Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 05/05/2025 in all areas
-
LOL, great. The same folks who refuse to define what a woman is in any meaningful way, so that they can protect dudes who think they are women... are now going to try to define what MAGA is?4 points
-
I have always been conservative until PP took over. His rhetoric and inability to help make Canada a better place and his dismal house of commons voting record made be abandon the conservatives. He has never proposed any bill. Never left the country to see how we are in the world circles. Never did anything in the house except criticize Trudeau. https://www.greenpeace.org/canada/en/story/69079/pierre-poilievres-voting-record-and-the-politics-of-exclusion/ Had a 28% lead and when it came down to it, the people of Canada saw he had nothing to offer.... he lost the election for the conservatives and even his seat.2 points
-
2 points
-
Lmao.. ok. So you tried to make it about me and when that back fired you just decided to call them names, as if you are a child. So, here's the deal. You've come down on the side of a known MS13 gang member that beat his wife and smuggled people, massive government waste and a forever war in Ukraine. All because Orange Man bad. You do you slick.2 points
-
You really don't believe in rule of law or the Constitution. You are all in for a dictatorship. What are you going to do if some day someone decides to come for you or one of yours?2 points
-
Lets see, if you're wanting to send everyone you don't like to a foreign concentation camp then the thing you would need to do is get rid of immigration courts. Just claim everyone you don't like is MS13 or some shit and kick them out right? No part of the process in your way to question any facts or consider evidence?2 points
-
They may not be Nazi as of now. But they are using the same, 100% playbook and program as them to get to the power. Lying fascist propaganda deafening all common sense, reason and independent thought in the society.2 points
-
South Korea makes unsolicited proposal Delivery times far in advance of anything we could buy from the US or Europe. The KSS III is an interesting submarine. A diesel electric sub capable of 20 days submerged and a submerged speed of 20 kts.1 point
-
To put it simply and succinctly, maga is a political technology of principle-less antidemocratic populism that combines fascist-style massive propaganda with modern channels of spreading the message into the population. It works as this: - Appoint an unconditional diabolical and hellish adversary, then the enemy. There's nothing good about them and no understanding and/or compromises are possible - Fan out hatred and raise the temperature by drumming half-lies, groundless allegations and far-reaching allusions - Avoid and denounce any notion of responsibility, or relation to the reality - Use massive financing of private capital to amplify and spread the message - Promise instant solutions and miracles without any regard for the reality This is maga and it always works the same, trying to undermine and destroy an imperfect but functioning democracy without offering any positive and feasible ideas and ways to improve it. Maga is about destruction and power, power and destruction only and it has no other intent and doesn't understand any other purposes of democratic politics. Maga can try to blend into democratic political process but it's not a part of democracy and in fact, anti-democracy. Maga is a real, present and factual threat to democracies. They need to develop means and instruments to defend themselves against maga. Not in the least in these domains: - Veracity and objectivity of political news. Tight control of foreign ownership. Responsibility for spreading biased false messages. - Strong and immediate prevention of anti-democratic authoritarian tactics and practices, such as threats, intimidation, vandalism, public messages of hate with responsibility up to the level of the party if its leadership fails to denounce and restrict such practices. - Illegal practices, conspiracies to undermine democracy should carry heavy sanctions including fines, prohibition to take public office, etc.1 point
-
Since PM Carney seems to want to portray himself as different than Trudeau, it would be nice to see what he is going to do about some of the policies that happened under Trudeau. But I have not heard about what changes Carney will make. In this case I am thinking about foreign aid spending which was in the billions per year. From this article, it looks like much of it was questionable and it appears to have had very little affect. As PM Carney is a long established globalist and spent many years mixing with the WEF, Vatican, and U.N. globalists, I have a feeling that billions of dollars will continue to be doled out to the rest of the world every year, much of it without accountability. " The government of Canada’s annual donations in foreign aid to Third World countries is one of the most overlooked issues in Canadian society. Billions of dollars are being shipped out of the country each year under spurious circumstances. In 2020, the Liberal government increased international assistance spending by 3.5% to $6.6 billion, up from $6.4 billion in 2019. It must be mentioned that the outflow of these billions began well before Justin Trudeau came along. Historically speaking, the funding reaches back to Canada’s United Nations affiliation established decades ago. Still, no previous PM has played Robin Hood to 3rd World nations like our current prime minister. To add perspective, our foreign aid budget is more than the Liberals spend on departments of health, the environment and the Canada Food Inspection Agency combined. According to Canadian Taxpayers Federation, foreign aid also costs more than the cumulative budgets of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and the Canada Border Services Agency. The bulk of the aid budget goes to the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA)– which has been folded into the Foreign Affairs and International Trade department. All the while, there has been a growing consensus that although foreign aid is well intentioned, it has had little to no impact on the countries it seeks to help. Why would this infrastructure remain in place if the billions are entirely ineffective? Is this not the odd-ball situation of the century? According to Special Inspector-General John Sopko, “billions of dollars in western foreign aid to Afghanistan, including from Canada, has been lost to widespread waste, lax oversight, and corruption. Nobody is really held accountable for wasting the money,” Incredibly, unlike the United States, Canada does not independently audit the money it puts into trust funds for international aid. Why have these circumstances remained static for decades? The answer is one which also applies to Canada’s Multicultural infrastructure– because it employs thousands of people. An entire industry of civil servants and bureaucrats are receiving steady paychecks based on the maintenance of this structure. The result is big government of the variety that the socialist-infused Liberal Party enjoy. To dissolve the status quo is to wreak havoc upon the lives of government and non-profit organization employees. Therefore, it remains. Another reason can be found in what CAP call “globalist optics.” This is the area from which PM Justin Trudeau has accumulated his greatest success as a political leader. Another question nags at the heart: why has Canadian media for decades hidden away the reality of the wasted billions? Just think of the positive impact these funds would have had upon the Canadian economy. READ MORE: $800 Million In Foreign Aid To Jordan Funneled Into Luxury Real Estate The Hidden World Of Wasted Billions In Canadian Foreign Aid1 point
-
Yes, it would show that our nation is not as rich as you think it is....one in four canadians going to food banks, tent cities in all our towns and cities across the nation....all our federal departments underfunded....well over a trillion in debt...ya sounds rich to me....1 point
-
We can assume you’re correct, and are not the dishonest interlocutor that your responses indicate. We’re the 30th wealthiest country on the planet. Where do you think the line is for wealth before a country should get foreign aid? If the wealth were distributed better in Canada, do you think we are wealthy enough that we could get rid of food banks? In other words, is there enough money in Canada to feed our poorest citizens?1 point
-
Try a little sugar in your rhetoric it's a very sour. Try moonshine it would suit you.1 point
-
1 point
-
Even I'd cook for him for that much money. Sadly, the job would only last 1 day.1 point
-
You are. And you do a pretty regular. You seem to be dismissing the due process that many of these people already received or broke1 point
-
1 point
-
I did. But they want to buy their own. See...unlike you Libbies...I taught my kids respect and honour.1 point
-
No there aren't, that's why they are shipping them to prisons outside the country beyond the reach of Congress and the courts. But hey, as long as it isn't you or someone you know, that kind of thing is fine by you.1 point
-
You said we're wealthy in response to the question "Why doesn't Canada get foreign aid?" The standard pivot is to come back with a different point and simply drag the conversation into a never-ending change of direction. It's not a progressive chat, ie. you're no longer going anywhere. You're just playing ping pong with someone who won't concede a point IMO.1 point
-
1 point
-
Without better verification? 🤣 The batshit absurdity of the claim was the first step in the verification process. A functioning critical mind demands ironclad verification for something as ridiculous as that, or dismisses it right out of the gate. Instead, the Lord Of Bronze announces it to a national audience, and his pliant chucklef*cks nod their heads, clap and exclaim "Yup Yup Yup!"1 point
-
Except they aren't. As before, it's manifested almost entirely as government subsidized real-estate grabs. DEI is not racist. That's some completely fictional bullshit they sold to you. It has nothing whatsoever to do with the superiority of any race. Race is, in fact, just one component, and even then the intention is to encourage organizational populations that are more representative of our broader population. You can't make the argument plausible, but you can repeat the nonsense you've seen on twitter. Sorry that you're so threatened by an inclusive environment and the erosion of privilege. You chickenshits simply know that you can't compete on a level playing field, so will fight tooth and nail to prevent any leveling. Again, complete bullshit. You know full well--okay, maybe not you, but the architects of project 2025--that erasing political power of marginalized groups starts with erasing their history. It's not an accident or a small thing that Trump has inserted himself at the Kennedy Center or Vance at the Smithsonian. This vile administration is actively waging war against arts, culture and history to establish an American Gleichschaltung. You have an infantile understanding of what constitutes refutation.1 point
-
One in a litany of statements that on its own would have been entirely disqualifying back when the Republican voting bloc still had standards.1 point
-
I have no doubt that trump would not be entirely opposed to the idea of acquiring provinces one by one until he has the complete set I don't know that the rest of America is as excited about it though. We'll have to see1 point
-
I mean, I'd say the debate qualified as part of the campaign, no? That fat buffon literally went on national television to tell everyone they're eating the cats, they're eating the dogs, they're eating the pets of the people who live there. You're like, "THAT'S MY GUY!" 🤣👌1 point
-
1 point
-
People who violate laws get due process. It’s in your constitution.1 point
-
Quite frankly...none of you really have a point. You have a lot of accusations and made-up chickenshit designed to shock and scare the mindless. But a real and honest point? No. But hey...if your happy acting like that mush-brain @myata...then I'm happy for you.1 point
-
It says "no person" it doesn't say illegal alien or any other category of person you decide to make up. Maybe they are but that doesn't give the federal government or anyone else the right to ignore the constitution. People who violate laws are guaranteed due process. It's in your f*cking constitution. It's also in Canada's constitution and the constitution of every other country that believes in rule of law and human rights.1 point
-
No ? By some measures they are: -Advocating for big corporate subsidies and special treatment under trade deals etc. -Acceptance that capitalism is a central foundation for our economy -Anti-nationalization If you forget that the NDP is moving right, then you do odd things like singing Barry Manilow songs while sleepwalking, thinking Dr. Pepper tastes good and believing that the Democrats are 'left'.1 point
-
US Code 135 It prescribes penalties, it doesn't say anything about denying due process or grabbing people from their homes and sending them to third world prisons in the middle of the night. It also has nothing to do with any deportation process.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
oh my god are you STILL crying?!!?!? It's been 6 bloody days dude, you need to pull yourself together and get on with life! We're just not that upset, get over it! Now go and change your diapers and try to calm down. it's a school day tomorrow1 point
-
Fair point, well played. I shall now invent a time machine and send my shock and outrage regarding his lack of sanity back to three days after he joined where it belongs1 point
-
GET THIS Only Canadian citizens can vote. You are no longer an immigrant if you have citizenship. Even if you still talk or dress funny.1 point
-
Eyeball says: Sure and for every person who says that there's another who'll say the opposite Sure, we know the school kids are being brainwashed by the woke NDP as they control the school agenda with their SOGI 123 curriculum. So what Greta Thunberg thinks is all that matters. Shut down resource development, abolish capitalism, and embrace Socialism. That's their insane ideology. Self destructive. We could end up as a Venezuelan basket case, paying 50 bucks for a loaf of bread or a litre of gas.1 point
-
He obviously never heard of Nazi regime. Knowledge, information, memory, brain - but why? 4 billion years of evolution, wasted.1 point
-
The Dictator For A Day has now ruled by decree for over 100 and you still do sweet f*ck all... good show USA [/sarc]1 point
-
The First Step Act? You mean the bipartisan (and veto-proof) bill that Trump vocally opposed before his son-in-law persuaded him that it would be advantageous? Opportunity Zones? You mean the opportunity for wealthy people to avoid capital gains by buying up rental properties in poor areas? (This could have worked better if the incentive were for business investment. Alas there's the rub. It's almost all real estate.) And the wealth gap is basically static since the 80s. Small peaks and valleys if you zoom in enough, but it really hasn't budged. That little peak there? It's housing prices. Black wealth is disproportionately in housing, so it got a nudge upward. But it's not new wealth, jobs, income or anything else to signal meaningful gains. Those gaps are largely consistent as well. You're looking at a mirage. Trump is actively destroying DEI efforts, repealing anti-discrimination measures, removing Black history from museums and schools, lionizing confederate generals--and so much more. The idea that he's any kind of friend to minorities in America is downright laughable.1 point
-
"Obey the law" = left wing talking point now HAHAHA1 point
-
You're not getting it, dummy. Do you not know what RINO means? Republican in Name Only. If, from the leadership to the rank-and-file Republicans were characterized by common values and a shared platform, that's what membership means. They weren't Republicans in Name Only. They were Republicans. -- The radical takeover that's happened over the last 10 years is what's new, and assuming the Republican name. And those people are not "real patriots." They are actively trading away everything that America has stood for in exchange for expedient execution of a hateful agenda. They prefer a fast-moving dictatorship to democracy. That's simply where they're at, and why they don't object to the lawlessness and the constitutional crisis unfolding.1 point
-
And for as many decades, RINOs have ruled the Republican Party. No...it sucks to be you. Brandon bucked the rule of law trying to forgive student loans. Ha lied to his own citizens about his ability to close the border. You Libbies have put the civil rights of citizens on hold for the perceived rights of criminals. So it certainly does suck to be you. Just keep your eyes open and move when you have to 'cause...REAL Patriots are gonna steamroll right over you if you don't. Very much like your Libbie judges who are being lined up and charged. Enjoy...1 point
-
That's wildly stupid. Just made-up nonsense. The "Council of Presidents" is some random crap you read on Twitter. And no, nobody opened the border. And no, reverting to non-COVID status quo of border law is, by definition, not radical. No, they didn't fund Hamas. Nor were parents persecuted, etc. And holding people accountable for breaking the law is not lawfare. You're just a full-on raging loon. Like you've been mainlining Newsmax concentrate or something. It's weird to see people enter another reality entirely. This again? Can you identify any employment or income programs that Trump put in place for Black and Hispanic Americans? Oh, wait. No. He just happened to inherit a robust economy approaching full employment. And in which Black employment and wages lagged behind the rest of the economy just as much as they always have. If he had closed that gap you'd have a story, but what you are actually trying to do is give him credit for something he didn't prioritize or cause in the least. MAGA clearly isn't about any America we've had before. Rather, it's about hate of the other--marginalization of the already marginalized. A reclamation of power by white men who are (probably rightly) scared that many of them can't compete without the benefit of privilege.1 point
