Charlie Kirk shot!

[CouchPotato]

I think the guy they are circulating pictures of online that got arrested did not do it. Someone on Fox actually said they knew the guy and there's no way he did it.

[Shady]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

Who knew fomenting so much division could make you a target for violence. 

Division is subjective.  The fact that you’re a sh!t stain isn’t.  

[CouchPotato]

Trump orders flag at half staff for Charlie Kirk.

[Moonlight Graham]

6 minutes ago, WestCanMan said:

It's a central theme of 2nd amendment rights proponents that the cost of having guns is outweighed by the danger of living in a society where a small group of people has all the guns and the populace is entirely at their mercy, but at the same time he wasn't a terrorist supporter, and this is first and foremost another act of left-wing terrorism, not an act of gun violence. 

You gotta admit, it's better that the terrorist who attacked him used a gun than a moving truck, a bomb, or some other incendiary device. The body count was one, not 230.

I mean sure, you can make a good argument about everything you said.  Except this is both a terrorist act and an act of gun violence.  The cost of the 2nd amendment is very high though.  All for the fear of the rise of a tyrannical government and the ability to uprise against it, a situation that hasn't actually happened in the history of the US.

Anyways, Americans are free to live in whatever society they choose.  I'm just saying Kirk is a victim of it.   If a society is armed to the teeth, sometimes some angry or crazy people are going to start shooting.

1 minute ago, Greg said:

He can't, I banned him, and boy did I had fun doing it.

Is there a way we can tell if a forum member is banned, on their profile or something?  Don't see anything on Boges's profile to indicate.

[gatomontes99]

Is this too coincidental to be an accident?

Quote

Immediately before the shooting, Kirk was taking questions for an audience member about mass shootings and gun violence.

“Do you know how many transgender Americans have been mass shooters over the last 10 years?” an audience members asked. Kirk responded: “Too many.”

The questioner followed up: “Do you know how many mass shooters there have been in America over the last 10 years?”

“Counting or not counting gang violence?” Kirk asked.

https://www.al.com/news/2025/09/what-charlie-kirk-was-saying-moments-before-he-was-shot.html

If it was me, this questioner would be in jail right now and until it was obvious they had nothing to do with the shooting. 

[User]

23 minutes ago, Moonlight Graham said:

Kirk said (paraphrase) that school shooting deaths are the unfortunate cost of the rightful preservation of the 2nd amendment.  He didn't deserve to get murdered and this is terrible, but he's a victim of the society he advocates for.  Live by the sword, die by the sword.

Yes, I accept that when you go to the lake and like swimming pools, this results in some people drowning... 

Has absolutely nothing to do with some drunk and indifferentt idi0t on a boat running someone over and them drowning while they were out enjoying a nice day on the lake...

 

[CDN1]

1 hour ago, Boges said:

=

I think Nationalist coined the term "You git what you pay for" or something. 

That's my sentiment here. No one deserves to get murdered, Well maybe Donald Trump does. But Kirk makes money being a troll and he uses Christianity as his shield. His conduct is pretty revolting to someone that's not brainwashed by the MAGA hivemind. 

The left is an anti-White, anti-West cult, that condones terrorism, and poses imminent existential threat. 

Violent destabilization and open ethnic conflict across the Western world is inevitable.

The liability must be severed.

 

Edited September 10, 2025 by CDN1

[Michael Hardner]

13 minutes ago, Greg said:

Cause they consistency say asinine / borderline illegal things.

Why do you b1tch and complain about things you know to be true?

So it's true that you ban Leftys?

It sounds like you're against a particular political type.  People made fun of Paul Pelosi being attacked and nothing came of it.

Not complaining, exactly.  I'm still here, posting solid gold every day 🙂

I don't know, I respect what you've done here but Anthony was the biggest arbiter of objectivity on here IMO

Anyway, moving on...

 

 

[CouchPotato]

12 minutes ago, gatomontes99 said:

Is this too coincidental to be an accident?

If it was me, this questioner would be in jail right now and until it was obvious they had nothing to do with the shooting. 

That was my immediate thought as well. 

[TreeBeard]

Isn’t this the 2nd Amendment remedies conservatives have talked about?  If you’re pro-fascist government, maybe don’t be. 
 

“I think it's worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the Second Amendment to protect our other God-given rights."

-Charlie Kirk

Edited September 10, 2025 by TreeBeard

[Nationalist]

5 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So it's true that you ban Leftys?

It sounds like you're against a particular political type.  People made fun of Paul Pelosi being attacked and nothing came of it.

Not complaining, exactly.  I'm still here, posting solid gold every day 🙂

I don't know, I respect what you've done here but Anthony was the biggest arbiter of objectivity on here IMO

Anyway, moving on...

 

 

You know full well that Libbies generally start the bullshit Mike.

Im quite sure Greg has thought about banning me a time or two. But to outright say that someone deserves to be assassinated for his/her opinion is just sick and just a bridge too far.

Now...Mr. Conservative...if you'll excuse me...my daughter the "chud" just came in upset about all this.

Think I'll make her a banana split to try to cheer her up.

[CdnFox]

38 minutes ago, CouchPotato said:

Fox reporting that the assassin is still on the loose.

Yeah, they had a guy but he turned out not to be involved at all. 

19 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So it's true that you ban Leftys?

It sounds like you're against a particular political type.  People made fun of Paul Pelosi being attacked and nothing came of it.

Not complaining, exactly.  I'm still here, posting solid gold every day 🙂

I don't know, I respect what you've done here but Anthony was the biggest arbiter of objectivity on here IMO

Anyway, moving on...

 

 

Duuude... read the room.... maybe a discussion for another day......

[Michael Hardner]

6 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

You know full well that Libbies generally start the bullshit Mike.

Who started it when you posted, about Paul Pelosi?

 

"Poor Paul. He should know better than to keep crazy people as gay boyfriends. "

[Greg]

23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

don't know, I respect what you've done here but Anthony was the biggest arbiter of objectivity on here IMO

Go away Michael, I’m in no mood for your bullshit.

[Michael Hardner]

10 minutes ago, CdnFox said:

Duuude... read the room.... maybe a discussion for another day......

Sorry you're right.

[CouchPotato]

I have often thought we need someone like Charlie Kirk in Canada.

[Shady]

2 hours ago, Boges said:

That could also be used to describe just about anything Charlie Kirk says. 

Hey sh!t stain.

 

16 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Who started it when you posted, about Paul Pelosi?

 

"Poor Paul. He should know better than to keep crazy people as gay boyfriends. "

Go back to your cess pool.

[Shady]

38 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

So it's true that you ban Leftys?

It sounds like you're against a particular political type.  People made fun of Paul Pelosi being attacked and nothing came of it.

Not complaining, exactly.  I'm still here, posting solid gold every day 🙂

I don't know, I respect what you've done here but Anthony was the biggest arbiter of objectivity on here IMO

Anyway, moving on...

 

 

You guys are insane.  You’re so insane that you’re not able to recognize it, which is really scary.

[Nationalist]

23 minutes ago, Michael Hardner said:

Who started it when you posted, about Paul Pelosi?

 

"Poor Paul. He should know better than to keep crazy people as gay boyfriends. "

And?

Paul Pelosi has a semi-checkered history...very much unlike Charlie Kirk.

Paul got a ding on the head in front of cops, by a person he likely knew and let in the house.

Charlie got his neck blown out from under his head for holding public debates.

Im sure you see and understand the slight diff?

[I am Groot]

2 hours ago, Boges said:

I think Nationalist coined the term "You git what you pay for" or something. 

Please describe this 'revolting' conduct. Kirk is not my thing, and I disagree with him on a lot of stuff. But what I've seen of him in these talk sessions has him politely debating people, not screaming or yelling at them and not calling them names like Trump would. So aside from you disliking his opinons and beliefs, what do you think is revolting about his conduct?

[BeaverFever]

11 minutes ago, Nationalist said:

ding on the head in front of cops, by a person he likely knew and let in the house.

That’s a lie. His skull was fractured by a deranged intruder he did not know. You’re so deep in your fake news bubble you don’t know reality. But I applaud you for trying this time instead of just posting empty insults 

[I am Groot]

2 hours ago, Michael Hardner said:

Just a question: why do you only ban lefty-wing posters?

Lots of right wingers made fun of Pelosi's husband getting atta@cked as I recall.

I never did but there was an element of safety in that he was not seriously harmed. And I think it's a different matter when you basically excuse the murder of someone, especially, given this is a site that wants political debate, someone who wanted political debate.

[West]

Wow. Charlie Kirk has used non violent means to peaceful press for policies that he believed in. Instead of debating on the merits a whacked out leftist decides to assassinate him in cold blood. 

May September 10th be known as CHARLIE KIRK day. 

[I am Groot]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

I mean sure, you can make a good argument about everything you said.  Except this is both a terrorist act and an act of gun violence.  The cost of the 2nd amendment is very high though. 

I sort of agree with you but I sort of disagree. Because America has always had tons of guns. Masses of people had guns in the 1950s and school shootings, or crazy people who went on mass killing sprees, were fairly rare. The overall crime rate was much lower, as was the homicide rate. 

It seems to me that people are more violent today for some reason other than being able to access guns. And one of the reasons is we don't lock up criminals like we used to, and we don't lock up crazy people like we used to. They're all out there on the street. So maybe that's the reason for the shootings and violence and not necessarily firearms.

[WestCanMan]

1 hour ago, Moonlight Graham said:

I mean sure, you can make a good argument about everything you said.  Except this is both a terrorist act and an act of gun violence.  The cost of the 2nd amendment is very high though.  All for the fear of the rise of a tyrannical government and the ability to uprise against it, a situation that hasn't actually happened in the history of the US.

Anyways, Americans are free to live in whatever society they choose.  I'm just saying Kirk is a victim of it.   If a society is armed to the teeth, sometimes some angry or crazy people are going to start shooting.

You can't create a society where creating the perfect level of access to weapons doesn't "cause" someone's death.

If Nancy Pelosi could somehow 100% ban people from having guns, knives, bats, clubs, rocks and anything else that they could use as a weapon, then she would have created a society where the biggest people would know that everyone smaller than them was defenceless, and there would be no deterrent from them going into people's homes at night and then doing whatever they wanted. 

When a 240-lb dude waltzed into the Pelosi's home at night, and the Pelosis were just 100% at the criminal's mercy, Nancy would be a victim of the society that she chose. 

Honestly, how many more home invasions would there be if criminals knew that there were zero guns in America?

One of the scariest things that you can right now do is get caught breaking into an American's house. 

 

Just remember that the entire foundation of a complex society is a safe home. If you lived every minute of your life knowing that at any moment someone bigger than you could just waltz into your home and take what they wanted or even kill you, why would you bother to get educated? Could you leave your family behind and go to work? No, you would basically live at home like Gronk, just occasionally running out to kill something to bring home and throw on the fire.