Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 03/31/2025 in all areas

  1. 2 points
  2. If you come from a major position in the private sector you’re likely to have some potential conflicts of interest, not bizarre Trumpy ones where you’re clearly trying to rip the whole country off but as a natural consequence of your previous work. If we want such people in politics we need to give them some leeway on this. Somebody even mentioned the use of tax havens. To this I would say, if something is legal and you don’t like it, campaign to get the law changed.
    2 points
  3. Posted in a group chat on a commercial platform with a journalist present. That’s exactly what happened
    2 points
  4. Who would have thought that having an anti-american ideology, embracing mental instability, eliminating borders, driving up the cost of living and lowering the value of wages all while bringing us to the brink of WWIII, censoring citizens, arresting political enemies, sponsoring terrorists and denying the President had lost his shit when we could all see it would have ruined the brand?
    2 points
  5. I've seen a few rumours on FB today that Carney has already decided to step down due to his litany of conflicts of interest. Even the CBC's Rosemary Barton couldn't ignore it, and she's a shoo-in for a Liberal senate seat the day she retires. "[As someone] who spent most of his life in the private sector, there's no possible conflict of interest in your assets?" Barton asked. "That's very difficult to believe." For someone like Barton, whose entire career stems her shameless hagiography of liberal candidates, that about-face makes Brute's back-stabbing look like a vote of confidence. I don't think it will make much of a difference to this election, the CBC will just pimp the next LPOC candidate that much harder. If he is really dropping out, I think it has more to do with his ability to keep his head above water in a debate than any conflicts of interest that he has... The RCMP and CBC can keep all of that under wraps for him.
    1 point
  6. Do we burn LGBTQ people here in Canada...not that i'm aware of... choking on the smoke....and it's not from wildfires...its from our government departments...
    1 point
  7. Liberal voters don't have the same moral values as the rest of us, this is normal behavior....Now i wonder what happens when some wing nut does kidnap him and turns him in for the reward....is a sorry i had a lapse on judgement going to be enough...These are the type of people we want running our country....
    1 point
  8. Lets not forget littlest hobo, Mr dress up, friendly giant....lots of modern tv Canadian shows...Peaky blinders, monty python flying circus...
    1 point
  9. If you had two parties that shared the same views on things you happened to agree with on turning the country around.... then why not vote for the real deal?
    1 point
  10. It absolutely is classified. That's not even a question. It's just a blatant lie that it wasn't, and frankly it's hard to imagine a more necessary classification than an impending military strike. You are not dumb enough to believe otherwise. Come on. I defy you to come up with any scenario in which the facts of a military operation can simultaneously be shared publicly and also depends on the (comically) lauded "OpSec." Yes, they did. They are absolutely lying about the information not being classified. Nobody believes them, but they don't really care anymore. Post-truth. Lol. Selling the information is literally selling the information. Journalists don't sell information, they publish it. As in to make public. The job is to serve the public, not protect the image of a party-boy pundit turned (shudder) Secretary of Defense. The public should be informed when officials f*ck up--and this was a massive f*uckup. As always, you're not pissed that Trumpco has done so many things wrong, you're mad at anyone who tries to hold them accountable for their own actions. Nothing is too much. You'll happily take it all. You don't seem to have a gag reflex. 🤷‍♂️
    1 point
  11. I didn’t need a link here, just pointing out that what you are doing is wrong and appears dishonest. Do better.
    1 point
  12. That's only for conservatives. Liberalization of momentum means.... jumped up never come down, every which way sideways bottoms aren't up. Fluid dynamics applied to shot glasses only.
    1 point
  13. PP is getting the crowds out to hear him speak, carney is hiding most of the time. The libs do not want carney saying anything.
    1 point
  14. It's a pretty sad commentary on your life that you imagine people on an internet forum "obsessing" over you when they don't respond right away. 🥴
    1 point
  15. This is going to be another gaffe Carney standing by candidate Paul Chiang, who suggested Conservative be turned over to China for bounty | CBC News Standing by someone who threatens the life of a political rival is just not a good look. It'll come up again and again and he will have no way of justifying doing that.
    1 point
  16. So, the Carney has LPOC members who were identified as Chinese allies by CSIS, he doesn't want to get rid of them, but the CBC comes up with this: The CBC doesn't need to be defunded, they need to be in jail.
    1 point
  17. Absolute insanity. France's most popular and likely next leader is found guilty on some specious charges and banned from running for office? Yeah... seems real legit.
    1 point
  18. It's being kept empty for a reason..... ♬ cos the climates a changin ♫
    1 point
  19. 1 point
  20. You don't want them to lead, just to do the job of running things smoothly. Guiding elected policy makers is one thing but they shouldn't lead them.
    1 point
  21. Interpretation is ALWAYS open to further discussion. Facts DO NOT point to the same conclusions for everyone, and in fact the most common interpretation of the facts in science have very often proven to be wrong later. Newton was WAY off base but we believed his stuff for years. So it is 100 percent reasonable that two people would say "I interpret it this way" and another would say "i interpret it that way" and for those parties to discuss and debate and 'negotiate' on what they both can agree on and what actions would be wise to take that make sense in both scenarios. It displays your complete lack of understanding of science that you think that somehow a conclusion is absolute
    1 point
  22. Not surprising at all. Their support is volatile. Here’s a candidate who should be canned. Joking about handing someone over to the CCP is not acceptable: https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/liberal-paul-chiang-bounty-joe-tay-conservative-1.7496751
    1 point
  23. This is sooo tired, cliched and, well, dumb. Why does the Left think it's fine to say "You're not a real Canadian if you weren't born here five thousand years ago!" but at the same time say "The instant you get off a plane and get your passport you're a 100% Canadian and as good as anyone else born and raised here!" Because they're DUMB.
    1 point
  24. At your very best, you're a useful id10t.
    1 point
  25. I love it. The economy's in the shitter, and we have 30 million illegal aliens roaming the country as guests of the democrat party (all thanks to Biden), and all you diapered cultists can do is cry about a nothing burger. Well done, comrades, WELL done! lol
    1 point
  26. That's too much country for 57,000 people. They're going to have to take Trump's deal.
    1 point
  27. That's why you light Teslas on fire and ship coal across the planet to burn it instead of burning it where it's mined. That's why your PM runs and hides when he sees bouncy castles, it's why Kamala and Biden didn't answer any questions for 4 years, it's why Biden has to pardon his son and your hero (Fauci), and it's why Trudeau doesn't even answer to the RCMP. Peace? Leftists are the biggest war-mongers in NA. The thought of ending the war in Ukraine drives you guys mental. Where did that bit of honesty come from? I woulda mistaken that for sarcasm if you didn't have a vax-Nazi swastika on your forehead. Nothing like a good victim back-story, hey? You give enough of it. When was the last time you told the truth about anything, eyeball? Just name one topic where you feel like your average was higher than 20%....
    1 point
  28. Why shouldn't he be? Hundreds...maybe thousands of hardened criminals...invited into the states by Brandon and protected by zombies like you...have finally gotten what they deserve. A jail cell. Now if you'll excuse us, there are millions more to catch and send packing. Have a nice day.
    1 point
  29. Trump says he’s considering ways to serve a third term as president WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. (AP) — President Donald Trump said Sunday that “I’m not joking” about trying to serve a third term, the clearest indication he is considering ways to breach a constitutional barrier against continuing to lead the country after his second term ends at the beginning of 2029. “There are methods which you could do it,” Trump said in a telephone interview with NBC News from Mar-a-Lago, his private club. He elaborated later to reporters on Air Force One from Florida to Washington that “I have had more people ask me to have a third term, which in a way is a fourth term because the other election, the 2020 election was totally rigged.” Trump lost that election to Democrat Joe Biden. Still, Trump added: “I don’t want to talk about a third term now because no matter how you look at it, we’ve got a long time to go.” The 22nd Amendment, added to the Constitution in 1951 after President Franklin D. Roosevelt was elected four times in a row, says “no person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice.” …. https://apnews.com/article/trump-third-term-constitution-22nd-amendment-efba31be02ee96b0ef68b17fe89b7578
    1 point
  30. Sure! Lies are funny I mean it's not as funny as the liberal who suggested having the conservative killed for money this week but still...
    1 point
  31. LMAO I just came on here to post this, beat me to it! Oh get a sense of humour already
    1 point
  32. It certainly is for that conservative sub-culture that cleaves towards Trump - the most solid third or more of Pierre Poilievre's supporters. Poilievre is stuck between a frustrated and a stupid place as evidenced by the apparent schism developing in his party. Between those who want more focus on Trump as the election issue then the issues he's been grooming himself and his party to campaign on for the last two years. Poilievre risks alienating the most solid part of his base by distancing himself from Trump. He's doubly screwed by also having to get rational voters to believe he means it. As for the fùck the liberals fixture of conservative culture...the split developing within the Conservative Party between by rational conservatives and the nutbars is no where near as bad as the one that's all but destroyed the old in the GOP.
    1 point
  33. So your assumption is that I sat at my computer for "days" finding the quote you said that didn't exist, rather than that like most functioning adults, I don't spend my whole day arguing with people on the internet? Nobody does a better job making you look like a deadbeat than you yourself do here. WELL DONE! 🤣
    1 point
  34. I mean if you do we're still not going to help but we could all use the laugh
    1 point
  35. You posted almost the entire article. That's not the 'relevant bits', that's just spamming the board which is what he complained about. And you're lying again, i've never "admitted" that i "don't read". I actually read quite a bit. More than you apperently. and my response proves i do. Jezuz kid, no wonder people don't respect you. IF you're going to lie that brazenly at least try not to do it where the proof you're wrong is a few posts above And stop spamming the site and next time whatever quote or paragraph you think is really relevant then go ahead but don't post the whole thing and expect people to dig through it and try to guess what your point is. IF you have a brain use it, only the stupid just mass spam and hope people figure out what the hell they're talking about.
    1 point
  36. Ukraine received 909 bodies of Ukrainian fallen soldiers, and Russia received 43 bodies of Russian fallen soldiers. Ukraine and Russia Exchange Nearly 1K Bodies of Fallen Soldiers
    1 point
  37. In fairness is pretty hard for them to enjoy their favorite pastime of lying themselves into believing their talking points if you're just going to come along and slap them with the truth. So in the end this is all your fault anyway
    1 point
  38. Here you go muppet, as requested: Once again, a quick little search is all it takes to make a clown out of you.
    1 point
  39. Nope. Lower costs is accurate and lower infant mortality is accurate but by and large we have far worse health outcomes. More die due to lack of care even tho we all have coverage. More suffer far longer with horrible chronic pain and often die without ever getting treatment. And life expectancy in the states has more to do with their choices of diet and nothing to do with health care. Meanwhile we have less choice and vastly more people cant' even get a doctor. There's pros and cons to both sides but you're quite wrong saying we get better results
    1 point
  40. And no one is saying "The guys who have been selling Canada out for ten years are the obvious choice to defend our country all of a sudden", except for the CBC and their sycophants.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...