Leaderboard

Iran Killed as Many Civilians in 2 Weeks as Israel Did in 13 Months - Here's Why Those Leftist Protesters Are Nowhere to Be Found How many threads have we seen here crying like babies about the deaths of the Palestinians and yet the left in general and left-wing posters on this board are utterly silent about the slaughter going on in Iran. Why it's almost as if they don't give a Flying Fig about people dying, they only cared about the politics to begin with

I could cate less about Iran in the 50's. But you...are a traitor in 2026.

The Carney is nothing more than a Brookfield pimp. Canada's just another stepping stone for more grift.

More of your intelligent debate.

or actually the police officer made contact with the car before killing the driver We watched it carefully and the Minneapolis mayor watched it too. Clear murder for no reason at all. They could have arrested her but instead one of them m-ons decided in a split second to kill her! What was the purpose of shooting? You do not stop a car with a shot; you move out of the way. F-ing m-ons , same m-ons as those who elected the orange faced thing and who can be found on this forum.

I agree with all of your concerns, but Canada is a middle power that needs leverage against US trade aggression and China is potentially a larger market for our exports than the U.S. However, we can’t compromise our democratic values and way of life or adopt their totalitarian surveillance state. Carney is being very concerning in that regard. His announcement today about a new world order was very loudly, clearly, and slowly stated, so that it would be noticed. That he said this beside China’s executive was a signal. It definitely heightened my conspiracy fears, because Carney came from the centre of globalist power and central banks. He was a darling of Wall Street, Davos, and the International Bank of Settlements that is the banker of banks. In certain ways he’s more powerful than Trump because of his pull with the biggest investors, banks, international organizations, and heads of state. In most of those circles Trump is an outsider. Canadians need to be asking what Carney’s alliances are. How much is he still climbing the ladder with Brookfield or Goldman or Blackrock? He was pushing net zero energy deals with Xi, which may sound good but may also mean that Carney is secretly committed to all the fascistic ESG stakeholder capitalist goals he touted before becoming PM. That’s the problem with the Liberal Party of Canada. It’s riddled with woke-green globalist fanatics, the same crowd that brought you the Emergencies Act. It’s another reason I wish Trump had taken a better approach to Canada, because in many respects Canadians are safest following the American conservative shift, but it’s inherently nationalist. Canada has to assert its identity but do so without embracing the undemocratic anti-freedom and anti-free speech policies that have been the Liberal hallmark the last decade. Oh and if part of this new world order involves digital ID, that’s the ultimate totalitarian move, as our ability to purchase and what we can purchase is directed centrally and tied to algorithmic ESG goals and social credit scores. That’s the current horror from China that we have to keep out of Canada.

The truth again eludes you.

I'm not sure you should be giving him challenges like that..... If it gets much Dumber he's just going to forget to breathe or something and then you'll feel badly

I know, I know...if you were in his place at that time...you would have rolled to the side and shot out the tires...all four of them...with only two shots🙄

Jack Smith Admits Making False Claim to Court In Trump Case ‘No white knight’: Jack Smith’s record rife with mistrials, overturned convictions, judicial rebukes

Germany and Japan could have been new markets for oil and gas but Justin Trudeau said no. Both of those nations are friendly to Canada, unlike China.

usa is impossible to deal with at moment so i see no bad thing in making some trade deals with china

Your solution to "not being racist anymore" is to racially discriminate against white people "to make up for past injustices", whatever that means. So yeah its going to get people heated if you deny people jobs because of their skin colour. I'm for equality of opportunity, which means hiring people based on their merit and qualifications regardless of what they look like.

Like you wanted the unvaxxed and the convoy people rounded up? Thanks for showing us how it gets done.

I keep speaking the truth and Trump has NOT FALLEN, so YOU'RE LYING. ^BAAAlDIOT

Sure, and that's why you're reduced now to calling anyone who does a traitor. You know those wars you said it was wrong for the US and its allies to have engaged in back in the day? You would have been called a traitor for doing so, I know was. In fact half our country called the other half traitorous for not wanting to join in. We sent a few people anyway, it's not like we didn't have someone on scene. I'm still sticking by my guns and you caved and now you're blaming the left for all your grievous angst. You're not a traitor you're just really pathetic.

1. It's not perfect, nor is it explicitly evil. The people who set it up have goals, some noble some not. It's our job to discuss and look through it. I don't think I ever said it was "really fair". 2. If you went to Harvard, your kid gets to go. Period. When you go there, you end up immersed in a network of money-making that is less and less related to merit, skill, and knowledge. These are the so-called 'Elites' skewered often on here, but the thing is they're both Democrat and Republican. 3. What you're describing is a tiny corruption... not even worth thinking about. 4. I agree. 5. That kind of reverse discrimination happens too, if that's what you mean. 6. Not true. We don't give the best jobs to people who got the highest marks in school. It's an idealized view that testing = ability. Instead, you want to make sure that the qualifications are MET - that they can do the core work competently, then other facts will be born out in the job et. communications skill, leadership etc. There's no way to objectively assess based on numbers who would be the best cop, leader, Director of Development. 7. It's one measure, not THE measure. Now, again, I am not saying testing is useless. 8. I have worked with enough Dean's List folks who would never progress above the bottom of the ladder, yes. I also worked with artsies, philosophers and street musicians who found their groove and made millions. 9. I wouldn't suggest otherwise, but go back to the discussion above for context. It was about nepotism not safety. 10. "Diversity gives strength" is the slogan and there are reasons for that. I appreciate the idea, because people from away (eg. Americans - with whom I work) bring a different culture and perspective that can be helpful. 11. It's called the market... again, there are lots of factors. 12. I'll take what you say, but you implied that I am making things up. 13. Do YOU work in a company where there is actual loyalty ? Because the concept went out the window 20+ years ago in my industry. We are, conceptually, collaborating prostitutes in IT as far as I am concerned. Your boss will openly talk about you/he/she leaving if something happens next quarter... 14. What you're writing here is 100% foreign to anything I have experienced at work in the last 25 years. The only time I saw family come in was internship (which is a kind of slavery anyway) in a small/medium company where the kid was fully qualified and the position was created for them because the boss was the president. And it was a bargain for everyone. Not to cast aspersions on the way other outfits work, but I just can't relate. Likewise, when I speak to my friends who work in healthcare the whole setup seems cuckoo-for-Cocoa-Puffs with me... folks filing HR complaints over the weirdest little things... massive and crippling bureaucracy... that's a whole thread topic in itself.

How's about some intelligent discussion ON THE SUBJECT ???

Well, ok ... but you're falling into the trap of thinking politicians have a solid principle that they're following, rather than looking at the day's polling.

More inane ramblings.

The problem with liberal supporters isn't that they believe lies or deceive themselves, the problem is that they emotionally invest their entire personality into the lie or the deception. Which means when you present them with evidence that their belief was false it's not a matter of changing their mind, you're almost having to change who they are as a person and that is obviously in order of magnitude more difficult. To their dying day most of them will still think of the Convoy as the Canadian version of January 6th, where are democracy almost fell. And the tragedy is that the jerk is gone and living life making tens if not hundreds of millions of dollars a year from paybacks for the Canadian taxpayer dollars he wasted and there will be absolutely no repercussions from this ruin. The liberals will not suffer an inch for the fact that they committed one of the greatest acts of injustice we've seen in many decades Couldn't come up with another example huh? Well there you go. Like most liberals you don't see how serious this is. You don't understand what a fundamental breach of freedoms we're talking about. But sure, name another time federal Canadian government did something that was more of an egregious attack on rights according to the courts

Again... what about age ? What about nepotism and clan loyalty ? Are we allowed to complain about these ?

agreed............better to be a communist in China than in Korea. A country with a population of 1.5 billion, functions adequately and is on the cusp of being the World's leading economy is doing something right. Nixon should be considered their saviour .............. with a nod to Kissinger.

And? Another useless lazy spambot trolling thread.

Well from my point of view your being absurd, Why should this generation atone for the sins of our fore fathers ? We have already seen BC take this in to the extremes in regards to lands claims....DEI is more than just excluding whites from jobs, they break it down into What sex you are, are you a part of a mistreated race. Religion is a special carve certain religions, minus Christian, or Jewish those are very bad...The rest well they get special treatment in regards to our laws.... If you want to end discrimination , you must practice what you preach, and not just trade one for the other....That is absurd...and Racist... Had any of this been against any other race of color or religion what do you think the consequences would have been...

Holy frack!!! Your paranoia cup runneth over LOL

Don't let the left-wing radicals like MH, Pee1990, and the 12 year old make you think it's wrong and conspiracy theory to question Canada's new love of everything China. @Politics1990 How are you coming along disproving all the points I made in the OP about what China has done in Canada? MOUs, Burner Phones, and Blind Faith: Carney’s China Reset Tests Canadian Credulity The relationship has been strained for years by diplomatic crises, retaliatory trade actions, and mounting security warnings, yet Ottawa now insists this reset is simply pragmatic diversification away from the United States. That framing asks the public to forget everything that came before, and to pretend that leverage, intimidation, and economic coercion disappear the moment a new talking point is rolled out. In Beijing, one reporter cut through the choreography and asked whether China is even the right kind of partner for Canadian industry, citing surveillance risks and the need for burner phones. Industry Minister Mélanie Joly replied that Canada is engaging “eyes wide open,” a phrase that has become Ottawa shorthand for acknowledging serious threats while proceeding anyway. Carney, for his part, told Zhao Leji that renewed engagement could serve as an example of cooperation in a divided world, pointing to energy, agriculture, people-to-people ties, and even security discussions as areas of opportunity. Canadians are entitled to notice the disconnect: a government preaching trust and cooperation with a regime linked to intimidation of politicians, illicit policing operations, and the chemical supply chain behind a deadly drug crisis. Public skepticism is not cynicism it is a rational response to a reset that asks too much to be forgotten and too little to be confronted.

@eyeball ^ crab guy ^

woke up to amazing news china ev's tarrifs on canola oil down and crab and lobster deals with china. as someone who works in crab that's amazing news

Remember when Kissinger was regarded as a genius for opening up tthe US to China? And the giant US retailers who for decades have bought as much Chinese goods as they could, to hell with US manufacturing? How many small countries has the US shafted or destroyed? Lord Palmerston (1848): "We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow". Henry Kissinger: Famously adapted this idea, stating, "Nations have no permanent friends or enemies, only interests," embodying this pragmatic approach to foreign policy.

As Trump tries to destroy NATO and set up his "New World Order".

When other countries set up industrial operations it's foreign investment, but when China does it it's a foothold? Why aren't you complaining about the US trying to destroy our economy?

Isn't Alberta an ally now ....... the entire Western p/o the country? Seal Team six waking up the PM in the dead of night has proven to be successful.

So what would you have done? Canada lost its independence the moment it stopped manufacturing products and relied on other nations to supply them to us. Wait, did Canada ever manufacture something? I knew of the Ontario automotive industry and now that will be gone too. With this type of long term planing, you can pick which d-k to suck, American , Chinese, Indian....they will all hurt !

You're arguing with someone so stubborn they equate immigrants with criminals and failed to notice the subjuect id asylum seekers who are neither immigrants nor criminals. Knee jerks and overrides reasoned response.

Well this is the thing that really gets to me. Any student of firearmstheir effectiveness in application will know that it is almost impossible to stop anyone quickly with a single shot from a pistol unless it's a very very large pistol. Police are trained to fire two to three times immediately in order to make sure they hit and to do enough damage to actually cause someone to stop their activity. Three rounds and quick succession is exactly what you would expect a police officer to do. They don't shoot and then stop and think maybe I should shoot again. They shoot two to three times and then they assess. Basically for a cop 3 shots IS one shot This guy fired at a threat three times in rapid succession and from what we know only ONE of the bullets was fatal, and it still took seconds for the bad guy to be incapacitated. This isn't the movies, a single round of 9mm or 40 sw isn't going to stop an attacker jacked up on adrenaline.

Seems like the old alchie with a shriveled gherkin has serious zucchini envy.

You’re being absurd. You’re unserious.

This is dumb. Of course he's the most culpable. It's not even a question. He lied to his slavering followers for 2+ months about a fictional stolen election. That's the only reason any of them were there.

The fact you support the murderous basterds in Iran is not surprising, seeing as you have a penchant for siding with scumbags.

Don't snow the Snow Queen... to quote a "senior member" "YOU can't stop being stupid."

But you'd be thrilled if it was a police officer that got killed. That seems to be what you're saying. I haven't seen one single person here who's happy that a lady was killed but we've seen many many stories where people on the left such as yourself are thrilled that somebody was murdered. Or attempted to be murdered. Charlie Kirk, that medical executive got tons of applause around here, the trump shooting, all that good stuff got you lefties screaming for joy And here again, You're not just happy that an officer was assaulted, your big concern is that they didn't hurt him enough and he wasn't injured enough. That was your comment Which can be quite lethal if used properly and you hit hard enough. As you say they didn't hit hard enough for your liking But not hard enough. So you're the kind of scum that would prefer to see officers injured more by criminals. Because you on the left absolutely adore seeing people hurt provided their people you don't like. At the same time if you shot and kill the guy that was assaulting him instead of just wounding him lightly you'd probably be furious at how unfair it was.

So you like the "freedom" to choose JUNK PLANS that bankrupt patients when hit with severe illness and put their burden back on hospitals and taxpayers. You obviously don't understand that's why the ACA required MORE.

Go ahead and prove that what I posted in the OP is all false allegations, conspiracy theory.

This is the American left for you. Sad

Yup but what we need right now is a trade partner. One that will buy from us. There is no getting away from what China is but we need to cut our apron strings from the US. They are as worrisome and unreliable as China. As for the media...everyone is paranoid about media so the real information only comes from facebook, twitter, whatsapp and other social media sources like this one

In less than 2 years, we went from this 2023 report that concluded "China undermines our democratic institutions and our fundamental rights and freedoms" to....... Mark Carney discussing security with the Communist Party of China.

Don't lie. You did. You're imagining things. In 2025 nobody gives a sh*t what race or gender someone is. Except for tokenists like yourself. Using skin color or gender as hiring criteria is equality of outcome not equality of opportunity, and can only occur via racist and sexist discrimination.