Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/2023 in all areas

  1. Was it a “far left looney” who released the social security numbers, or was it a small group of possibly overworked people who were asked to review over 1,000 pages of documents in few days who may have made a mistake? Maybe you think you’re Superman, but here in the real world, we have human beings and they make mistakes. It doesn’t make them loonies.
    2 points
  2. Sure many have personal political affiliations but we have no idea what they are. Nor do we have any idea of their motivations or even whether they had any.
    2 points
  3. Why don’t you take personal responsibility? According to the article, “The Government Publishing Office (GPO), which was responsible for publishing the file, does not appear to have notified any of the individuals whose private information was released, the report said.” You don’t know the political affiliation or opinions of the people in the GPO who made this mistake. You don’t even know their names. So take personal responsibility and admit that you’re mistaken.
    2 points
  4. 1. You are saying that the US Government, which includes the US Government under Trump since he didn't fire/rehire the entire apparatus, is "libbie". It doesn't stand up to sane analysis. 2. I guess I touched a nerve. Let me explain, respectfully: posters who post nonsense, without regard for providing evidence, and bring the value of the forum down are not welcome, at least by me. 3. You seem to take issue with my assessment that Conservatism entails something called "responsibility". And now you're riding in on your white horse to save the two posters I was commenting on. I guess you do believe in collective action after all, at least on some level.
    2 points
  5. Why do you waste so many posts making excuses for the transgressions of Libbies? Also...who the fck do you think you are telling members they should go to another site? Mike...if you're so butt-hurt and have such a huge issue with people who oppose your rather interesting brand of "conservatism", YOU can go to another site. I'm pretty sure no one would mind.
    2 points
  6. And now the faceless US government functionaries are just "leftists" ? Conservatives used to believe in taking responsibility for one's statements back in my day. These hysterical paranoids really should post elsewhere IMO
    2 points
  7. Exactly. It also raises the issue that thousands of cancer patients had their treatment delayed, by government mandated shutdown of vital medical services. Somehow the fools deemed them "non-essential". It's been revealed there is now a high incidence of people presenting at their initial diagnosis with advanced stages of cancer. It seems nobody can explain why the government did this to us. But at least, we didnt die of Covid.
    2 points
  8. Across the countries that follow the British parliamentary model, power has shifted relentlessly to the PMO. It’s terrible for democracy. MPs must fight back.
    2 points
  9. It is actually a sign of a healthy democracy when members of a party don't vote as a solid block. The LPOC is a perfect example of a political party which has forgotten what the word democracy even means. Individual electoral ridings no longer have their vote. Every LPOC MP who goes to Ottawa on behalf of their constituents is actually just doing the bidding of 1 man. Even those who were elected to the NDP are doing Trudeau's bidding. The reason why is simple - Trudeau has the MSM locked down, and as long as they're under his thumb to the extant that they are, opposing Trudeau is like asking for career cancer.
    2 points
  10. I’m almost embarrassed for CNN these past couple years. I shake my head quietly in disbelief. Sad media collapse.
    2 points
  11. Democrats have been peddling a lie that offices were killed on January 6th. They are mentally deranged lunatics.. one person was killed, Ashley Babbitt, UNARMED. That's it.
    1 point
  12. Critical Race Theory is a complex legal concept taught in graduate-level law programs. It’s usually above the JD level, and taught in some PhD of Law programs. CRT cannot and is not taught in grade school or high school. A short forum post cannot encompass it. But here is a taste of it. 1857: Dred Scott v Sanford established that black people were not “people” under the U.S. Constitution. 1865: The 13th Amendment abolished slavery. That should have been the end of Dredd Scott, and black people should have become fully equal under the law. 1866: The 14th Amendment established that all persons born or naturalized in the US were citizens and guaranteed equal protection under the law. Despite this, black people remained unable to vote in most Southern jurisdictions, and they were defined equality in most other respects. 1870: The 15th Amendment guaranteed the right to vote to black people. It should not have been necessary; if you read the 14th amendment it should be clear that all people should have equal protection under the law. 1896: Plessy v Ferguson established that “separate but equal” was Constitutional and it made nearly 100 years of brutal segregation legal throughout the South. And segregation was separate but it was never equal. 1965: The Voting Rights Act was passed to ensure that the 15th Amendment was applied. For the first time, black people throughout the South voted in numbers. These are only the most clear examples of how hard-fought laws were passed and subsequently ignored. A more thorough study shows how discriminatory practices in real estate sales, banking, employment and education discriminated against black people nationwide, North and South. So what is the purpose of CRT? The purpose is to educate legal scholars and future lawmakers in methods to analyze laws and policies to ensure that they are non-discriminatory, and that they close loopholes to prevent attempts at discrimination. CRT does not seek reparations nor to shame anyone. The purpose is to ensure equality, because it posits that when we base laws upon pre-existing precedents and texts, they enable institutionalization of racism.
    1 point
  13. Did you notice how the CBC, CTV news hosts and political pundits are constantly mocking or slurring the American GOP (Republicans) for the many votes they are casting to choose their house speaker? The Democrats and the mainstream media seem to be obsessed with trying to fault the GOP for not reaching an immediate majority vote and some even claim the democratic system is collapsing somehow. How ridiculous can they get and desperate to find fault with the Republicans? The media just prove over and over how shallow their thinking is and how little credibility they have. The sky is not falling and the American system will continue as normal. At some point the House will choose a speaker and they will move on. No need for all the chicken littles to panic and loose their marbles.
    1 point
  14. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/kristi-noem-demands-answers-after-us-government-leaks-social-security-numbers-family Leftist loonies try to do damage to political opponents by releasing social security numbers.. leftist loons show once again how deranged they are
    1 point
  15. The FACT is, Trump DID INCITE the violence. And PROVED that's what he WANTED by doing NOTHING to STOP IT, until it was CLEAR that it FAILED.
    1 point
  16. If gun owners shoot themselves, that is their responsibility and not a reason to curtail legal gun ownership. You Libbies are so...warped. You all know the incredibly vast majority of gun crimes are committed by criminals usually with illegally obtained guns, yet you all howl like butt-hurt puppies about legal gun owners.
    1 point
  17. Geez, that was a quick response. You must have missed P2 of the Trudeau/China thread, about Russia and China...
    1 point
  18. Yes.. now its my fault for being upset about having a bunch of conservatives private info released He's one of the apologists for the hacking of the convoy givesendgo and subsequent release of info on cbc.. Just accept the vile lefty tactics is his message and don't get upset or YOU are the issue
    1 point
  19. Full employment doesn’t mean nobody ever gets laid off. Individual employers can still lay off workers even when there is full employment. The fact remains that there are still many more unfilled positions than there are people unable to find work and nearly everyone who wants to work is employed.
    1 point
  20. Are you stupid? An alt-leftist was just talking about someone "trying to kill a cop" (by opening a door 'murderously', I suppose?), as if it was a bad thing. The official position of leftists for years was that it's ok to try to kill cops. They deserve it. https://news.yahoo.com/guns-knives-flagpoles-skateboard-guide-174530861.html Of course I wasn't lying, why would I need to lie when I'm talking to leftards? You're all low-hanging fruit, boy. So if you're keeping score, there are only 3 people charged with bringing a gun onto the grounds, and in at least one of those 3 instances there's no proof that he even had a gun with him. It might have just been in his house. That means that if he even had it with him, he never even brandished the weapon. Are the other two cases just idle speculation as well? "He has a gun so he mighta brought it...." Did anyone fire a gun in this attempted violent coup genius? Did anyone show someone a gun? Did anyone point a gun at someone? Aside from those 3 guns that "might have been there", there are two more that might have been brought to Washington. Guess what Einstein, Americans own around 400 million firearms, GOP supporters own at least half of those. Are you saying that they brought somewhere between 0-5 guns, didn't even crack off 1 round, and that constitutes attempting to "violently overthrow the government and end democracy"? Ashley Babbit didn't even have a gun and you specifically accused her of trying to "violently overthrow the government and end democracy"... That's the dumbest thing you've ever said by far on this forum, and you're easily in the top 5 dumbest posters here. Maybe top 3. If I carry a feather into the woods, can I be charged with poaching bears Einstein? Grow up Hodad. I'm not factually wrong at all. So far you identified one guy who might have had intent to kill. FYI that doesn't mean that Ashley Babbit had intent to kill, and it definitely doesn't mean that there was an attempt to "end democracy". Do you know how many people brandished, maybe even fired fully automatic "assault rifles" when they overran a police station and took over part of Seattle, declaring autonomy? They even killed a 16 yr old black kid in their "autonomous zone". Was that just a mini-rebellion, or was it step one in a plot to "violently overthrow the government and end democracy"? Are you sure that it was a violent insurrection in DC? Maybe it was just a summer of love. (Not many leftards will know that January isn't in the summer) Are you gonna say that you're dumb enough to believe all the things you said, or are you gonna admit to being a liar? There's no third option, it's one or the other. So he had a gun, never even pulled it out it when confronting an armed police officer, he didn't bring it into the capitol building, and yet he's the strongest piece of evidence that you have for your stupid comment that Ashley Babbit was attempting to "violently overthrow the government and end democracy"? Forget the top 3 dumbest, dude. You don't even have 500 posts here yet and somehow you managed to rocket past people with as many as 30,700 posts here to take the #1 spot.
    1 point
  21. This could easily be a case of negligence but the people affected are entitled to an explanation.
    1 point
  22. "For some reason..." Lol They DID pack the court with Trump-appointed justices (and cheated to do it). And what makes you think that a man who proposed suspending the constitution to regain power is going to listen to the courts? He already tried to overturn the will of the voters, from which all power is supposed to originate. You're making excuses for behavior that was truly beyond the pale, hand-waving it away because it probably wouldn't have worked or some other entity would surely have stopped the madness. A. The idea that someone might have stopped the coup does not excuse the attempt. B. Even a failed coup is a grevious and irreparable harm to the institution and the people. C. Every fallen democracy starts with naivete and a lack of vigilance. "It'll never happen here!" Regardless of what you think might have eventually happened, something terrible and harmful DID happen and we were on the verge of far, far worse.
    1 point
  23. Only in Amurica could a first grader get his hands on a loaded firearm. But yall need more guns to protect yourself from armed first graders.
    1 point
  24. Really? Yet you were OK with a 4100 page omnibus bill that the reps had only 4 days to review. BTW...I have worked in a government bureaucracy. Something like this is not a "mistake".
    1 point
  25. This is flat out wrong. There are tens of thousands of administrative, clerical and executive personnel in the US government that remain regardless of which party the president belongs to. And these workers have political affiliations, I’m surprised you need to be made aware of this. What the OP suggests is entirely possible.
    1 point
  26. 1 point
  27. Lol...take your horse kaka and shove right where the sun don't shine. It is blatantly obvious that these institutions have lost all trust.
    1 point
  28. Trump WON the election on legal votes. And yes there are really stupid, ignorant humans out there who believe somehow a racist pedophile criminal named Biden somehow got all those votes LEGALLY. Not ALL humans are superior. Those on the left certainly aren't.
    1 point
  29. 1. It is real Conservatives who are trying to find out the truth of the matter. 2. Then YOU might wanna go to REDDIT, where they simply adore people who call themselves "conservative", yet promote all Libbie talking points. Hell Mike...they'll love you to pieces there. 3. My horse is a mustang. My responsibility is to promote truth. When I smell a rat, it's my responsibility to call it a rat...not a harmless kitty.
    1 point
  30. Hilarious, Putin puppet. You have picked Putins side and are dreaming that he gets the win….To be fair it’s not unrealistic that you expect that even after another YEAR Russia would still be losing. But your hope that the weather is going to eventually save the day and win this war for Putin is not realistic. The Ukrainians and the rest of the world have a whole year to prepare for next winter, which for all we know will be as mild as this one. Even if not, weather would be harder on the invading Russians, as the Ukrainian troops have home field advantage.
    1 point
  31. Lmao No YOU DON’T That’s hilarious. He has tens of thousands of documented lies. Lying is his defining feature, the biggest being THE BIG LIE because he can’t handle the fact that he lost the election. He wasn’t simply “wrong” about his inauguration…he LIED while trying to allege there was a vast conspiracy to intentionally misreport the event. No not at all. You’re just such a mindless devout cult follower you think everyone must worship SOMEBODY the way you worship your cult leader. Any other way of life is unfathomable to you. You’re like a religious person who insists that there are no real atheists and believes atheists are really secret devil worshippers. It’s just incomprehensible to to them that there could be people in this world who DON’T worship a deity or would deliberately reject god’s word for any other reason Your statement of “if you don’t hate….(insert current democrat name here)…as much as I do it means you worship them)” is as tired and lame as it is absurd. All the time. Democrats and liberals are criticized in the MSM and liberal press daily. And most of the REAL scandals liberal leaders face are stories that were broken by the MSM, not Putin-praising propagandists and liars like Carlson. They are not trump-level threats to democracy lies they are mostly laughable ones. And the media doesn’t look away. A quick 2-second google finds Politifact fact check (which I know you guys hate fact checking) on Biden’s falsehoods, CNN headlines like “Fact check: Biden's midterms message includes false and misleading claims, Washington Post headlines such as “A Bottomless Pinocchio for Biden — and other recent gaffes,” NYT headlines like “Biden, Storyteller in Chief, Spins Yarns That Often Unravel”. But I know these facts aren’t convenient to your narrative so I’m sure you’ll auto-delete them from your brain as you’re known to do so you can keep telling YOUR lies that suit your narrative. Your continued falsehoods about the seditious and violent insurrection is a perfect example of the lies you tell. Just because you foolishly believe them doesn’t mean they’re not lies when you repeat them. Your conspiracy beliefs are also lies. Biggest GOP lies from my lifetime a are (going backwards in chronological order) All the the 2020 election lies All the coronavirus lies All the “deep state conspiracy” lies All the climate denial lies All the “all muslims are terrorists” lies All the GWOT / Iraq invasion lies All the different Birther and Obama/Clinton conspiracy lies All the war on drugs lies All the mass-incarceration/“criminals are coming to kill us all”lies All the Iran Contra lies All the Richard Nixon lies ^ each one of these is a constellation of lies big and small and I’m sure I’m leaving many out. I could probably do another one for republican fake culture war nonsense such as the bogus ”war on Christmas”. ^ Making asinine statements like that is supporting Putin I believe that for the most part you genuinely believe the lies you repeat and therefore don’t think you’re lying. However a lie is a lie even if you believe it.
    1 point
  32. Oh on the contrary there little lefty.. The process Giuluani promoted was in fact in the constitution. What Democrats did by changing the rules to their benefit without consulting the people's representatives in their respective stated was what was ACTUALLY undemocratic in this whole thing. Of course a lefty only believes that any challenges to their power are undemocratic while they impeach a guy over made up delusional nonsense.. but that's okay tho because lefties love democracy ?
    1 point
  33. You sure do get wound up when I bring up that warped election. Sort o' like...ur desperate to have this garbolla believed by everyone. Yet democrats can an have believed any number of elections were garbolla. Interesting...
    1 point
  34. 1) The dumbest half of America rallied around Michael Brown after he tried to kill a cop and I don't even have to ask, because I know for certain that you were part of that dipshit horde. 2) How stupid does one have to be to believe that a handful of people tried to "violently overthrow the US gov't without so much as a single gun or a knife"? Your hypocrisy knows no bounds, it's only rivalled by your lack of intelligence.
    1 point
  35. He really is stupid enough to try to apply his OWN DEFINITION to a meme and believes it is a legitimate argument. LMAO
    1 point
  36. I find your complete faith in multiple vaccines just as radical as the anti-vaxxer who attributes the deaths of all vaccinated people to vaccines. Science has a way of evolving. If you can’t acknowledge that some people have adverse side effects from the vaccine and that the vaccine is relatively new and therefore unsubstantiated by long-term trials, that can also be called unscientific and superstitious. I’m very sorry to hear about your wife.
    1 point
  37. Well, we all should know by now as to where the CBC, CTV and Globull will always stand. They despise anything conservative and those three misfits will go out of their way to mock and attack anything conservative. ?
    1 point
  38. Yes, it was, and no, it wasn't The review board that shook the swamp agent perp's hand and sent him on his way to make money off his murder was a private hearing. There was no George Floyd style circus on that one. They kept it quiet. The media didn't appear to mind. There's all kinds of video most people have never seen from the events leading up to the tragedy. I've posted one because it was somehow leaked out this month. Ashley Babbitt was trying to stop the instigators from breaking the windows. She winds up giving one of them a shot in the head. More damaging is what the media have managed to put into peoples' heads that video doesn't support. Everybody is sure Ashley Babbitt was climbing through that window. Look again. I challenge you to find something showing Ashley doing something more than standing on something leaning through the window. The perp has to step away from the wall where he's hiding to get an angle for a shot.
    1 point
  39. You have definitely picked sides, you just don't have the balls to stand by it.
    1 point
  40. Do you think that the Israeli intelligence would have said it so in public if the regime was about to fall? Or that the regime take counter measures? This regime will never reform. The murderous Islamic republic leader Khamenei will never take one step back because he believes taking any step backward will cause the fall of his brutal regime. He always uses the fall of Soviet Union as an example and he is dead against slightest reform as he believes the only way his Islamic republic can survive is by brutality, mass murder, fear, torture, rape and executions and so far he is proven right.
    1 point
  41. Boys and girls, I have ZERO problem with effective gun control. But it has to be gun control that is aimed ONLY at criminals. A few years after Florida decided to grow a brain and quit electing Democrat governors, our legislature and Governor Jeb Bush passed a bill called 10-20-LIFE. It was (and still is) the ONLY reasonable gun control law on ANY books in the United State because it targets ONLY the criminal. Bring a gun to a crime and you get ten years automatically. Fire the gun at a crime and you get TWENTY years automatically. If you shoot someone, (whether he/she dies or not) LIFE IMPRISONMENT automatically. Unlike Nazi gun laws like in Chicago (which have had ZERO EFFECT ON VIOLENT CRIME) the Florida law targets ONLY the criminal. And I'm sure there will be some more onz here who will have a problem targeting ONLY CRIMINALS with gun control. I'll even go a step further. Illegal aliens should NOT be permitted to own or even TOUCH a firearm. Simple possession of a gun should mean instant deportation of the animal.
    1 point
  42. I don't know if they intended to change politics but they did. They're an entertainment outfit. Hannity told Lin Wood that the election was stolen, and testified that he didn't believe it. He's an actor and he's playing a character on a show.
    1 point
  43. Thats easy listen to the person making the 911 call..... It's all in the way you phone 911, in a Canadian home it would be my home is being broken into please send the police please hurry...I'm scared... A shooters home ya, in the USA, i got some dead guy on my front steps can you send someone over to pick it up, it's starting to attract wild life...no hurry.
    1 point
  44. A female chess player warned not to return to Iran and her parents in Iran threatened all because she refused to wear the hated hijab. https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/iran-chess-hijab-sara-khadem-1.6702024 Down with islamic republic Death to religious dictators.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...