Leaderboard

They might be along but their bus will be a short

This is shockingly horrible. And i hope @impartialobserver is noting this, as he frequently claims there's no possible way bias can enter the numbers when it comes to the gov't. Yet here is another Stark example where there has been an unusual and gross error in favor of the democrats. And once again this isn't a small error, this is huge and very clearly intended to benefit the democrats. Honestly why are the people in America not up in arms over this kind of crap? It has become so blatant that you would have to be 17 different kinds of stupid not to realize that there is obviously an effort whether coordinated or not to try and fake government figures in an effort to keep one political party in favor

The FBI lied about the Hunter laptop by saying it was Russian disinformation the FBI lied to a judge to start the Russian collusion show trial the FBI are known to have lied to the FISA court judge dozens of times to get warrants to spy on Trump but they were never indicted for that even once the FBI was found guilty of fabricating evidence and providing it to the FISA court judge the FBI indicted dozens of people for Russian collusion and got zero convictions on all of those collusion-related charges the FBI tried to coerce false testimony against Trump by offering reduced sentences to people convicted of crimes that had nothing to do with Russian collusion, the FBI are the ones who actually came up with the idea to kidnap Gretchen Whitmer and then they publicly solved their own crime a month before the 2020 election during their Whitmer entrapment scheme the fBI offered free money, guns and even drugs to the people they were trying to frame the FBI brought CNN along to publicize Roger Stone's arrest the FBI raided multiple homes and businesses just to retrieve Ashly Biden's diary

And it was up against some pretty stiff competition too.

Yet again... we see the blatant politicization of government agencies like the FBI. This has been a huge talking point from Democrats that violent crime is down! Now, we find out that it is actually up in 2022 and the FBI revised the numbers and didn't tell anyone. Oh gee... why would they keep this a secret? I know! So that they can hide this before the election to preserve the Democrat's talking points. I don't expect this to be on the front page of most of the major media outlets or if it is it will quickly die. Stealth Edit: FBI Quietly Revises Violent Crime Stats https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2024/10/16/stealth_edit_fbi_quietly_revises_violent_crime_stats_1065396.html "But the FBI has quietly revised those numbers, releasing new data that shows violent crime increased in 2022 by 4.5%. The new data includes thousands more murders, rapes, robberies, and aggravated assaults."

Where are all the leftist apologists who are supposed to come along and pretend that none of that stuff matters, or that it's all a bunch of conspiracy theories?

Vivek Ramaswamy said he would wipe the FBI completely out. I so wanted this guy to be nominated, but it's not his time.

The choice has never been clearer:

I'm not surprised a guy who called a Black poster a monkey and gleefully posted the n word in its entirety doesn't see anything wrong with someone putting posters saying "it's ok to be white" up to cover photos of trailblazing Black students at a formerly segregated school, but normal people can see that this was clearly an act of racial provocation. It was literally popularized by white nationalists on 4chan you dummy. "Speaking out about woke ideology" is not specific. Try again. oops looks like someone's reading comprehension problems are flaring up again. I did not claim that non-white feelings specifically are of no interest to you. But it is funny how you DEMAND proof here when you can't even be arsed to do the bare minimum to support your own arguments. Yes I did. You did not. You made a vague reference to an incident at some unnamed college and I had to do the actual work to provide the specific example because you are a very lazy person chronically incapable of presenting supporting evidence. It's also funny that of all the millions of examples you say you could have chosen, the one anecdote you referenced was about a incident of racial incitement and not someone's feelings being hurt by wokeness or whatever. No in this case literally on you for being a dummy who couldn't parse a very simple sentence.

I hope @Michael Hardner is reading this. The vaunted FBI...plus assorted other "institutions" are fcking lying to us again! It's not like the FBI didn't know the numbers they were getting were bullshit. They knew. They published them I'm spite of that. This slanted horseshit has to be stopped.

Many will remember that I specifically predicted that Kamala needed to come out of the convention at least six or seven points ahead of trump and three or four in the swings. My reasoning was given her circumstances in their entirety she would slowly do worse and worse as time went on and then in the last 2 to 3 weeks nose dive and crash and she needed to have that extra room to be able to glide to the finish line because she wasn't going to add support relative to trump Well it appears that I was correct, she's been weakening and weakening and now there's enough of a trend line to be able to say that she is apparently begun her fall. This chart is from approximately the end of august for all the swing states. Trump is leading in all but one at this point and that one is trending up for him. She came out of the convention with a slight bump but nowhere near what she needed. Trump fairly quickly caught up and now she is beginning to descend fairly rapidly. The chart is a little deceptive, the race is still very close. But she's got nothing left in the tank. She's not getting another debate, she can't do talk shows cuz she looks like a complete !diot, her rallies aren't helping. Unless trump screws up personally and opens the door I don't see where she is going to get an opportunity to suddenly wow the public who is obviously starting to decide that they just don't like her. And she's still going to run into that voter turnout issue we talked about. Meanwhile trump is plugging along, playing it relatively safe, and doing his job as a presidential candidate. He's running disciplined campaign and he isn't swinging for the fences, he's just going with slow and steady wins the race and it's paying off. It's too soon to call it of course, as I said the difference isn't that big yet, but it's pretty obvious that it's trending in that direction. By about approximately october 21st to 25th we're going to see the gap wide enough to be able to say that she lost this.

Wheel..... Of...... CANDIDACY!!!! Leftist Americas favorite new game show Phrase" KA___ALA SUCKED B__ ___ ___ ___ ( Answer was "kamala sucked bigly. What were YOU thinking?)

Trump can’t even hold a town hall anymore. Forty minutes of swaying to music as his teleprompter and host were asking him to answer questions as people were leaving.

Oh my...scat content. Pup I sure hope the local authorities have you on a sex offenders list.

Like typical right wing fascists, your idea of "accounting for people's needs" is to take away their voting power as individuals. This is functionally meaningless as it relates to the electoral college. Can you cite an example of how the electoral college has helped an otherwise ignored region of the United States meet their unique needs? Nope, that's a Straw Man and has never been my point. Tyranny of the minority is when a minority of the country rules unjustly over the majority of citizens. This is what you're defending. I think you're projecting your own aimlessness and insecurity. You're arguing in support of an indefensible and immoral system, so it makes sense that you're expressing feelings of shame rather than responding to anything rationally.

Your analysis is badly flawed. The Covid economy was deflationary in many respects, and as soon as the economy restarted, it triggered worldwide inflation. And then Russian petroleum was embargoed and OPEC raised prices. Inflation happened in Germany, England, France, Japan, China, Canada, etc. And the inflation rate in the U.S. under Biden is lower than in the other G7 countries. So pointing to Biden as the cause flies in the face of facts. And Trump’s promised tax cuts will increase deficits, which as you say is inflationary. And tariffs are definitely inflationary. There is absolutely nothing in any of Trump’s plans which will reduce inflation.

In the podcast "All In": "he (Biden) constantly said the wrong things and one of the wrong things he said was that Ukraine would join NATO.” Trump said, “When I heard him talking, I thought: this guy is going to start a war.” The facts: the aggressor started this war. There are no, none, and cannot be any excuses for brutal and destructive aggression in Europe of this century. Undermining NATO: every free European and Northern American nation has the birth right to join the defense alliance of democracies. He is weakening and undermining NATO right at the time the new Axis of tyrants is rising. NATO is the only thing that stands in the way of their claim to rewrite the rules of the world. Trump is playing right into their hands. Saying that Ukraine in NATO would give Putin any justification for his brutal war is nothing short of claiming that Poland's defense pact with Great Britain was the cause of the WWII. In 1939 with the same words, he would have been apologizing for Hitler. So: it will be the citizenship test: nothing short of, and nothing less. Everybody knows what it will be about and what's at stake. No one could claim ignorance about what the options were and what they meant. No such excuses. Not a chance.

Attaboy, see you just needed to do little reading. Now that you've consulted wikipedia you can hopefully agree that electors don't necessarily vote "only at the instruction of the people of their state." They are. Either the electoral college is based on democracy or it is not. Either the people are primarily getting the say or else these abstact territorial entities called states are primarily getting the say. Democracy means rule by the people. There is no such thing as pure democracy vs impure democracy. There is a range of degrees to which a thing embodies democracy. The electoral college is from a proto-democratic period of history and the system is not by design intended to be democratic. Though the contest for electors became more democratic eventually. Still, the selection of president is not. You don't believe votes cast should be equal. There is no scenario where taking voting power away from certain citizens makes the system better or more fair. You appear to be talking about state legislation. That's not relevant to the electoral college vote for president. Plus the <500,000 people of Wyoming will certainly have laws made at the national level that they don't agree with. So what? That's how a representative government works. Making some citizen's votes worth more or less is not a reasonable fix and just creates even worse problems.

O'Wiinag

They're too busy spreading disinformation elsewhere. But they'll be along....

Probably busy getting their lives coordinated just at the moment

The climate crisis is the new covid lie and hoax. Even the billionaire globalists do not believe in it and yet they are the ones that keep pushing this climate crisis nonsense and bull chit. The sad part about it all is that people are told that there is a problem, but yet, never bother to do their own research to see if there really is a problem. They just take what their lying globalist puppet on a string politicians and the lying left wing liberal MSM tells them as the gospel truth. Bloody sad.

The orientation of valleys vs prevailing winds and fuel loading is huge part of the situation estimate as well (Mommy, why are the trees red?). Forestry management may be a science but common sense has merit as well. People who are routinely "out on the land" will often tell you that they're surprised there aren't more forrest fires. In many cases, like Jasper, the threat assessment comes easy and the after action question is WTF did you think was going to happen? Attributing it all to global warming is a deflection that provides an easy out and a shoulder shrug instead of accountability and lessons learned. That's not to say it doesn't exist either, but combine it with management that doesn't exist and responsibility never acknowledged or assumed and you have a big dog with sharp teeth waiting for the right conditions to bite your a$$. Land doesn't need to be managed... unless you want to live there.

Actually Trudeau was warned and was told we need some controlled burns and cleaning in jasper. They wouldn't do it,because burning would make them look bad.

uuuhhhhh..... there isn't though. It's literally what i said. They freaked because someone posted signs saying it's ok to be white. In fact they called it 'vandalism". LOL "I wondered if there was more to the story and it turns out you were exactly right! ha! TAKE THAT! " seriously what is WRONG with you? ' Nope, and it certainly wasn't before the left tried to pretend it was in order to justify their outrage when people came back and said why is it not okay to be white? Again you were given specifics and now you're just making yourself look like a fool Funny how that's absolutely not true but you're going to say it anyway because lying is the only way you can defend your points. Go ahead and prove me wrong, post where I have ever said that non-white feelings specifically are of no interest to me And you literally posted an article about it. If you're going to lie, maybe you don't provide the proof that you're lying in the same reply where you're accusing someone of lying "It's ok to be white" is, of course a popular white nationalist slogan. Again, I asked "what specific words and acts" we're talking about and you respond with vaguery. Give me an example of tis happening and what specifically was said. Funny how your ilk never gives a shit about the "feelings" of college and university students unless they're white males. But again, I asked for specifics, not generalities. And yet you haven't provided a single concrete one. They go through there ups and downs but sure, this is hardly the first time in history when colleges and universities have been more about left-wing indoctrination than about actual education

Still too much of a coward to even be able to say who you're talking to I see. What a Sad and terrified little man you are

The man in the Kibble box.

Are you suggesting CNN should just be able to defame 15 year olds for political purposes? That's vile

The needs of people wherever they are geographically are not met by making some voters worth more than others in an election. I agree with every word of this. But civil rights and liberties are protected via legislation, courts, and policies maintained by state and federal agencies. Manipulating a voting system to establish minority rule at the ballot box is not a justifiable or effective way to safeguard rights and instead simply shifts the risk of abuse onto the majority.

LOL you sounded EXACLY like an npc But if there was any doubt if you were a kid in his mom's basement you just put it to bed I never said anything about it being a rom-com? Oopsie, did we make a little bit of a Freudian slip? LOLOLOL well i guess your sexual preferences are out in the open as well aren't they NPC?

What I want to see in this conflict with India is India stopping the flow of Indian residents to Canada and then Canada retaliating by sending back the last 1,000,000 Indians who came under the various citizenship and immigration programs.

Actually he stood off to the side on stage and swayed along to canned music for almost 40 minutes while staring into the middle distance as his brain dribbled out his ears.

Human CO2 emissions are about 3% of the atmospheric CO2. Natural CO2 is 97% of the atmospheric CO2. The total CO2 in the atmosphere is about 400 parts per million (PPM). This is called a trace gas. Out of that approximately 400 PPM Canada produces about 0.18 PPM. That is negligible or almost nothing. It is time to wake up and realize this whole thing is total nonsense. We are being sold a bill of goods by the U.N. and people like Trudeau and Greta Thunberg. Sadly millions believe these people who have no idea what they are talking about. Canada could kill all its energy industries, stop driving gas or diesel vehicles and stop heating homes with LNG or oil and it wouldn't make the slightest difference to the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere or affect the climate. The whole idea of blaming mankind for climate change is ludicrous and insane.

Followed by LOL sigh. I knew he couldn't hold out forever honestly black dog, you can't lose a single fight without eventually devolving into bizarre sexual fantasies about the people beating up on you

A. The people's needs are more important. Minority rule over any society is fundamentally unjust. B. The electoral college does nothing to make presidental candidates care more about small states. Only 7 states matter in the current election in terms of wooing attention. What a garbage response by someone preaching authoritarianism. No. But a more analogous example would be a voting system where black people's votes each counted as like 5 votes, to an extent that they were able to control the outcome of most elections. You're logic is that this would be fair and protect everyone's rights better. Correct?

At this point, you are just lying. I think it's safe to say that we all know Trump is in severe cognitive decline. He rambles on, but never addresses simple questions. People who have experience with relatives with dementia, will tell you Trump is in early stages dementia. Biden is too, but at least he had the good sense to step down. By the fall of 2025, it's almost guaranteed that Trump will be forced to step down, since any visits with foreign leaders,, are going to embarrass America to such a degree that people will be demanding it. So may as well get used to saying President Vance.

You run out of Kibble again?

Lol...are you sure you're a male?

First, The people I know aren't bureaucrats, but even if they were, you attacked them on a personal level and that's just a dick move Second, still nothing to do with free speech. Based on the fact that all you're doing is trying to go down semi related rabbit trails and don't seem able to have a conversation without resorting to adhom attacks (on people you don't even know), I see no path forward to a fruitful discussion Take care

Give it a rest. I'm civil with anyone who stays on topic and relates facts instead of narratives.

Fox is a legitimate news organization.

Huh? One of the most disjointed posts of the year. Seems you are good at nonsensical posts LOL

This always seemed a non-issue to me. If a private company chooses not to provide their services for any reason (legitimate or not) should have the right to do that. Personally I wouldn't turn down a client whatever (save those promoting violence or hate) they may stand for. I once did a union event for some big wigs and I think unions are for the most part useless and are a large contributor to the bureaucratic waste stalling every attempt to improve the lives of the masses, but I digress. Public services of course must accept all

You don't have an honest bone in your body. And straight back to calling me a leftist. You're a complete joke I will no longer be responding to you in the future You're pathetic.

Is that an Alberta style suggestion? Split the country in two divided parts lose control over 3 seas, toss out our heritage and cuiture and lose ten million citizens so you can have a couple extra coins in your pocket?