Leaderboard

Given the current security classification of the investigation and source documents, if you are trying to get to the bottom of this and hold individuals (and the government) accountable, then there's a simple choice to be made. Either you attempt to reverse engineer known facts already in the public domain and thus are essentially Or you know exactly what happened and exactly what they did but not only can't you hold them accountable, you can't even say a word about it. If you see knowing the unreacted details as a simple function of leadership within a national party then you probably want PP read in. If you want him silenced you do too. if you want the opposition party to hold the governing liberals to account in a public manner then you don't. There's no other available options here. Personally, I want the opposition party to hold the liberals accountable and to ask the questions I would ask if I had the venue to ask them. That's especially true now that we have little in the way of media types actually doing that. Parroting things widely circulated in open source reports isn't a breach, but since you seem to be asserting that it is, are you also suggesting that Jag be charged? If you aren't, how do you square that circle?

Oooh!!! You’ve got us all so fooled!! So clever! Hows this: If Biden commits a crime in, I dunno… Delaware or Rhode Island, then he can Stand trial there, as he should. The disgusting fat slob you’re cheering for is a convicted felon who’s going to be criminally tried in Georgia and probably Arizona. Because he is a criminal. This stupid law won’t pass, it won’t get thru the House much less the Senate and Biden certainly wouldn’t sign it and the courts would rule it unconstitutional because the Federal government has no such right. This is obviously all grandstanding for attention among the MAGA crowd and the only purpose is to let Trump circumvent all the laws he’s broken by dismissing all of these criminal charges if he’s elected

Right, so citizens elect their representatives to make decisions like we are talking about here with passing a law to move criminal actions against the President to Federal Courts. So, what is your problem with this? Um... no. The Constitution says no such thing. So, what is your point here? Saying Biden broke the law less than Trump did still means Biden broke the law. Thanks for coming to my Ted Talk.

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/national/ Have a warm and fuzzy day...

WHOMEVER CONTROLS THE TELEPROMPTER IS THE REAL PRESIDENT

You just contradicted yourself. You claim they can't be beaten on the ground and then congratulate Ukraine for beating them on the ground. And then you push a lie as if all 300,000+ of their military they have committed to this, plus the 25K more a month in replacements for the casualties were just poorly trained convicts. That is absurd on its face. The bulk of the forces they have committed are not poorly trained convicts. They have sent a good chunk of convicts, but that just shows the Russians can't feed this war machine as relentlessly as you and others keep trying to pretend they can forever.

Actually, they are all disputed. Disputed does not mean disproven. Even if it did, your unwillingness to accept that they are disproven does not negate the fact that they have been disproven. Just one example. Trump never said or implied, that if he wasn't elected there would be a literal blood bath (as in a violent revolution). He said there would be a bloodbath for the automotive industry. Aka jobs. How about two; Trump never said he'd be a dictator from day one. He said he would not be a dictator, except on day one when he signed several EOs. His comment was a stinging attack on EOs as unconstitutional and then he highlighted several agenda items he wanted to pass. But, you refuse to accept the obvious.

You're holding the government to account by not even knowing what you're holding them to account for? It's like you're auditioning to be Pierre Poilievre's fluffer or something. 🤣

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/democratic-power-broker-donor-charged-racketeering Set up criminal enterprise to sway legislation

Ain't that the truth. I think Canadians are curious, especially if the nominations were ri9gged, I also think that they are curious if there are any sitting members that have been lobbied by foreign interests. Lobbying is a long standing tradition in all democratic countries/societies/politics. I personally cannot see any way to prevent it or temper it. Be it form foreign entities, businesses, companies and even people in general. Everyone want so be seen as knowing a sitting politician...it feeds the buisiness and ego,

Clearly we're not trying hard enough.

Considering that 85 % of the votes were for the 2 known terrorist groups has got to say something about the Palestinian population, Fatah is just as bad as Hamas, both are global known terrorist groups...trying to paint the palestinian people as good becasue only 44 % of them voted for Hamas, is meaniless, when both parties have called for the destruction of Israel and death to all jews...let me repeat that 85 %, a vast majority of those palestinians that could vote, voted for a known terrorist group, that would continue the fight with israel....

Frontiers | Brief research report: impact of vaccination on antibody responses and mortality from severe COVID-19 (frontiersin.org) This study found vaccinated patients were more likely to have severe covid outcomes than were unvaccinated patients. The study measured antibody responses and mortality in jabbed and unjabbed patients hospitalized with severe covid and acute respiratory failure at Ohio State University hospitals between May 2020 and November 2022. The researchers found that among covid patients, mortality was significantly higher in vaccinated patients (70%) compared to unvaccinated patients (37%), even after adjusting for comorbidities. Even more fascinating, they found the vaccinated patients had higher total IgG4 antibody levels, suggesting jabbed people develop an improper immune tolerance allowing spike protein to run wild. (I discussed the IgG4 antibody problem in the Trickle thread.) These antibodies are a normal but unusual part of the immune system that usually activates in response to allergens, where the body tries to stop an immune over-response by ignoring a particular foreign protein, like pollen. In this case, the allergen is probably mRNA-induced spike protein. As is now known, the jabs were originally sold on the false premise they would flatten the curve and help us reach herd immunity. When that narrative collapsed, bureaucrats and pharma shills shifted to arguing that they still “protected people” through somehow reducing the severity of covid infection when they had it. But this study adds to the growing evidence that, not only don’t the shots prevent infection in the first place, and not only don’t they protect people from severe covid cases, but they appear to actually increase the risk of a bad covid case and increase the risk of dying from covid.

Ditto. It's for the parents. This will be likely a non issue in the near future. Gay parents will do it maybe... but its relevancy is tied to its status as a political flashpoint IMO. In the city, these things are offered as a side event to large gatherings that need content. I've never seen anyone object...

So then why are these men wanting to read for the kids in drag? What's the point? Do you believe in parents rights? We could just as well say that you're trying to manipulate people into thinking there's nothing to be outraged about. Based on what people wear at Pride parades, I think it's also not age- appropriate to bring kids there. You said when you went there were naked gay men dancing. Parents have a right to expose their kids to certain things and I have a right to have an opinion on it.

Isn't there ANYONE on this board who likes you or respects you? Geez.

The Prep Act set the bar at "intent to harm" for the purposes of suing vax-pimps for promoting the jab, but they seem to clear that bar easily.

I am not twisting anything. I understand that pushing Russia further back is no walk in the park, but it certainly is not hopeless, impossible, where negotiation is the only way out as you keep saying. You keep trying to argue that Russia has the numbers... but those numbers didn't get them a win on their invasion. You keep bringing this up, but you fail to note how much of that territory they had already captured in their proxy war before their invasion. In total, they have not gained all that much as part of this invasion at all.

A heart-rending clip making the rounds this weekend showed the halting testimony of a covid vaccine-injured pharmacist. Former pharmacist. He’s 100% disabled now. Mike Yoha testified last week before an Ohio house committee considering the Conscientious Right to Refuse Act, H.B. 319. This is an Ohio bill. Change will need to happen on the state level until the Feds act on this. https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1801781505829531934

No you don't. This is important to you. It's important to you that there is no accountability for anyone, ever. You'll never stop pretending that "It's time to move on, and forget about the crimes of the past."

to be a shill.. I have to care about one side or the other.. When someone would say, "I am not getting the vax".. my response was "sounds good".. That is the hallmark of someone who cares passionately about the pro-vax or anti-vax... says no one ever. Much like most Americans.. I just wanted it over with. Mask Mandates were silly and at work.. the pandemic-era policies were making the job more difficult than need be.

He knows he's chosen the side of the liars. He lashes out now because the chips are falling and he's clearly landed on the side of evil.

A. I did not exclude combat roles for women? WTF do you get that? B. Thank goodness you're here to armchair quarterback the DoD. You should send them a letter with your counterpoints: "Nuh-uh!"

You didn't even hit it out of the crib. Black Votes Matter! Vote dem or you're not black.

Ahhh- you mean like those ones who would weaponize the courts to oppress opponents and seize power? Well... i guess biden IS pretty darn white now that you mention it....

LOL Yeah, sure. Nucance thinking for you: Protestors you like and agree with = you will ignore and/or play down excuse/justify their lawlessness. Protestors you don't agree with = hammer them with the full might and fury of the law and more. Screw em.

See @User? Its "nuance". For instance... If Trump has classified documents in his home...packed by others and sent to his home...he deserves a swat team to raid his home and snif Melania's panties. But "nuance" dictates that Brandon can have all the classified documents he wants. It doesn't matter that he was not POTUS when he took them...on his own. He's not all there and can't be prosecuted. Or if Roger Stone is accused of purgery and obstruction, again...call CNN...and send an armed team to get the old man out of bed and put him in jail in his PJs. But "nuance" dictates that we can see Brandon is not a cognitive mess, that he has profited from selling out America, that Garland can lie to the American people and create a bunch of political prisoners...and nothing can be done. See how that works?

Case by case basis. Going to war with Hitler was the right thing to do. Trump was very successful against ISIS if you'll recall. ISIS does not have nuclear weapons...yet. Compromise may be the safer option sometimes. Biden seems to want to enable Iran, while Trump wanted to contain them and make them an international pariah. You guys are all over the map. You want to go all out against Russia while at the same time restraining Israel in their fight against Hamas.

Once again, you don’t know why I mention 29 pages when that’s the page count of the document you linked. Since women are now eligible to serve in combat, why should they be ineligible for the Selective Service? Are women inferior to men? Are they not equal citizens under the law? Does it offend your fragile ego? This policy has no effect on anyone’s life. We are very unlikely to institute a draft ever again. But you never know.

It was Trump that was very critical of Germany's energy deal with Russia if you'll recall. The US could have supplied them with natural gas but Germany said no.

Exactly, you pinhead. YOU started this thread by linking to a 29-page DoD document, which you obviously didn’t read… or else you’d know it’s 29 pages long. Which means you’re just a bot who gets his talking points from somebody else… you’re too dum to think for yourself. You didn’t find this document and read it, you just re-posted somebody else’s drivel. The DoD document you linked is an overview of the DoD’s proposals for the entire upcoming year. Not “the Democrats” proposals, the DoD’s. And in all of that, expanding selective service to include women is inconsequential. It doesn’t actually draft women, it doesn’t do anything. It’s probably the most insignificant line item in the document. But you’re a nitwit, you can’t come up with any independent thoughts of your own, so you just repost this fake outrage nonsense you’ve been fed by someone.

Russia targeted the children. Israel is not targeting the children, Hamas is just hiding behind them

It's 2024. We can wage war by wire--partially if not wholly--in most scenarios. Most service personnel are not assigned to combat roles anyway. No reason not to do this.

I think his name was Goredon. So you're like 4 years old at least then

Not only can they buy the oil whenver they want at below market rates right now, but they just shut down a pipeline that would have given them more access to oil. Maybe 40 years ago but right now the US produces more oil than it uses and could increase production, and as noted they get our oil already at a discount. They coudln't give a flying eff about our oil. They've got it already if they want it and right now they don't even want any more than they already get. If anything the last thing the oil producers in the states wants is some other new 'state' that gets to play by the same rules they do. So EFF no they wouldn't take alberta for the oil, which they already mostly own.

People with low intelligence believe whatever confirms their biases regardless of evidence. People with high intelligence believe the evidence regardless of their biases.

Like code breaking, analyzing aerial photographs, delivering new aircraft from the factory to squadrons. Some female British pilots were checked out on dozens of types from fighters to heavy bombers. All kinds of jobs if you bother to look it up instead of making stupid sexist comments

🤔. Because.... Gay men don't have fathers? Because they don't have kids,? Sounds like this guy you made up in your mind is really getting you angry, even though he's NEVER GOING TO EVEN EXIST! What an a5s hole he is!

Who came up with that idea first? I'm old enough to remember when democrats called tarrifs against China, racist.

Are you ignorant that it's 2024 and expecting women to be exempted is as abhorrent as segregated units used to be? You provided a source that imagined the scenario, one who also thinks like it's 1953. You fell for the BS, not me. And even posted it with an inflammatory headline as if it was news.

Neither do you. If you want to act like you are, I will keep calling you out for it.

No, she wasn't. That's absurd. There are literally millions of people who share her kooky beliefs but didn't show up at clinics to harass the patients. None of them were arrested. Because in America, you're allowed to be stupid and wrong all you like. We only care when your beliefs are expressed as actions that harm others.

Again doesn't care about the truth or the deaths, cares about his echo chamber talking points. You're not going to get anything else out of him

The only thing you hit is the local gay bar.

This sounds perfectly reasonable without some context, or further analysis. August, how do you feel about the Chinese police stations that were on Canadian soil? Does that seem like foreign interference of some sort? Or what about the reports of Chinese military being allowed to conduct drills on Canadian soil? In your judgement does any of this raise a red flag?

Well we don’t seem to know yet whether this particular fire was intentional, but the cultural loss for Toronto and Canada is enormous. If this was arson and part of the revolutionary fervour unleashed after the “ground-penetrating radar” press event that turned out to be nothing of substance, we’re watching the continued rapid elimination of Canada’s culture. It’s absolutely terrible that our own government refuses to stop it.