Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/10/2024 in all areas

  1. I would take BLM more seriously if they actually defended someone who deserves to be defended. In the case of Neely he was in and out of jail over 40 times and some of his crimes were violent crimes, he was a completely useless person. At some point it is pointless to try to rehabilitate them, it doesn't work. Lock them up and throw away the key. I am not saying he should of been killed but even if he survived he would be out of jail again in less than a day and would be out committing crimes. His father is a complete piece of shit using his son to get a payday. Where was he when his son was in and out of jail and was strung out on the street sucking dick for crack? Also screw the media for giving Neely the Trayvon treatment they took an old picture of him and was like "Oh he looked like such a sweet and kind boy" except he was a 30 year smelly homeless guy who was out of his mind.
    3 points
  2. It's an established fact that the DNC and FBI were guilty of spreading disinformation and censoring the truth regarding the Hunter laptop, and those two, along with the Cdn gov't, were guilty of spreading covid disinformation and banning specific facts about the covid pandemic. Still, when the important topic of disinformation comes up, leftist cultists always refer to imaginary "RUSSIANDISINFORMATION", like the stuff that sucked them in during the collusion investigation and again during the FBI's laptop lying fiasco. They honestly want to have a serious conversation based on the bogeyman of Russian disinformation while ignoring the far more serious topic of disinformation coming right from the LPOC and DNC, the FBI, and sycophant legacy media outlets like CBS, who went so far as to change Kamala's answers entirely after her recent interview. It's not right to have this conversation without including lefties, it would make us no better than them, but where can you find a leftist who will even admit that their gov't lied about things like the Hunter laptop and the BSL4 lab? Are we at impasse?
    2 points
  3. 2 points
  4. So your answer is to gun down people you don't approve of even though you have no idea who they are or what they've done? it's pretty obvious you have no idea of what fair or just means
    2 points
  5. No, because you are still ignoring what you did.
    2 points
  6. Wrong. I'm the one who highlights your ongoing race hustling. It never ends with you stunted perverts.
    2 points
  7. "The vast majority of these stranger attacks follow a predictable pattern: The assailant is usually mentally ill, often has a lengthy criminal record and is frequently on bail or probation." Let's give these guys access to guns instead!
    2 points
  8. But the disinfo problem goes hand in hand with the poor ecology of the public in shooting down ridiculous claims. It should be a common habit for people to shoot down extremists from their own side of the fence, IMO. Liberals shoot down radical claims by leftists, Red Torys shoot down alt-right weirdos. Clean up the mess and disinfo will stand out like a piece of sh!t on the floor of a pastry shop. ----------------- Forums like this represent a potential space for true discussion, but for the people who treat discussion like it's an all-or-nothing bloodsport, and who think their enemies are subhumans whose ideas need to be eliminated. So let's legalize militias and ban individuals from owning firearms less than 250 years old ? Maybe you have a germ of an idea, Auguste. I appreciate your posts.
    2 points
  9. Well, at least you admit “your words” are disinformation. Admitting you have a problem is always the first step.
    2 points
  10. Huh? Second Amendment: "I have the right to be the first kid to be the last kid on my street." BTW, your amendment specifically refers to a "well-ordered militia".
    2 points
  11. oh look at you backpedal. Well I suppose I'd want to take back what I said if I said something that ignorant too
    2 points
  12. I can just see the line up now: Bill O'Reilly at 6 ET Tucker Carlson at 7 Glen Beck at 8 And then on weekends they have Charlie Kirk, Dan Bongino, and Ben Shapiro. Oh...and Madcow on the 2 am slot with Carrot Top.
    2 points
  13. The disinformers disagree 100%. It violates their freedumb of speech.
    2 points
  14. Apparently it has been done, here in canada, this is what i found in a quick google search, there are a lot more if you want to look... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/canada-stabbing-saskatchewan-deaths/ https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/ottawa-homicide-barrhaven-berrigan-drive-arrest-1.7136366 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mass_stabbing_incidents_(2020–present) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_Calgary_stabbing Canada has some of the strictest fire arm laws on the planet, So why are we using US stats here why not just Canadian...Deaths by knives is just behind those that use a fire arm, 289 deaths by fire arms and 234 by knife's...and no one is talking about banning knifes...anyone ? https://www.statista.com/statistics/433716/number-of-homicides-in-canada-by-type-of-method/ Since Justins attack on legal gun owners , crimes with fire arms have increased....suggesting his ban is not targeting the right group of canadians...everyone can see that except those that hate the fact some Canadians like guns... https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/nearly-9-per-cent-increase-of-firearms-crimes-in-canada-report-1.6748323
    2 points
  15. Probably would of wet himself and hid under the seat
    2 points
  16. She is 100% correct. Disinformation has been the greatest threat to democracy in the past decade. We really need to pass laws and regulations, that punish the people that spread blatant disinformation. We have seen first hand at what damage it has done, especially during the COVID pandemic. Canada Proud is a perfect example of a "media" entity that has ties to Russia, and it's misinformation campaign.
    2 points
  17. No, according to your source it's actually the Commons Ethics Committee report that is proposing this. This committee also includes the input of a bunch of Conservatives as well. Here's what your source actually says. Canada should adopt a code of practice on media disinformation, says a Commons ethics committee report. Liberal MP Iqra Khalid (Mississauga-Erin Mills, Ont.), a committee member, called it among “the biggest issues of our time.” https://www.blacklocks.ca/report-urges-code-on-truth/ Have you got any quotes from Conservative members also saying we're all fùcked?
    2 points
  18. What if your job is to lay sod? Is there a sod simulator?
    2 points
  19. What's hilarious is that you believe FOS LIES is "fact based" and MSNBC isn't. What a dupe you are.
    2 points
  20. That's not how he wants to change the military. Nothing I have read about Hegseth supports this. How did you arrive at this conclusion? Everything I have read about him points to the fact that he is a militant Christian extremist. He literally wrote a book called “American Crusade” – which calls for the pushback of Muslims in Europe and the US. Hegseth has spoken about: https://www.npr.org/2024/11/14/nx-s1-5191941/pete-hegseth-defense-department-dei Maybe Hegseth is just too extreme for second-in-command of the US military
    2 points
  21. I don't understand why you tolerate these things.
    1 point
  22. Projection. Every thread you have ever been in where you even try, as soon as you are proven wrong you either run away or turn to insults. Look here, I ask you for your solution... you ignore the question, then you claim you alluded to one. This whole topic you have been nothing but a clown distorting the facts of what happened, trying to down play it to people being uncomfortable, when the facts are that he made direct threatening remarks that had people on that subway in fear of their lives, mothers barricading their children behind strollers in fear for their lives. You are nothing but a pathetic lying coward, defending this madness, which is why you have no solutions.
    1 point
  23. What human right is that? Feel free to buy "Smart Water" for $3 a litre or one of those gizmos that "filters 99.9%of flouride" they've been bombarding FB with ever since Trump announced a fellow 1diot to rum Health
    1 point
  24. the more these Liberal & Red Tory Laurentian Elites discredit themselves therein the more powerful MAGA becomes in the face of it
    1 point
  25. I'll get you a pillow and a blanket So how about union leaders. I think they're immoral. Should people be allowed to shoot them?
    1 point
  26. ONLY if "the next CEO" engages in similarly immoral policies/actions which cost lives.
    1 point
  27. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." Ending birthright citizenship as clearly and unambiguously articulated in the 14th requires a constitutional amendment or the violation of the constitution itself.
    1 point
  28. She is not a RINO. For crying out loud, even if she did not support Hegseth, that is one data point on her record. The charge of RINO is carelessly thrown around far too often by folks in the party against anyone who doesn't support everything 100% or is 100% Conservative ~ anarchist Libertarian.
    1 point
  29. Where do you get she is steadfastly against him from? She has met several times with him. She has not endorsed him and pledged support yet, but it is hardly the opposite, that she is steadfastly against him either.
    1 point
  30. I'm actually glad that meme got posted, moronic sentiments should continue to be brought forward so we have an opportunity to learn from them. When we get to the point of seriously considering the"how did we get here?" question the worst "OFFENDERS" will grow silent, refuse to acknowledge their role in prolonging the mess and lay the blame (for their own arrogance) at the feet of the politicians who actually gave them the mandates they demanded. All I can say is watch the video and then... follow your own advice as quoted: https://www.rebelnews.com/science_confirms_sv40_dna_in_pfizer_s_covid_shot_validating_concerns_over_unexplored_genetic_health_risks Only now are we asking the sort of questions that thoughtful people with rudimentary biology knowledge were concerned about on day one of the adventure, and it seems that pro vaccination fact checks prefixed with "there is no evidence to suggest" have evaporated like summer dew. This should never have been about being right, it should have been about getting it right... ignoring fools (who peaked in grade 12) shouting things like STFU is part of that process IMO. My fear now is that all too soon we will be talking about safety of the blood supply.
    1 point
  31. Someone voting Trump and a Trump supporter are 2 different things. Huh?
    1 point
  32. So how did a former KGB colonel and politician who's salary is $140K a year become one of the worlds richest people and how did you become one of his useful fools? https://www.foxbusiness.com/fox-news-world/putins-net-worth-rivals-elon-musk-cobweb-bank-accounts-assets-hides-full-value-expert-says
    1 point
  33. I'm sure that's a lie that makes you sleep better at night with your hatred Always done is raise awareness of how psychotic the left wing is these days. This is what happens when your entire political outlook is based on hatred
    1 point
  34. Which is exactly what you would have done had you been on that train.
    1 point
  35. I see you are here to be dishonest as usual.
    1 point
  36. 1 point
  37. It's difficult to have proof when a poison kills you slowly, but when in doubt, we abstain
    1 point
  38. There is a difference between calling for violence and viewing a violent act as justice. Do you think the rebels who just violently overthrew Syria's Bashar Al Assad are immoral murderers or is it ok to fight against a violent dictatorship?
    1 point
  39. I already am in management but my industry doesn't depend on human misery and immiseration for profit so I think I'm safe.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...