Leaderboard

No, that was not your only claim: "1 Gender studies, gender is a social construct, the complete opposite of Objective, " Gender is not a social construct. "roles" are a social construct and the folks pushing the trans madness want to conflate these things so they can pretend some dude who thinks he is a woman, is a woman, and we should all go along with calling him one too. That is what the trans madness folks claim now, so they can reconcile calling some dude a woman. It completely falls apart as soon as you ask them to define what a woman is. So, can you define what a woman is in any meaningful way? That is objective. Sex is objective. And up until about 5 minutes ago for all of human history sex/gender were objective.

Jobs for the boys. If it was serious work we already have the infrastructure bank which could easily have dealt with it. He's creating million dollar a year jobs for people he knows and creating investment capital for businesses friendly to the liberals doing projects he approves of. This has been done before in canada and i don't mean 'legitimate' wealth funds like the heritage fund, but rather these faux investment funds. They were notorious in several provinces as political tools and harper did one with very strict rules to shut some of those down. But even tho he did it with the best of intentions it's still a bad idea and never amounted to much, and the potential for abuse was well established. In the end it'll syphon more money out of canada and move us closer to bankruptcy and carney will be long gone with our money by that point.

Wow you managed to find a liberal that served in a military...Most that served in todays Canadian military are conservatives....very few are liberals....why do you think that is ?

Liberals new fund has many experts asking a lot of questions, including CBC, which everyone knows is Liberal friendly....which is a huge red flag, that something does not smell right....And Carney was being touted as a master banker, and yet many of his comrades are not convinced this idea is going to work....It is not the same as those examples he uses, they are very different than Carneys model.....Is this going to be a huge gamble for Canadians investing in this fund....Government does not exactly have a record of investing money wisely... The video is well done...

Sometimes I try to make sense of the ever growing divide in this country. I often think to myself "how can these a$$holes be like this?" But then a very good answer came from one of my favorite podcasters: he essentially said that one of the biggest differences between us MAGA patriots and the woke haters is that we see foreign dictators as the enemy and the woke haters see us as the enemy. When you think about it for a moment, it makes sense: these degenerates tell us to go kill ourselves, or they tell us they would rather have illegal aliens as neighbors than us patriots. We've had three assassination attempts in less than two years. We've had jokes about assassinations, talk of assassinations, and God knows what's being said in private. lol People speak of a future civil war, but really, it's already started.

Greatest presidential president ever! Lives rent free!

Sure, that's why he's boinking starlets instead of being boinked in prison.

If he doesn't understand how taking orders from China makes us lose our sovereignty, you're dealing with a whole new level of stoopid here.

Oh F off with your bullshit. Wanna have a slice of real honesty? Canadians support the rape accusations of all those women over Trump's claim of innocence. AT least here money might buy your way out of jail sometimes, but not 99.9% of the time.

First, Iran closed the Strait. Why do you cover for them? Second, you continue to push a dishonest take on what a "bribe" is or that this is how politics works across the board. There is nothing "heavily regulated" or public, about people donating to a PAC or doing so through a non-profit anonymously. Hence, why you are a partisan hack. Like almost every discussion, you ran away from that discussion before, just to come back and mindlessly repeat the same BS. Somehow you think this is not buying access... "— Among them were Roger Altman, the co-founder of the investment banking firm Evercore. Altman gave the maximum $5,600 to Biden directly in 2020, and FEC records show he kicked in $200,000 toward the pro-Biden super PAC Unite the Country. He cut a $185,000 check for another pro-Biden super PAC, and gave $91,000 to a joint fundraising committee between the Biden campaign and DNC." https://www.politico.com/newsletters/politico-influence/2022/12/02/which-biden-donors-scored-invites-to-the-state-dinner-00071982 Third, Trump never pressured anyone to falsify vote counts; that is your dishonest partisan hack spin. Fourth, "bogus lawsuits" is the name of the game... they are only bogus until they are not. Also, I never said anything about supporting them all or how that all played out like it did. Fifth, Trump never tried to "steal" an election and if the legal challenges he made played out lawfully there was nothing fake about it. Which is exactly why those "fake" electors are not in prison because if you read the fine print, the vast majority of them signed off on, it explicitly said as much. Only something like 2 groups didn't have that explicit language and that didn't change their motives or the plan. Sixth, any obstruction of the J6 vote Trump pursued was an entirely lawful mechanism to do so. As stupid and contrived as it was. Seventh, you ran away and pushed so many lies about Al Gore... his attempts to twist and contort the law were just as legal and lawful as anything Trump was trying to do. He lost. He lost the recounts. His only hope was getting some kind of hand recount where the counters interpreted people's votes because they were too stupid to push a hole through a piece of paper, or maybe not... who knows, not Al Gore's job to try to interpret them selectively. Eighth, You sit on here bragging about and cheering on Europe and Canada doing away with the US... now you cry about wanting the US to keep troops in Germany? Why doesn't Canada send 5,000 troops there? I guess that is because you want Putin to win?! Why Does Canada support Putin? I am perfectly fine pulling troops out of Europe because you are all a bunch of free loaders off NATO that have been shirking your duties for decades and now cheer on and brag about closing air space and taking petty passive actions to oppose America. You don't get to have it both ways, where you beg and cry for our military support and then turn your backs on us and act petty because you don't like what we are doing.

So in other words... To better fit your conservative biased frame of mind we've lost of our sovereignty if another country representative 'tells' us something. Even in your make believe world that's a stretch... Your devotion to Harper is amusing.... "he didn't tolerate any political shenanigans" 😂 No of course not, he just bent his knee to China for the almighty dollar rather than his early tough guy talk of standing up for human rights. It's always about the dollar, and always will be about the dollar... What am I supposed to answer about being okay with Carney doing what... China's envoy talking a warning about our relationship with Taiwan? That's a non-sensical question... even for you. Why are you always sticking up for Goddess? I'm actually starting to wonder if you're one in the same...

War aside...it appears Spirit would be operational today had Pocahontas and her fellow Dumbocrats not stopped Spirit from merging with JetBlue. https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/sen-warren-blasted-cheering-blocking-merger-might-have-saved-spirit-airlines Yet another failure brought to you by the party of destruction and stupidity. Thanks Dumbocrats. Great call.

This is noteworthy. Trump usually just bankrupts his own businesses. I guess it's just part of making America great again... He works in mysterious ways.

No, it's your confirmation bias. You've been obsessed with the lab leak theory from day 1. And like all conspiracy kooks, you think there are only two types of information: evidence to confirm your theory or proof of a cover up. Scientists we're promoting a natural origin theory? They're part of a cover up!!! Meanwhile, go ask your friend AI about the origin of COVID 19. I'll wait. ... Done yet? Still, to this day, the scientific preponderance of evidence points to natural origin and that is still the dominant theory. You WANT to believe something else, but it's not a conspiracy that scientists believe differently. It's, you know, science.

Pax can't help it. These are the same prople that laughed at Japanese cars. Then years later made Hyundai jokes. Now us built cars are the new British Leyland.

So you'll just man up and die if you can't afford it?

More selective bullshit from the most selective bullshitter. Spirit Airlines ceased operations and went out of business on May 2, 2026, after years of severe financial trouble, including accumulated losses of over $2.5 billion since 2020 and two bankruptcies within the last year (November 2024 and August 2025). The carrier struggled with high debt, rising fuel costs, and a failed merger attempt.

That's a little extreme isn't it? Define 'interfere'. Economic freedom implies that rule of law exists and that all market participants are treated equally under the law. It doesn't suggest no government action. Who makes the laws and regulations in the first place? Government of course. It helps though if governments were more pro business, and tried to make the markets run as efficiently as possible. If the economy sucks then you know where to look first.

So in your mind 'we've sold our sovereignty' because China's envoy 'warns' us about going to Taiwan or through the strait. Explain how we 'sold' our sovereignty...? I'll ask the question again... Were you dead set against China when Harper was kissing their back ends for stronger economic ties, or did you just have an epiphany when Carney reset the relationship?

Meanwhile the 17,000 ex-employees of Spirit Airlines are surely “sick of winning” after Trump’s epic mismanagement of his unnecessary war of choice that forced their employer to go bust. Not that anyone can afford to fly anymore thanks to Trumpflation.

It's just too bad Conservatives are so useless at doing anything to improve transparency and accountability when they get their kick at the can.

You continually talk about how 'informed' you are, yet as I see it you're one of, if not the laziest seekers of information in this forum because you only read what suits your ideology. You see something that you like and it's like a dog on a bone.... no thinking required or need to see if it's really a bone.... just get it in their mouth and watch them go to town. If you'd have questioned this, which you wouldn't because it fits well for your hate of liberals, you'd have found this; Under the procedure and practice of the House of Commons of Canada, documents and transcripts from in-camera (closed-door) committee meetings are designated as confidential and kept secret for 30 years. [1, 2] Key Aspects of the 30-Year Rule for In-Camera Meetings: Definition of In-Camera: Meetings held in-camera are closed to the public and media, with no broadcasting of proceedings. They are generally used to consider draft reports, hear confidential testimony, or discuss sensitive matters. What is Kept Secret: Transcripts, documents submitted, and detailed notes of proceedings are restricted. While minutes (which show decisions/votes) are public, they do not include the details of the discussions. 30-Year Secrecy Clause: According to House of Commons procedure, confidential committee documents are archived at Library and Archives Canada as "Secret Records" for a period of 30 years from the end of the session in which they were created. Access During Secrecy: Although not public, these records remain available to Members of the House (MPs) during that 30-year period. The funny thing and not surprising is that your little friend Fxx has to jump in like he always does and say "But they did. Committees have the power to do that for those who participate in the committee".... You're both as stüpid as hell and think you're having some sort of 'intelligent' conversation that starts with your BS... which is not surprising considering you both pick things out of your áss to make your so-called information 'sound better'...

^^This is yet another sterling example of your cultist stupor at work. It's absolutely about Fauci, because the person in question is on trial for emails with Fauci where the two of them conspired to conceal vital facts from the whole population of the planet, and then Fauci went on all of our TV screens and lied about everything. You should care about Fauci's lies, because they were central to your whole twisted understanding of the covid saga. It wasn't disinformation you lying m0r0n. It is an established fact, right from testimony right in Congress, that Fauci was funding GoF research on the bat coronavirus in the Wuhan lab before covid ever got out. Fauci and his dummy were talking about the creation of the pangolin narrative, and preventing anyone from finding out about his manmade covid virus. AI Search: Based on documents and emails released by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, Dr. David Morens, a top advisor to Dr. Anthony Fauci at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), is accused of using personal email to evade FOIA requests and hide communication regarding the origins of COVID-19, including discussions on the "pangolin narrative". [1, 2] The "Pangolin Narrative" and Hidden Emails [1] Concealment Tactics: David Morens used his personal email and sometimes misspelled keywords in emails to avoid public scrutiny and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests. "Fingerprints" Comment: In a July 29, 2021 email, Morens stated, "Tony [Fauci] doesn't want his fingerprints on origin stories," specifically noting that he could help hide conversations from the public. Origins Debate: The emails indicate a push to support a natural origin theory, including the possibility that the virus passed through pangolins, as opposed to the lab leak theory. Back-Channel Communication: Morens is accused of passing information back-and-forth between Dr. Fauci and Dr. Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance, the latter of whom was involved in collecting coronaviruses in China. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5] Key Findings on Morens' Conduct Indictment: In April 2026, the DOJ indicted Morens for conspiracy and for destroying or concealing federal records. Support for Natural Origin: The indictment alleges Morens and his co-conspirators worked to hide communications and promote a natural origin theory for COVID-19 while simultaneously seeking to discredit lab leak discussions. Fauci's Awareness: The House Subcommittee found that Morens frequently referenced speaking with Fauci about the pandemic and in one instance told colleagues he could pass on information via a private channel. Fauci's Response: Fauci stated in 2024 testimony that Morens was not his adviser on "institute policy or other substantive issues" and denied using his personal email to conduct official business Do you understand ^^that^^? I think your confirmation bias is working overtime right now. Explain to me how banning people from social media for talking about the BSL4 lab in China was the right thing to do? Those platforms should't be allowed to exist if they're going to be used exclusively for the propagation of disinformation from Fauci or anyone else.

You just got a down-arrow for a post that was completely devoid of objective comments: it only contained facts from the ultimate authority on the topic, and a link to it. That just goes to show ya exactly what leftists look for in a post... If you wrote a negative criticism or an accusation about a conservative politician, you would have gotten a like from that scumbag, regardless of whether or not your post contained a single verifiable fact or cited a reliable source. But unwanted facts.... DOWN YOU GO, NAZI!

The only permanent solution is a complete overthrow of this murderous terrorist regime. Nothing short of this can bring peace and stability in the world. Naval blockade for 6 months and if it didn't work then full military ground invasion by an alliance of Israel, US and Persian Gulf States. Europeans are cowards and don't have the balls so leave them out.

Where on earth is this coming from? The regime is on the verge of collapse. The f*cking Ayatollah is dead and internal dispute brewing between blood thirsty regime tops and if this blockade continues for 6 months, they run out of money to pay off their murderous mercenaries amd once mercenaries out then the people will rise up again, take over and all these f*cking Islamic mullahs and regime tops will be hanged and a democratic Iran emerge and the world will be free of islamists, fascists and terrorists. Consistency is the key. Keep the blockade, pay the extra dollars for gas, European cowards bastards, stop appeasing this murderous regime. Be united and overthrow the islamo-Nazis.

Do you have a cut-off date in mind for rules? I'm not following your "logic". Are you saying this procedure is 10 years old, so they don't follow it? You'll have to provide proof of that. I'm wondering because our Westminster system still has procedures on the books that date back more than a hundred years and they are still followed. Some of it looks silly now - like when they parade in new members and present them to the House. But it's still a procedure that s followed. The rule to not murder in Canada goes back further than that. Is that also an outdated rule? Maybe your friend John Stone can help you - he agrees with everything you are saying.

Always a controversy over what country has better health care. U.S. has Health Ins and Medicaid (Medicare) Kanadian citizens tap Universal Health Care (Medicare) Additionally, many U.S. hospitals are profit-drive (Business) Kanadian hospitals are government owned. Per capita U.S. citizens pay huge amounts in Ins / deductibles (15K USD/ yr) Kanada it depends on the Province .......... but the bill is paid by the Gov. .......... around 5k CDNf Roughly 10 percent of the U.S.. population have no health ins.

10 Years Ago (Approx. 2016): While political disputes over in-camera meetings are not new, current critics suggest the trend towards shutting down public debate has intensified under the current Liberal government's majority in 2026. Decrease in Parliamentary Transparency: Data generally suggests a long-term trend of the Canadian Parliament meeting less frequently and conducting more work away from public scrutiny over the past few decades, with 2025 being one of the lowest-sitting years in Canadian history

Irrelevant. You do not pay here. If you simply don't want to wait, no one is stopping you from going to the USA or even India if you wish to. Two different things. And completely ignore those who can't pay.

................ doable.

You people believe so many lies that you don't even know what reality is. Lie #1: The implication, and llie, here is that the right just randomly wanted Hillary Clinton thrown in jail. However, there were two viable reasons (and a whole host of rumors) as to why she should be locked up. The most pressing was her bathroom server. She operated a ghost e-mail from that server that was hacked. On that server were classified documents/information. Her use of that server and its storage of sensitive information was a clear violation of the law. No one is above the law? Well, except her. Then there was the infamous "stand down" order that is believed to come from her office during the 2012 Benghazi attack. Her and/or Obama created a lie that some goofball made a video in the desert near Vegas and that caused these terrorists to kill our ambassador. That goofball went to jail for that lie. The lock her up chants were not some made up attacks with no basis. There was a real need for the justice system to hold power accountable. They did not. Lie #2: What he really said: "If she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don't know". What he really said was that her judges would eliminate rights. Then, the only recourse would be the 2nd amendment. Part of the reason we have a 2nd amendment is to fight oppression. But he never said the 2nd amendment people will take care of her. Lie #3: He never said that. He has called people treasonous for things that are not fully treason, but that is standard rhetoric. Lie #4: You are projecting. Then there is the left: Lie #5: Gerrymandering isn't racist, except when the left does it. The Supreme Court on Wednesday, in the case of Louisiana v. Callais, struck down a Louisiana congressional map that a group of voters who describe themselves as “non-African American” had challenged as the product of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering. The left created racially motivated districts with the intent of promoting one race over another under the racist assumption that skin color is your defining political trait. Lie #6: This is so far off base that I have no idea what you are talking about. Lie #7: The ruling said you CANNOT use race to give people preferential treatment like their own voting district. That is anti-racism. Lie #8: Limiting the amount of money an individual or entity can use to promote a message, especially a political message, is against the first amendment. It is tantamount to saying you can only spend $1000 to save your life, then you just have to die. Lie #9 You are being so racist here, on top of lying. More than half of Latinos now favor the republican party. But your assertion that the republican party is about rich whate people displays your bigotry toward people that have money and people that are white. It is blatant racism and it is truly disgusting. Let's talk reality. Most of your assertions about the right are really things you are doing. But you tell yourself these lies over and over and over and over until you actually believe them and can't phathom the truth.

1. When comparing two situations, you have to notice the differences. 2. Freedom from government interference, I think it is. So a court order telling someone, effectively, that their spiritual person is subordinate to their physical persona is ... that. 3. People vote for all kinds of reasons. 2 of the last 4 presidents were TV stars before they entered politics. I thought I got it from the FOX news article linked. No ?

4 attempts...everyone keeps forgetting the kid at Mar-Mar-a-lago with a shotgun and gas can.

Not a crime. You're a traitor and a total doormat to anti-White genocidal fascists. Nothing terrifies the liberal establishment more than open transparency over the racial demographics of crime and overall bent of interracial violence, rapes. This Liberal government is covering up the scale & scope of anti-White rape and sexual assaults committed by 3rd world immigrants just like the UK grooming gangs scandal and trends we see across Europe now. There's no greater treason here, Herb. You're a rape denialist and an enabler, so spare us the moral condescension.

There is more to life than just lifespan. American 1940s/1950s automobiles have a longer lifespan in Cuba too.

I disagree...President Obama very much wielded American military and economic power to meet his administration's foreign policy objectives, many of which were continuations of Bush era policies for Iraq and Afghanistan plus the Libya/Gaddafi doublecross, in some cases doubling down on attacks. President Biden authorized military strikes in several nations, including Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He used American military power for its intended purpose. Bill Clinton's Sec'y of State got this right:

Neither Obama nor Biden were bullies. And plenty more if you look back. I think you know that Trump is a different kind of animal altogether. The basest of because. He occupies the same office, but he has different aims altogether.. No ethics, no morality, no empathy.. We've worn out the word "unprecedented."

He reversed a period of warming relations and in his second term has dramatically escalated the attack. As for why, frankly, the core issue is that trump is a bully and a narcissist. Little Cuba has defied the US (primarily by existing as a communist state despite our pressure) and he is personally offended by disobedience. It will get a sloppy veneer of geopolitical urgency (liberating the people of Iran, anyone?) but it's always about Trump with Trump. I'd say this is a window to the soul, except he hasn't got one. PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: You know, all my life, I've been hearing about the United States and Cuba. You know, when will the United States do it? I do believe I'll be the honor of - having the honor of taking Cuba. That'd be a good honor. That's a big honor. UNIDENTIFIED REPORTER: Taking Cuba? TRUMP: Taking Cuba in some form, yeah. Taking Cuba. I mean, whether I free it, take it, think I can do anything I want with it, you want to know the truth. They're a very weakened nation right now.

No, he's bonking starlets because people like you kept voting him in. The CPC could have investigated or the like, and at least he'd have been out of power. But YOU said "i'm fine with corruption because it'll pown the cpc" so he gets away with it and gets rewarded. As long as his crimes have the support of people like you he can't be held accountable. That's a you thing, not a law thing.

Oh right, i forgot you think trudeau's crimes are HARPER's fault LOLOL Justin fell afoul of a few of harper's laws.. SNC happened because of new harper accountability laws You can't blame the fact liberals will find any way possible to be corrupt on the CPC. Sorry kid Maybe if you stopped voting for corrupt politicians?

As usual...headline coinfux left out a lot of the story "closures were broad-based, but one industry took a severe hit—Transportation & Warehousing. The segment represented nearly a third (32.1%) of all closures," "business opening rate was unchanged at 4.9%, helping to offset net closures." "However, more abstract measures like real GDP that rely on inferred data and modelled deflators show growth continues to beat economists’ expectations. " HA HA HA "under current majority".... which has been only in the past 2 weeks LOL LOL LOL So sad LOSER Man, you sure are grasping at straws and losing grip

Weapons don’t ultimately defend you — they put you in the same logic of danger you think you’re escaping. All who take the sword will perish by the sword.” (Matthew 26:52)