Leaderboard

I don't think we put anywhere near enough effort into trying to avoid dictators. In fact the opposite is just as often the case. The idea that they'd become more like us is questionable and even reasonable people will argue we're becoming more like them.

Thanks for admitting your reliance on partisan hackery for YOUR "analysis." ?

Meh, I think the media runs with these issues for clicks & ratings. @Michael Hardner has dubbed this "angertainment" (trademark pending).

But the Dept of Sanitation Engineering just announced with 2% certainty it leaked from Mao's mausoleum that's funded by Hilary Clinton! that makes it an alternative fact.

Murdoch and everyone at FOX knew the fraud allegations were bogus but chose to support them anyway.

There's never really been a "homosexual society", for obvious self-limited reasons. There certainly were homosexuals out in the open 3000 years ago, and rock/cave art depicting homosexuality from 10,000+ years ago. Somehow humanity survived. ?

There is definitely something to be said about that last part. I don't like Bill Maher in general, but I remember him chatting with Seinfeld and saying something along the lines of "The politically correct are so excessively tolerant that they tolerate intolerance".

I think that Fox News losing $1.6 billion of its $4 billion cash reserve will teach them a lesson about deliberately lying to their viewers and they damage the cause to their targets.

I mean no kidding. What planet have these people been on? You think Russia and China are going to go against each other and tear themselves apart? No, but they're gonna make us tear ourselves apart. With these inept azzhole leftists.

Right, and they wouldn't want to do it anyways. You have to give them a certain amount of self-determination. Indigenous bands also aren't a homogenous group, they have their own customs, cultures, and ways of governance etc. We're all stuck together and we have to make our work for everyone.

Why are you so hostile to the most logical conclusion on the origin of the Chinese Virus? You a Chinese bot or something?

Not sure if this is the right place to post this but I did not see an introductions section. I would just like to say hello.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/marisadellatto/2023/02/26/timeline-how-the-covid-lab-leak-origin-story-went-from-conspiracy-theory-to-government-debate/?sh=3cc37b3637b9 Sooo...looks like the Libbies have once again been proven wrong. What a shocker. The question now becomes...'Where the hell is Fauci?'. Fauci went way out of his way to convince the world The Rona was a natural occurrence. That's because his organization was funding this gain of function crap all over the world...including Wuhan. This POS needs to be caged and the WHO needs to be disbanded. These fcks all knew that happened and denied it vehemently.

I get that you’re playing games by taking a very well-known racist meme which pretends to be innocent but is not innocent and using it to “prove” racism. Let me give you an example: If you ask Jewish people whether they support the phrase “Work sets you free,” would they support it? No, definitely not. Is it because Jews are lazy, or because they know it is the slogan which appeared above the Nazis largest concentration camp?

Shut up, you troll, and go start a BLM thread if you want. This thread is not about BLM.

That was the point. They feared losing viewers to FURTHER right wing outlets, so they completely abandoned legitimate news reporting to give their viewers WHAT THEY WANTED TO HEAR. Not that there was much to abandon.....

This shuts the door on the question of FOX as a legitimate journalistic organization. They simply don't care. And you have people on this thread who still prefer them because they "lean right" with their lying...

It's YOUR BURDEN to prove YOUR CLAIMS. Just say you don't know because you obviously don't.

^Cryptic DRIVEL much.

No ONE said they weren't. Duh.

How would YOU know?

And you always look like an lDIOT with ^these content free posts.

There's only one cult in this country and it swings Left 100% of the time.

2 headlines this morning that show the vast gulf between how Canada reacts to Chinese election interference and how the US reacts to it One article: "House's new US-China committee holds first hearing focusing on communist threat" and "Trudeau warns journalists that questions about China's election interference are racist and should stop." Sorry I can't post links right now but you can Google the articles and I'm sure you get the idea. Canada is not taking this seriously. Trudeau benefits from it so he doesn't care and wants it buried. Liberal MPs refusing to cooperate. This is hurting our US relations politically.

So, you got nothing to support your claims. KK. Amazing how every single time I ask for the studies and data, you guys got nada.

i thought you said the bible didn’t say to kill gay people…? Now your argument is that they had their justifications for doing so . However, my issue is not that people killed each other for bad reasons 3000 years ago. My issue is that people believe this is a divinely inspired book that we should base our morals on today. A divinely inspired book from an all-loving god who is still teaching us to do good based on the book.

God made Man, but Sam Colt made all men equal. (Even the fairer sex.) And you're right. It's beautiful when a woman improves the gene pool by taking out the trash, especially when the trash is trying to kill her. It's a powerful message sent to scumbags everywhere. Don't try that shit in Florida.

Here’s the poll that set Adams’ head on fire: ”It’s ok to be white” 53% Agree 26% Disagree 21% Not Sure Knowing that this is a white supremacist phrase, do you think black people would approve of it? This should make all of us very untrusting of Rasmussen Reports from now on. They clearly used this poll to mislead people. If you look at Rasmussen’s Twitter post about the poll, they sure as heck didn’t mention that it’s a phrase commonly used by white supremacists. And of course they didn’t ask black people if they were aware that white supremacists used the phrase. The purpose of a survey is not to try to “prove” that people think differently from the way they actually think. Here’s the thing: “It’s OK to be white” is a phrase invented by white supremacists: https://www.adl.org/resources/hate-symbol/its-okay-be-white ”The phrase “It’s Okay To Be White” is a slogan popularized in late 2017 as a trolling campaign by members of the controversial discussion forum 4chan. The original idea behind the campaign was to choose an ostensibly innocuous and inoffensive slogan, put that slogan on fliers bereft of any other words or imagery, then place the fliers in public locations. White supremacists had themselves used the phrase in the past—including on fliers—long before the 4chan campaign originated.”

The poster who started this thread has all the indicators of a Chinese bot

In order to force all Canadians to adopt to the liberal and far left hallowed "utopian" society it will be necessary to have almost complete control over the public. The chinese have mastered that - of course the hard left has a hard on for them. It' s like a highschooler with his first guitar watching Hendrix. Like justin said - he admires the chinese regime because they can make changes they want on a dime.

Chinese bot^^^

Not a bad interpretation. It's what the superpowers do to each other.

Okay (not that you'll listen anyway) 1. The Wuhan lab was working on a variety of coronaviruses 2. There appeared to be a shut down of the virology lab. 3. It was apparent that Chinese scientists in the lab came down with symptoms associated with Covid-19. 4. The lab then destroyed a bunch of computers and scrubbed servers 5. The Chinese refused to allow any scientists in at the start of covid 6. Covid itself seemed far more advanced in the evolutionary cycle of a virus found in nature that it's probably more realistic to believe the virus was generically altered 7. They HAVE NOT found ANY credible link between bat species and covid

Imagine being a supporter of a man who drapes himself with a scarf of one of the most corrupt nations on the planet, siphoning of billions of dollars to give to said country, then berating a CANADIAN citizen when he dares question the charade

Leviticus is the third book of the Torah those laws are Judaism not Christianity

You misread my post. I said "intelligent," NOT fantastical.

Do you have ANYTHING intelligent to contribute?

You said "sexual relationship" NOT "consensual" and no one said the former is impossible. Consensual is IMPOSSIBLE for a master/slave. Just like for a adult/child.

Didn't we already do something like that?

Oh oh indeed. And what usually happens when a country tries to fight wars on 2 fronts?

That comment was STUPID. NATO? Huh? 1) By the same token - if the Capulets say it, then the Montagues are guilty of it... Right? 2) Did NATO say that the Cuban 'quarantine' was illegal? The US depth-charged a Russian sub in international waters and their only justification was "There are Russian missile silos in Cuba", a country the US had just invaded - illegally - a year earlier. The FBI wanted Biden elected so badly they interfered in the 2020 election, now the topic of WWIII is very real. "Play stupid games, win stupid prizes."

This was largely expected all along and there's no 'uh oh' or 'yikes' moments here. If china sends lethal aid to russia the us and others will consider trade sanctions and tarrifs and the like, not a military response.

Nobody cares. It's been a couple of days now and the mainstream media is like "Ho hum". Hardly a thing about this is appearing anywhere. A Liberal MP is, according to CSIS, a knowing agent of a hostile foreign power that puts Muslims in concentration camps. And the media doesn't care. But oh let a couple of Tory MPs do a picture with a European MEP whose party is against immigration and anti-Islam and it's headline news from coast to coast with breathless outrage being voiced on all the political panels.

To you they are. And that's fine. I'm not going to argue your interpretation, as we're both just ordinary laymen. Or is that, laypersons Since the majority of those who died were generally the elderly, it's the elderly who were saved by the vaccine. And that makes good sense, even if there is a risk of vaccine injury such as sterility. Not too many 90 year olds are gonna have kids anyway. There's a clear argument of risk vs. benefit. But the mandates are the problematic issue. Especially for the young, where the risk of covid drops to very low. We heard "The young are vectors for Covid." Well maybe that's good. Maybe that's what they're supposed to be, when they're young. They need exposure to all sorts of things that won't kill them. But makes them stronger...

You’re confused. I’m not the one who linked the article and touted what it was saying. You read 4 lines and decided you agreed with it. Next time, read the article before you post it.

Excuse you. The MSM is all fake news until it says something I want to hear. Then, it's reliable, but only for this.

Don't forget you're talking to the guy who says Health Canada is lying in the same breath he says look at their data.

The Vox article goes on to say why there are issues with that study. That particular study looks to be faulty, and other studies point to the opposite conclusion. Do you just choose the one that you like?

No. Genuine question. I am curious how one’s brain goes from “anything they say should be immediately disregarded” to “they speak the truth”.

Honestly the article pretty much shoots down their work. From the article: "First, the reasons I don’t totally buy the Cochrane review’s conclusions: The review includes 78 studies. Only six were actually conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic, so the bulk of the evidence the Cochrane team took into account wasn’t able to tell us much about what was specifically happening during the worst pandemic in a century. Instead, most of them looked at flu transmission in normal conditions, and many of them were about other interventions like hand-washing. Only two of the studies are about Covid and masking in particular. Furthermore, neither of those studies looked directly at whether people wear masks, but instead at whether people were encouraged or told to wear masks by researchers. If telling people to wear masks doesn’t lead to reduced infections, it may be because masks just don’t work, or it could be because people don’t wear masks when they’re told, or aren’t wearing them correctly." And that's the problem with any meta analysis. If the studies are all good studies then you can tend to get some interesting new results and information, but if the studies are crap to begin with it's really hard to get anything useful. The fact that the reports author doesn't think Covid originated in china doesn't help his credibility