compulsory insurance. How that would be reconciled with our provincial/federal ‘system’, Lord only knows. One issue we have been unwilling to explore: why are Canadian medical grads turning away from towns in favour of the large cities? This is not a simple economic matter because towns of my size are crying out for them in many regions. When I arrived in my town we must have had at least 10 Canadian GPs under 50. Now we have none. There is something going on there that the sociologists and psychologists should investigate. It won’t be easy - the replies given by physicians on this matter are misleading and I’m not sure physicians themselves know the answers. One possible and controversial issue is assortative mating. I’ll leave it for others to discuss. And a small hack for rural Canada - a one year program in dermatology for GPs. In Britain they have the Dip Derm for this purpose. We need it far more than they do. Many people in my province can’t travel to see the dermatologists who are all in one place now. GPs see all the skin conditions - pay a few of them to treat them.

Polls are now showing that a majority of Canadians support the convoy. The leftists have deserted the worker and shown that they are the elitists that we all knew they were.

There seems to be an attempt to slander some of us who ask questions as being anti-vax. While there certainly is some people that fit that category, the majority of us are just asking the questions. I'm vaccinated and vaccination is NOT the hill I'm willing to die on. I know an RCMP fellow in our church who is now unemployed because he won't vaccinate. He has 4 young children so I think that's a little crazy.