Leaderboard

Maybe ? I don't know... if denouncing it is "sick" then maybe that says somebody thinks it's ok ? I'm not sure. I do think that a guy who wears blackface shouldn't be the person who defines morality in this area - whether you are Liberal or Conservative.

Del Duca forgot how badly the liberals messed up Ontario then and for the future. He had a horrible debate. Horwath does nothing but complain and promise everything for everyone. Same old, same old. The Green guy forgot that it was not just the Nurses that got a 1% pay freeze with Bill 124. That was his only point (or the one he constantly repeated). Ford actually came out of it relatively unscathed. Best line of the night was Ford telling Del Duca that ""Under yourself and the former premier Kathleen Wynne, you destroyed this province. The economy was going downhill quicker than the Canadian bobsled team." "

Who is talking about gun control except you? I care not about guns or gun control. The topic is mass shootings. The emphasis should be on the shooters and a society that brings forth this sort of thing. You and your ilk trying to make this a left/right issue is BS. People of both sides can be mass shooters. Idiocy and extremism is ambidextrous.

This is a feud between Russia and Ukraine. Why do so many Canadians give a shit about what is going on over there. Do you know why? If so, what is it? Do you a stake in what is going on in the Ukraine? Well? The problem is that the MSM has butted their globalist brown noses into it, and have made Russia appear to be the bad guy here. So, maybe Putin is not such a great guy, but then again neither is Zelensky. Zelensky is just as corrupt as the MSM says Putin is. Our Canadian political leaders are just as corrupt here in Canada. That is what Canadians should be more concerned about, and not worry about what is going on in this feud between two countries. Most Canadians do not know anything about anything. The only time they seem to think that they know all is when the MSM tells them that they need to listen to what the MSM has to say, and then go along with what the MSM has to say without question. Personally, I could careless as a Canadian as to what is going on in Ukraine. It's none of my Canadian f'n business. ?

1. Poilievre first lost my vote on bitcoin. 2. If Poilievre wins, he will kick out Charest. 2a. If Charest wins, he will try to keep Poilievre inside. 3. Canada is a neat country. Let's get along.

Hi @Greg - this goes out to you because it is your forum. The GUIDELINES https://repolitics.com/forums/guidelines/ have several references to No Rolling, Personal Attacks, Insults... show respect and be polite So can you explain how an utterly retarded post such a RedDog's survives being reported ? What exactly do you want out of this forum seriously ? Are you happy with the low quality of posters who have gravitated here to post garbage or does it upset you in any way ? I am seriously confused by your rules at this point.

Not sure what else there is to want. If you ever worried about influence peddling from government officials, or what it would look like, look no further than the Bidens. They had troughs set up for Hunter to feed from in China and Ukraine, god knows what the US gave up in return for all that loot, and now all of a sudden the US is using Ukraine to fight their proxy war against Russia. I wouldn't touch that dirty-ass war with a ten-foot pole. Canadians shouldn't even donate matches for the Ukrainians to light their candles when the power goes out.

which translates for the average Canadian as living the dream find a mate, get married, have children, buy a fully detached home on a nice property, some sort of retirement thereafter

Thought the liberal and green guy had best debate tbh fords line was so scripted it came across lane and NDP girl didn't make much sense most of time she spoke they need to ditch her she's had enough chances

I will tell you one more time as to why Putin may have invaded Ukraine, clueless. When you are only interested in knowing one side of the story, and not the other, than you know nothing at all. Looks like you alright. One side or the story that I just read was that Putin went into Ukraine to destroy many bioweapons labs that were producing dangerous bio weapon viruses that Putin believed would be used against Russia and his citizen's one day by the good old USA. I guess that is why BiDumb wants to send 40 billion dollars to Ukraine to save those few labs left and to try and keep the war going. I guess that this also shows that Zelensky must be losing the war with Russia. Aw too bad, so sad. Source: Stillness in the Storm website.

The last I heard was that Putin invaded Ukraine to destroy many dozen bio hazard labs that were experimenting with dangerous viruses, and as far as I heard, Putin has destroyed 30 of them already. Those labs were believed by Putin that those bio weapons being developed in Ukraine would be used one day against Russia and his citizen's. Putin said no way, Jose Globalists. There is still one huge lab left at some iron works building in Mariupol. Putin has not eliminated that lab yet because Zelensky went and flooded it with many Ukranian innocent citizen's, and Putin does not want to bomb and destroy or hurt any more Ukranians. Zelensky is using his own citizen's as cannon fodder. I guess that the elite globalists must be somewhat in a panic now, that they have lost so many dangerous to humanity bio weapons labs. I guess also that is why BiDumb is so anxious to be able to send 40 billion dollars in aid to help fight off the Russian military. Zelensky must be losing the war big time. Ha-ha-ha. Source: Stillness in the Storm website.

Does anyone on here actually think racism is okay? “An unjust act anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” I’d like to think that everyone here agrees that double standards aren’t okay, whether because of race or any other superficial marker.

Stop killing babies is a better solution.

Doesn't matter. That was just the first link I came to. Why? Did you want more? Here ya go. If you want even more feel free to ask. There's lots: A few Democratic-affiliated researchers disagreed. Researchers Stephen Ansolabehere (Harvard), Samantha Luks (YouGov) and Brian Schaffner (UM-Amherst) dismissed the Richman et. al. study, later writing “the likely percent of non-citizen voters in recent U.S. elections is 0.” Just Facts, an independent New Jersey research organization, released the results of its study in June 2017. Using extensive data from a Harvard/YouGov study of tens of thousands of voters, Just Facts “estimated that as many as 7.9 million noncitizens were illegally registered to vote in 2008, and 594,000 to 5.7 million voted [in the 2008 U.S. presidential election].” https://cblwomen.org/how-many-illegals-vote/

I think it's because the party realizes just how pathetic the base is at denouncing racism and wish it would just stfu.

Thanks. It did help. Now that I see it at its original source without key info edited out it makes more sense. Google sucks. So they're talking about legal American citizens then. The quote they use is from the leftist British rag the Independent. It's American Democrats angry about a comment Donald Trump made against what is called the Democrat "Squad" of 4. 3 American born and 1 legal immigrant. "“As far as I’m concerned if you hate our country, if you’re not happy here, you can leave,” Mr Trump said."

No idea at all? Bullshit. Take Carlson for example, like most of the right wing posters around here and everywhere you go his entire shtick is to describe in great detail what a lefty is and why a lefty is the way they are. It's an endless tirade that's polluted and poisoned discourse in the west and particularly the US to the point it's translating into violent reactions like the one in Buffalo. The youthfulness of the Buffalo shooter coupled with the apparent content of his manifesto should be ringing alarms in older right wingers who should know better than to lose or give up their grip in such a way. Words, rhetoric and bullshit matter.

These people won't be voting. At worst they'll be taking jobs that Americans seem unwilling to do.

An avowed white supremacist and anti semite guns down 10 black people with the intent to kill more but, "nothing to see here".

Hopefully, they can't. At least, not legally. However the Dems are even currently all the time pushing to allow greater "rights" including voting rights for what they call "Dreamers" and others.

Seems perfectly appropriate to me for the left to be defining what you people are given the great license you guys seem to have for defining what lefties are.

What it sounds like, Boges, is your narrative masters are trying to push is their ol' change the definition of the label trick to justify a slur.

That's not the great replacement theory. Here's what a left wing source tells me the great replacement theory is: "The original theory states that, with the complicity or cooperation of "replacist" elites,[a][4][7] the white European populations are being demographically and culturally replaced with non-white peoples — especially from Muslim-majority countries — through mass migration, demographic growth and a drop in the birth rate of white Europeans.[4][8][9] Mainstream scholars have dismissed these claims as rooted in an exaggerated reading of immigration statistics and premised upon an unscientific, racist worldview.[10][11]" Tucker is talking about how Biden and the Dems have been hoping to open the border up to illegals to attract more Democrat support in elections. He's made no assumptions concerning color. He has all kinds of evidential support for that theory. You don't for yours on him supporting the great replacement theory. Try again.

Cite where non-citizens in the US can vote Federally.

Google is a Progressive Socialist's friend. Not mine. I did go to Duck Duck Go though to find out who provided that definition. Near as I can find IAW is some sort of women's forum. Is that who you and Google are using for your authority on what words mean or is IAW something else? Nationalist asks a key question you didn't answer. Are whatever IAW is talking about legal or illegal immigrants. Tucker is most often talking about illegals or Biden allowed but should be illegal immigrants.

Progressive narrative BS. Tucker deals in facts - something you and yours can't seem to tolerate. Speaking of which...I specifically asked to see some to factual support for your particular BS. I notice you didn't. Is that because you don't have any? Yeah it is.

I will never know why some psycho did what they did. That doesn't explain or justify their criminal acts. But you try to by putting a convenient label and reassigning the responsibility. Our leaders have many problems but invading and blowing apart an independent democratic country is not one of them. If you are OK with the world where anyone who managed to get enough explosives could go and rob and kill anyone they feel like, this is an easy concept so just say it, don't hide behind words.

Perhaps. Yet if the information in Hunter's laptop is true...and there's no reason to doubt that...then the POTUS is a manchurian candidate. A compromised criminal. The economy is a mess and the southern borader is wide open, actively changing the demographics of the USA. And if Biden finally goads Russia into direct war...America and the entire world's population may be at risk.

As a humanist I don't. Given the science on the how the universe was created there were no gods involved so that precludes the existence of a soul. Before I was humanist I was a taoist which is a huge religion in China. They believe everything was created by a mysterious force called the Tao and don't believe ib souls either. As far as I know souls are mainly a teaching of the Abrahamic religions.

And I watched Pierre for 5 minutes, which left no doubts in me, he is a weasel evading the question asked of him.

That's just stupidity. You know that conservatives are in favour of tougher gun laws for criminals. It's leftist politicians who downgrade serious violent crimes to misdemeanours or decide not to even prosecute. In LA you can rob a store with a handgun now and as long as you don't shoot it at anyone it's just a misdemeanour. The guy who ran over all those people at the Christmas parade had just used a vehicle as a weapon a week earlier and was out on $1000 bail. Leftists all over the place scream "racism" about 'stop & frisk', but stop and frisk works, and the thousands of people that it saved in NYC were mostly black. It seems like getting rid of it was the actual racist policy. It's only leftists that say "LOOTING STORES IS REPARATIONS!" You're way out to lunch on this topic dude. Leftists shouldn't even talk about crime. It's like getting a lecture about pedophilia from a leftist. ?

As usual, an excellent response. We will continue to have differing opinions on many aspects, but this is a learning experience for me. Thanks.

I think we may have been through some of this before so I will make it brief. Your first paragraph claim is out of wack because you are talking about the Old Testament laws which churches today know and believe only applied to Israel back in that period in history. They do not apply to the church and never did since the church began 2,000 years ago. The only thing in the Old Testament that clearly applies today are the ten commandments except the Sabbath which for the church, the day of rest is the Lord's Day. But it is not given the same character as the Sabbath as Christians are not restricted as to what they can do or not do on the Lord's Day, Sunday. There is no Sabbath for Christians because the New Testament says clearly we are not under the law. The other nine commandments apply because they are a guide for all time and they are re-stated in the New Testament. The Bible clearly shows the unborn child is a person. Google abortion and the Bible and read some of the articles. It gives references to verses in the Bible that demonstrate God considers the unborn as persons. You cannot hide behind the claim of judging because we are to judge evil of course. We are to oppose abortion. Sodomy is condemned in both the Old and New Testaments. See the King James Bible on it. Again Google it and look for KJV articles. It doesn't really matter what some churches do because many have fallen away from the Bible. The Bible is the final authority, not mainline apostate churches. Read some articles. You can find articles on both sides of the issue on homosexuality. Some claim people are born that way; others say it is an acquired behavior perhaps through social interactions and influences. I won't argue that point. It doesn't matter. All that matters is what the Bible says. If you want to believe sexual orientation is God's choice, that is your decision, but the Bible does not support you on that. You cannot make the claim it is God's choice because the Bible does not teach that.

Even though the US was over two years late to the party and had to be attacked first, (even Hitler declared war on the US first) it can be justifiably proud of its contributions when it finally did arrive. What I don't understand is the arrogance and contempt for the contributions of others. Is it a national trait or just plain ignorance?

Even the P-51 was originally commissioned by the British and wasn't a successful fighter until fitted with a British Merlin engine.

I like to call it feud. That chosen word works well for me. I am pretty sure that Putin went into Ukraine because Putin must of had a good reason to do so. You nor I will never really know why he did. I have my own theory has to why he did. You seem to forget that America has been doing the same thing for decades now where they have gone into other countries and invaded their territories and have toppled legally elected governments. Hello. Are you awake yet? Even Canada has backed America in those efforts. So quit with the bullshit. Invading other countries has been the in thing for decades now. Hello? ?

So you just don't know what's commonly meant by "mass shootings" then. Your English lacks precision, to say the least. Hahaha. Lol. Right. And the majority of "mass shootings" aren't "mass shootings". Do you think it's weird to conflate gang murders with other types of mass killings? Do you understand why it might be important to differentiate? Do you think that the Buffalo murders have more in common with the killing spree at the Christmas parade in Waukesha, which involved a car, or or with gun violence between rival gangs?

What Was Canada's Role in World War II Canada, of its own free will, entered the war in September 1939 because it then realized that Nazi Germany threatened the very existence of Western civilization. Almost from the beginning Canadians were in the thick of the fighting—in the air. In that element the Dominion made its most striking contribution to the general war effort. On the outbreak of hostilities, the British Commonwealth Air Training Plan was established in Canada to develop the air forces of Britain, Australia, and New Zealand, as well as of Canada. It was under the direction of the Royal Canadian Air Force, and it cost the Canadian government well over 1.5 billion dollars. Here it may be well to note that Canada’s population is only about one-eleventh that of our country. We have to multiply Canadian figures by eleven, therefore, to get the approximate American equivalent of Canada’s war effort. By 1944, the Royal Canadian Air Force had a strength of more than 200,000. This was only a part of what Canada did in this line, for at the same time nearly half the ground crew personnel and more than a quarter of the air crew strength of the Royal Air Force were also Canadians. The Royal Canadian Navy, which started from scratch in 1939, grew to 700 ships and 95,000 men. This force too was in the fight from almost the beginning. It participated in the daring rescue at Dunkirk, and it took over more and more of the Allied convoy work across the north Atlantic—half of it by 1943 and most of it by the end of 1944. The Canadian army numbered in 1944 about half a million men, five-sixths of whom had volunteered for overseas service. Some of it formed most of the force that suffered disaster at Dieppe in the summer of 1942. Some fought alongside Americans and British in Sicily and Italy. But the main military effort of the Canadians began in June 1944 with the landing on the beaches of Normandy, and continued with the fight across France and into Germany. Canadian units were out in Hong Kong when the Japs attacked it on Pearl Harbor Day, and the Canadian declaration of war against Japan was made the evening before our declaration. A battalion of Canadian troops took part in the landing on Kiska in the Aleutian Islands. Canada did not receive a cent of lend-lease aid from us. Instead of receiving, she supplied it to the United Nations. The total at the end of 1944 was some 4 billion dollars, which is more dollars per capita than our lend-lease contribution. On the economic side, the war placed a more severe strain on Canadians than on us. The average Canadian citizen paid more taxes and, on the whole, was subject to more rigid controls. He knows what the war cost and, let us be frank, he knew it longer than we did. https://www.historians.org/about-aha-and-membership/aha-history-and-archives/gi-roundtable-series/pamphlets/em-47-canada-our-oldest-good-neighbor-(1946)/what-was-canadas-role-in-world-war-ii

So how does one classify those Antifa members in those pictures, with the communist flag in the background? They are definitely far far left, definitely not red necks, and seem to freely fly a communist flag as if it represents something they can relate to.

And we have a potential conservative leader that want to fire the governor and damage the Bank of Canada and wants us to invest in crypto currency. For a finance critic, he sure ain't a financial advisor LOL

The lead on this mass shooting isn't that it's a mass shooting. It's that the shooter was motivated by this "Replacement" Theory peddled by Right-Wing media. Steve King, one of the lead Convoy racists was motivated by Replacement Theory. Replacement Theory is straight up naked Racism and should be decried. . . unless you're racist, I suppose.

Yes, but many of our current challenges are echoes of past struggles for freedom and prosperity.

I agree with a lot of this. I mean, if Canada wants to step in to help people who are being attacked, then there are so many other places around the world that we would need to be stepping in. Like to help the Yemenis being attacked by the Saudis, or the Palestinians losing more and land each day, and living in an open air prison because of Israel, or the the Rohingyas' persecution in the hands of the Myanmar, or the Uyghurs who are living in prison camps in China, and etc. It's silly to pretend that this is a humanitarian move. The reality is that West's presence in the conflict is geopolitical. Having said all of this, one thing that we should be concerned about is the sovereignty over our land in the north. Russia has been quite aggressive over that area. Perhaps the West is using the opportunity in Ukraine to push Russia to spend on military and starve them through sanctions, so that they would lose power. It looks like Russia didn't expect this much resistence.

The USA is finished. It happened in November of 2020. Now its a banana republic.

This guy knows what cards to play. With his backing of Trudeau, he knows he is holding a winning hand.

That is your story in every thread: You don't know Jack, you don't want to know Jack, and you still make dumb comments anyway. Amazing. Aren't you embarrassed? You should be.

Where are the billions? This “country” is a farce.

There is a minor obstacle in your title called due process. Even in the US, a person is innocent UNLESS proven guilty in a court of law. Mr. Biden, President Trump and Mother Theresa all have the same rights to due process. His addiction issues are documented but the rest is speculation. The President's other son was a war hero. Does that make the President a war hero? I wish I could be praised for the actions on my children and I would hate for them to be smeared by my sins.