Leaderboard

MEDIA hah hah hah hah hah! Nice try..... anyone with Internet access and a stupid opinion is media now.....

Hey, this is a family website. Don't say such things.

Maybe we've been going about this all wrong... Maybe the best way to thwart madness is to agree and encourage it under the guise that radical surgical procedures are preventing these creatures from breeding and that's a net benefit to society. They'll become so offended they'll decide THEY want it stopped just to spite the MAGA hyenas who now favour the idea.

I doubt Epstein was much different from Hefner. Pretty young girls were a commodity, and both of them made use of them. This idea that it's child molesting to have consensual sex with 17 and 16-year-olds didn't exist in previous decades. Hell, the age of consent in Canada was 14 up until Stephen Harper changed it. And girls as young as 15 appeared in British men's magazines naked. Topless page 3 girls were often 16. And I doubt you can find a rock star from the 60s, 70s, 80s or 90s who hasn't slept with girls that age and younger MANY, MANY times while on the road. If they had the body and were willing (or drunk or drugged out) few in the entertainment industry had much of an issue with it. I think Epstein was just the victim of changing times and an eager lawyer who wanted to make a lot of money, along with mercenary old whores who resented no longer being attractive and who wanted some of that cash themselves.

All drugs should be legalised to consume, as it is a mental health issues, not a criminal issue. It's mainly poor and vulnerable people with underlying mental health issues with poor coping mechanisms that use hard drugs. We should be going after the dealers, and the manufacturers, who produce, and sell the drugs. Alcohol is clearly the most destructive drug to society. However, prohibition does not work. Perhaps more accountability is necessary (bars and restaurants knowingly serving intoxicated patrons). Make then liable for drunk driving accidents, if it can be proven the establishments knew the individual left drunk, and made no attempt to report the person when they drove away.

You guys are all over the anonymous bull shit about Hegseth but when a guy puts his name on a very high profile case that led to one person dying, suddenly the credibility is an issue?

He thinks ballots have names like Nutcracker and Swan Lake.

Poilievre also has a CO2 plan to replace the carbon tax you know. It'll be more expensive, less effective and hurt Canadians even more. Which raises the question, assuming the vast majority of his supporters who either think anthropogenic global warming is bullshit or simply don't care how can they possibly support his emission reductions plans if they'll only cause greater pain? Never mind who Poilievre is kidding, who are his supporters trying to kid?

This guy won't even criticize CNNs targeting of a minor and war veteran. No reason to believe he's made a point here ^^^^^

Dude said it to NYP. If he didn't, it'd be easy to produce the audio showing he didnt say it.

NYP and Gateway Pundit 🤮 Did you scrape those off the floor of your bird cage? LMAO

Everyone always wondered why Epstein got away with what he was doing for so long. The most logical explanation was that he was being protected by powerful people. So why did he get arrested when he got arrested? This might be a clue: Did Epstein get arrested to put pressure on him to out Trump? That would explain why they didn't release his client list. That would explain why he "committed suicide" with the cameras not working and the guards not watching.

Don't let Trudeau have you see it through his warped lens. I can understand other nations would want to use tariff for what they think is for the good of their own nation(s). If Trump - or any other leaders - would do it to us, the way I see it is......................that's just the way it is. BUT, we can all tighten our belts, and stand together. BUT - the LIBERAL PARTY (Trudeau and MPs), don't have the MORAL ground to lead us into this, and expect Canadians to stand with them! HECK - it's one thing for another nation to inflict pain on us.............but, it's really quite another for our very own PM to be inflicting hurt on us....................... ........................... ON TOP OF WHAT WE KNOW, IS GONNA BREAK SO MANY OF US! The tarrif is one thing. The carbon tax, is quite another. Why would I expect Smith to stand with Trudeau for the so-called good of the country? Is Trudeau standing for us? I don't think so. HECK - what good for the country is the carbon tax gonna be? Why should Canadians wait for a new Prime Minister to cancel it? I'm asking: Why is our PM hurting us so badly? Why can't he say, "because of the tarrif that will hurt our people, I'm going to cancel the carbon tax that's supposed to come on April, and postpone it for another time, to help ease the hurt the tarrif will inflict on our people." I'm not going to find fault with Danielle Smith. BUT I surely, am pointing my finger at TRUDEAU! HOW COULD YOU?

Carney bans independent media from campaign launch | True North Hasn't even launched his campaign and is already practicing censorship. Well if anyone had any questions about whether or not he was any different than the previous liberal government, there you go.

More games. My commenting on what you and others do here doesn't mean you are not seen as an individual.

That's the most "FBI" story I've heard in a while. They coerced every other person they could get behind bars for false testimony against Trump, of course they would have done it to Epstein. Apparently he didn't play his hand correctly though. What he thought was his trump card looked like this: but they would accept no less than this:

Oh, so we can't control the climate but we can change it? Contradicting yourself in one sentence is a sign of dementia or some mental problem.

It's not a strange idea at all. In fact it's been to court already in Canada. Remember when Justin Trudeau tried to exclude the rebel and claim it wasn't a legitimate news organization? And they took the government to court and won? If you allow one media source then you have to allow all media sources. If your claim is that you don't have to actually be in the same room with a politician to ask questions then nobody should be in the room. Only a woke left-wing dictatorial type would suggest that somehow it was strange to think that excluding some news sources while allowing others would be a fair and reasonable practice in a democracy. That is absolutely asinine and you should be embarrassed for suggesting it

Sure, if we just gave the carbon tax another couple hundred of years we'd see right? 🙄🙄 If it can't make a noticeable significant difference in 10 years, it's not going to in any reasonable time. You were told this. You were told it would not work and it would lead to people being sick of paying for "Climate action". The liberals never even thought it would work in the first place. If you expect something to work you put targets in place and then you monitor to see if those targets were hit. they didn't either. They never had any goal in mind and they never checked to see how it was doing and admitted as much directly. You and the left had your chance to deal with climate change. You had your chance to show that something that we could do could make a difference. You had free run and could have gotten away with anything. But you blew it and simply used it as an excuse to steal people's money and tax them further to no benefit and now they're fed up and it's your fault

Biologically it is absolutely a binary. One sex carries the egg, the other sex carries the sperm. When it comes to mammals that's basically it. There are some minor details around it but when you look at the definition that's what it is. Which is a problem for your side because you want to pretend something. You want to pretend that mail is the same as female if the male feels that he is female. But at the end of the day they're male and there is no complicated conversation necessary. There are also only two genders, and everybody exists on a spectrum between them. It can be argued that the spectrum includes more than one line so to speak, a person may be more masculine or feminine in one element of their life and more feminine and less masculine in another element of their life but they are all just on a spectrum between male and female. Sorry for the inconvenience. But that is a simple truth. Everything else is an attempt to obfuscate that truth for a political agenda and to try and make a mental health issue somehow legitimate.

NYP and Gateway Pundit denigrate THEMSELVES all the time. Time for YOU to cancel your National Enquirer subscription, too. I am fine with not knowing the identities of anyone who fears the Trump MAGA CULT CRAZY GOONS. You should be, too, before the next David Depape comes looking for YOU. "More often than not," is a really shitty standard for ANY reputable news organization. As is NOT ISSUING CORRECTIONS. You're the one defending a "more often than not" and very few if any corrections standard. 🤮

Libbies... @robosmith, @DUI_Offender and @Hodad have no argument so they denigrate the news agencies that reported this. They are generally good with "unnamed sources" and the likes of CNN and MSNBC because they will tell them what they want to hear. The problem they have is...the NYP is proven correct more often than not, as is Gateway Pundit. Their chosen news sources are...well...less than correct more often than not. Poor Libbies...they live lives of lies and "misinformation".

1) There are two types of "breaking stories". Stories like this, that would just end up coming from a different "news" org twenty minutes later, and stories that legitimate journalists busted out which were never meant to see the light of day, like the Hunter laptop story which the Dems and FBI went ballistic to block from the public eye. FYI when the news is just there to run propaganda for the gov't, they're not doing their job. 2) People like Trudeau and Biden go to their trusted sources to get this kind of news out so that they can control the initial narrative. It's important for that story to be released with a certain tone, on Trudeau's exact terms, which other sycophant media will follow up on, so that people like Rosemary Barton don't die from the shock of finding out about it with the Rebel News edge to it. Now the story goes out framed as "a magnanimous gesture by a great leader to ensure the future strength of his party", rather than a story about "1) the delusional narcissist finally coming to terms with the fact that he's the most reviled politician in Canada's 160-yr history, 2) the MSM told him that they can't pull his fat outta the fire anymore, and 3) his whole party is tarnished by their lock-step dedication to his destructive fascist BS". ^That's why G & M was chosen to reveal this. That and the fact that CBC would be too obvious a choice to polish his rod one last time. R Barton wouldn't be able to break that story without real snot-bubbly bawling.

A rare genetic disorder, there are about twice as many people who are missing fingers. Should children who identify with the latter group due to Body Integrity dysmorphia be allowed to have fingers amputated?

It's not surprising to find out that hit-piece was done by the corporation that Trudeau gifted $675,000,000 to within months of being elected. FYI Trudeau and Jagmeet Singh are literally holding Canadians hostage with this shitty, feckless, deceitful, treasonous gov't just to get a few NDPers their pensions. It's not surprising to find out that you're completely oblivious to all of these finer points, because CBC never said anything about any of that 😉

Everyone on earth is in agreement that Trudeau's BS about "215 graves at a residential school!!!" was incorrect, and everyone with an IQ over 50 understands the wave of racism and hatred that it caused, and how calculated it was. Sorry but we can't make it any easier for you. It's even more complicated than those dastardly 2x tables 😉

Trump is bar none the most unethical president that has ever been. Making money off of gullible people is his mark in trade. Add this to the other business opportunities (like gold shoes and the only Bible endorsed by Trump) that prove the maxim, "There's a sucker born every minute." Lol, buy a token for $27.

The Global and Mail? They broke the story of Trudeau's resignation. I guess The Rebel was still vetting their sources... 😂

In 2025 there are hundreds of thousands of people on the internet who are more reliable sources for news than CNN or MSNBC, and that's an obvious fact. The above meets their standard for "accurate reporting". They never admitted to any wrongdoing there, that's actually still considered "CNN News". People literally have to go to court to correct the type of blatant lies shown below, because that type of disinformation just spreads like wildfire in the MSM landscape: Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of "people on the internet" were correct about the BSL4 labs, the Hunter laptop, Biden's blatant dementia, the dangers of the pseudovax, the FBI's collusion felonies, etc, and we got fact-checked or banned for telling the truth. CNN and the Demis HATE the fact that they can't even keep their false narratives above water for two hours now before they're shot down on social media and a few podcasts. The really hate that Twitter was yanked from TNI, breaking their monopoly on social media disinformation. All the MSM can do now is try to gaslight people using the full weight of their remaining TNI muppets, such as BBC, CBC, NYT, WashPo, Reuters, Associated Press, the European Broadcasting Union, etc. They all say "Biden is mentally healthy" and you little cultists just go along with it, no matter what.

Smith going to Mara Lago shows weakness and division. Guys like Trump thrive on that.

You would have to be pretty dumb to think carbon taxes made any difference at all to greenhouse gas emissions or the climate.

Well yes they have. Now it's womanly women and manly man. The rest have tailored nether regions.

Finally, we agree! Like how the economy was flagging under Bush 1 and Clinton revived under Clinton. Or how Bush 2 squandered a balanced budget, spiked deficits and handed the economy to Obama in complete shambles before the Obama recovery. Or how Obama gave Trump a strong economy and Trump spiked deficits and left Biden a dumpster fire. And now Biden is handing Trump another strong economy. It's a pattern all right. I wonder how long it will take the Republicans to fark it up this time? With the tariff plan, not very long.

Russia invaded Ukraine in 2014, and has been waging war on Ukraine for the past decade. If Russia withdrew it's forces from Ukrainian land, the war would be over. It's really that simple.

CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, Global, and CTV are state-run?

A+ thread title.

Once again, you reference an email that was sent in private that his mother came out and said was sent in the moment of anger to which she immediately regretted and she went on to praise her son and who he has become. Who are these coworkers? Name them. You can't.

It's MAGA CULT reflexe: "MUST DEFEND TRUMP MUST DEFEND TRUMP MUST DEFEND TRUMP" whatEVER he says.

Do you think I'll be as disappointed as Hegseth's mother, who denounced him as an abuser of women? She's pretty disappointed. Probably some Hegseth-style breakfast gin will make me feel better.

Oil and gas is the main industry in Alberta. That is different than Ontario, Quebec, and B.C. which have other industries. I never heard Ford say Ontario will be willing to put an export tax on the auto industry. Obviously, they think they can use Alberta as a sacrificial offering.

Oh look the stalinist thinks only state run media is valid

BINGO betsy! The Canadian Liberals are panicking and doing what the Democrats tried. Copy the common sense of their adversary in hopes nobody will remember they supported Pixie-Dust and his destructive ideas all along. Will Canadians fall for this brand of chickenshit politics? Gawd I hope not!

To add salt and insult to injury..... Carney was implying he'll do away with the carbon tax. He's gonna replace it with something that won't hurt. Its not because he thinks of us. Let's not kid ourselves! He's going to do it because POILIEVRE promises to do it! The gall! They're using pain to pressure Canadians into voting them back in. SHAME ON THE LIBERALS! I hope they end up with only 1 seat or none at all!

true north and the rebel aren't even real media they are fools who play the victim everytime lol

These are the types of sites that attend events, and then agitate to the point where they provoke security response and report on being persecuted by the police.

Pros of socialism Reduction of relative poverty. A welfare state which provides a minimum basic income for those who are unemployed, sick or unable to work maintains a basic living standard for the poorest in society and helps to reduce relative poverty. Free health care. Free health care at the point of use means everyone is entitled to basic health care. This increases the living standards of those who cannot afford to pay private doctors. By improving the nation’s health it also contributes towards increased labour productivity and higher economic growth in the long-term. In the US, there is no universal health care and uninsured workers can slip through the net and either not be entitled to health care or go bankrupt trying to pay bills. According to CNBC (2019) ‘[in the US], An estimated 530,000 families turn to bankruptcy each year because of medical issues and bills.] Diminishing marginal utility of income. From a utilitarian perspective, a redistribution of income and opportunity from the very rich to the very poor can increase total utility [happiness] in society. A millionaire who pays a marginal income tax rate of 50% still has the ability to buy most goods they need. If an unemployed person gains an extra £50 it leads to a very large increase in utility because they can afford to buy basic necessities. See: diminishing marginal utility of income/wealth A more equal society is more cohesive. A society which has equality of opportunity and limited inequality is likely to be more cohesive. If people perceive they live in a very unequal society – exploited by monopsony employers and earning significantly less than their bosses, it can lead to frustration and resentment. If everyone feels they have a fair stake in society, it can help create a more harmonious society where workers are committed to the success of the firm which they work. Socialist values encourage selflessness rather than selfishness. Capitalism encourages attitudes to make profit – even if it is at the cost of other individuals or the environment. A socialist society does not pursue profit as its highest goal, but social cohesion and the common good. Benefits of public ownership. The benefit of public ownership is that companies can be run in the public interest rather than just for the benefit of shareholders. For example, industries like railways and water have significant externalities, which are ignored in a profit-oriented company. Public ownership of water and the railways allows the companies to target goals such as long-term investment, low prices for the consumer and improved safety. Environment. An economy which is regulated to work towards the long-term welfare will place a higher value on environmental concerns, such as limiting pollution – even if it lowers profit. Reduced hidden taxes. An economy with no public health care will have lower tax rates. However, individuals and firms will pay for health care in a different form. In the US both firms and individuals pay significant sums for private insurance. Therefore, although there is less tax, there is the ‘hidden’ tax of private health insurance. Furthermore, because the US health care system is for-profit with fewer constraints to limit spending, the US pay significantly more on health care (17.6% of GDP) than other countries (e.g. UK 9.6% of GDP) (See: Health care spending)

Technically, I consider myself a social democrat. Socialism has many good ideas.

Trudeau calling someone a liar . . .