Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/08/2026 in all areas

  1. Come git some little man I noticed that with every other country trump is threatening the military but when it came to Canada he was like "No no no! Not them! I wouldn't threaten them militarily! Just econoimcally!!!" Trump scared of us and so are you. Like I said before, don't make us burn your white house down again
    3 points
  2. Why would any rational human being purposely put themselves in such a position...against armed federal officers that have used lethal and less lethal force many times while conducting ICE operations ? ICE has a job to do...obstruction is a crime. I think this woman got in way over her head after watching too many YouTube videos, panicked, and drew deadly fire from an officer who had previously been injured under similar circumstances. I don't think she intended to hit him or others, but the officer doesn't know that in that instant. Her family's legal recourse will likely be a wrongful death lawsuit, not criminal charges against the ICE officer. City schools have closed for the rest of the week and protests are happening...crowds are not huge and there is no damage like in 2020. I will be going into Minneapolis on Friday and its seems relatively calm.
    2 points
  3. What we discovered is that the supposed $4.5B contract your OP describes seems to be based on nothing more than phantom reports from phantom sources you scraped off social media. 10 paragraphs of useless nattering nobody is going to read doesn't magically substitute for this lack of evidence. 🙃
    2 points
  4. Funny thing for you to say, since you made a fool out of yourself right out of the gate with your opening post. Yes, I'm aware, but how does that change the fact that you've once again been caught scraping balogna off your feeds for which no evidence is provided nor available? Perhaps you have some links or citations for the phantom reports and the phantom sources referred to in Google AI overview you copy-pasted here? This is the same AI tool that suggested people put glue in their pizza to make the cheese stick, btw. Congratulations on being bamboozled by misinformation...again. 🙄👍
    2 points
  5. Are you talking about how leftists/Democrats are encouraging the lawlessness on the streets to create this chaos interfering with law enforcement?
    2 points
  6. You need to watch the video. The guy was not in front of the car. He was to the side. She backed up and aimed the car at him. She then hit and hospitalized (for a short time) him. If she had just put the car in park and gotten out, the worst that would have happened is defending herself in court. But she chose to run and her actions put an officer in danger. Here is what she was doing, according to people that claim to know: Translation: she was out obstructing ICE. Some people say that. But she crawled through a window. That was the perimeter that that officer chose as the final barrier. He was justified. She was stupid.
    2 points
  7. Yes, and barring any further substantiated facts to the contrary, this women died for nothing after getting caught up in the anti-ICE hype and mania. The ICE legal observer organization training specifically warns not to block ICE operations with vehicles or obstruct officers. But in death, she will serve as the martyr for like minded folks and the anarchists. Senseless and unnecessary event...totally preventable.
    2 points
  8. WW2 began because one powerful country thought they had the right to invade and/or annex all the other countries in their sphere of influence for their own national self-interests. The logic is exactly the same. You're just another Republican warmonger. Someone dig up FDR please.
    2 points
  9. Did you see the guy in front of the car that she was attempting to run over?
    2 points
  10. Says the same AI chatbot that also says: There is no official evidence or public contract announcement that Brookfield Asset Management has been awarded a specific, large-scale Canadian or international government-funded contract to lead the general reconstruction of Ukraine. Claims to the contrary often originate from political debates and social media, stemming primarily from the following points:
    2 points
  11. Naw, they're way to right-wing for my liking. They're into redistributing power to themselves and the gap between rich and poor is widening fast under them than it ever has. To be perfectly honest my increasing contempt for conservatives is rooted in seeing so many of you completely lose your shit over the last 25 years. It certainly hasn't inspired confidence.
    2 points
  12. Eesh. Makes debate Joe Biden look like Kennedy. To clarify: John Fitzgerald, not the unhinged kook currently running HHS.
    1 point
  13. Oh spare me your bitterness. You aren't interested in logical discussion, just regurgitating your hate online.
    1 point
  14. Yes, it's just that the liar doesn't understand that Right side of this forum sees right through his bullshit. Brown shirts and Antifa would've been great friends and allies.
    1 point
  15. POSSIBLY. That’s the most generous explanation for the officer. But that’s not really a “I had to kill this lady to save my life” situation. More like “things happened so suddenly I only had a split second to react”. In this latter defence, whether he was ACTUALLY is in harm’s way is irrelevant. As Ive said American prosecutors and juries tend to be very lenient with law enforcement in far more egregious cases so I don’t think he’s going to get in any trouble here. She wasn’t going towards him. He was to the left of the vehicle while she was driving forward with a slight right hand turn even. He shot her through the driver window not the windshield. But like I said this is all probably within the scope of what Americans consider acceptable, where police shooting someone over a traffic ticket or jaywalking encounter gone wrong is commonplace …. In other countries these things are not normalized and the population is not so desensitized to it.
    1 point
  16. I think technically it's more of a long term lease
    1 point
  17. The interesting thing about your posts is that I can really tell what I've said that hurt you because you try and repeat it back but it's out of context The only one having a hissy fit is you kiddo. I assume your mommy didn't change your diaper yet this morning
    1 point
  18. Haha, no you don't. It was obvious you had no clue what he was saying. You quickly googled "Daedalus" and posted the first line from Wiki. Then completely missed that he was not comparing YOU to Daedalus. The rest of us understood, we're adults. You're just a little boy who wants to be a Top Gun pilot when he grows up. Thanks for the laugh today. 🤣 (Just to be clear, laughing AT you, not WITH you.)
    1 point
  19. Hospitals got paid for delivering medical care? Say it ain't so! They got paid for treating COVID, as they should, regardless of the outcome. They did not get paid to list COVID as the cause of death. Which is what you are accusing them of doing when you dismiss the death rates tracked for COVID. What you are insinuating, in the conspiracy manner, is that medical providers committed fraud and falsified their medical records, risking extreme personal loss, including medical license, fines, 15 years in jail, etc., all in exchange for a few dollars for the hospital. (Every business fantasizes about employees that loyal.) And also that this insane rationale was so widespread that it meaningfully skews the data. That's nutty. GTFO. A. Thanks for the link to the student newspaper article that you clearly didn't read, but what you are claiming is simply not true. You can criticize the secondary effects of lockdown, but there is no mechanism by which people staying home and reducing exposure to the virus causes the virus to spread more quickly. B. Even if you believe that kookery, it does not change the fact that young people in lockdown were not out doing the things that most frequently kill young people, accounting for the reduction in expected deaths. C. Even ignoring A and B, your hunches and speculations about why there were fewer than expected deaths among children, it DOES NOT CHANGE the fact that we have an actual count of COVID deaths among children. You said something dumb. Now your defense of it is just waving your hands and saying that we can't look at the data that unequivocally disproves your claim, because hairbrained theory X,Y,Z. And the "evidence" for those theories? Data. We're deep in the rabbit hole of your fiction.
    1 point
  20. Well with the Carney meandering around Europe signing memorandums of joint agreement, polishing his elbows polka and learning the Brookfield fandango. All will be hunky dory in another 20 years, just wait and see.
    1 point
  21. Guess it depends on how you define scared. He certainly not scared of carney. But it is obvious that he knows better than to push things to the point where Canada becomes furious and he has had to back off a couple of times.
    1 point
  22. I hear you, my friend. I think we have to do baby steps here. People, the normies, aren't ready for the truth. This has been a Pharma racket since the mid-80's when they were given complete immunity from prosecution for vax injuries and so they EXPLODED the number of jabs given to babies. People really believe their babies will DIE if they don't get all 22 recommended shots in the first year of life. Taking so many jabs off the schedule (I think it's about 30% of them) means Big Pharma loses money. They've benefited handsomely from government mandating so many, while barely questioning need. The childhood vax schedule was never tested in placebo trials or RCTs, that will be done now. This is good. Other countries have done this, as noted in the above press release. Pharma will have to defend all 88 of the jabs given to children. People are going to find out how little these jabs are tested. It's eye-watering. The covid jab has been removed from the childhood schedule, as well. Also good. They are all risk, no benefit for children. Removing sketchy jabs from the schedule also opens up the possibility of future lawsuits for vax injuries, something parents have been screaming about in the US for decades. Pharma never used to be allowed to advertise on TV. I think it will go back to that, too. Baby steps.
    1 point
  23. 🙄What does it mean to "hate Israel"? I know it's part of the MAGA initiation ritual to lobotomize away the part of the brain that once processed nuance, but try to think back. What do you actually mean when you say that? Do you mean that "the left" hates a designation on a political map? Do you mean that "the left" hates Jewish people? Do you mean that "the left" disagrees hates the way the Palestinians have been treated by Israel? What is it that you're actually trying to argue?
    1 point
  24. I would like to thank my biggest fan for being here for me! Your oddly devoted focus is always on me and it's impressive how much time you've chosen to invest in me. Your downvotes arrive with such regularity and in such copious amounts! That kind of precision and dedication is rarely seen in people with so few accomplishments.
    1 point
  25. If it hit him, how was he was able to pull out a gun and shot her? Or did the vehicle just brush him as it started moving past him? Strange how he was able to make such an accurate shot if he was being run down. It doesn't add up.
    1 point
  26. Well, I guess if you ignore all the kids it killed, then sure. But back in reality, at the height of the pandemic (2021–2022), COVID-19 was the eighth leading cause of death overall for children and the first among infectious diseases.
    1 point
  27. Canadian beaver are def fun ........ they can gnaw on my wood anytime.
    1 point
  28. Let's see, one circle is 'Islam' and the other is 'the Left'. The overlap could read 'hatred of Israel', and 'use of violence as a means to an end'
    1 point
  29. Hopefully the blue hairs pull back. This left wing violence has to stop.
    1 point
  30. ....... arguably there is some parallel to Ashli Babbitt. Of course Ashli was a Trump supporter. ..........martyr
    1 point
  31. Here's the bottom line. This woman had been harassing the ICE cops and impeding their progress. That's a crime. She then refused to exit her vehicle when so ordered by federal cops. That too is a crime. She then tried to escape and hit a federal cop. That too is a crime...and with a deadly weapon too. The federal cop fired in defense as per his training. Case closed. The moral: The kid gloves are off Libbies. You still wanna assault and attack federal cops?
    1 point
  32. I see now that there's an update saying the officer WAS hit by the vehicle and suffered minor injuries and was released from hospital. so, maybe she panicked and didn't mean to hit him, maybe she tried to go around him and just misjudged or maybe she thought he'd dive out of the way and not fire, but you can't blame a cop for shooting if you drive a vehicle at him.
    1 point
  33. FIFY. Which makes it even clearer what you meant right after saying Brookfield benefitted in your thread title. I'm sure your incomplete quote of yourself is just an oversight on your part...so. You're welcome.
    1 point
  34. Looks like bad choices were made. The driver ran over the police officer contrary to the early release camera angles. Her bumper made impact with the officer. This is assault with a deadly weapon and justification for deadly force. @eyeball
    1 point
  35. Play stupid games, catch stupid bullets. An unfortunate event but seriously, what did they think was going to happen
    1 point
  36. https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/06/politics/us-options-greenland-military or for those here like User who are illiterate:
    1 point
  37. On Ukraine and Indigenous Stuff Alone: Canada has provided nearly CAD $22 billion (~USD $16 billion+) in multifaceted assistance to Ukraine since February 2022, covering: Direct financial support Military assistance Humanitarian aid Reconstruction, development, and stabilization support This figure is confirmed in official Government of Canada announcements marking Canada as one of Ukraine’s largest bilateral contributors in this conflict. On Indigenous Stuff: One analytical estimate noted that annual Indigenous-related spending had tripled over the decade — from around $10 billion in 2014 to about $32 billion in 2025.
    1 point
  38. On the other hand, they're stealing oil from another sovereign country and ripped up the UN Charter. Gee, hope tanks roll into Alberta next. You know, cuz China.
    1 point
  39. I am ashamed of your Dunning Kruger amateur pretenses.
    1 point
  40. I reported this comment for encouraging killing people. Last time that happened on this forum, a member was permanently banned for cheering the death of that rightwing guy.
    1 point
  41. Far more died of COVID than the very few who died from the vax. And you have no thanks for those whose lives were SAVED by the vax.
    1 point
  42. Will do. Enjoy your batshit-crazy personalized conception of reality. 👍
    1 point
  43. Not to me there wasn’t. Unless you’re talking about my opinion of Robosmith. But that’s not the topic of this thread and that came after you already dodged others’ question on your stance on Greenland. And you CONTINUE TO DODGE You are here shitting on everyone else’s opinion while refusing repeated requests to provide an opinion of your own. That is the definition of an INTERNET TROLL. Why are you only trolling this thead? Because you only mindlessly apologize for Trump AFTER he does something and parrot whatever flimsy justification he or his muppets put out afterwards. But you have NO IDEA what Trump might do or say about Greenland and you don’t want to say something now that might be offside with what happens in future You’re afraid to say annexing Greenland would be wrong or that Trump would never cross a line like that because you’re afraid he might actively do it and - horror of horrors- you’ll be wrong on the internet! Worst of all you’ll have accidentally criticized your messiah which is a cardinal sin in MAGAland. OTOH you’re afraid to sayTrump will or should annex Greenland because you know there is absolutely no intelligent legal moral or ethical argument for it whatsoever and you don’t (yet) have any MAGA lies and talking points to mindlessly parrot. Don’t worry I’m sure we’ll soon hear how Greenlanders are actually “narco-terrorists” flooding USA with Fentanyl or similar such nonsense. It’s coming. And then you can parrot away. But until such time as you’re actively willing to contribute to the topic why don’t you stop the trolling?
    1 point
  44. Are you trying to win me over with debate, dialog and serious conversation here? Good job.
    1 point
  45. I doubt I'd like it very much, it is a predominately conservative country after all.
    1 point
  46. How on Earth is an observation made in here that's shared by numerous other observers around the world akin to a contractual obligation you're entitled to? Do you think you're in court or something? In the meantime you're truly unable to understand why so many people would say Trump is on Putin's side, especially after the figurative beating Trump and his administration gave Zelensky last February? Trump told Zelensky "You've got no cards" for Ukraine's benefit? You've got to be kidding.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...